Adverse reactions to Janus kinase inhibitors: Study of their incidence and predictive factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. / Reacciones adversas a inhibidores de quinasa Janus: estudio de su incidencia y de factores predictivos en los pacientes con artritis reumatoide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors has acquired attention due to post-marketing observed adverse drug reactions. The study focuses on the analysis of adverse reactions related to tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients, including identifying predictive factors linked to their occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study. Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a university hospital receiving JAK inhibitor treatment between September 2017 and January 2024 were included. The cumulative incidence of each adverse reaction was calculated using the Naranjo scale. Risk factors for developing adverse reactions were identified through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were included, with 28.7% presenting adverse reaction related to JAK inhibitor treatment. The adverse drug reactions with the highest cumulative incidence were infections and gastrointestinal disorders. Infections included: upper respiratory tract (4.5%), cellulitis (3.1%), urinary tract (2.7%), herpes zoster (1.8%). Gastrointestinal disorders comprised: abdominal pain (4.0%), diarrhea (3.6%), nausea and vomiting (3.6%), gastrointestinal perforation (1.3%), diverticulitis (0.9%). Classified at 0.5% were: headache, paresthesias, skin rash, severe neutropenia, insomnia, dyspnea, hypertensive crisis. As risk factors, were identified: the treatment with a non-selective JAK inhibitor (OR adjusted: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.15-14.10; P=.029) and older age (OR adjusted: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; P=.036). CONCLUSIONS: Infections and gastrointestinal disorders represented the adverse reactions related to JAK inhibitor treatment with the highest cumulative incidence, with risk factors for their occurrence being non-selective JAK inhibitor treatment and older age of the patient.

Diseño de un panel de indicadores para programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los Servicios de Urgencias / Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department

Objetivo: desarrollar un panel de indicadores para monitorizar la actividad de los programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los servicios de urgencias. Métodos: un grupo multidisciplinar formado por expertos en el manejo de la infección en urgencias y en la implantación de programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) evaluó una propuesta de indicadores utilizando una metodología Delphi modificada. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos clasificó la relevancia de cada indicador propuesto en 2 dimensiones (repercusión asistencial y facilidad de implantación) y 2 atributos (nivel de priorización y periodicidad de medida). La segunda ronda se realizó a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas y nuevos indicadores sugeridos por los participantes. Los expertos efectuaron modificaciones en el orden de priorización y calificaron los nuevos indicadores propuestos de la misma manera que en la primera ronda. Resultados: se propusieron un total de 61 potenciales indicadores divididos en 4 grupos: indicadores de consumo, microbiológicos, de proceso y de resultado. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, 31 indicadores fueron clasificados como de alta prioridad, 25 de prioridad intermedia y 5 de baja prioridad. Además se generaron 19 nuevos indicadores. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron los 61 indicadores inicialmente propuestos y adicionalmente se incorporaron 18 nuevos: 11 como de alta prioridad, 3 como de intermedia y 4 como de baja prioridad. Conclusiones: los expertos consensuaron un panel de indicadores PROA adaptado a los servicios de urgencias priorizados por nivel de relevancia como un elemento de ayuda para el desarrollo de estos programas, que contribuirá a monitorizar la adecuación del uso de antimicrobianos en estas unidades.(AU)

Objective: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. Methods: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritization level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritization order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. Results: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analyzing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. Conclusions: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritized by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.(AU)

Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department / Diseño de un panel de indicadores para programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los Servicios de Urgencias

Objetivo: desarrollar un panel de indicadores para monitorizar la actividad de los programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los servicios de urgencias. Métodos: un grupo multidisciplinar formado por expertos en el manejo de la infección en urgencias y en la implantación de programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) evaluó una propuesta de indicadores utilizando una metodología Delphi modificada. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos clasificó la relevancia de cada indicador propuesto en 2 dimensiones (repercusión asistencial y facilidad de implantación) y 2 atributos (nivel de priorización y periodicidad de medida). La segunda ronda se realizó a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas y nuevos indicadores sugeridos por los participantes. Los expertos efectuaron modificaciones en el orden de priorización y calificaron los nuevos indicadores propuestos de la misma manera que en la primera ronda. Resultados: se propusieron un total de 61 potenciales indicadores divididos en 4 grupos: indicadores de consumo, microbiológicos, de proceso y de resultado. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, 31 indicadores fueron clasificados como de alta prioridad, 25 de prioridad intermedia y 5 de baja prioridad. Además se generaron 19 nuevos indicadores. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron los 61 indicadores inicialmente propuestos y adicionalmente se incorporaron 18 nuevos: 11 como de alta prioridad, 3 como de intermedia y 4 como de baja prioridad. Conclusiones: los expertos consensuaron un panel de indicadores PROA adaptado a los servicios de urgencias priorizados por nivel de relevancia como un elemento de ayuda para el desarrollo de estos programas, que contribuirá a monitorizar la adecuación del uso de antimicrobianos en estas unidades.(AU)

