Respiratory recovery trajectories after severe-to-critical COVID-19: a 1-year prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of severe-to-critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have functional impairment, radiological sequelae and persistent symptoms requiring prolonged follow-up. This pragmatic study aimed to describe their clinical follow-up and determine their respiratory recovery trajectories, and the factors that could influence them and their health-related quality of life. METHODS: Adults hospitalised for severe-to-critical COVID-19 were evaluated at 3 months and up to 12 months post-hospital discharge in this prospective, multicentre, cohort study. RESULTS: Among 485 enrolled participants, 293 (60%) were reassessed at 6 months and 163 (35%) at 12 months; 89 (51%) and 47 (27%) of the 173 participants initially managed with standard oxygen were reassessed at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 3 months, 34%, 70% and 56% of the participants had a restrictive lung defect, impaired diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and significant radiological sequelae, respectively. During extended follow-up, both D LCO and forced vital capacity percentage predicted increased by means of +4 points at 6 months and +6 points at 12 months. Sex, body mass index, chronic respiratory disease, immunosuppression, pneumonia extent or corticosteroid use during acute COVID-19 and prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were associated with D LCO at 3 months, but not its trajectory thereafter. Among 475 (98%) patients with at least one chest computed tomography scan during follow-up, 196 (41%) had significant sequelae on their last images. CONCLUSIONS: Although pulmonary function and radiological abnormalities improved up to 1 year post-acute COVID-19, high percentages of severe-to-critical disease survivors, including a notable proportion of those managed with standard oxygen, had significant lung sequelae and residual symptoms justifying prolonged follow-up.

[The advanced practice nurse in post-COViD-19 respiratory follow up]. / L'IPA dans le suivi respiratoire post-Covid-19.

The setting up of an advanced practice nursing activity to monitor patients with severe or very severe pneumonia associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, is a reponse to the population's new health care needs and a massive influx of patients. The skills of the advanced practice nurse are mobilised in this context in order to carry out prevention missions and screening for potential sequelae which could lead to chronic respiratory failure.

Use of Biologics to Treat Relapsing and/or Refractory Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: Data From a European Collaborative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). METHODS: A retrospective European collaborative study was conducted in patients with EGPA who received treatment with biologics for refractory and/or relapsing disease. RESULTS: Among the 147 patients with EGPA included in the study, 63 received rituximab (RTX), 51 received mepolizumab (MEPO), and 33 received omalizumab (OMA). At the time of inclusion, the median Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was 8.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-13) in the RTX group, while the median BVAS in the OMA group was 2 (IQR 1-4.5) and the median BVAS in the MEPO group was 2 (IQR 1-5). In patients receiving RTX, the median BVAS declined both at 6 months (median 1, IQR 0-4.5) and at 12 months (median 0, IQR 0-2), and the frequency of remission, partial response, treatment failure, and stopping treatment due to adverse events was 49%, 24%, 24%, and 3%, respectively. For the treatment of glucocorticoid (GC)-dependent asthma, patients who received MEPO had a much better GC-sparing effect and overall response than did patients who received OMA. The frequency of remission, partial response, treatment failure, and stopping treatment due to adverse events was 15%, 33%, 48%, and 4%, respectively, in the OMA group and 78%, 10%, 8%, and 4%, respectively, in the MEPO group. Remission rates at 12 months were 76% and 82% among patients receiving MEPO at a doses of 100 mg and 300 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that RTX could be effective in treating relapses of EGPA vasculitis. MEPO is highly effective with a good safety profile in patients with GC-dependent asthma. Our data suggest that 100 mg MEPO monthly could be an acceptable dosage for first-line therapy in selected instances of EGPA, recognizing, however, that this has not been compared to the validated dosage of 300 mg monthly.

Strong ALK and PD-L1 positive IHC expression related ALK amplification in an advanced lung sarcomatoid carcinoma: A therapeutic trap?

