Acute venous thromboembolism in patients with recent major bleeding. The influence of the site of bleeding and the time elapsed on outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with major bleeding who subsequently develop clinically apparent venous thromboembolism (VTE) present a particularly difficult therapeutic dilemma. METHODS: RIETE is a prospective registry of consecutive patients with symptomatic, objectively confirmed, acute VTE. We retrospectively studied those who had experienced recent major bleeding (<30 days prior to VTE) to assess the influence of the site of bleeding and the time elapsed to VTE on their 3 month outcome. RESULTS: Of 12,294 patients enrolled up to July 2005, 306 (2.5%) had recent major bleeding: gastrointestinal (GI) tract, 116 (38%); intracranial, 94 (31%); other, 96 (31%). During the study period, 19 patients [6.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5-8.9] with recent bleeding rebled (eight died): 13 of them (68%) during the first 2 weeks. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with recent GI bleeding had an increased risk for both major rebleeding (hazard ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.4-5.3) and death (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.1) compared to those with no recent bleeding. Those who bled in other sites had an increased risk only for death (hazard ratio 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3). An elapsed time of <2 weeks from bleeding to the index VTE event was also associated with an increased risk for major rebleeding (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-5.0) and death (hazard ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.8-4.5). CONCLUSION: The incidence of new bleeding or death depends on the site of prior bleeding and the time elapsed until VTE. This information may help to identify the best therapeutic approach for these high-risk patients.

Prospective application of risk scores in the interhospital transport of patients.

We carried out a prospective evaluation of 172 patients using our own risk score for patients transferred from the emergency department of a community hospital in Tudela, Spain, to main centres, during 1988. Although the data go back almost 10 years, this scoring has not been internationally published and is at present widely applied in Spain. Patients scoring less than 7 points were transferred under specialized nursing supervision (Group I), and those scoring equal to or over 7 points were transferred in a specially equipped intensive care unit surface ambulance and supervised by a physician and a nurse (Group II). There were 102 patients in Group I and 70 in Group II. Complications arising during transfer were defined as minor or serious. A low overall incidence of complications was recorded--a total of 29 cases (16.9% of all transfers). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in Group II patients (p < 0.005). One patient from Group II died during transport. All patients from Group II were admitted to the ICUs compared with only 20 (18.6%) from Group I (p < 0.001). Of a total of 23 deaths in hospital, nine were from Group I and 14 from Group II. During the first 24 hours after admission, six patients died from Group II and none from Group I. The application of risk scores has permitted to assign effectively technical and human resources for a safe interhospital transfer of critically ill patients.