Retention in nursing education and scholarship programs: Survival analysis of the Veterans Health Administration National Nursing Education Initiative Data.

AIMS: To investigate factors affecting non-completion by registered nurses (RNs) participating in degree programs supported by the scholarship program of the National Nursing Education Initiative of the United States Veterans Health Administration. Secondarily, to assess overall retention in the scholarship program over time. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal design using administrative data. METHODS: Defining retention time as the time elapsed from enrollment date to non-completion, we performed survival (retention) analysis (i.e.,Kaplan-Meier survival functions, log-rank tests and Cox regressions) to retrospectively analyzea national sample of RNs (N  = 15,908) enrolled in the scholarship program between the United States federal fiscal years 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: Nurses' mean age was 44 years (range: 19-71), and 86% were females. Six- and 12-month cumulative educational program retention rates were 92% and 84% respectively. The newest group of enrollees (2016-2020), younger nurses (<50 years), and nurses in traditional degree programtype were more likely to complete their academic programs than the earlier groups, older nurses and nurses in non-traditional type, respectively. Male nurses who aspired to advanced occupational levels upon completion were more likely to complete their academic programs compared to those who expected no change from their current level of practice. CONCLUSION: Multiple factors affected non-completion of academic degree programs by RNs enrolled in the scholarship program. More work is needed to examine these plus additional plausible factors and their correlates extensively. IMPACT: Our findings highlighted areas for quality improvement in employee scholarship programs for RNs. The findings are expected to inform tailoring of proactive helpful intervention towards individual needs and prioritization of limited resources to maximize graduation rate from academic programs for scholarship recipients. The study will have impact on nursing workforce policy makers interested in implementing employee scholarship programs, and on their scholarship recipients.

Reliability and validity of the Veterans Administration Mobility Screening and Solutions Tool.

OBJECTIVES: The Veterans Administration (VA) Mobility Screening and Solutions Tool (VA MSST) was developed to screen a patient's safe mobility level 'in the moment' and provide clinical decision support related to the use of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) equipment. This evidence-based flowchart tool is a common language tool that enables any healthcare worker at any time to accurately measure and communicate patient mobility and transfer equipment needs across disciplines and settings. METHODS: The VA MSST has four levels and differentiates between the need for powered and non-powered equipment depending on the patient's independence. Subject matter experts wrote scenarios for interrater reliability and validity testing. The initial VA MSST draft iteration was reviewed by 163 VA staff (mostly physical therapists and occupational therapists) amongst simulation scenarios and provided content validity, and additional insight and suggestions. Revisions were made to create the final VA MSST which was evaluated by over 200 healthcare workers from varied disciplines (including medical doctors, advanced practice registered nurses, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nursing assistants, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech therapists, radiology and ultrasound technicians, etc.). An instruction video and eighteen scenario videos were embedded in an online survey. The survey intended to demonstrate the interrater reliability and validity (concurrent and construct) of the VA MSST. Over 500 VA staff (raters) received a survey invitation via email. RESULTS: Raters (N = 230) from multiple disciplines and healthcare settings independently screened patient mobility status for each of 18 scenarios using the VA MSST. The raters were diverse in their age and years of experience. The estimated interrater reliability (IRR) for VA MSST was excellent and statistically significant with an estimated Krippendorff's alpha (ICC (C, k)) of 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-0.999]. Eighty-two percent of raters reported that overall VA MSST instructions were clear or very clear and understandable. VA MSST ratings made by technicians and nursing assistants group correlated strongly (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) with the 'gold standard' (experienced physical therapists), suggesting a high concurrent validity of the tool. The VA MSST significantly discriminated between the different levels of patient mobility required for safe mobilization as intended (each difference, p < 0.0001); this suggests a good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The VA MSST is an evidence-based flowchart screening and decision support tool that demonstrates excellent interrater reliability across disciplines and settings. VA MSST has strong face and content validity, as well as good concurrent and construct validity.

A preliminary evaluation of full practice authority of advance practice registered nurses in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: Responding to National Academy of Medicine and National Council of State Boards of Nursing recommendations, the Department of Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) implemented full practice authority (FPA) for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in VHA medical centers (VAMCs) in 2017. PURPOSE: To evaluate FPA policy implementation's impact on quality indicators including access to care as measured by new patient appointments in primary, specialty and mental health services. METHODS: Linear growth models compared early (n = 85) vs. late (n = 55) FPA implementing VAMCs on the trajectories of each of the three quality indicators. FINDINGS: Early FPA implementing VAMCs showed greater rates of improvement over time in new patient appointments completed within 30 days of preferred date for primary care (p = .003), specialty care (p = 0.05), and mental health (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: VAMCs that started implementation of FPA policy early showed greater improvement in access to care for Veterans over time than VAMCs that did not.