OBJECTIVES: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered as a screening method for ALK rearrangement thanks to its excellent sensitivity. Strong marking on immunohistochemistry give the go-ahead to start ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK TKI). Lack of therapeutic response may then lead to the suspicion of molecular alterations other than ALK rearrangements. METHODS: We present a patient with strong ALK and PD-L1 positive IHC expression lung sarcomatoid carcinoma with initial life-threatening disease progression after beginning ALK TKI. We also review the literature to summarize ALK amplification clinical features and therapeutic management in lung cancers. RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) revealed ALK amplification on the initial anatomopathological samples. Lack of ALK rearrangement and strong PD-L1 positive IHC expression led to the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) as a second line of treatment, with an excellent response. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that IHC positive test, in these cases, must be interpreted with caution. FISH analysis has to be recommended to confirm IHC results in case of unusual phenotype, such as smoker or lung cancer other than adenocarcinoma. Although lung carcinoma with ALK rearrangement seems to be not sensitive to ICI, further investigations should be conducted on other types of ALK molecular alterations. ALK amplifications, as observed in the present case, should not be an impediment to taking into account the PD-L1 marking for the initiation of treatment by immunotherapy.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Sarcomatoid Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer prognosis but have not been evaluated specifically in sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC), a rare lung cancer subtype with poor prognosis. As such, our study sought to retrospectively assess the efficacy of ICI in SC. METHODS: All consecutive patients with centrally confirmed SC treated using ICI as a second-line treatment or beyond between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry (SP263 clone) and the tumor mutational burden (TMB) with the Foundation One panel. TMB was considered high if it was greater than or equal to 10 mutations per megabase. RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients with SC were evaluated, predominantly men (73%) with a median age of 63.2 years (36.8-79.7) and who were current or former smokers (94.6%). Immunotherapy (nivolumab, 86.5% of cases) was given as a second-line treatment in 54% of the patients and as third-line treatment or beyond in 46% of the patients. The objective response rate was 40.5% and disease control rate was 64.8%, regardless of PD-L1 status. Median overall survival was 12.7 months (range: 0.3-45.7). One-third of patients exhibited early progression. The median PD-L1 expression was 70% (0-100). There was a trend toward higher PD-L1 expression in responsive diseases, with an objective response rate of 58.8% in patients with PD-L1+ and 0% in the one patient with PD-L1- (p = 0.44). The median TMB was 18 (4-39) mutations per megabase, with 87.5% of the cases displaying a high TMB. There was a trend toward higher TMB in responders versus stable or progressive diseases (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SC exhibited high response rates and prolonged overall survival under ICI treatment. These data support the prospective investigation of ICI in patients with SC who are under first-line treatment.

[Risk factors and prevention of lung cancer]. / Facteurs de risque et prévention des cancers du poumon.

Risk factors and prevention of lung cancer. In France, lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer with more than 30,000 deaths per year. The vast majority (85%) of lung cancer are due to tobacco and the duration of smoking has a greater impact than the amount smoked. Passive smoking increases the risk of lung cancer and is responsible for around 25% of lung cancers in non-smokers in France. The risk of lung cancer linked to cannabis smoke hasn't been demonstrated, but is suspected. Other carcinogens found in certain workplaces, such as asbestos, or in the environment, such as radon in granite soils and urban air pollution, increase the risk of lung cancer. The maximum benefit on lung cancer mortality reduction should be obtained by combining smoking cessation and lung cancer screening by chest CT. Lung cancer screening has shown its effectiveness, but is currently not recommended in France. Measures to promote smoking cessation are known and include public health measures to de-normalize tobacco (neutral packaging, ban on advertising, significant increase in its price) and treatments that have been shown to be effective in smoking cessation: nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline and cognitive behavioral therapy.

