RESUMEN
Geothermal features, such as hot springs and mud volcanoes, host diverse microbial life, including many extremophile organisms. The physicochemical parameters of the geothermal feature, such as temperature, pH, and heavy metal concentration, can influence the alpha and beta diversity of microbial life in these environments, as can spatiotemporal differences between sites and sampling. In this study, water and sediment samples were collected and analyzed from eight geothermal sites at Yellowstone National Park, including six hot springs, a mud volcano, and an acidic lake within the same week in July 2019, and these geothermal sites varied greatly in their temperature, pH, and chemical composition. All samples were processed and analyzed with the same methodology and taxonomic profiles and alpha and beta diversity metrics determined with 16S rRNA sequencing. These microbial diversity results were then analyzed with respect to pH, temperature, and chemical composition of the geothermal features. Results indicated that predominant microbial species varied greatly depending on the physicochemical composition of the geothermal site, with decreases in pH and increases in dissolved heavy metals in the water corresponding to decreases in alpha diversity, especially in the sediment samples. Similarly, sites with acidic pH values had more similar microbial populations (beta diversity) to one another than to relatively neutral or alkaline pH geothermal sites. This study suggests that pH and/or heavy metal concentration is a more important driver for microbial diversity and population profile than the temperature for these sites and is also the first reported microbial diversity study for multiple geothermal sites in Yellowstone National Park, including the relatively new mud volcano Black Dragon's Caldron, which erupted in 1948.
RESUMEN
This article compares the learning outcomes and student perceptions of a one semester undergraduate biochemistry laboratory course that was taught using either a fully online or a fully in-person teaching modality. The semester long biochemistry laboratory mimicked the work sequence a researcher would encounter when transforming a plasmid containing a gene for a recombinant protein (superfolder green fluorescent protein, sf-GFP) and then purifying, identifying, and characterizing that protein. The two modalities of the course were completed in the same semester, by the same instructor, in which students self-selected into which modality they preferred at the beginning of the semester. Students in the in-person section reported enjoying the laboratory course more than the online cohort of students and found it to be less time-consuming. Additionally, a survey of biochemistry laboratory instructors from across the United States, who had experience teaching both online and in-person biochemistry laboratories, indicated that the majority of instructors that responded to the survey preferred the in-person modality: believing them to be more effective and engaging for the students, more enjoyable, and less time-consuming for the instructor. Statistical analysis of formative and summative assessments indicated no significant difference in non-hands-on student learning objective and learning goal scores between the two groups, but the small number of students and instructors in this study limits the generalizability of these results.
RESUMEN
The monkeypox (Mpox) virus has raised significant concerns given its recent spread with an increasing number of confirmed cases worldwide. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a laboratory developed test (LDT) using BioGX Xfree hMPXV/OPXV reagents for the qualitative detection of non-variola Orthopoxviruses and Mpox virus DNA, in swabs from human pustular or vesicular rash specimens. Analytical and clinical testing analysis were carried out on two different platforms: the BD MAX™ System (BD Diagnostics) and the new pixl.16 Real-Time PCR Platform (BioGX), using a synthetic Mpox virus DNA (ATCC VR-3270SD) and residual clinical samples previously identified with an EUA approved Mpox real-time PCR assay. In the end, the Xfree hMPXV/OPXV LDT proved to be a sensitive, specific, and reproducible test for the detection of Mpox on both platforms evaluated with the pixl.16 having an advantage of a small footprint and providing faster TAT facilitated by an extraction-free workflow.
Asunto(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Monkeypox virus/aislamiento & purificación , Monkeypox virus/genética , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/virología , ADN Viral/genética , ADN Viral/análisis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodosRESUMEN
With multiple food fortification frameworks, countries can find it challenging to determine optimal methods for planning and implementing food fortification programmes to combat vitamin and mineral deficiencies, especially without additional technical support. To address this challenge, this study aimed to review existing frameworks to determine consistencies, differences, strengths, and weaknesses across the frameworks, and based on the review findings, formulate an enhanced and streamlined fortification framework. Nineteen frameworks were ultimately examined following a comprehensive literature review and key informant interviews. Generally, the reviewed frameworks amply describe motives and methods for the determination of fortification need and feasibility, industry engagement/quality assurance and quality control, and impact evaluations/surveillance. However, there was limited inclusion or discussion throughout the reviewed frameworks around harmonization of fortification with existing micronutrient interventions; fortification policy and/or strategy; enforcement, incentives, and penalties to ensure producer compliance with industry standards; and periodic fortification programme review and reassessment. The findings were used to develop a comprehensive Fortification Blueprint that aims to provide structured guidance and a library of tools and resources to fortification programme managers and key stakeholders to ensure optimal and sustainable programme design.