Objective: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. Methods: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritization level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritization order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. Results: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analyzing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. Conclusions: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritized by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.(AU)

Programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los servicios de urgencias españoles: Estudio PROA-URG / Antibiotic stewardship programs in the Spanish emergency services: PROA-URG Study

Introducción: Los programas de optimización de antimicrobianos (PROA) son herramientas clave en la adecuación de estos fármacos. La información disponible sobre la aplicación e indicadores para monitorizar estos programas en urgencias es limitada. El objetivo del estudio es conocer el grado de implantación de programas PROA en los servicios de urgencias, así como el uso de antimicrobianos en estas unidades. Material y métodos. Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo. Se envió una invitación a todos los participantes del grupo de trabajo de farmacéuticos de urgencias REDFASTER-SEFH. Se utilizó un cuestionario de 21 ítems, contestado por un equipo formado por especialistas en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria, urgencias, enfermedades infecciosas y microbiología. Resultados. 18 hospitales completaron la encuesta. Catorce (77,8%) disponían de un responsable PROA en la unidad. El valor de DDD por 1000 ingresos osciló entre 36,5 y 400,5 (mediana 100,4 [RIQ:57,2-157,3]). El grupo de carbapenémicos y macrólidos presentó una amplia variabilidad. Únicamente seis (33,3%) hospitales disponían de informe anual de resistencias específico para urocultivos y hemocultivos en urgencias. El porcentaje de multirresistentes en urocultivos fue del 12,5% y en hemocultivos del 12,2%. El porcentaje de adecuación en bacteremia de acuerdo con el resultado del hemocultivo fue del 81,0% (RIQ:74,6-85,0%), y en infección urinaria del 78,0% (RIQ:71,5-88,0%). Conclusiones. Pese a la existencia de responsables PROA, actividades formativas y guías de tratamiento en urgencias, la información sobre el uso de antimicrobianos y el perfil de resistencias en estas unidades es limitado. Futuras actividades han de ir encaminadas a mejorar la información sobre los resultados PROA propios para estas unidades. (AU)

Introduction: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have become a key tool in the adaptation of these drugs to the health system. The information available on the application and indicators used in these programs in emergency departments is scarce. The objective of this study is to know theextent of ASP implementation in the emergency departments, as well as the use of antimicrobials in these units. Material and methods. Multicenter retrospective study. An invitation was sent to all participants of the REDFASTER-SEFH emergency pharmacist working group. A questionnaire was used consisting of 21 items, answered by a team made up of a pharmacist, emergency room specialist, infectious disease specialist and microbiologist. Results. Eighteen hospitals completed the survey. Fourteen (77.8%) had an ASP manager. The DDD value per 1000 admissions ranged between 36.5 and 400.5 (median: 100.4 [IQR:57.2-157.3]). Both carbapenem and macrolide group presented wide variability in use. Six (33.3%) hospitals had an annual report on the specific resistance profile for urine and blood cultures. The percentage of multi-drug resistant strains in urine cultures was 12.5% and in blood cultures 12.2%. The percentage of adequacy in the bacteremia treatment was 81.0% (IQR:74.6-85.0%), while in urinary tract infections was 78.0% (IQR:71.5-88.0). Conclusions: Despite the existence of ASP members in emergency services, as well as the training activity and local guidelines is common. knowledge of the use of antimicrobials and resistances is limited. Future activities must be aimed at improving information about the ASP results in these units. (AU)

Short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in emergency departments: results from the EDEN project.

Background: Polypharmacy is a growing phenomenon among elderly individuals. However, there is little information about the frequency of polypharmacy among the elderly population treated in emergency departments (EDs) and its prognostic effect. This study aims to determine the prevalence and short-term prognostic effect of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in EDs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Emergency Department Elderly in Needs (EDEN) project's cohort was performed. This registry included all elderly patients who attended 52 Spanish EDs for any condition. Mild and severe polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5-9 drugs and ⩾10 drugs, respectively. The assessed outcomes were ED revisits, hospital readmissions, and mortality 30 days after discharge. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses, including the patient's comorbidities, were performed. Results: A total of 25,557 patients were evaluated [mean age: 78 (IQR: 71-84) years]; 10,534 (41.2%) and 5678 (22.2%) patients presented with mild and severe polypharmacy, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, mild polypharmacy and severe polypharmacy were associated with an increase in ED revisits [odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.23) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.24-1.51)] and hospital readmissions [OR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.60)], respectively, compared to non-polypharmacy. Mild and severe polypharmacy were not associated with increased 30-day mortality [OR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.89-2.26) and OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.12)], respectively. Conclusion: Polypharmacy was common among the elderly treated in EDs and associated with increased risks of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days but not with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients with polypharmacy had a higher risk of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days after discharge.

