Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017624

RESUMEN

AIM: The evidence for beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) is randomized trials conducted more than 30 years ago, and the continued efficacy has been questioned. DESIGN AND METHODS: The ongoing Danish (DANBLOCK) and Norwegian (BETAMI) randomized beta-blocker trials are joined to evaluate the effectiveness and risks of long-term beta-blocker therapy after MI. Patients with normal or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≥40%) will be randomized to open-label treatment with beta-blockers or no such therapy. This event-driven trial will randomize ∼5700 patients and continue until 950 primary endpoints have occurred. As of July 2023, 5228 patients have been randomized. Of the first 4000 patients randomized, median age was 62 years, 79% were men, 48% had a STEMI, and 84% had a normal LVEF. The primary endpoint is a composite of adjudicated recurrent MI, incident heart failure, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The primary safety endpoint includes a composite of recurrent MI, heart failure, all-cause mortality, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or resuscitated cardiac arrest 30 days after randomization. Secondary endpoints include each of the components of the primary endpoint, patient-reported outcomes, and other clinical outcomes linked to beta-blocker therapy. The primary analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. End of follow-up is expected in December 2024. CONCLUSION: The combined BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial will have the potential to affect current clinical practice for beta-blocker therapy in patients with normal or mildly reduced LVEF after MI.

2.
J Echocardiogr ; 20(3): 166-177, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35290613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain has shown variable results in detecting ischemia in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain, but without other clear evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Our aim was to investigate whether assessment of regional longitudinal myocardial function could assist in detecting significant CAD in these patients. METHODS: Clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and troponin T were evaluated in 126 patients admitted with chest pain. A subsequent invasive coronary angiography divided patients into two groups: significant CAD (CAD+) or non-significant CAD (CAD-). Global and regional myocardial function were evaluated by speckle tracking echocardiography. Regional longitudinal strain was defined as the highest longitudinal strain values in four adjacent left ventricular segments and termed 4AS. RESULTS: CAD+ was found in 37 patients (29%) of which 51% had elevated troponin. Mean 4AS was - 13.1% (± 3.5) in the CAD+ and - 15.2% (± 2.7) (p = 0.002) in the CAD- group. Predictors for CAD+ were age [OR 1.06 (1.01-1.11, p = 0.026)], smoking [OR 3.39 (1.21-9.51, p = 0.020)], troponin [OR 3.32 (1.28-8.60, p = 0.014)) and 4AS (OR 1.24 (1.05-1.46, p = 0.010)]. A cutoff for 4AS of > - 15% showed the best diagnostic performance with event-reclassification of 0.41 (p < 0.001), non-event-reclassification of - 0.34 (p < 0.001) and net reclassification improvement 0.07 (p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Decreased myocardial function in four adjacent LV segments assessed by strain has the potential to detect significant CAD in patients admitted with chest pain and negative/slightly elevated initial troponin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Research information system in Norway (CRISTIN). Id: 555249.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Troponina
3.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 37(12): 3477-3487, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327649

RESUMEN

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a more sensitive prognostic factor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in various cardiac diseases. Little is known about the clinical impact of GLS changes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study aimed to explore if non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was associated with higher risk of subsequent composite cardiovascular events (CCVE). Patients with AMI were consecutively included at a secondary care center in Norway between April 2016 and July 2018 within 4 days following percutaneous coronary intervention. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 3 months. Patients were categorized with non-improvement (0 to - 100%) or improvement (0 to 100%) in GLS relative to the baseline value. Among 214 patients with mean age 65 (± 10) years and mean LVEF 50% (± 8) at baseline, 50 (23%) had non-improvement (GLS: - 16.0% (± 3.7) to - 14.2% (± 3.6)) and 164 (77%) had improvement (GLS: - 14.0% (± 3.0) to - 16.9% (± 3.0%)). During a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (95% CI 3.2 to 3.4) 77 CCVE occurred in 52 patients. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, baseline GLS was associated with all recurrent CCVE (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p < 0.001) whereas non-improvement versus improvement over 3 months follow-up was not. Baseline GLS was significantly associated with the number of CCVE in revascularized AMI patients whereas non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was not. Further large-scale studies are needed before repeated GLS measurements may be recommended in clinical practice.Trial registration: Current Research information system in Norway (CRISTIN). Id: 506563.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico
4.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 54(4): 220-226, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32408833