An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration National Nursing Education Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Since 1999, the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) National Nursing Education Initiative (NNEI) has provided 16,294 scholarships for registered nurses to attain baccalaureate and advanced nursing degrees. PURPOSE: The goal of this evaluation was to determine factors that enhanced or hindered a scholarship recipient in the completion of their degree and service obligation. METHODS: A regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of degree completion for 10,043 participants in 162 VHA facilities. FINDINGS: Significant predictor variables for degree completion were intended occupation, entry degree, gender, age, and year entering the program. Eighty-six percent (86.7%) of participants completed the degree requirement. Of those who completed their degree, 97% completed the service obligation. DISCUSSION: As recruitment and retention initiative, NNEI scholarships are poised to address the VHA nursing staffing shortages as well as build a highly qualified nursing workforce capable of providing the best care to our Nation's Veterans.

A Literature Review of Nursing Extern Program Outcomes.

This literature review gathers in one place recent published literature on extern programs. Fourteen extern articles published between 2009 and 2019 were identified, and program information was extracted. Student benefits were increased in confidence, clinical skills, and learning the nursing environment. Organizational benefits were reduced orientation, reduced recruitment costs, and hiring nurses that were a good fit with the organization. For a healthcare organization, extern programs may ease the shortage of available registered nurses.

The use of safe patient handling and mobility equipment in rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, occupational and physical therapists are using safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) equipment, such as mechanical lifts, in rehabilitation. However, there is little guidance in the literature on how SPHM equipment can be used to assist patients to reach rehabilitation goals. The purpose of this projectwas to document and categorize common and innovative ways rehabilitation therapists use SPHM equipment in their clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This article investigates common and innovative uses of SPHM equipment in rehabilitation practice. METHODS: Occupational, physical and kinesio therapist employed at the Veterans Health Administration wrote narratives and took photos describing rehabilitation therapy activities where they used SPHM equipment in their clinical practice. The authors used a systematic process to review and categorize the narratives and subsequent photos by using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). RESULTS: Thirty narratives (13 innovative and 17 common) were coded into four categories on the ICF section of mobility. The most common category was "changing and maintaining basic body position"(21) followed by "walking and moving" (5). The category "carrying, moving and handling objects" garnered two narratives and there were no narratives for "using transportation." CONCLUSIONS: Project findings may serve as a guide for therapists who would like to enhance their use of SPHM equipment in rehabilitation. Additional research is needed to expand the use of SPHM in rehabilitation practice and evaluate the impact on patient rehabilitation outcomes and therapist safety outcomes.

Doctoral-prepared nurses in the Veterans Health Administration: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Doctoral-prepared nurses with diverse skillsets are required to meet nursing care needs in a complex and changing healthcare environment. A better understanding of the roles of doctoral-prepared nurses in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) workforce will help leverage their expertise to meet the needs of Veterans. PURPOSE: Assess the current roles of doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was used to collect information on doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA in 2016. Multiple strategies were used to identify doctoral-prepared nurses to recruit for an online survey. Survey invitations were sent electronically to unique individuals identified (N = 2403). RESULTS: Responses were received from 1015 nurses (42.2% response rate), with 929 nurses with a doctoral degree identified. DNP/DNAP degrees were most common (55%), followed by a PhD or DNS (33%). Significant differences were noted between nurses in different doctoral education categories across four main roles: research, clinical, educational, and administration. CONCLUSIONS: This survey generated the first comprehensive list of VHA doctoral-prepared nurses. Findings are being used by the VHA Office of Nursing Services to align degree types, duties of different positions, functional statements, and position expectations. Results support the continued need for collaboration between nurses with PhDs and DNPs to achieve research and clinical goals.

Pressure Injury Documentation Practices in the Department of Veteran Affairs: A Quality Improvement Project.

