Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Bras Nefrol ; 40(2): 151-161, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29927458

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The risk of death after kidney transplant is associated with the age of the recipient, presence of comorbidities, socioeconomic status, local environmental characteristics and access to health care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the causes and risk factors associated with death during the first 5 years after kidney transplantation. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control study. RESULTS: Using a consecutive cohort of 1,873 kidney transplant recipients from January 1st 2007 to December 31st 2009, there were 162 deaths (case group), corresponding to 5-year patient survival of 91.4%. Of these deaths, 25% occurred during the first 3 months after transplant. The most prevalent cause of death was infectious (53%) followed by cardiovascular (24%). Risk factors associated with death were history of diabetes, dialysis type and time, unemployment, delayed graft function, number of visits to center, number of hospitalizations, and duration of hospital stay. After multivariate analysis, only time on dialysis, number of visits to center, and days in hospital were still associated with death. Patients who died had a non-significant higher number of treated acute rejection episodes (38% vs. 29%, p = 0.078), higher mean number of adverse events per patient (5.1 ± 3.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.194), and lower mean eGFR at 3 months (50.8 ± 25.1 vs. 56.7 ± 20.7, p = 0.137) and 48 months (45.9 ± 23.8 vs. 58.5 ± 20.2, p = 0.368). CONCLUSION: This analysis confirmed that in this population, infection is the leading cause of mortality over the first 5 years after kidney transplantation. Several demographic and socioeconomic risk factors were associated with death, most of which are not readily modifiable.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
2.
J. bras. nefrol ; 40(2): 151-161, Apr.-June 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-954536

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Introduction: The risk of death after kidney transplant is associated with the age of the recipient, presence of comorbidities, socioeconomic status, local environmental characteristics and access to health care. Objective: To investigate the causes and risk factors associated with death during the first 5 years after kidney transplantation. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control study. Results: Using a consecutive cohort of 1,873 kidney transplant recipients from January 1st 2007 to December 31st 2009, there were 162 deaths (case group), corresponding to 5-year patient survival of 91.4%. Of these deaths, 25% occurred during the first 3 months after transplant. The most prevalent cause of death was infectious (53%) followed by cardiovascular (24%). Risk factors associated with death were history of diabetes, dialysis type and time, unemployment, delayed graft function, number of visits to center, number of hospitalizations, and duration of hospital stay. After multivariate analysis, only time on dialysis, number of visits to center, and days in hospital were still associated with death. Patients who died had a non-significant higher number of treated acute rejection episodes (38% vs. 29%, p = 0.078), higher mean number of adverse events per patient (5.1 ± 3.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.194), and lower mean eGFR at 3 months (50.8 ± 25.1 vs. 56.7 ± 20.7, p = 0.137) and 48 months (45.9 ± 23.8 vs. 58.5 ± 20.2, p = 0.368). Conclusion: This analysis confirmed that in this population, infection is the leading cause of mortality over the first 5 years after kidney transplantation. Several demographic and socioeconomic risk factors were associated with death, most of which are not readily modifiable.


RESUMO Introdução: O risco de óbito após transplante renal está associado à idade do receptor, presença de comorbidades, condição socioeconômica, às características ambientais locais e ao acesso a serviços de atenção à saúde. Objetivo: Investigar as causas e fatores de risco associados ao óbito nos primeiros cinco anos após o transplante renal. Métodos: Este é um estudo unicêntrico retrospectivo com pareamento dos grupos caso e controle. Resultados: Em uma coorte consecutiva de 1.873 receptores de transplante renal atendidos de 1/1/2007 a 31/12/2009 foram registrados 162 óbitos (grupo caso), correspondendo a uma taxa de sobrevida após cinco anos de 91,4%. Dos óbitos registrados, 25% ocorreram nos primeiros três meses após o transplante. A causa de óbito mais prevalente foi infecção (53%), seguida de doença cardiovascular (24%). Os fatores de risco associados a mortalidade foram histórico de diabetes, tipo e tempo em diálise, desemprego, função tardia do enxerto, número de consultas, número de hospitalizações e tempo de internação hospitalar. Após análise multivariada, apenas o tempo em diálise, o número de consultas e dias de internação permaneceram associados a mortalidade. Os pacientes que foram a óbito tiveram um número não significativamente maior de tratamentos de episódios de rejeição aguda (38% vs. 29%; p = 0,078), maior número médio de eventos adversos por paciente (5,1 ± 3,8 vs. 3,8 ± 2,9; p = 0,194) e TFGe média mais baixa aos três meses (50,8 ± 25,1 vs. 56,7 ± 20,7; p = 0,137) e 48 meses (45,9 ± 23,8 vs. 58,5 ± 20,2; p = 0,368). Conclusão: A presente análise confirmou que nessa população, a infecção foi a principal causa de mortalidade nos primeiros cinco anos após transplante renal. Vários fatores de risco demográficos e socioeconômicos foram associados a mortalidade, a maioria não prontamente modificável.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Ambiente
3.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 14: 108-115, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29254534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Modern immunosuppressive regimens, although associated with improved 1-year graft survival, are associated with adverse effects, including opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus after transplantation, cardiovascular complications, and de novo malignancies. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term (12 months) cost-effectiveness of everolimus (EVR) versus mycophenolate sodium (MPS) in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction therapy, tacrolimus, prednisone, and no prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection. METHODS: A Markov state transition model was designed. Data from a single-center prospective trial were used along with data from the center's medical bills database. The target population comprised adults with low immunological risk submitted to first ABO-compatible transplantation with kidneys recovered from living or deceased donors. The time horizon was 12 months. The interventions included tacrolimus and prednisone plus a single 3-mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and EVR or basiliximab (BAS) and EVR or BAS and MPS. The clinical outcomes considered for this analysis were cytomegalovirus infection/disease, acute rejection, graft dysfunction, surgical complications, graft loss, and life-years gained. RESULTS: ATG/EVR was cost-saving compared with BAS/MPS on all evaluated outcomes; BAS/EVR outperformed BAS/MPS on most of the evaluated outcomes. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MPS, EVR is an alternative immunosuppressive agent that is able to provide resource-saving to the health care provider with effectiveness gains for the patient.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Economía Farmacéutica , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Animales , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Conejos
4.
Am J Nephrol ; 45(6): 497-508, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28511172

