Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
2.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 633, 2016 07 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable reductions in malaria achieved by scaling-up long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), maintaining sustained community protection remains operationally challenging. Increasing insecticide resistance also threatens to jeopardize the future of both strategies. Non-pyrethroid insecticide-treated wall lining (ITWL) may represent an alternate or complementary control method and a potential tool to manage insecticide resistance. To date no study has demonstrated whether ITWL can reduce malaria transmission nor provide additional protection beyond the current best practice of universal coverage (UC) of LLINs and prompt case management. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted in rural Tanzania to assess whether non-pyrethroid ITWL and UC of LLINs provide added protection against malaria infection in children, compared to UC of LLINs alone. Stratified randomization based on malaria prevalence will be used to select 22 village clusters per arm. All 44 clusters will receive LLINs and half will also have ITWL installed on interior house walls. Study children, aged 6 months to 11 years old, will be enrolled from each cluster and followed monthly to estimate cumulative incidence of malaria parasitaemia (primary endpoint), time to first malaria episode and prevalence of anaemia before and after intervention. Entomological inoculation rate will be estimated using indoor CDC light traps and outdoor tent traps followed by detection of Anopheles gambiae species, sporozoite infection, insecticide resistance and blood meal source. ITWL bioefficacy and durability will be monitored using WHO cone bioassays and household surveys, respectively. Social and cultural factors influencing community and household ITWL acceptability will be explored through focus-group discussions and in-depth interviews. Cost-effectiveness, compared between study arms, will be estimated per malaria case averted. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes the large-scale evaluation of a novel vector control product, designed to overcome some of the known limitations of existing methods. If ITWL is proven to be effective and durable under field conditions, it may warrant consideration for programmatic implementation, particularly in areas with long transmission seasons and where pyrethroid-resistant vectors predominate. Trial findings will provide crucial information for policy makers in Tanzania and other malaria-endemic countries to guide resource allocations for future control efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02533336 registered on 13 July 2014.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Anemia/epidemiología , Bioensayo , Niño , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Resistencia a los Insecticidas , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/transmisión , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Parasitemia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Población Rural , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tanzanía/epidemiología
3.
Malar J ; 8: 58, 2009 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19358697

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended as a means of prolonging the effectiveness of first-line malaria treatment regimens. Different brands of mefloquine (MQ) have been reported to be non-bioequivalent; this could result in sub-therapeutic levels of mefloquine with decreased efficacy. In 2002, mefloquine-artesunate (MQ-AS) combination therapy was adopted as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Amazon region of Peru. Although MQ resistance has yet to be reported from the Peruvian Amazon, it has been reported from other countries in the Amazon Region. Therefore, continuous monitoring is warranted to ensure that the first-line therapy remains efficacious. This study examines the in vivo efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters through Day 56 of three commercial formulations of MQ (Lariam, Mephaquin, and Mefloquina-AC Farma) given in combination with artesunate. METHODS: Thirty-nine non-pregnant adults with P. falciparum mono-infection were randomly assigned to receive artesunate in combination with either (1) Lariam, (2) Mephaquin, or (3) Mefloquina AC. Patients were assessed on Day 0 (with blood samples for pharmacokinetics at 0, 2, 4, and 8 hours), 1, 2, 3, 7, and then weekly until day 56. Clinical and parasitological outcomes were based on the standardized WHO protocol.Whole blood mefloquine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental analysis of concentration versus time data. RESULTS: By day 3, all patients had cleared parasitaemia except for one patient in the AC Farma arm; this patient cleared by day 4. No recurrences of parasitaemia were seen in any of the 34 patients. All three MQ formulations had a terminal half-life of 14-15 days and time to maximum plasma concentration of 45-52 hours. The maximal concentration (Cmax) and interquartile range was 2,820 ng/ml (2,614-3,108) for Lariam, 2,500 ng/ml (2,363-2,713) for Mephaquin, and 2,750 ng/ml (2,550-3,000) for Mefloquina AC Farma. The pharmacokinetics of the three formulations were generally similar, with the exception of the Cmax of Mephaquin which was significantly different to that of Lariam (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: All three formulations had similar pharmacokinetics; in addition, the pharmacokinetics seen in this Peruvian population were similar to reports from other ethnic groups. All patients rapidly cleared their parasitaemia with no evidence of recrudescence by Day 56. Continued surveillance is needed to ensure that patients continue to receive optimal therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacocinética , Artemisininas/farmacocinética , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Mefloquina/farmacocinética , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Artesunato , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Mefloquina/administración & dosificación , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Perú , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 79(1): 42-4, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18606762

