Patient Blood Management in Microsurgical Procedures for Reconstructive Surgery.

Introduction: The main purpose of reconstructive surgery (RS) is to restore the integrity of soft tissues damaged by trauma, surgery, congenital deformity, burns, or infection. Microsurgical techniques consist of harvesting tissues that are separated from the vascular sources of the donor site and anastomosed to the vessels of the recipient site. In these procedures, there are some preoperative modifiable factors that have the potential to influence the outcome of the flap transfer and its anastomosis. The management of anemia, which is always present in the postoperative period and plays a decisive role in the implantation of the flap, covers significant importance, and is associated with clinical and laboratory settings of chronic inflammation. Methods: Chronic inflammatory anemia (ACD) is a constant condition in patients who have undergone RS and correlates with the perfusion of the free flap. The aim of this treatment protocol is to reduce the transfusion rate by maintaining both a good organ perfusion and correction of the patient's anemic state. From January 2017 to September 2019, we studied 16 patients (16 males, mean age 38 years) who underwent microsurgical procedures for RS. Their hemoglobin (Hb) levels, corpuscular indexes, transferrin saturation (TSAT) ferritin concentrations and creatinine clearance were measured the first day after surgery (T0), after the first week (T1), and after five weeks (T2). At T0, all the patients showed low hemoglobin levels (average 7.4 g/dL, STD 0.71 range 6.2-7.4 g dL-1), with an MCV of 72, MCH of 28, MCHC of 33, RDW of 16, serum iron of 35, ferritin of 28, Ret% of 1.36, TRF of 277, creatinine clearance of 119 and high ferritin levels (range 320-560 ng mL-1) with TSAT less than 20%. All the patients were assessed for their clinical status, medical history and comorbidities before the beginning of the therapy. Results: A collaboration between the two departments (Department of Transfusion Medicine and Department of Reconstructive Surgery) resulted in the application of a therapeutic protocol with erythropoietic stimulating agents (ESAs) (Binocrit 6000 UI/week) and intravenous iron every other day, starting the second day after surgery. Thirteen patients received ESAs and FCM (ferric carboxymaltose, 500-1000 mg per session), three patients received ESAs and iron gluconate (one vial every other day). No patients received blood transfusions. No side effects were observed, and most importantly, no limb or flap rejection occurred. Conclusions: Preliminary data from our protocol show an optimal therapeutic response, notwithstanding the very limited scientific literature and data available in this specific surgical field. The enrollment of further patients will allow us to validate this therapeutic protocol with statistically sound data.

Dorso-ulnar reverse flow pedicled osseous flap for reconstruction of the distal phalanx of the thumb: A case report.

Reconstruction of osseous defects of the distal phalanx of the thumb is usually addressed with free bone grafts or free vascularized bone flaps. Some reports demonstrated the possibility to harvest an osteo-cutaneous flap in the dorso-ulnar side of the first metacarpal bone with success. In the same manner, no reports are present in the literature in which bone deficits were reconstructed with this flap elevated as an exclusively osseous flap. We report our successful experience with one case of distal phalanx reconstruction of the thumb by mean of the dorso-ulnar reverse flow pedicled osseous flap. The patient was a 45-year-old woman with symptoms related to a cystic bone tumor that involved the entirety of the distal phalanx of the thumb. Flap dimensions were calculated based on x-ray gap measures, which resulted in need of 1.5 × 0.8 × 0.5 cm flap dimensions. An osseous flap was harvested and transposed from the ulnar side of the first metacarpal bone. K-wire fixation was utilized for bone flap stabilization. No complications occurred and excellent functional result was evaluated at 6 months follow-up. In our opinion, the flap may be considered as an alternative to free bone grafts in situations in which perilesional tissues may jeopardize the process of free graft taking and in cases in which free vascularized bone flaps are not feasible for patient or surgeon decision.

Immediate vs. delayed toe-to-thumb transfer: Is the infection rate greater?

BACKGROUND: After loss of a thumb, the big toe is a possible donor site for reconstruction with wrap-around free flap and trimmed-toe transfer techniques. Early reconstructions seem to reduce the risk of post-operative infections, despite several studies that show different infection rates of the recipient site in immediate toe-to-hand transfer. The authors carried out a retrospective analysis of their experience in thumb reconstruction with big toe transfer and evaluated the results achieved with both immediate and delayed reconstructions in terms of infection occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2017, patients who presented cut, crush and avulsion injuries in the thumb were selected and 33 toe-to-thumb transfers were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: in group A, patients underwent immediate reconstruction, while in group B delayed reconstructions were performed. The two groups received identical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Reliability of the immediate or delayed reconstruction was compared in terms of flap survival, requirement for a secondary intention healing and, in particular, rate of infection. RESULTS: 29 male and 4 female patients were treated. Toe-to-thumb transfers were performed in both groups: in group A, 8 wrap-around free flaps and 4 trimmed toe transfers; in group B, 11 wrap-around and 10 trimmed toe transfers. No flap loss occurred in either groups. No cases of infection were detected in the transferred toes. CONCLUSION: For toe-to-thumb transfer, there are published reports of a wide range of infection rates of the recipient sites. The authors compared their results in terms of infection rate between immediate reconstruction, group A, and delayed reconstruction, group B. Immediate toe-to-thumb transfer showed equal success rates to delayed transfer. No statistically significant difference in risk of infection between the two groups was found. Results showed that the immediate reconstruction was as safe and reliable as the delayed one.

Improvement of Superomedial Breast Reduction and Mastopexy with a New "Hammock" Flap.

Oncoplastic breast reduction shares similar aims and principles with esthetic surgery. Superomedial breast reduction provides harmony, symmetry, and satisfactory lower pole projection, but long-term outcomes are not consistently good. We describe our experience with a new hammock-shaped flap, which was combined with superomedial pedicle breast reduction to improve long-term outcomes by enhancing pedicle support and preventing ptosis recurrence. METHODS: From January 2017 to June 2018, 10 patients underwent unilateral breast reduction (n = 7) or bilateral esthetic reduction (n = 3) by a novel approach combining a superomedial pedicle and a perforator-based inferior advancement flap. The flap is based on the inframammary fold (IMF) and fixed to the pectoralis major fascia and the pedicle like a hammock. Preoperative and postoperative (1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months) measurements included sternal notch-to-superior areola border length, nipple-to-IMF length, and lower pole convexity. Patients rated their satisfaction with breast shape, size, nipple-areola complex position, and lower pole projection at 12 months using a condensed form of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Esthetic outcomes at 12 and 18 months were good in all patients. There were no complications. Postoperative measurements were stable throughout follow-up. The BREAST-Q scores indicated that most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their breast(s). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary series demonstrates that the hammock flap, which is performed with autologous tissue, allows changing IMF position, it is safe, effective, and provides improved pedicle fixation and positioning. This technical refinement seems to afford good long-term outcomes in patients undergoing superomedial pedicle breast reduction and mastopexy.