RESUMEN

Objectives. In grading of aortic stenosis, two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D TTE) routinely results in underestimation of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area, and hence the aortic valve area (AVA). We investigated whether three-dimensional (3D) TTE measurements of the LVOT would be more accurate. We evaluated the feasibility, agreement and inter-observer variability of 3D TTE LVOT measurements with computed tomography (CT) and Haegar sizers as reference. Design. Sixty-one patients with severe aortic stenosis were examined with 2D and 3D TTE. 41 had CT and 13 also had perioperative Haegar sizing. Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare methods. Inter-observer variability was tested for 2D and 3D TTE. Trial registration: Current research information system in Norway (CRISTIN). Id: 555249. Results. Feasibility was 67% with 3D TTE and 100% with 2D TTE and CT. Mean LVOT area for 2D, 3D, CT and Haegar sizers were 3.7 ± 0.6 cm2, 4.0 ± 0.9 cm2, 5.2 ± 0.8 cm2 and 4.4 ± 1.0 cm2 respectively. Bias and limits of agreements for 2D TTE was 1.5 ± 1.3 cm2, compared with CT and 0.4 ± 1.5 cm2 with Haegar sizers. Corresponding results for 3D TTE were 1.2 ± 1.6 cm2 and 0.2 ± 1.8 cm2. Intraclass correlation coefficients for LVOT area were 0.62 for 3D and 0.86 for 2D. Conclusions. 2D TTE showed better feasibility and inter-observer variability in measurements of LVOT than 3D TTE. Both echocardiographic methods underestimated LVOT area compared to CT and Haegar sizers. These observations suggest that 2D TTE is still preferable to 3D TTE in the assessment of aortic stenosis.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
5.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 36(7): 1283-1290, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236908

RESUMEN

There are unresolved questions related to the proper use of editing the region of interest (ROI) for measurements of global longitudinal strain (GLS). The purpose of the present study was to compare the semi-automatic default GLS value by the vendor's software with manually adjusted GLS and test the impact on GLS measures with different ROI widths. We selected 25 patients post myocardial infarction treated with PCI who had excellent echocardiographic recordings after 2-5 days and 3 months. The different GLS values were assessed from these 50 analyses in three steps. The semi-automatically GLS by default ROIs was compared with manually adjusted ROIs widths selected by an expert and then with manual adjustments, but with fixed ROIs being narrow, medium and wide. Their mean age was 64 (± 12) years, 52% had ST elevation MI and mean LVEF was 52 (± 4)%. Mean default GLS was - 15.3 (± 2.5)% with the widest ROI level selected semi-automatically in 78% of all widths. The mean expert GLS with manually adjusted ROI was - 14.7 (± 2.4)%, and the medium ROI level was selected by the expert in 85% of all examinations. The mean adjusted GLS, but with fixed ROIs widths was - 15.0 (± 2.5%)% with narrow ROI, - 14.7 (± 2.6)% with medium and - 13.5 (± 2.3)% with wide ROI width (p < 0.001 vs. default GLS). The Intra Class Coefficient Correlation between default and manually adjusted expert GLS was 0.93 (p < 0.001). The difference between the default and the manually adjusted expert GLS was neglectable. These findings may represent a simplification of the assessment of GLS that might increase its use in clinical practice. The GLS measurements with a fixed wide ROIs were significantly different from the expert measurements and indicate that a wide ROI should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Anciano , Automatización , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
6.
Am Heart J ; 208: 37-46, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30530121