Short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in emergency departments: results from the EDEN project Management elderly patients with polypharmacy is becoming a major challenge to the emergency services. The progressive aging of the population is producing a progressive increase in the number of patients treated with multiple comorbidities and chronic medications. It's well known that polypharmacy is associated with an increase in hospital admissions and health care system costs. However, the impact of polypharmacy over the risk of new visits to the emergency rooms is not well defined. Understanding the impact of polypharmacy on the frequency of new visits to the emergency room and on patient mortality is the first step to establish prevention measures for new visits, proposing improvements in chronic treatment at discharge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and effect on short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in Emergency departments. The authors used a retrospective multipurpose registry in 52 hospitals in Spain. This study includes 25,557 patients with a mean age of 78 years. On admission, the median number of drugs was 6 (IQR: 3­9), with 10,534 (41.2%) patients taking 5­9 drugs and 5,678 (22.2%) taking ⩾10 drugs. In these patients comorbidities were associated with an increase in the number of drugs. In the patients with severe polypharmacy (⩾10 drugs), diuretics were the most frequently drugs prescribed, followed by antihypertensives and statins. The results obtained indicate that polypharmacy is a frequent phenomenon among the elderly population treated in Emergency departments, being antihypertensives the most frequently used drugs in this population. Those patients who takes ⩾10 drugs have a higher risk of new visits to the emergency room and hospital readmissions in short term period.

Healthcare risk stratification model for emergency departments based on drugs, income and comorbidities: the DICER-score.

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the progressive increase in age and associated chronic comorbidities and polypharmacy. However, assessments of the risk of emergency department (ED) revisiting published to date often neglect patients' pharmacotherapy plans, thus overseeing the Drug-related problems (DRP) risks associated with the therapy burden. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for ED revisit, hospital admission, and mortality based on patient's characteristics and pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients visited in the ED (triage 1, 2, or 3) of multiple hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) during 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of ED visits, hospital admission, or mortality 30 days after ED discharge. The study population was randomly split into a model development (60%) and validation (40%) datasets. The model included age, sex, income level, comorbidity burden, measured with the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), and number of medications. Forty-four medication groups, associated with medication-related health problems, were assessed using ATC codes. To assess the performance of the different variables, logistic regression was used to build multivariate models for ED revisits. The models were created using a "stepwise-forward" approach based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (AUCROC) curve for the primary endpoint was calculated. RESULTS: 851.649 patients were included; 134.560 (15.8%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge, 15.2% were hospitalized and 9.1% died within 30 days from discharge. Four factors (sex, age, GMA, and income level) and 30 ATC groups were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score. The model showed an AUCROC values of 0.720 (95%CI:0.718-0.721) in the development cohort and 0.719 (95%CI.0.717-0.721) in the validation cohort. Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk: 18.3%; intermediate risk: 40.0%; and high risk: 62.6%. CONCLUSION: The DICER score allows identifying patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days based on sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics, being a valuable tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

[Translated article] Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritisation level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritisation order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. RESULTS: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analysing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP Indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritised by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.

Programa de optimización de antibioterapia en infección urinaria por cepas multirresistentes en el servicio de urgencias / Antimicrobial stewardship program in urinary tract infections due to multi resistant strains in the emergency department

Introducción. Las infecciones urinarias (ITU) son un mo tivo frecuente de asistencia a los servicios de urgencias hospi talarias (SU), siendo cada vez más frecuente el aislamiento de cepas multirresistentes. El presente trabajo pretende evaluar el impacto de un programa multidisciplinar de optimización de antibioterapia en pacientes con ITU causada por bacterias mul tirresistentes atendidas desde el SU. Material y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de la puesta en marcha de un programa en el que participaron los servicios de urgencias, microbiología y farmacia. El tratamiento antibiótico de los pacientes que consultaron urgencias con urinocultivos positivos para bacterias multirresistentes fue revisado al alta por el equipo multidisciplinar. En aquellos pacientes con tra tamiento inapropiado se contactó con los médicos y/o farma céuticos del siguiente nivel asistencial o con los propios pa cientes en el caso de alta a domicilio. Se evaluó el impacto del programa sobre las nuevas consultas a urgencias a 30 días en comparación con los resultados obtenidos de la práctica habi tual en tres meses previos a la intervención. Resultados. Durante el año de implantación se revisaron 2.474 urinocultivos de pacientes con ITU, 537 (21,7%) causa das por bacterias multirresistentes. El tratamiento empírico al alta de urgencias fue inapropiado en 287 (53,4%) pacientes, realizando modificaciones del tratamiento en 232 de ellos. 73 pacientes (19,3%) reconsultaron el SU a los 30 días del alta, siendo este porcentaje inferior a los resultados obtenidos en los tres meses previos a la intervención (27,9%; p=0,031), sin encontrar diferencias significativas en el porcentaje de nuevas visitas asociadas a infecciones urinarias. Conclusión (AU)