Evidence suggests that inaccurate and incomplete pressure injury (PI) documentation threatens the validity of treatment and undermines policy and quality improvement. This quality improvement project sought to identify barriers and facilitators when conducting and documenting the daily comprehensive skin assessment in 31 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. Evaluators in this 1-year, cross-sectional quality improvement project, using a qualitative approach, interviewed nurses of medical-surgical and critical care units. Participants (N = 62) from 12 high reassessment units (HRUs) and 13 low reassessment units (LRUs) were interviewed using telephone focus groups. Staff from HRUs reported 9 activities that ensured consistency in clinical practices, in validating data, and in correcting inaccuracies. The LRU staff tended to report performing only 2 of the 9 activities. The main barriers to accurate documentation were lack of knowledge, poor templates, and staffing issues such as understaffing and turnover, and main facilitators were an internal data validation process and a documentation template to local practices. Findings from this project led to increased VA leadership engagement, development of 3 innovative, award-winning VA mobile PI prevention and management applications, updated policies and directives on PI prevention, and upgrading of the national VA HAPI workgroup to an advisory committee and improved collaboration between the PI advisory committee and nursing informatics.

CE: Original Research: Patient Handling and Mobility Course Content: A National Survey of Nursing Programs.

: Purpose: Despite the evidence supporting safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) practices, anecdotal evidence suggests that such practices are not universally taught in academic nursing programs. The primary goal of this cross-sectional descriptive study was to understand what nursing programs teach students about lifting, turning, transferring, repositioning, and mobilizing patients. METHODS: Faculty from baccalaureate and associate's degree nursing programs in the United States were invited via e-mail to complete a 64-item survey questionnaire, which was accessible through an online link. Participants were also invited to send documents related to SPHM course content to the research team. RESULTS: Faculty from 228 baccalaureate and associate's degree nursing programs completed the questionnaire. Most curricula included outdated manual techniques, taught reliance on body mechanics to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, and made use of nonergonomic aids such as draw sheets. Elements of SPHM in the curricula were less common, and nearly half of the respondents didn't know whether their affiliated clinical facilities had an SPHM program. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest many possibilities for improvement-such as partnering with faculty in physical and occupational therapy departments, clinical partnering, and working with equipment vendors-to better incorporate evidence-based SPHM principles and practices into nursing curricula.

Pressure Injury Education in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Results of a National Wound Provider Cross-sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe experience, training, educational needs and preferences, and perceptions of pressure injury (PI) prevention education of wound care providers in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as an indicator of effectiveness of the mandated VHA PI Prevention Program. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A convenience sample of national VHA wound care providers practicing in VHA facilities was compiled from members of special interest groups and committees and by referrals from known wound care specialists and clinicians (N = 1726). The response rate was 24% (n = 410). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. METHODS: A 42-item online cross-sectional survey was administered via a blast-email of the survey link to the sample. The survey link was active for 1 month (March 3-31, 2014). The survey queried demographic data, PI experience and education, and their perceptions and preferences for PI education. Quantitative responses underwent descriptive analyses, and responses to open-ended questions were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: The majority of the 415 respondents completed most of the questionnaire (n = 310, 74%). Half were board-certified providers with a mean wound care experience of 14.2 years (standard deviation = 9.8 years). Preference for type of wound training ranged from 17% for online gaming to 82% for face-to-face training. Training provided by facilities was perceived to be inadequate for wound care by 60% (n = 175) and inadequate for PI care by 49% (n = 142). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 greatest areas of need in PI care identified by wound care providers were education and documentation. These same issues were identified as problematic by an audit of PI prevention and management at 47 VHA facilities that was conducted by the VA Office of Inspector General.

What Elements of the 2013 American Nurses Association Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Standards are Reflected in State Legislation?

Many professional organizations have endorsed and provided guidance on the implementation of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) programs. In 2013, the American Nurses Association published the interprofessional standards of SPHM. Eleven states have passed laws to implement statewide SPHM programs. This article describes the evaluation of the quality of SPHM legislation against the ANA standards. Information gleaned from this analysis could be used to strengthen existing legislation, craft new bills in the 39 states without SPHM legislation, and provide direction for national legislation.

Effects of a national safe patient handling program on nursing injury incidence rates.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify which components of a system-wide safe patient handling (SPH) program reduced musculoskeletal injury (MSI) due to patient handling among nurses. METHODS: The 3-year longitudinal study from 2008 to 2011 used a pretest-posttest design. The study was conducted in the Veterans Health Administration, and all medical centers participated. The outcome was 2011 MSI incidence rates due to patient-related handling for nurses, expressed as injuries per 10 000 full-time employees. RESULTS: Three organizational risk factors, bed days of care, facility complexity level, and baseline MSI incidence rate, were significantly associated with MSI incidence rate and explained 21% of its variation. Five SPH components, including deployment of ceiling lifts and other new technologies, peer leader effectiveness, competency in SPH equipment use, facility coordinator link with safety committee, and peer leader training, uniquely accounted for an additional 23% of the total variation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide evidence to support the effectiveness of a multicomponent approach to SPH programs given contextual considerations.