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on the use of ß-blockers in post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are based on studies before the implementation of modern reperfusion and secondary prevention therapies. It remains unknown whether ß-blockers will reduce mortality and recurrent MI in contemporary revascularized post-MI patients without reduced LVEF. DESIGN: BETAMI is a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point multicenter study in 10,000 MI patients designed to test the superiority of oral ß-blocker therapy compared to no ß-blocker therapy. Patients with LVEF ≥40% following treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolysis and/or no clinical signs of heart failure are eligible to participate. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause mortality or recurrent MI obtained from national registries over a mean follow-up period of 3 years. Safety end points include rates of nonfatal MI, all-cause mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, and hospitalizations for heart failure obtained from hospital medical records 30 days after randomization, and from national registries after 6 and 18 months. Key secondary end points include recurrent MI, heart failure, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and clinical outcomes linked to ß-blocker therapy including drug adherence, adverse effects, cardiovascular risk factors, psychosocial factors, and health economy. Statistical analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. A prespecified per-protocol analysis (patients truly on ß-blockers or not) will also be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the BETAMI trial may have the potential of changing current clinical practice for treatment with ß-blockers following MI in patients without reduced LVEF. EudraCT number 2018-000590-75.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Volumen Sistólico , Administración Oral , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Noruega , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Proyectos de Investigación , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia
7.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother ; 5(1): 12-20, 2019 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192930

RESUMEN

Aims: Guidelines concerning ß-blocker treatment following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are based on studies undertaken before the implementation of reperfusion and secondary prevention therapies. We aimed to estimate the effect of oral ß-blockers on mortality in contemporary post-AMI patients with low prevalence of heart failure and/or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods and results: A random effects model was used to synthetize results of 16 observational studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 October 2017. Publication bias was evaluated, and heterogeneity between studies examined by subgroup and random effects meta-regression analyses considering patient-related and study-level variables. The pooled estimate showed that ß-blocker treatment [among 164 408 (86.8%) patients, with median follow-up time of 2.7 years] was associated with a 26% reduction in all-cause mortality [rate ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.85] with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 67.4%). The patient-level variable mean age of the cohort explained 31.5% of between study heterogeneity. There was presence of publication bias, or small study effect, and when controlling for bias by the trim and fill simulation method, the effect disappeared (adjusted RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.04). Also, small study effect was demonstrated by a cumulative meta-analysis starting with the largest study showing no effect, with increasing effect as the smaller studies were accumulated. Conclusion: Evidence from this study suggests that there is no association between ß-blockers and all-cause mortality. A possible beneficial effect in AMI survivors needs to be tested by large randomized clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Administración Oral , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Cardiology ; 140(3): 152-154, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089282

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are different today than when oral ß-blockers first were shown to have an incremental effect on mortality. They are now, as opposed to then, offered revascularization procedures and effective secondary prevention. In this pilot-study, we aimed to explore the prescription of ß-blockers to these patients stratified by their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Consecutive stable patients treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure following an AMI were included for measurement of LVEF after 1-5 days. ß-Blocker treatment was recorded at inclusion and after 3 months. RESULTS: We included 159 patients, 89% with LVEF ≥40% (56% had a LVEF ≥50% [preserved], 33% LVEF 40-49% [mid-range] and 11% LVEF <40% [reduced]). At discharge the prescription rates of ß-blockers according to LVEF stratification were 79% for preserved, 79% for mid-range and 94% for reduced LVEF. After 3 months 72% of all patients continued such treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, a large proportion of contemporary managed patients with AMI but without clinical heart failure does not have reduced LVEF shortly after PCI, but the majority is still treated with a ß-blocker.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 24(14): 1555-1566, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617620