Introduction. Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a fre quent reason for attendance at emergency department (ED). The present study evaluates the impact of a multidisciplinary program for the optimization of antibiotic therapy in patients with UTI caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria treated from the hospital ED. Material and methods. Descriptive study of the imple mentation of a program in which emergency, microbiology and pharmacy departments participated. Antibiotic treatment of the patients who consulted the ED with positive urine cul tures caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria was reviewed up on discharge. In those patients with inappropriate treatment, doctors and/or pharmacists of the next level of healthcare or patients in the case of home discharge were contacted. The impact of the program was evaluated based on new visits to the ED at 30 days after discharge, compared with the results obtained from the usual practice three months prior the in tervention. Results. During the first year, 2,474 urine cultures of pa tients with UTI were reviewed, 533 (21.7%) were caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Empirical treatment was inap propriate in 287 (53.4%), making treatment modifications in 243 of them. 73 (19.3%) patients returned to the ED 30 days after discharge, being lower than the results obtained in the three months prior intervention (27.9%; p=0.031), without significant differences in new visits associated with UTI. Conclusion. The implementation of a multidisciplinary program focused on multidrug resistant UTI at discharge form ED correct antibiotic therapy in a large number of patients, be ing a potentially tool to reduce the number of new ED visits (AU)

Atención farmacéutica en los servicios de urgencias: documento de posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) y la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) / Pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments: a consensus paper from the Spanish hospital pharmacy and emergency medicine associations

Objetivo: Desarrollar un conjunto de actividades e indicadores de atención farmacéutica en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarias mediante un consenso colectivo de un panel de expertos que permita priorizar las actividades a realizar por los farmacéuticos en estas unidades. Método: Un comité formado por miembros de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) y de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) evaluó una propuesta inicial de actividades e indicadores potenciales, basados en la evidencia científica disponible, en formato de cuestionario. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos del panel clasificó de forma individual la relevancia de cada una de las actividades propuestas en cuatro dimensiones: evidencia científica, impacto en la respuesta clínica y seguridad para el paciente, facilidad de implementación y grado de prioridad. La segunda ronda se realizó mediante una reunión grupal de forma virtual, a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas, así como los comentarios vertidos por los participantes del panel de forma anónima. En esta ronda, cada actividad fue clasificada por consenso como básica, intermedia o avanzada en función del grado de prioridad de implantación considerado por el grupo de expertos. Resultados: Se propusieron un total de 26 potenciales actividades a los expertos, con indicadores asociados. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, no se eliminó ninguna de las actividades propuestas. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron 25 actividades, de las cuales se puntuaron 9 como actividades básicas, 10 actividades como intermedias y 6 actividades como avanzadas. (AU)

Objective: To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting. Material and methods: A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced. Results: The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced. (AU)

Utilidad de los diagnósticos alertantes CIE-10 para identificar acontecimientos adversos por los medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias / Usefulness of ICD-10 diagnosis triggers to identify adverse drug events in emergency care

Objetivos: Evaluar la utilidad de una herramienta basada en los códigos diagnósticos CIE-10 para identificar a los pacientes que consultan a un servicio de urgencias por acontecimientos adversos por medicamentos (AAM). Métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo, en el cual se incluyeron los pacientes que acudieron a un servicio de urgencias durante el periodo de mayo-agosto de 2022 con un diagnóstico codificado con alguno de los 27 diagnósticos CIE-10 establecidos como alertantes para el estudio. La confirmación de la presencia de AAM a partir de dichos diagnósticos se realizó analizando los fármacos prescritos previamente al ingreso, a través de un debate entre expertos y mediante una entrevista telefónica con los pacientes. Resultados: Se evaluaron 1.143 pacientes con diagnósticos alertantes, de los cuales 310 (27,1%) correspondieron a pacientes cuya consulta se atribuyó a un AAM. El 58,4% de los AAM se detectaron mediante 3 códigos diagnósticos: K59.0-Estreñimiento (n = 87; 28,1%), I16.9-Crisis hipertensiva (n = 72; 23,2%) e I95.1-Hipotensión ortostática (n = 22; 7,1%). Los códigos diagnósticos con mayor grado de asociación con AAM fueron: E16.2-Hipoglucemia no especificada (73,7%) y E11.65-Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 con hiperglucemia (71,4%), mientras que los diagnósticos D62-Anemia poshemorrágica aguda e I74.3-Embolia y trombosis de arterias de los miembros inferiores no identificaron ningún AAM. Conclusiones: Los códigos CIE-10 asociados a diagnósticos alertantes son una herramienta de utilidad para identificar a los pacientes que consultan los servicios de urgencias por AAM y podrían ser utilizados para abordar las intervenciones de prevención secundaria dirigidas a evitar nuevas consultas al sistema sanitario. (AU)

