Posttraumatic stress disorder in people with dementia: study protocol.

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is considered an independent risk factor for dementia. Despite the (clinical) evidence that PTSD is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia, studies on its prevalence and clinical manifestation are limited, and their quality is affected by the lack of a structured method to diagnose PTSD in this population. The primary aim of the current study is to validate the 'TRAuma and DEmentia' interview as a diagnostic tool for PTSD in people with dementia and to test feasibility of EMDR treatment for people with PTSD and dementia.Methods: This prospective multi-centre study is divided into two parts. In study A, 90 participants with dementia will be included to test the criterion validity, inter-rater reliability and feasibility of the 'TRAuma and DEmentia' interview. In study B, 29 participants with dementia and PTSD will receive eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy by a trained psychologist, and 29 participants with dementia and PTSD will be placed on the waiting list control group.Conclusion: This study aims to improve the diagnostic process of PTSD and to assess the effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing treatment in people with dementia living in Dutch care facilities.Trial registration: NL70479.068.20 / METC 20-063 / OSF registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AKW4F.

This study protocol describes a two-part study on posttraumatic stress disorder in people with dementia in Dutch care facilities.The primary aim of the study is to validate the 'TRAuma and DEmentia' interview as a diagnostic tool for posttraumatic stress disorder in people with dementia.This study aims to test the feasibility of an evidence-based treatment for people with dementia and posttraumatic stress disorder in the form of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy.

Treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in people with dementia: a structured literature review.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with cognitive dysfunctions and is an independent risk factor for dementia. A recent study has found the prevalence of PTSD in people with dementia is 4.7%-7.8%. However, little is known about the effectiveness of PTSD treatment for people with dementia. The primary aim of the current study is to review previous studies on the treatment of PTSD in people with dementia. A structured literature review was performed using a 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' analysis in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Two independent researchers screened titles and abstracts. The inclusion criteria were: PTSD symptoms present, diagnosis of dementia, PTSD treatment form described and effects of the treatment mentioned. Articles that matched these criteria were included and content and quality were analyzed. We included nine articles, all case reports, with a total of 11 cases. The discussed treatment options are eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) (n = 3), prolonged exposure (n = 1), cognitive behavioural therapy (n = 1) and pharmacological treatment (n = 4). All articles reported a positive effect of the intervention on several monitored symptoms. Evidence for positive effects and feasibility of EMDR were most reliable, and it was applied in two articles of sufficient quality published in 2018 and 2019. EMDR 'on-the-spot' was described with positive effect in one article in which three cases were discussed. The quality of included papers ranged from insufficient to sufficient. This review shows that people with PTSD and dementia can benefit from PTSD treatment. EMDR, prolonged exposure, acceptance and commitment therapy and pharmacological treatment are applicable in this population. EMDR treatment is most described in this population (n = 5) and shows positive results, and the studies are of sufficient quality (n = 3). Further research in the form of a randomised controlled trial is required to study the effectivity of different treatment interventions in this population.

Large negative lymph nodes - a surrogate for immune activation in rectal cancer patients?

AIM: The size of regional, tumor draining lymph nodes without metastasis (LNneg) found in rectal cancer resection specimens varies and seems to be related to patient survival. Yet, the histopathological features influencing LNneg size in rectal cancer have not been studied in detail. Our pilot study focused on investigating the relationship between lymph node (LN) size and LNneg microarchitecture in rectal cancer (RC) resection specimens. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study, resection specimens from 146 RC patients, treated with either surgery alone (n = 29) or neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection (n = 117), were included in the study. Histology of LNnegs was reviewed to establish number of lymphoid follicles and presence of intranodal fat. Longest long axis and area of each LN were measured digitally. RESULTS: 1830 LNnegs were measured. The microarchitecture was analyzed in a subset of 680 LNnegs. 153 (22.5 %) LNnegs contained intranodal fat. After neoadjuvant treatment, presence of intranodal fat was related to smaller LNneg area (median (range) area of LNneg without intranodal fat: 4.51 mm2 (0.15-46.89 mm2), with intranodal fat: 3.46 mm2 (0.12-27.22 mm2), p = 0.048). A higher number of lymphoid follicles was related to a larger LNneg area in both patient groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our pilot data suggest that in rectal cancer the presence of large regional LNnegs may reflect increased immune activation due to tumor related antigens. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether histologically visible microarchitectural features of LNnegs such as lymphoid follicles translate to particular features in radiological images and hence could potentially help to identify LNneg with more certainty at the time of pre-treatment disease staging.