Facteurs de risque et prévention des cancers du poumon. En France, le cancer du poumon est la première cause de mortalité par cancer, avec plus de 30 000 décès par an. La très grande majorité (85 %) des cancers du poumon sont dus au tabac. La durée du tabagisme a un impact plus important que la quantité fumée. Le tabagisme passif augmente aussi le risque de cancer du poumon et serait responsable d'environ 25 % des cancers du non-fumeur en France. Le risque de cancer du poumon lié à la fumée de cannabis n'est à ce jour pas démontré mais est suspecté. D'autres cancérogènes trouvés dans certains lieux de travail, tels que l'amiante, ou dans l'environnement, tel que le radon des sols granitiques, et la pollution de l'air des villes peuvent augmenter le risque de cancer du poumon. Le bénéfice maximal sur la réduction de la mortalité par cancer du poumon pourrait être observé par le sevrage tabagique et le dépistage par scanner thoracique. Le dépistage a montré son efficacité, mais n'est pas à ce jour recommandé en France. Les mesures pour favoriser le sevrage tabagique comportent les mesures de santé publique pour dénormaliser le tabac (paquet neutre, interdiction de la publicité, augmentation importante de son prix) et les traitements qui ont démontré leur efficacité dans le sevrage tabagique : la substitution nicotinique, la varénicline et les thérapies cognitives et comportementales.

Outcomes of Patients With Advanced NSCLC From the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique Biomarkers France Study by KRAS Mutation Subtypes.

INTRODUCTION: KRAS mutations are detected in 20% to 30% of NSCLC. However, KRAS mutation subtypes may differently influence the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In the Biomarkers France study, 4894 KRAS mutations (26.2%) were detected in 4634 patients from the 17,664 enrolled patients with NSCLC. Survival and treatment data on noncurative stage III to IV NSCLC were available for 901 patients. First- and second-line treatment effects on progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed according to the KRAS mutations subtype. RESULTS: Over 95% of patients with KRAS mutation were smokers or former smokers who were white (99.5%), presenting with adenocarcinoma (82.5%). The most common KRAS mutation subtype was G12C (374 patients; 41.5%), followed by G12V (168; 18.6%), G12D (131; 14.5%), G12A (62; 6.9%), G13C (45; 5.0%), G13D (31; 3.4%), and others (10; 1%). Approximately 21% of patients had transition mutation and 68.2% had a transversion mutation. G12D and transition mutations were predominant in never-smokers. The median overall survival for patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-9.5), without any differences according to the different KRAS subtypes mutations. The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI: 4.2-5.1) for first-line treatment and 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.8) for second-line treatment, without any differences according to the different KRAS subtypes mutations. CONCLUSIONS: KRAS mutation subtypes influenced neither treatment responses nor outcomes. The KRAS G12C mutation was detected in 41.5% of patients, who are now eligible for potent and specific G12C inhibitors.

Pulmonary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) during cancer treatment is rarely observed (<5%). ICI-P is more often observed in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in those with other cancers. Likewise, it is more common in those receiving programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-1 ligand inhibitors rather than cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors alone. The frequency of ICI-P is higher when anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 are administered concomitantly. Despite the low fatality rate (≈13%), ICI-P is the leading cause of ICI-related deaths. This narrative review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological presentation and prognosis of ICI-P occurring in patients, especially those with advanced NSCLC. Emphasis is placed on the differences in terms of frequency or clinical picture observed depending on whether the ICI is used as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI or chemotherapy. Other pulmonary complications observed in cancer patients, yet not necessarily immune-related, are reviewed, such as sarcoid-like granulomatosis, tuberculosis or other infections. A proposal for pragmatic management, including differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, is presented, based on the ICI-P series reported in the literature and published guidelines.