Objectives: To assess the usefulness of a tool based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patients who consult an emergency department for adverse drug events (ADE). Methods: Prospective observational study, in which patients discharged from an emergency department during May to August 2022 with a diagnosis coded with one of the 27 ICD-10 diagnoses considered as triggers were included. ADE confirmation was carried out by analyzing drugs prescribed prior to admission, and through a discussion among experts and a phone interview with patients after hospital discharge. Results: 1,143 patients with trigger diagnoses were evaluated, of which 310 (27.1%) corresponded to patients whose emergency visit was attributed to an ADE. A 58.4% of ADE consultations were found with three diagnostic codes: K59.0-Constipation (n = 87; 28.1%), I16.9-Hypertensive Crisis (n = 72; 23.2%) and I95.1-Orthostatic hypotension (n = 22; 7.1%). The diagnoses with the highest degree of association with consultations attributed to ADE were E16.2-Hypoglycemia, unspecified (73.7%) and E11.65-Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (71.4%), while diagnoses D62-Acute posthemorrhagic anemia and I74.3-Embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower limbs were not attributed to any case of ADE. Conclusions: The ICD-10 codes associated with trigger diagnoses are a useful tool to identify patients who consult the emergency services with ADE and could be used to apply secondary prevention programs to avoid new consultations to the health care system. (AU)

Drug-Related Problems in Elderly Patients Attended to by Emergency Services.

The progressive aging and comorbidities of the population have led to an increase in the number of patients with polypharmacy attended to in the emergency department. Drug-related problems (DRPs) have become a major cause of admission to these units, as well as a high rate of short-term readmissions. Anticoagulants, antibiotics, antidiabetics, and opioids have been shown to be the most common drugs involved in this issue. Inappropriate polypharmacy has been pointed out as one of the major causes of these emergency visits. Different ways of conducting chronic medication reviews at discharge, primary care coordination, and phone contact with patients at discharge have been shown to reduce new hospitalizations and new emergency room visits due to DRPs, and they are key elements for improving the quality of care provided by emergency services.

Prevalencia de acontecimientos adversospor medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias. Proyecto multicéntrico FARM-URG / Prevalence of adverse drug events in emergency departments. FARM-URG multi-center project

Objetivo: Los acontecimientos adversos por medicamentos son una causaconocida de asistencia a los servicios de urgencias. El objetivo del proyectoFARM-URG, impulsado por el Grupo de Trabajo REDFASTER de la SociedadEspañola de Farmacia Hospitalaria, es evaluar estos acontecimientos adversos mediante cortes periódicos. En este estudio se muestran los resultadosdel primer registro. Sus objetivos fueron determinar la prevalencia de acontecimientos adversos respecto al total de pacientes atendidos y caracterizarlos.Método: Estudio multicéntrico transversal realizado en los servicios deurgencias de hospitales españoles. La identificación y registro de pacientesse obtuvo a partir del censo de pacientes atendidos en urgencias en elmomento del corte (16 de junio de 2020). Se revisaron las historias clínicasretrospectivamente y se registraron los datos en la plataforma REDCap®.Resultados: En este corte FARM-URG de 2020 participaron 13 hospitales, que evaluaron 772 pacientes, de los cuales 57 (7,4%) habían consultadopor un acontecimiento adverso por medicamentos. El grupo de fármacosantitrombóticos fue responsable de la mayor parte de estos episodios, siendoacenocumarol (22,8%) el principal fármaco implicado. (AU)

Objective: Adverse drug events are a well-known cause of emergency department admissions. FARM-URG is a project promoted by theREDFASTER working group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy.Its aim is to evaluate these adverse events through regular prevalencemeasurements. The present study shows the results of the first observations.The goal was to determine the prevalence of adverse drug events withrespect to the total number of patients treated in emergency departmentsand carry out a description of the different events identified.Method: This is a multicenter cross-sectional study carried out in theemergency room of 13 Spanish hospitals. The identification and registration of patients were obtained from the emergency department patientcensus at the time of the first prevalence measurement (16 June 2020). TheREDCap® platform was used for patient registration.Results: The 2020 FARM-URG registry, which included 13 hospitals,evaluated 772 patients, of whom 57 (7.4%) consulted for adverse drugevents. Antithrombotic drugs were responsible for most of these episodes, acenocoumarol being the main drug involved (22.8%). (AU)

Carga anticolinérgica en pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en un servicio de ugencias / Anticholinergic burden in patients treated for constipation in an emergency department

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la frecuencia e impacto de la carga anticolinérgica del tratamiento en la reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en un servicio de urgencias (SU). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyeron por oportunidad pacientes que fueron dados de alta con diagnóstico de estreñimiento desde un SU entre septiembre 2018 y junio 2019. Se recogieron los fármacos y su carga anticolinérgica. La variable de resultado fue la reconsulta por cualquier causa a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes, 47 (56,6%) se clasificaron como tratamiento con alta carga colinérgica, 30 (36,1%) intermedia y 6 (7,2%) baja. Veintinueve (27,9%) pacientes sufrieron una reconsulta a urgencias en los primeros 30 días tras el alta. Los pacientes con fármacos con una carga anticolinérgica alta tuvieron una mayor frecuencia de reconsultas a 30 días [19/47 (40,4%) vs 8/57 (14,1%); p = 0,002]. Tras el análisis multivarible, en comparación con aquellos con tratamiento con baja carga anticolinérgica, el tener una alta carga (ORa = 4,21; IC 95% 1,07-16,5; p = 0,039), pero no intermedia (ORa = 1,27; IC 95% 0,25-6,41; p = 0,776), se asoció de forma independiente con una mayor reconsulta a los 30 días. La prescripción de laxantes crónicos al alta no redujo la reconsulta a 30 días en el grupo con alta carga anticolinérgica (OR = 0,86; IC 95% 0,48-3,27; p = 0,526), pero sí en aquellos con carga intermedia (OR = 0,13; IC 95% 0,02-0,99; p = 0,049). CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción de fármacos con alta carga anticolinérgica fue un factor asociado con reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en urgencias

