[Secondary malignancies after successful primary treatment of malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma]. / Sekundärneoplasien nach erfolgreicher Primärtherapie des malignen Hodgkin-Lymphoms.

Malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has become a curable disease through the increasing intensity of the treatment strategies applied. These regimens are aggressive, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy leading to the possibility of secondary malignancies. The German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group considered three cohorts including 5,411 patients with all stages of HL. In 127 patients a secondary solid tumor was diagnosed (cumulative risk 2%, median follow-up 72 months), with bronchial carcinomas (23.6%) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (20.5%) being the most frequent neoplasms. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia was found in 36 patients, another ten developed myeloid dysplasia (cumulative risk 1%, median follow-up 55 months). A total of 52 patients revealed a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; cumulative risk 0.9%, median follow-up 46 months). The overall incidence of secondary malignancies was 3.9% in patients who had been treated successfully for their HL with radio- and/or chemotherapy.A secondary NHL can be particularly difficult to be distinguished from the preceding HL. Therefore, in case of a suspected relapse, a complete histopathological work-up must be performed.

Hodgkin's disease in the elderly: current status and future directions.

In general, it was agreed that high rates of toxicities during treatment occur in the elderly and that there is a frequent occurrence of early relapse. It is clear that different combinations of effective therapies with lower toxicity are required. It was felt, however, that certainly in the 60-70 year age group, approaches should be vigorous to and the same diagnostic and staging procedures as in younger individuals, but with much closer monitoring of toxicity and response to treatment. It was felt that as part of the approach, liberal support with haemopoeitic growth factors (G-CSF) was necessary to reduce prolonged neutropenia. It is important to understand that age in general is not a contrary indication for aggressive treatment and that biologically younger patients under the age of 65 years, in good physical and mental condition, often should be given with stage-adapted treatment, analogous to conventional treatment protocols for the <60 years age group. It was also considered that, in patients who clearly could not accept conventional treatment, study groups could begin to define the best palliative care for patients with pre-existing organ impairment, and that in all situations of assessment, whether in trial or not, there should be a detailed prospective assessment of quality of life parameters.

BEACOPP, a new dose-escalated and accelerated regimen, is at least as effective as COPP/ABVD in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: interim report from a trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: The HD9 trial aims to evaluate whether moderate dose escalation and/or acceleration of standard polychemotherapy is beneficial for advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). Two variants of a novel bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) scheme (standard and escalated dose) are compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP)/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The randomized, three-arm trial recruited patients in stages IIB and IIIA with risk factors and stages IIIB and IV. BEACOPP in baseline dose contains all drug dosages of COPP/ABVD (except vincristine and procarbazine) rearranged in a shorter, 3-week cycle. Escalated BEACOPP uses higher doses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. After eight chemotherapy cycles, initial bulky and residual disease is irradiated. The trial is monitored and analyzed by means of a sequential strategy. RESULTS: An interim analysis with 505 assessable patients and a median follow-up of 23 months showed a significant inferiority (according to sequential monitoring strategy) of the COPP/ABVD regimen in progression rate and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) compared with the pooled results of both BEACOPP variants. The 24-month FFTF rate was 75% for COPP/ABVD and 84% for BEACOPP pooled (P = .034). There was 12% progressive disease with COPP/ABVD and 6% with BEACOPP pooled. Differences in survival were not significant in sequential analysis. The acute toxicity of baseline BEACOPP resembled that of COPP/ABVD; escalated BEACOPP showed increased but manageable hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Combined with local irradiation, BEACOPP in one or both variants shows superior disease control compared with COPP/ABVD, with acceptable acute toxicity. Further follow-up is required to assess the effect of dosage and the effect on survival and late toxicities.