RESUMEN

Background In contemporary atrial fibrillation trials most deaths are cardiac related, whereas stroke and bleeding represent only a small subset of deaths. We aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of cardiac events and all-cause mortality in individuals with atrial fibrillation compared to no atrial fibrillation. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 1 January 2006 and 21 October 2016. Methods Four databases were searched. Studies had follow-up of at least 500 stable patients for either cardiac endpoints or all-cause mortality for 12 months or longer. Publication bias was evaluated and random effects models were used to synthesise the results. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results A total of 15 cohort studies was included. Analyses indicated that atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk (RR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.85), all-cause mortality (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.50-2.54) and heart failure (RR 4.62, 95% CI 3.13-6.83). Coronary heart disease at baseline was associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction and explained 57% of the heterogeneity. A prospective cohort design accounted for 25% of all-cause mortality heterogeneity. Due to there being fewer than 10 studies, sources of heterogeneity were inconclusive for heart failure. Conclusions Atrial fibrillation seems to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction in patients without coronary heart disease and an increased risk of, all-cause mortality and heart failure in patients with and without coronary heart disease.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
10.
BMC Med Imaging ; 17(1): 22, 2017 03 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Focus Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) performed by internal medicine residents on call with 2 h of training can provide a means for ruling out cardiac disease, but with poor sensitivity. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness as well as diagnostic accuracy of FoCUS following 4 h of training. METHODS: All residents on call were given a 4-h training course with an additional one-hour training course after 6 months. They were asked to provide a pre- and post-FoCUS diagnosis, with the final diagnosis at discharge as reference. RESULTS: During a 7 month period 113 FoCUS examinations were reported; after 53 were excluded this left 60 for evaluation with a standard echocardiogram performed on average 11.5 h after FoCUS. Examinations were performed on the basis of chest pain and dyspnoea/edema. The best sensitivity was found in terms of the detection of reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (92%), LV dilatation (85%) and pericardial effusion (100%). High values were noted for negative predictive values, although false positives were seen. A kappa > 0.6 was observed for reduced LVEF, right ventricular area fraction and dilatation of LV and left atrium. In 48% of patients pre- and post-FoCUS diagnoses were identical and concordant with the final diagnosis. Importantly, in 30% examinations FoCUS correctly changed the pre-FoCUS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A FoCUS protocol with a 4-h training program gained clinical usefulness in one third of examinations. False positive findings represented the major challenge.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Capacitación en Servicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cardiología/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Radiología/educación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Volumen Sistólico
11.
13.
BMC Med Imaging ; 15: 25, 2015 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients evaluated for acute and chronic chest pain comprise a large, heterogeneous group that often provides diagnostic challenges. Although speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has proved to have diagnostic value in acute coronary syndrome it is not commonly incorporated in everyday practice. The purpose of the present systematic review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function by STE to predict significant coronary artery stenosis (CAD+) or not (CAD-) verified by coronary angiography in patients with chest pain suspected to be of cardiac ischemic origin. METHODS: 4 electronic databases; Embase, Medline, Cochrane and PubMed ahead-of print were searched for per 19.05.14. Only full-sized articles including >40 patients were selected. RESULTS: A total of 166 citations were identified, 16 full-size articles were assessed of which 6 were found eligible for this review. Of 781 patients included 397 (60%) had CAD+. The overall weighted mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) was -17.2% (SD=2.6) among CAD+ vs. -19.2% (SD=2.8) in CAD- patients. Mean area under curve in 4 studies for predicting CAD+ ranged from 0.68 to 0.80. The study cut-off levels for prediction of CAD+ in the ROC analysis varied between -17.4% and -19.7% with sensitivity from 51% to 81% and specificity between 58% and 81%. In 1 study GLS obtained during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) had the best accuracy. Regional strain measurements were not uniform, but may have potential in detecting CAD. CONCLUSIONS: GLS measurements at rest only have modest diagnostic accuracy in predicting CAD+ among patients presenting with acute or chronic chest pain. The results from regional strain, layer specific strain and DSE need to be verified in larger studies.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Volumen Sistólico
14.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 27(11): 1238-46, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25216765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physical examination and auscultation can be challenging for medical students. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a brief session of group training in focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) with a pocket-sized device would allow medical students to improve their ability to detect clinically relevant cardiac lesions at the bedside. METHODS: Twenty-one medical students in their clinical curriculum completed 4 hours of FCU training in groups. The students examined patients referred for echocardiography with emphasis on auscultation, followed by FCU. Findings from physical examination and FCU were compared with those from standard echocardiography performed and analyzed by cardiologists. RESULTS: In total, 72 patients were included in the study, and 110 examinations were performed. With a stethoscope, sensitivity to detect clinically relevant (moderate or greater) valvular disease was 29% for mitral regurgitation, 33% for aortic regurgitation, and 67% for aortic stenosis. FCU improved sensitivity to detect mitral regurgitation (69%, P < .001). However, sensitivity to detect aortic regurgitation (43%) and aortic stenosis (70%) did not improve significantly. Specificity was ≥89% for all valvular diagnoses by both methods. For nonvalvular diagnoses, FCU's sensitivity to detect moderate or greater left ventricular dysfunction (90%) was excellent, detection of right ventricular dysfunction (79%) was good, while detection of dilated left atrium (53%), dilated right atrium (49%), pericardial effusion (40%), and dilated aortic root (25%) was less accurate. Specificity varied from 57% to 94%. CONCLUSIONS: After brief group training in FCU, medical students could detect mitral regurgitation significantly better compared with physical examination, whereas detection of aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis did not improve. Left ventricular dysfunction was detected with high sensitivity. More extensive training is advised.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología/educación , Competencia Clínica , Ecocardiografía , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Examen Físico/métodos , Radiología/educación , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Enseñanza
15.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 30(7): 1325-30, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24972778