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anticholinergic burden on discharge of patients treated for constipation in an emergency department (ED) and to assess the effect on emergency revisiting within 30 days. METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected cases with a discharge diagnosis of constipation after ED treatment between September 2018 and June 2019 and recorded information on all drugs taken and the anticholinergic burden of treatment. A revisit to the ED within 30 days was the primary outcome. RESULTS: We included 104 patients. A high anticholinergic burden of treatment was identified in 47 (56.6%), an intermediate burden in 30 (36.1%), and a low burden in 6 (7.2%). Twenty-nine (27.9%) patients revisited the ED within 30 days of discharge. An intermediate anticholinergic burden (23 patients [31.1%] vs 4 [13.3%]; P = .061) and high burden (19 [40.4%] vs 8 [14.1%]; P = .002] was associated with revisiting within 30 days in the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, a high anticholinergic burden was independently associated with a higher rate of revisiting than a low burden: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.21; 95% CI, 1.07-16.5; P = .039. An intermediate load was not associated with more revisits, however: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.25-6.41; P = .776. Prescription of long-term treatment with laxatives on discharge did not reduce revisiting withing 30-days in the group with a high anticholinergic load (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-3.27; P = .526), but it did have an effect in patients an intermediate burden (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.99; P = .049). CONCLUSION: The prescription of drugs leading to a high anticholinergic burden was a factor associated with ED revisits within 30 days in patients treated for constipation

Situación actual del farmacéutico de hospital en las unidades de cuidados intensivos a nivel nacional / Nationwide current situation of hospital pharmacists in intensive care units

Objetivo: Describir la situación actual del farmacéutico de hospital en las unidades de cuidados intensivos, su actividad asistencial, docente e investigadora. Método: Estudio multicéntrico, prospectivo mediante encuesta difundida por la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, la cual constaba de varios apartados: datos personales y del hospital, características del hospital, implicación del farmacéutico en la unidad de cuidados intensivos y docencia. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 58 encuestas completadas. El número de farmacéuticos implicados en unidades de cuidados intensivos era 1 en el 77,6% de los casos, atendiendo una media de 30,8 camas (5-70). La experiencia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos del farmacéutico fue de 5 años de mediana (2 meses-25 años). La asistencia al pase de visita o cambios de guardia fue entre "nunca" en un 36,2% a "diariamente" en un 22,4%. El 93,1% de los encuestados reportaron dedicación a tiempo parcial en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Respecto a actividades desarrolladas, entre el 40-60% gestiona estupefacientes, docencia en unidad de cuidados intensivos, conciliación y seguridad; entre el 60-80% abarca nutrición clínica, protocolización, optimización de antibióticos y farmacocinética, y un 84,5% realizan seguimiento farmacoterapéutico. Un 77,6% cuenta con formación sanitaria especializada, rotando los residentes en la unidad de cuidados intensivos en un 86% de los casos. Conclusiones: La mayor parte de los hospitales encuestados cuenta con un solo farmacéutico a tiempo parcial en estas unidades. Con objeto de mejorar la calidad de la atención farmacéutica del paciente crítico sería necesario ampliar la dedicación en tiempo y personal respecto a la situación actual y que más centros incluyan al farmacéutico en las unidades de cuidados intensivos hospitalarias

Objective: To describe the current situation of the hospital pharmacist in intensive care units and their activity in care, in teaching and in research. Method: Multicenter and prospective study through a survey disseminated by the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy, which consisted of several sections: personal and hospital's data, hospital's characteristics, pharmacist's involvement in intensive care units and teaching. Results: A number of 58 completed surveys were obtained. The number of pharmacists involved in intensive care units was 1 in 77.6% of cases, assisting an average of 30.8 beds (5-70). Experience of pharmacists in the intensive care unit was 5 years on average (2 months-25 years). Visitor's pass assistance and shift changes were between "never" by 36.2% to "daily" by 22.4%. Out of respondents, 93.1% reported a part-time intensive care unit involvement. Regarding activities undertaken, between 40-60% of pharmacists manage narcotics, teaching at intensive care unit, conciliation and safety. Between 60-80%, pharmacists cover clinical nutrition, notarization, optimization of pharmacokinetics and antibiotics; and 84.5% perform pharmacotherapy follow-up. Out of the surveyed pharmacists, 77.6% have specialized medical training, rotating intensive care unit residents in 86% of cases. Conclusions: Most of the surveyed hospitals have one part-time pharmacist in these units. In order to improve the quality of pharmaceutical care of critically ill patients, it would be necessary to extend the involvement in time and staff, regarding the current situation, and a greater number of hospitals should include pharmacists in hospital intensive care units

