Ovarian mature teratoma: a ten year experience in our institution.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To describe the surgical management and diagnoses of mature ovarian teratomas and ovarian strumas in the present centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive retrospective analysis of cases of mature ovarian teratoma at the present university-associated hospital over ten years. RESULTS: The mean age was 29 years and in 17 patients the diagnosis was made during other surgery. When surgery was planned, the approach was 80.2% laparoscopic and 16.1% laparotomic. In the laparoscopy group more cases had been diagnosed previously as dermoid cyst by ultrasound and fewer days of hospital admission. In the laparotomy group the authors found higher ultrasound size and the size in the gross pathology description. With regards to treatment, 45.3% of cases underwent ovariectomy and 49.3% a cystectomy. Comparing these two groups, the authors found larger pelvic mass size in the group of ovariectomies. Healthy ovarian tissue in the removed specimen was found more frequently in the ovariectomies group (29.1%) but also in some cystectomies (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of the ovarian mature teratoma in the present center was directed on the basis of ultrasound diagnosis, ultrasound tumor size, and the existence of associated gynecologic pathology. The authors strongly recommend a laparoscopic approach and a cystectomy in order to preserve fertility especially in young women.

Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the agreement between an expert and a non-expert examiner using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules for classifying adnexal masses on real-time ultrasound and when using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes and digital clips. METHODS: Forty-two non-consecutive women diagnosed as having an adnexal mass were evaluated by transvaginal power Doppler ultrasound as part of their diagnostic work-up. In each woman, examination was first performed by a non-expert examiner (a trainee) and immediately afterwards by an expert examiner. Both used the IOTA simple rules to describe the mass, blinded to each other's results. After finishing the examination, each examiner classified the mass as benign, malignant or inconclusive, according to the IOTA simple rules. Additionally, the expert recorded a short videoclip and acquired a static 3D volume of each mass, which were subsequently assessed by four trainees in obstetrics and gynecology with different levels of training, who also classified the mass as benign, malignant or inconclusive according to the IOTA simple rules. Agreement was assessed by calculating weighted and standard kappa index values with 95% CI and the percentage of agreement between observers. RESULTS: Agreement between the observers who performed real-time ultrasound examination was good (weighted kappa = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90; agreement = 78.6%). Agreement between trainees using videoclips plus 3D volumes was moderate (kappa values ranged from 0.45 to 0.58, depending on pair comparison). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement of the IOTA simple rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign, malignant or inconclusive using real-time ultrasound, between an expert and a non-expert examiner, might be considered good. Agreement using a videoclip plus a 3D volume was moderate for trainees with different degrees of training.