RESUMEN

In 2001, Peru changed its treatment policy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria on the northern Pacific Coast to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with atresunate (SP-AS). Because Peru was the first country in the Americas to adopt this combination therapy, we established a surveillance system in the region to assess the frequency of new or worsening symptoms after starting therapy. Over a period of two years, 1,552, or approximately two-thirds of all patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria who had received SP-AS on the northern coast were followed up. Of these, 8.8% reported at least one adverse effect, with the most common being vomiting, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, dizziness, and fever; no severe adverse effects related to SP-AS therapy were identified. Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with SP-AS was associated with a low frequency of mild adverse effects in Peru, and therefore should be considered as a first-line therapy in areas of the Americas where SP efficacy is still high.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Perú/epidemiología , Pirimetamina/administración & dosificación , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos
5.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 77(2): 261-5, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17690397
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 76(4): 614-8, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17426158

RESUMEN

High levels of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to both chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) have been documented throughout the Amazon Basin of South America. Because of reports about the persistent efficacy of both of these drugs in the northwestern Peruvian Amazon region, we carried out an evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine (25 mg/kg) and SP (25 mg/kg of the sulfadoxine component) for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum infections at two sites: Ullpayacu and Pampa Hermoza/Alianza. A total of 111 patients were enrolled. Only 5 (14.3%) of the 35 patients who received CQ had an adequate clinical and parasitologic response (ACPR). Six subjects (17%) had early treatment failure, 1 (2.9%) had late clinical failure, and 23 (65.7%) had late parasitologic failure (LPF). Of the subjects treated with SP, 92.3% had ACPR and 7.7% had LPF. Based on these findings, it is clear that there are at least limited areas within the Peruvian Amazon region where P. falciparum strains continue to be sensitive to SP.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Cloroquina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perú/epidemiología , Pirimetamina/farmacología , Sulfadoxina/farmacología
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 72(5): 568-72, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15891131

RESUMEN

To assist the Peruvian Ministry of Health in modifying the malaria treatment policy for their north Pacific coastal region, we conducted an in vivo efficacy trial of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and SP plus artesunate (SP-AS) for the treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infections. A total of 197 patients were randomized to therapy with either SP (25 mg/kg of the sulfadoxine component in a single dose on day 0) or a combination of SP plus AS (4 mg/kg on days 0, 1, and 2) and were followed for 28 days for symptoms and recurrence of parasitemia. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed on enrollment with respect to age, sex, history of malaria, or geometric mean parasite density. A total of 185 subjects completed the 28-day follow-up. Of the 91 subjects treated with SP alone, two had recurrences of parasitemia on day 7 and one on day 21. Of the 94 subjects treated with SP-AS, one had a recurrence of parasitemia on day 21. Fever and asexual parasite density decreased significantly more rapidly and the proportion of patients with gametocytemia on days 3-28 was significantly lower in subjects treated with combination therapy than in those who received SP alone. No severe adverse drug reactions were observed; however, self-limited rash and pruritus were significantly more common and an exacerbation of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain were observed significantly more frequently among patients who had received SP-AS. These results have contributed to a National Malaria Control Program decision to change to SP-AS combination therapy as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in northern coastal Peru in November 2001, making Peru the first country in the Americas to recommend this combination therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Niño , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Perú , Pirimetamina/administración & dosificación , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/administración & dosificación , Sesquiterpenos/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos
9.
Trop Med Int Health ; 9(2): 217-21, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15040558

RESUMEN

We assessed the efficacy of mefloquine monotherapy and mefloquine-artesunate (MQ-AS) combination therapy for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at four sites in the Bolivian Amazon region. Patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum infections between 5 and 60 years of age were randomly assigned to be treated with either MQ (15 mg/kg in a single oral dose) or MQ (15 mg/kg) plus AS (4 mg/kg daily for 3 days). A total of 143 patients were enrolled and followed for 28 days. None of the 73 patients who received MQ alone or the 70 patients who received MQ-AS combination therapy had recurrences of parasitaemia during the 28-day follow-up period. Asexual parasite densities fell significantly more rapidly and the proportion of patients with gametocytes was significantly lower on days 7-28 in patients treated with MQ-AS than in those treated with MQ alone. All patients tolerated the medications well. After this study, the Bolivian Ministry of Public Health changed its treatment policy for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in the Amazon region to combination therapy with MQ-AS to slow or prevent the development of resistance.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Bolivia , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/sangre , Masculino , Mefloquina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sesquiterpenos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Public Health Policy ; 25(3-4): 328-45, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15683069