Fosfomycin in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens / Fosfomicina en las infecciones producidas por gramnegativos multirresistentes

The alarming increase in antibiotic resistance rates reported for various pathogens has resulted in the use of alternative treatment policies. Given the fairly limited availability of new antimicrobial drugs, the reassessment of older antibiotics is now an interesting option. Fosfomycin, a bactericidal analog of phosphoenolpyruvate that has been previously been employed as an oral treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection, has recently raised interest among physicians worldwide. In general, the advanced resistance described in Gram-negative bacteria suggests that fosfomycin can be an appropriate treatment option for patients with highly resistant microbial infections. This review, which refers to key available data, focuses on the possibility of extending the use of fosfomycin beyond urinary tract infections and against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

El alarmante aumento en las tasas de resistencia a los antibióticos comunicado entre varios patógenos ha generado el empleo de políticas de tratamiento alternativas. Dado que la disponibilidad de nuevos fármacos antimicrobianos es bastante limitada, la reevaluación de los antibióticos más antiguos constituye ahora una opción interesante. La fosfomicina, un análogo bactericida del fosfoenolpiruvato, utilizado anteriormente como tratamiento oral para las infecciones del tracto urinario no complicadas, ha interesado recientemente a los médicos de todo el mundo. En general, la resistencia avanzada descrita en las bacterias gramnegativas sugiere que la fosfomicina puede servir como una opción de tratamiento adecuada en pacientes con infecciones microbianas altamente resistentes. En esta revisión, y en referencia a los datos clave disponibles, se centra la atención en la posible extensión del uso de fosfomicina más allá de las infecciones del tracto urinario y contra bacterias gram-negativas multirresistentes

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on critical haematological patients / Impacto de un programa de optimización de antimicrobianos sobre el paciente crítico hematológico

Objective: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have appeared as very useful tools in order to improve the use of antimicrobial agents. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of an ASP on haematological patients hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study, which included haematological patients admitted to an ICU and assessed by the ASP program during 3 years. The impact of the program on patient evolution was assessed by comparison between the previous period and the intervention period in terms of mortality, mean stay, number of re-hospitalizations, and duration of mechanical ventilation for intubated patients. Results: The ASP team assessed 324 antimicrobial agents in 169 patients; they recommended 121 modifications, including 55 treatment discontinuations. Compared with the pre-intervention period, there were no significant differences in the variables assessed. No variation was observed in colonization by multi-resistant bacteria. Conclusions: The implementation of an APS on critical haematological patients will lead to a relevant number of treatment modifications, without any impact on the clinical evolution of patients (AU)

Objetivo: Los programas de optimización de antimicrobianos (PROA) han surgido como herramientas de gran utilidad para mejorar el uso de estos. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar el impacto de un PROA sobre pacientes hematológicos ingresados en una unidad de pacientes críticos. Métodos: Estudio cuasi-experimental pre-post intervención. Se incluyeron pacientes hematológicos ingresados en una unidad de críticos evaluados por el equipo PROA durante 3 años. El impacto del programa sobre la evolución de los pacientes se evaluó mediante la comparación entre el periodo previo y de intervención de la mortalidad, estancia media, número de reingresos y duración de ventilación mecánica en los pacientes intubados. Resultados: 324 antimicrobianos de 169 pacientes fueron evaluaron por el equipo PROA, recomendando un total de 121 modificaciones, incluyendo 55 suspensiones de tratamiento. Comparados con el periodo pre-intervención, no se observaron diferencias significativas en las variables consideradas. No se observó variación en la colonización por bacterias multirresistentes. Conclusiones: La implantación de un PROA sobre el paciente crítico hematológico conduce a un número relevante de modificaciones en el tratamiento, sin afectar la evolución clínica de los pacientes (AU)

Calidad y legibilidad de la hoja de información al paciente en estudios con análisis farmacogenético / Quality and legibility of written informed consent form in pahrmacogenetic research

Fundamento y objetivo: Los estudios de farmacogenética se han convertido en una práctica habitual en el desarrollo de nuevos medicamentos, surgiendo la necesidad de evaluar las Hojas de Información al Paciente (HIP). Los objetivos de este estudio son evaluar el grado de adecuación a las recomendaciones establecidas por la legislación y grupos de expertos de la información contenida en las HIP de estudios que incluyan análisis del material genético y analizar su legibilidad. Material y métodos: Se analizó el contenido de las HIP que recibieron los participantes en los estudios farmacogenéticos presentados al Comité Ético entre abril de 2011 y abril de 2013 en un hospital de tercer nivel. Para evaluar la calidad de la HIP se elaboró un cuestionario con 42 preguntas con los elementos que debe contener la información que reciben los sujetos. La facilidad de lectura fue evaluada aplicando distintos índices de legibilidad. Resultados: El 31,5% de las 92 HIP presentaron más del 75% de los apartados considerados en el cuestionario. Las secciones con menor grado de cumplimiento fueron las relativas a los riesgos y beneficios (41,7%) y a las compensaciones derivadas del estudio (56,1%). Ninguna de las HIP cumplió con menos del 50% del global del cuestionario. El 90% de las HIP mostraron un grado adecuado de legibilidad. Conclusiones: Se han encontrado deficiencias en algunos puntos de la información contenida en las HIP evaluadas. El grado de legibilidad es elevado, siendo necesario futuros estudios para establecer el grado de entendimiento real de los pacientes

