Addressing Mental Health Needs Among Frontline Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Frontline workers experienced inordinate stress levels during the COVID-19 pandemic, as historically high volume and acuity in our hospitals was accompanied by concerns about our safety. We suggest that supporting frontline workers is an essential part of the pandemic response plan. We propose strategies to address the emotional and mental health (MH) needs of frontline health care workers during and after a pandemic that integrates knowledge from the disaster MH literature with the lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. The disaster MH literature emphasizes distinguishing development of defined psychiatric disorders from emotional distress representing normative responses to disaster trauma and stress. Differentiating psychopathology from distress requires diagnostic assessment by a trained clinician. Where shortages of psychiatrists exist, primary care physicians may be trained to assist with disaster-related psychiatric assessment and initiation of treatment for psychopathologic features. The first component of a pandemic MH plan for critical frontline workers is to distinguish psychiatric illness from normative distress and to provide adequate treatment of psychopathologic symptoms. A second component of the comprehensive pandemic MH response is the provision of supportive care interventions and resources for normative distress. These interventions may include psychological first aid, individual or group counseling, broadening the pool of frontline workers, and buddy systems. Although these interventions were unknown or difficult to put in place at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we now have an opportunity to implement postpandemic MH response plans and to create response planning for subsequent COVID-19 surges integrating MH care into the front lines.

Chronic Critical Illness: The Limbo Between Life and Death.

The entity of chronic critical illness (CCI) has shown a rise in the past decades for popularity and prevalence. CCI is loosely defined as the group of patients who require the intensive care setting for weeks to months; its hallmark is prolonged mechanical ventilation. The outcomes of chronically critically ill patients have been dismal and have not improved over time; 1-year survival hovers at approximately 50%. Given the high mortality, prognostic variables are important when making medical decisions. CCI encompasses a syndrome that includes altered pathophysiology across a variety of organ systems. Another crucial element of CCI is the symptom burden that patients experience which include feelings of dyspnea, difficulty communicating and pain. This patient population necessitates the combined efforts of multiple care teams and the early integration of palliative and critical care. Future directions need to include improving the symptom management and communication for patients with CCI.

Pulmonary hypertension in parenchymal lung disease.

The pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in parenchymal lung diseases is partially related to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. PH treatment is controversial for these patients. This article focuses on group III PH, namely PH attributable to lung diseases and/or hypoxia. Group III includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung diseases, the most common parenchymal lung diseases associated with PH. It also includes sleep-disordered breathing and hypoventilation from any cause. Other parenchymal lung diseases associated with PH, namely sarcoidosis and systemic vasculitides (group V), are discussed. The data describing PH in specific parenchymal diseases are reviewed.