RESUMEN

Recent guidelines regard three-dimensional echocardiography (DE) derived measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) as the method of choice. The feasibility of 3DE and agreement between 2DE and 3DE was examined. Our hypothesis was that a number of patients can only be examined with 2DE in a patient population admitted to a general hospital. Hospitalised patients referred for echocardiography by residents on call who found grounds to perform a pocket-sized ultrasound examination (PCU) were included. A subsequent 2DE and 3DE was planned. 3DE was considered unfeasible in the presence of irregular heart rhythm and poor quality imaging (included inability to hold breath). Agreement was evaluated with correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Of 273 consecutive patients examined with 2DE, 202 (74 %) had satisfactory 3DE images for LV volume and EF measurements. Reasons for exclusion of 71 patients from the 3DE study included irregular heart rhythm in 58 patients and poor quality images in 13 patients. Median LV end-diastolic volume was 146 mL with 3DE and 161 mL with 2DE (p < 0.001). The respective values for LV end-systolic volume were 76 mL and 83 mL (p < 0.001), and for LVEF 48 % and 49 % (p = 0.061). Optimal 3DE assessment of LV volumes and EF could only be performed in 3/4 of patients. A significant overestimation of LV volumes was observed in terms of 2DE versus 3DE, whereas no such difference was found for LVEF.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Tridimensional , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
16.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 29(8): 1749-57, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23974908

RESUMEN

Pocket-size imaging devices may represent a tool for fast initial cardiac screening in the emergency setting. Pocket-size cardiac ultrasound (PCU) examinations performed by experienced echocardiographers yield acceptable diagnostic accuracy compared to standard echocardiogram (SE). However, the success of this method when used by unselected non-cardiologists remains unexplored. The current study studies the diagnostic accuracy of PCU when used by unselected internal medicine residents with minimal training. All residents were given a 2-hour introductory course in PCU (Vscan) and reported PCU results for up to 15 predefined cardiac landmarks. These were arbitrarily divided into 3 priority groups, such that left ventricle (LV) and pericardium were of first priority. Diagnostic accuracy [sensitivity/specificity and negative/positive predictive values (PPV/NPV)] and agreement were evaluated using a subsequent SE as reference. During a 9.2 months period a total of 303 patients were included in the study, the majority on the basis of presenting with chest pain or suspected heart failure. In the pooled LV and pericardial (1st priority) data, sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV were 61/92/70/89% respectively. Similar specificities and NPVs were observed for the 11 remaining indices, as were lower sensitivities and PPVs. The best PCU sensitivity (76%) was attained for the assessment of LV wall motion abnormalities. Overall agreement was k = 0.50. PCU examination performed by internal medicine residents with minimal training could provide a suitable means of ruling out cardiac pathology, as reflected in the high specificities and NPVs. It is not, however, a satisfactory tool for identifying patients with various cardiac disorders.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/instrumentación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Competencia Clínica , Vías Clínicas , Estudios Transversales , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Cardiopatías/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
18.
Int J Cardiol ; 168(2): 1306-15, 2013 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23295040