RESUMEN

Between 1998 and 2001, the Peruvian Ministry of Health made sweeping changes in its malaria treatment policies in response to a resurgence of disease and the spread and intensification of antimalarial drug resistance. On the Pacific Coast, the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria was changed to combination therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate; in the Amazon region, mefloquine-artesunate combination therapy was introduced. With these changes in treatment policy, Peru became the first country in the Americas to use combination therapy with an artemisinin drug as its first-line treatment for falciparum malaria and the first country in the world to use two different drug combination therapy regimens based on an artemisinin drug in different regions of the country. This paper describes the process involved in assessing the geographic distribution and intensity of antimalarial drug resistance throughout the country and the use of that information to guide decisions related to national malaria treatment policy.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Países en Desarrollo , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Vivax/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Perú
11.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 69(5): 548-52, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14695094

RESUMEN

Reports from several sites in South America suggest the presence of isolated cases of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria. To investigate the possibility of chloroquine-resistant P. vivax in Peru, we conducted 28-day in vivo drug efficacy trials at three sites in the Amazon region and one site on the northern Pacific Coast between 1998 and 2001. A total of 242 patients between the ages of 2 and 60 years were enrolled (177 from the Amazon region and 65 from the northern coast). All subjects received directly observed therapy with chloroquine, 25 mg/kg, over a three-day period. On enrollment, 49% had a documented fever and 96% had a history of fever; their geometric mean parasite density was 5,129 parasites/microL. A total of 212 (88%) of the 242 subjects completed their 28-day follow-up. Four of the 177 patients from the Amazon region had a recurrence of P. vivax parasitemia on days 21 and 28 after treatment was initiated. Two of these patients had chloroquine-resistant infections, based on polymerase chain reaction-single-stranded conformational polymorphism genotyping and chloroquine-desethylchloroquine blood levels, which were > or = 97 ng/mL at the time of the reappearance of parasitemia. None of the subjects studied on the northern Pacific Coast had recurrent parasitemia.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Cloroquina/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Plasmodium vivax/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Protozoario/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Malaria Vivax/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perú/epidemiología , Plasmodium vivax/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Recurrencia
12.
Trop Med Int Health ; 8(10): 910-6, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14516302

RESUMEN

Since 1994, the Peruvian Malaria Control Program has used a simplified operational approach for monitoring antimalarial drug efficacy, in which blood smears are taken 7 and 14 days after treatment from all patients diagnosed with malaria at Ministry of Health facilities. The proportion of patients with parasitaemia on one of their return visits provides an indication of the efficacy of the drug being administered. We compared this approach for antimalarial drug resistance monitoring to the more labour-intensive and expensive World Health Organization (WHO) 14-day in vivo efficacy trial at six sites in the Amazon Basin and the north coast of Peru. Although the proportion of treatment failures at 7 and 14 days identified by the operational monitoring system was considerably lower than the results of the WHO in vivo efficacy test, the operational approach did accurately reflect the overall efficacy or lack of efficacy of the drugs being evaluated. Differences in the results of the two methods were greatest in the Peruvian Amazon region, where fully supervised treatment and patient follow-up is very difficult due to the widely dispersed population. While the operational approach cannot be considered an alternative to WHO in vivo testing for evaluating the efficacy of antimalarial drugs or for recommending changes in malaria treatment policy, if treatment is supervised and follow-up blood smears taken as scheduled, this method could serve as a simple, inexpensive and sustainable early warning system for reduced drug efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Parasitaria , Perú , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(4): 386-90, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12879851

RESUMEN

In spite of increasing resistance, chloroquine remains the primary drug for treatment of malaria in most sub-Saharan African countries. We evaluated the effect of drug treatment policy on the case-fatality rates of children, adjusting for differing distributions of malaria and severe anemia. In 1991, 63% of children were treated with chloroquine while the remaining 37% were treated with a regimen that would eliminate and clear parasitemia. Case-fatality rates were 13% and 4.1%, respectively; the proportion of deaths attributable to chloroquine treatment was 69%. The trend in case-fatality rates for malaria decreased as an increasing proportion of children received an effective treatment regimen; adjusted malaria case-fatality rates were 5.1%, 3.6%, and 3.3% in 1992, 1993, and 1994, respectively, when 85% of children in 1992 and 97% of children in 1993-1994 received effective therapy. These 4 years of data provide strong evidence that continued use of chloroquine in areas with resistance is contributing to excess Plasmodium falciparum-related deaths.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/mortalidad , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Preescolar , Cloroquina/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Kenia/epidemiología , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Parasitemia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(4): 391-7, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12875285

