Novel High Oxygen Affinity Hemoglobin Variant in a Patient with Polycythemia: Hb Kennisis [ß85(F1)Phe→Leu (TTT>TTG); HBB: c.258T>G].

We report the case of a 61-year-old Canadian male of Maltese descent investigated for unexplained polycythemia. Decreased p50 suggested the presence of a high oxygen affinity hemoglobin (Hb) variant. Molecular genetic testing demonstrated that he carries a novel missense mutation (HBB: c.258T>G), resulting in a Phe→Leu substitution at position 85 of the ß chain. The novel Hb variant has been designated Hb Kennisis in recognition of where the proband resides. Two other missense mutations have been reported at this position [Hb Bryn Mawr or Hb Buenos Aires, ß85(F1)Phe→Ser (HBB: c.257T>C); Hb Grantham, ß85(F1)Phe→Cys; (HBB: c.257T>G)], both of which have increased oxygen affinity.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythropoietin in non-small-cell lung cancer with disease-related anemia.

PURPOSE: Previous trials have suggested a quality-of-life (QOL) improvement for anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoietin, but few used QOL as the primary outcome. We designed a trial to investigate the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on the QOL of anemic patients with advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The proposed sample size was 300 patients. Eligible patients were required to have NSCLC unsuitable for curative therapy and baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) levels less than 121 g/L. Patients were assigned to 12 weekly injections of subcutaneous epoetin alpha or placebo, targeting Hgb levels between 120 and 140 g/L. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scores between baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Reports of thrombotic events in other epoetin trials prompted an unplanned safety analysis after 70 patients had been randomly assigned (33 to the active arm and 37 to the placebo arm). This revealed a significant difference in the median survival in favor of the patients on the placebo arm of the trial (63 v 129 days; hazard ratio, 1.84; P = .04). The Steering Committee closed the trial. Patient numbers compromised the interpretation of the QOL analysis, but a positive Hgb response was noted with epoetin alfa treatment. CONCLUSION: An unplanned safety analysis suggested decreased overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with epoetin alfa. Although infrequent, other similar reports highlight the need for ongoing trials evaluating erythropoietin receptor agonists to ensure that overall survival is monitored closely.

A randomised comparison of melphalan with prednisone or dexamethasone as induction therapy and dexamethasone or observation as maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: NCIC CTG MY.7.

The effectiveness of melphalan plus dexamethasone (M-Dex) with melphalan plus prednisone (MP) as induction therapy and dexamethasone with observation as maintenance therapy was compared in 585 older patients with multiple myeloma. Randomization to the M-Dex arm was stopped as a result of an analysis performed which met a predetermined event-related criterion. Of 466 patients randomised to MP or M-Dex, no differences were detected in the respective median progression-free survivals (PFS) [1.8 vs. 1.9 years; Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.07; P = 0.2] or overall survivals (OS) (2.5 vs. 2.7 years; HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.11; P = 0.3). Of the initial 585 patients, 292 remained evaluable for maintenance therapy. Patients randomised to maintenance dexamethasone had a superior median PFS (2.8 years vs. 2.1 years; HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.79; P = 0.0002). No difference in median OS was detected (4.1 years vs. 3.8 years; HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.18; P = 0.4). The maintenance therapy results were robust when analysed by using two additional methodologies. Dexamethasone did not improve clinical outcome when combined with melphalan during induction; maintenance dexamethasone improved PFS, but this did not translate into a detectable survival advantage.

A phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose of liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx ; Doxil in the United States) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine for previously treated patients with good performance status with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer. Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled between November 1999 and September 2001 and received liposomal doxorubicin 25-40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750-1000 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) every 21 days. At doses of liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V., 1 of 6 patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and fever in cycle 2 and 2 of 6 developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome during cycle 3. Therefore, the recommended phase II doses are liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V. every 21 days. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels. This combination is well tolerated and has evidence of antitumor activity. A phase II evaluation is ongoing.

Phase II study of sequential topotecan and etoposide in patients with intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study.

Preliminary results indicate that inhibitors of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase (topo) I, such as topotecan, may be active in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Pre-clinical studies have shown sequential administration of a topo I and II inhibitor has supra-additive anti-tumor effects in some model systems, and that greater cytotoxicity occurs if the topo I inhibitor is given first. We enrolled, 22 eligible patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate grade NHL in a phase II study ofsequential administration of topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 days 1-5 and etoposide 50 mg po b.i.d. days 6-12, every 28 days without G-CSF. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and all had received only one prior regimen (CHOP, 20 patients, or equivalent, 2 patients). Patients with stable or responding disease were allowed to proceed to high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplant after 2 cycles of therapy. The 22 patients received a total of 62 cycles of topotecan + etoposide (median 2, range 1-6), and 4/22 completed all six planned cycles. Hematologic toxicity was significant and resulted in incomplete etoposide dosing in half of all cycles in 16/22 patients. Nineteen of twenty-two patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 12 had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 6 grade 3/4 anemia. Eleven patients had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia or had documented infection. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. Four patients had a partial response (PR) (18.2%), nine had stable disease and seven progressed; three patients with stable disease went on to ABMT. The combination of topotecan and etoposide as given in this study has modest activity in relapsed/refractory aggressive histology NHL, and produces marked myelosuppression. Other doses and schedules combining topo I and II inhibitors, or topo I inhibitors with alkylating agents, should be explored with the addition of hematopoietic growth factors in this patient population.