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This analysis compared efficacy, renal function, and histology in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC) combined with everolimus (EVR) or mycophenolate (MPS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis from a randomized trial in kidney transplant recipients who received a single 3 mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), TAC, EVR, and prednisone (PRED; r-ATG/EVR, n = 85), basiliximab (BAS), TAC, EVR, and PRED (BAS/EVR, n = 102) or BAS, TAC, MPS, and PRED (BAS/MPS, n = 101). We evaluated the incidence of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigens antibodies (DSA) and histology on protocol biopsies at 12 months, and the incidence of acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria at 36 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, there were no differences in de novo DSA (6.4 vs. 3.4 vs. 5.5%) or in subclinical inflammation (2.0 vs. 4.8 vs. 10.2%), interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (57.1 vs. 58.5 vs. 53.8%) and C4d deposition (2.0 vs. 7.3 vs. 2.6%). At 36 months, there were no differences in the incidence of treatment failure (19.0 vs. 27.7 vs. 27.7%, p = 0.186), first biopsy-proven acute rejection (9.5 vs. 21.8 vs. 16.8%, p = 0.073), and urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.53 ± 1.05 vs. 0.62 ± 0.75 vs. 0.71 ± 1.24). eGFR was lower in the BAS/EVR compared to that in the BAS/MPS group (53.4 ± 20.9 vs. 50.8 ± 19.5 vs. 60.7 ± 21.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.017) but comparable using a sensitive analysis (49.5 ± 23 vs. 47.5 ± 22.6 vs. 53.6 ± 27.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.207). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the use of EVR and reduced TAC concentrations were associated with comparable efficacy, renal function, and histological parameters compared to the standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimen.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Aloinjertos/inmunología , Aloinjertos/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Basiliximab , Biopsia , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Humanos , Riñón/inmunología , Riñón/patología , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Donantes de Tejidos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
Ther Drug Monit ; 38(4): 447-55, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27414973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the influence of pharmaceutical care (PhC) in the intra-individual variability of dose-corrected whole blood tacrolimus (TAC) trough concentrations, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We randomized 128 kidney transplant recipients to receive PhC consisted of predefined instructions provided by a pharmacist (PhC group, n = 64) or standard nurse staff instructions (control group, n = 64) from day 3 to day 90 after kidney transplantation. The study was powered to detect at least 50% reduction in the coefficient of variation (%CV), calculated from 6 dose-corrected whole blood TAC trough concentrations, in the PhC group. Patient adherence was evaluated using Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS) questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no difference in the %CV comparing PhC and control group (31.4% ± 12.3% versus 32.5% ± 16.1%, P = 0.673). There were no differences in the proportion of patients showing TAC concentrations within predefined target concentrations in each study visit. There was no difference in the proportion of nonadherent patients at day 28 (17% versus 26%, P = 0.135) and day 90 (27% versus 25%, P = 0.457) based on BAASIS questionnaire answers, respectively. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Universal PhC in addition to standard nurse staff instruction was not associated with reduced intra-individual variability of dose-corrected whole blood TAC trough concentrations or improved adherence.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/sangre , Tacrolimus/sangre , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...