Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(3): 138-143, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted infection treatment guidelines recommend extragenital testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia in men who have sex with men and for women based on reported behaviors and exposures. The "IWantTheKit (IWTK)" program is a free online platform for specimen self-collection and mail-in for combined chlamydia/gonorrhea testing. We sought to assess the additional diagnostic value of extragenital testing compared with genital testing only for chlamydia/gonorrhea and determine factors associated with a positive extragenital test result among IWTK users. METHODS: From August 2013 to January 2022, 7612 unique IWTK users returned swabs for testing; 3407 (45%) users requested both genital and extragenital tests and were included in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were summarized for demographic characteristics, reported behaviors, and genital and extragenital test results, and data were stratified by gender and age group. A logistic regression model was used to estimate associations between factors and extragenital sexually transmitted infection positivity. RESULTS: Chlamydia positivity rates were 4.7%, 2.4%, and 1.5% at genital, extragenital, and both sites, respectively; for gonorrhea, 0.4%, 1.1%, and 0.4% were positive at those sites, respectively. Among women, age 25 years and younger was significantly associated with extragenital chlamydia (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; P = 0.010). Being in high-risk quiz score group was associated with extragenital chlamydia (OR, 2.6; P = 0.005) and extragenital gonorrhea in men and women (OR, 8.5; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Extragenital testing detected additional chlamydia and gonorrhea cases in the IWTK user population that would have been missed by genital-only testing, especially for women younger than 25 years and people reported to be at high risk.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Chlamydia , Gonorrea , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Chlamydia trachomatis
2.
Prev Med Rep ; 24: 101530, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34976607

RESUMEN

The objective of this evaluation was to assess the use of public health detailing in a pilot program to increase Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) uptake among community-based providers in two Maryland jurisdictions. Public health detailing is a method designed to raise awareness and increase implementation of evidence-based clinical practices by delivering educational content via one-on-one meetings with providers. EPT is a voluntary clinical practice of treating all sexual partners of patients diagnosed with STIs by prescribing medications without the provider first examining said sexual partners. The aim of EPT is to prevent STI reinfection and reduce further transmission. From April 2017 to March 2019, detailers visited community-based health care practice sites to conduct EPT detailing with providers. The effectiveness of this program was evaluated by comparing provider responses from pre- to post-detailing surveys, administered six months after detailing. Survey responses assessed EPT awareness and practices, barriers to implementation, and satisfaction with detailing. The proportion of providers (170) aware of EPT for treating chlamydia and gonorrhea increased from 61.7% (114) to 99.4% (169) (p-value < 0.001). The proportion who reported prescribing EPT increased from 63.2% (72) to 86.4% (146) (p-value < 0.001). Providers reporting no barriers to prescribing EPT increased from 30.6% (52) to 55.9% (95) (p-value < 0.001). Most providers were satisfied with detailing, 95.5% (164), and 95.3% (162) preferred this method to communicate about public health measures. Detailing appears to be a strategy to improve provider awareness of EPT, increase EPT implementation, and reduce barriers to prescribing EPT.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...