Implications for patient safety in the use of safe patient handling equipment: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries among nursing staff has been high due to patient handling and movement. Internationally, healthcare organizations are integrating technological equipment into patient handling and movement to improve safety. Although evidence shows that safe patient handling programs reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries in nursing staff, it is not clear how safe these new programs are for patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore adverse patient events associated with safe patient handling programs and preventive approaches in US Veterans Affairs medical centers. METHODS: The study surveyed a convenience sample of safe patient handling program managers from 51 US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers to collect data on skin-related and fall-related adverse patient events. RESULTS: Both skin- and fall-related adverse patient events associated with safe patient handling occurred at VA Medical centers. Skin-related events included abrasions, contusions, pressure ulcers and lacerations. Fall-related events included sprains and strains, fractures, concussions and bleeding. Program managers described contextual factors in these adverse events and ways of preventing the events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of safe patient handling equipment can pose risks for patients. This study found that organizational factors, human factors and technology factors were associated with patient adverse events. The findings have implications for how nursing professionals can implement safe patient handling programs in ways that are safe for both staff and patients.

Processes and outcomes of the veterans health administration safe patient handling program: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers, such as nurses, nursing aides, orderlies, and attendants, who manually move patients, are consistently listed in the top professions for musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These MSIs are typically caused by high-risk patient caregiving activities. In 2008, a safe patient handling (SPH) program was implemented in all 153 Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs) throughout the United States to reduce patient handling injuries. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study is to evaluate the effects associated with the national implementation of a comprehensive SPH program. The primary objectives of the research were to determine the effectiveness of the SPH program in improving direct care nursing outcomes and to provide a context for understanding variations in program results across sites over time. Secondary objectives of the present research were to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in reducing direct and indirect costs associated with patient handling, to explore the potential mediating and moderating mechanisms, and to identify unintended consequences of implementing the program. METHODS: This 3-year longitudinal study used mixed methods of data collection at 6- to 9-month intervals. The analyses will include data from surveys, administrative databases, individual and focus group interviews, and nonparticipant observations. For this study, a 3-tiered measurement plan was used. For Tier 1, the unit of analysis was the facility, the data source was the facility coordinator or administrative data, and all 153 VAMCs participated. For Tier 2, frontline caregivers and program peer leaders at 17 facilities each completed different surveys. For Tier 3, six facilities completed qualitative site visits, which included individual interviews, focus groups, and nonparticipant observations. Multiple regression models were proposed to test the effects of SPH components on nursing outcomes related to patient handling. Content analysis and constant comparative analysis were proposed for qualitative data analysis to understand the context of implementation and to triangulate quantitative data. RESULTS: All three tiers of data for this study have been collected. We are now in the analyses and writing phase of the project, with the possibility for extraction of additional administrative data. The focus of this paper is to describe the SPH program, its evaluation study design, and its data collection procedures. This study evaluates the effects associated with the national implementation of a comprehensive SPH program that was implemented in all 153 VAMCs throughout the United States to reduce patient handling injuries. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest evaluation of an SPH program in the United States. A major strength of this observational study design is that all VAMCs implemented the program and were included in Tier 1 of the study; therefore, population sampling bias is not a concern. Although the design lacks a comparison group for testing program effects, this longitudinal field study design allows for capturing program dose-response effects within a naturalistic context. Implementation of the VA-wide SPH program afforded the opportunity for rigorous evaluation in a naturalistic context. Findings will guide VA operations for policy and decision making about resources, and will be useful for health care, in general, outside of the VA, in implementation and impact of an SPH program.

A community planning process for the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Over the past 10 years, increasing attention has been paid to the development and implementation of 'evidence-based' practices or EBPs. In 1998, the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine began drawing attention to the discrepancy between research findings and practice patterns in the treatment of substance abuse. The community coalition described in this study was developed to create a partnership between substance abuse treatment providers, policy makers, university-based researchers, and consumers to examine treatment advances and evaluate their possible application in local community settings. In the first year the community coalition conducted a needs assessment, with the goal of prioritizing areas for practice change. The needs assessment process included focus groups, key informant interviews, and a survey of substance abuse treatment providers. The questions addressed at each stage of the assessment varied, but collectively all methods formed the basis for consensus-building for a change in practice in substance abuse treatment. The results of the needs assessment were further refined and influenced the development and implementation of two evidence-based practices (EBPs) within multiple agencies. Implications for using a community needs assessment to highlight coalition building and identify and adopting EBPs are discussed.