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have resulted in smaller probes, faster data acquisition and wider applicability. In spite of this, there is still an ongoing debate as to its ability to provide additional information to 2DE in general hospital clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search in EMBASE and MEDLINE was performed in order to identify original articles comparing the two techniques. Studies with a blinded comparison between 2DE and 3DE against a "gold standard" were included; these studies comprised patients with well defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The number of patients, selection criteria, echo manufacturer, cardiac disorder, and types of comparisons, along with "gold standard" and principal results were compared. RESULTS: A total of 836 original articles were identified, of which 35 were screened for eligibility. 20 studies from 18 publications were included for analysis. The results for LV assessment and reproducibility were clearly in favour of 3DE. In valvular heart disease the superiority of 3DE was also apparent, but was less convincing due to patient selection, methodological problems and the application of questionable "gold standards". CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a regular heart rhythm and for whom it was possible to obtain good quality images the introduction of 3DE has improved the accuracy and reproducibility of LV volume and EF measurements. The results for valvular heart disease are still controversial. It does not seem justifiable to introduce 3DE into common cardiac practice. Further studies are needed in order to support such an implementation.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Tridimensional/normas , Medicina General/normas , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/normas , Medicina General/métodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
19.
BMC Med ; 10: 58, 2012 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22691301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The term non-specific chest pain (NSCP) is applied to hospitalized patients in order to designate that they neither have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) nor display evidence of a coronary ischemia. The number of NSCP patients is increasing and comprehensive guidelines specifying their optimal management have not yet been introduced. The objective of this review was to explore the prevalence and prognosis of NSCP versus ACS among patients recruited in consecutive series hospitalized for chest pain suspected to be ACS. METHODS: This is a systematic literature search where three databases were searched from 1990 to 14 November 2011. In addition, one database was searched for Epub ahead of print per 24 March 2012. Three inclusion criteria were applied: 1. documentation of an unselected consecutive series of patients admitted for chest pain, where this review is based upon two groups of patients defined as follows: a) 'ACS/high-risk' and b) NSCP; 2. at least 100 cases with NSCP; and 3. follow-up of hospital readmissions and mortality for at least six months. RESULTS: A total of 2,204 citations were screened after removal of duplicates. Out of 80 full text articles assessed for eligibility 12 studies were included, comprising 24,829 patients (inter-study range 250 to 13,762), with 11,008 (44%) categorized as NSCP and 13,821 (56%) as 'ACS/high-risk'. The mean one-year total mortality rate among patients with NSCP in nine studies was 3.2% (inter-study range 1.4% to 8.1%), with the highest mortality among patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease (CHD). The mean one-year mortality rate among 'ACS/high-risk' patients was 18.0% (inter-study range 14.0% to 19.9%) in four studies with available data. In six studies the mean one-year readmission rate for patients with NSCP was 17.5% (inter-study range 2.5% to 40%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCP represent a large, heterogeneous and important group. Due to co-existing CHD in nearly 40% of these patients, their prognosis is not necessarily benign. Although their average one-year mortality rate was almost six times lower than those with 'ACS/high-risk', the subset with concomitant CHD had a relatively poor prognosis when compared with NSCP patients without evidence of CHD.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Animales , Dolor en el Pecho/mortalidad , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Hospitalización , Humanos , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 172(48): 3342-3, 2010 Nov 29.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21118666

RESUMEN

Trousseaus sign and "main d'acoucheur" is a clinical sign of increased neuromuscular sensitivity and can be seen in patients with hypocalcaemia. The fingers gather in a pyramid and the wrist if flexed. We report three different cases with hyperventilation as the apparent reason for main d'acoucheur. The treatment is simple and quick; removal of the underlying cause, reassurance and re-breathing.


Asunto(s)
Hiperventilación , Hipocalcemia , Adulto , Femenino , Dedos , Humanos , Hiperventilación/complicaciones , Hipocalcemia/complicaciones , Hipocalcemia/diagnóstico , Hipocalcemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tetania/etiología , Muñeca
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...