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for in vivo antimalarial drug efficacy testing for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in areas with low-to-moderate transmission, such as the Americas. These guidelines are used widely by ministries of health and national malaria control programs to assess the efficacy of their first-line and second-line drugs for the treatment of malaria and to provide the information necessary to update national malaria treatment policies. Following the WHO guidelines, we have conducted in vivo efficacy trials with a variety of drugs and drug combinations against P. falciparum and P. vivax at 13 sites in Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador. Based on these experiences, we have identified several modifications that we believe should be made in the WHO recommendations to make them more suitable to the relatively low levels of P. falciparum transmission in the Americas and to the logistic challenges of carrying out such studies in sparsely populated areas, such as the Amazon Basin. These include changes in inclusion and exclusion criteria, in enrollment and follow-up procedures, and in the measurement of study outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/normas , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Guías como Asunto/normas , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Vivax/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Bolivia/epidemiología , Ecuador/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Parasitemia/parasitología , Cooperación del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Perú/epidemiología , Embarazo , Recurrencia , Tamaño de la Muestra , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Organización Mundial de la Salud
15.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(5): 608-12, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12812355

RESUMEN

In the Amazon Basin of Peru, more than 50% of patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria fail to respond to treatment with chloroquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. To assist the National Malaria Control Program in identifying an alternative first-line therapy for this region, we conducted a trial of the safety and efficacy of mefloquine (MQ) compared with mefloquine-artesunate (MQ-AS) combination therapy. Patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum infections between the ages of 5 and 50 years were randomly assigned to be treated with either MQ (15 mg/kg in a single oral dose) or MQ (15 mg/kg) plus AS (4 mg/kg/day for three days). A total of 98 patients were enrolled and followed for 28 days. None of the 47 patients who received MQ alone or the 51 patients who received MQ-AS combination therapy had recurrences of parasitemia during the 28-day follow-up period. Asexual parasite densities decreased significantly more rapidly and the proportion of patients with gametocytes was significantly lower on days 3-21 in the MQ-AS group than in patients treated with MQ alone. All patients tolerated the medication well. Based on the results of this study and with the objective of slowing the development of resistance, the Peruvian Ministry of Health has decided to revise its malaria treatment policy and recommend combination therapy with MO-AS as the new first-line treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in the Amazon region.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mefloquina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Perú , Recurrencia , Sesquiterpenos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
16.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(1): 107-10, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12557835

RESUMEN

We assessed whether mutations in the Plasmodium falciparum multidrug-resistance gene 1 (pfmdr1) (C1034S, D1042N, and Y1246D) would predict treatment outcome during a 28-day in vivo treatment trial in the Peruvian Amazon. Mefloquine (MQ) was compared with mefloquine-artesunate (MQ-AS) in a randomized, multi-clinic protocol for the first time in the Americas. Of 115 patients enrolled in the in vivo arm, 97 patients were eligible for molecular analysis. All 97 patients remained parasite-free during 28 days of follow-up (MQ, n = 46; MQ-AS, n = 51), indicating 100% clinical efficacy of the MQ and MQ-AS treatment regimens. The reported MQ-sensitive alleles (C1034, D1042, and Y1246) were present in 48.5% (n = 47) of the cases, whereas 49 isolates (50.5%) contained the D1246 mutation reported to confer MQ resistance in vitro. However, neither this mutation nor a double mutation (S1034, D1246; n = 16) was predictive of MQ treatment outcome.


Asunto(s)
Transportadoras de Casetes de Unión a ATP , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Animales , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Artemisininas/farmacología , Artesunato , Secuencia de Bases , Estudios de Cohortes , ADN Protozoario/química , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Mefloquina/farmacología , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Mutación , Perú , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Alineación de Secuencia , Sesquiterpenos/farmacología
17.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(1): 120-3, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12557836

RESUMEN

As part of an effort to assess antimalarial drug resistance in Peru, we carried out 14-day in vivo efficacy trials of chloroquine (CQ; 25 mg/kg) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP; 25 mg/kg of the sulfadoxine component) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infections at three sites on the northern coast of Peru. Mefloquine (MQ; 15 mg/kg) also was evaluated at one site. The results from all three sites were similar. Of the 53 patients treated with CQ, 58.5% had RII/RIII responses. No RIII failures were observed among the 112 patients who received SP, but 4.5% and 1.8%, respectively, had RII and RI responses. All 33 patients treated with MQ showed a sensitive response. Early treatment failures were observed in 27.1% of the CQ patients but in no patients receiving SP or MQ. Late treatment failures were seen in 59.3% of the CQ patients and 6.4% of the SP patients but in none of those treated with MQ. Based on these findings and because of concern about the potential for development of resistance if SP were used alone, the National Malaria Control Program is planning a change in malaria treatment policy to SP-artesunate combination therapy for this region of the country.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Niño , Preescolar , Cloroquina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mefloquina/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perú , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Pirimetamina/farmacología , Sulfadoxina/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...