Background and objective: Pharmacogenetic studies have become in recent years a common practice in the development of new drugs, with the need to evaluate the information and readability of Informed Consent Forms (ICFs) to ensure compliance with the recommendations set by current legislation and expert groups. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational study that analyzes the content of ICFs received by participants of pharmacogenetic studies approved in a tertiary hospital. To evaluate the quality of the ICFs, a questionnaire of 42 questions was prepared (Table 1) with the elements that must contain the information given to subjects, while readability was assessed using different readability indices. Results: The 31.5% of the 92 ICFs analyzed showed more than 75% of sections considered in the questionnaire. Sections with lower compliance were relative to risks and benefits (41.7%) and compensation for study participation (56.1%). None of the ICFs fulfilled with less than 50% of overall sections. Regarding legibility, about 90%, have a suitable degree for the most of population based on indexes used. Conclusions: Deficiencies were found in some parts of the information contained in ICFs, while the degree of legibility was high, being necessary for future studies to establish the degree of real understanding of patients

Experiencia en el manejo de inmunosupresores con los fármacos inhibidores de proteasa frente al virus de la hepatitis C / Experience in the management of immunosuppressant treatment with hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los fármacos antivirales frente al virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) presentan un número importante de interacciones. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la interacción de telaprevir, boceprevir y sofosbuvir con los fármacos inmunosupresores en pacientes trasplantados. Métodos :Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes trasplantados hepáticos con infección por VHC que iniciaron tratamiento con telaprevir, boceprevir o sofosbuvir. Se recogieron las dosis, pautas posológicas y niveles plasmáticos de tacrolimus, ciclosporina y sirolimus previas y posteriores al inicio del tratamiento antiviral. Se calculó la variación media de dosis e intervalo de dosificación, así como la modificación de los niveles de inmunosupresor tras iniciar el tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 35 pacientes. En pacientes tratados con telaprevir (n = 18), la dosis de ciclosporina se redujo una media de 59,1% (SD = 14,6%), obteniéndose una reducción media de 14,6% (18,8%) en los niveles plasmáticos. En cuanto a tacrolimus, la dosis se redujo en un 34,3% (31,7%) aumentando el intervalo de dosificación una media de 73,4 (38,2) horas. Con ello, los niveles se incrementaron un 59,7% (89,6%). En los pacientes tratados con boceprevir (n = 4), tacrolimus se inició con una reducción del 18,1% (9,8%) de la dosis inicial y un aumento medio en el intervalo de dosificación de 12,0 (16,9) horas, observándose una reducción media del 37,7% (21,8%) en los niveles plasmáticos. El tratamiento con sofosbuvir (n = 13) no mostró variaciones importantes en los niveles de inmunosupresores. CONCLUSIONES: La interacción de telaprevir y boceprevir con los fármacos inmunosupresores requiere un ajuste de la dosis previa de los mismos al inicio del tratamiento, así como una monitorización rigurosa de sus niveles plasmáticos

INTRODUCTION: Antiviral drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections have a large number of interactions. The aim of this study was to describe the interactions of telaprevir, boceprevir and sofosbuvir with immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in liver transplant patients with HCV infection who started treatment with telaprevir, boceprevir or sofosbuvir. Dose, regimens and plasma levels of tacrolimus, cyclosporine and sirolimus before and after antiviral treatment initiation were collected. Average variations in dose, dosing interval and immunosuppressive plasma levels after the start of treatment were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included. In patients treated with telaprevir (n = 18), the cyclosporine dose was reduced by an average of 59.1% (SD = 14.6%), yielding an average reduction of 14.6% (18.8%) in plasma levels. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 34.3% (31.7%), increasing the dosing interval by a mean of 73.4 (38.2) hours. After this variation, tacrolimus levels were increased by an average of 59.7% (89.6%). In patients treated with boceprevir (n = 4), tacrolimus started with a reduction of 18.1% (9.8%) of the initial dose and an average increase in the dosing interval of 12.0 (16.9) hours, showing a mean reduction in plasma levels of 37.7% (21.8%). Sofosbuvir therapy (n = 13) showed no significant variations in immunosuppressive drug levels. CONCLUSIONS: The interaction of telaprevir and boceprevir with immunosuppressive drugs requires a substantial dose reduction at the beginning of treatment and close monitoring of plasma levels