Is chemotherapy rechallenge feasible in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND: Despite recent progress, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) first-line treatment remains a platinum-based doublet in most cases. No guidelines exist beyond third line. Chemotherapy rechallenge is an option, but little data is available in NSCLC. Our study aims to describe patients who underwent chemotherapy rechallenge while assessing its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Consecutive patients with advanced-stage NSCLC receiving first-line treatment in Tenon hospital in 2011 were included, with a 5-year follow-up. Patients were analyzed according to chemotherapy rechallenge or not. Chemotherapy rechallenge was defined as re-initiation of a previously administered chemotherapy agent at any point in the treatment sequence, with at least one treatment regimen between first use and rechallenge. RESULTS: Of 149 patients, 18 underwent chemotherapy rechallenge (12%). They were younger (56 vs. 61 years, P=0.04), mostly women (61% vs. 30%, P=0.02), with lepidic adenocarcinoma (23% vs. 3.5%, P=0.03), a better general state of health (100% performance status 0-1 vs. 74%, P=0.04), and fewer cardiovascular comorbidities (16% vs. 42%, P=0.04). They were more likely to have received a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment (89% vs. 43%, P=0.0003). Progression-free survival was longer at first use than at rechallenge (median 9.2 vs. 2.7 months, P=0.002). No increased toxicity was observed at rechallenge compared to first use. Finally, a subsequent line of treatment was given after rechallenge in 61% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Patients eligible for chemotherapy rechallenge were those with good prognostic factors. Chemotherapy rechallenge may provide a well-tolerated additional line of treatment, with decreased efficacy compared to its first application.

Calpain 1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is associated with poor prognosis in lepidic predominant pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Calpain 1 is a proinflammatory calcium-activated cysteine protease, which can be partly externalized. Extracellular calpains limit inflammatory processes and promote tissue repair, through cell proliferation and migration. Toll like receptor (TLR) 2 has been identified as a target of extracellular calpains in lymphocytes. The aim was to investigate the externalization of calpain 1 and the release of soluble TLR2 during tumor progression of pulmonary lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA). Extracellular calpain 1, soluble fragment of TLR2 and cytokines were analyzed by ELISA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) supernatants from patients with LPA (n=68). Source of calpain was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and soluble TLR2 by flow cytometry on polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and human lung cancer cell lines. Extracellular calpain 1, secreted by tumor cells, was associated to tumor progression, neutrophilic inflammation, with a poor prognostic factor on survival (P=0.003). TLR2 was expressed on PMN and tumor cells and decreased after calpain exposure. Soluble fragment of TLR2 in BALF supernatants was correlated to the extracellular calpain 1 concentration (r=0.624; P<0.001), and its high level was associated with tumor progression and a pro-inflammatory environment. Extracellular calpain 1 secreted by tumor cells, could participate in inflammatory microenvironment and tumor progression through TLR2 in LPA.

c-MET Overexpression as a Poor Predictor of MET Amplifications or Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Sarcomatoid Carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: MNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) abnormalities such as amplification and exon 14 mutations may be responsive to targeted therapies. They are prevalent in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs) and must be diagnosed as efficiently as possible. Hypothetically, c-MET overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may prove effective as a screening test for MET abnormalities. METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from consecutive patients with a resected LSC in four oncologic centers. IHC was performed using the SP44 antibody (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and evaluated using the MetMab score and H-score. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied with the dual color probe set from Zytovision (Clinisciences, Nanterre, France). True MET amplification was diagnosed when MET gene copy number was 5 or greater and the ratio between MET gene copy number and chromosome 7 number was greater than 2. All MET exon 14 alterations including those affecting splice sites occurring within splice donor and acceptor sites were detected in the routine molecular testing on genetic platforms. RESULTS: A total of 81 LSCs were included. Fourteen (17%) exhibited positive IHC using the MetMab score and 15 (18.5%) using the H-score. MET amplification was detected in six tumors (8.5%) and MET exon 14 mutation in five (6%). A weak positive correlation between IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization was found (r = 0.27, p = 0.0001). IHC sensitivity for MET amplification was 50%, with a specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 21.4%, and negative predictive value of 94.7%. IHC sensitivity for MET exon 14 mutations was 20%, with a specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 7%, and negative predictive value of 94%. CONCLUSION: IHC is not a relevant screening tool for MET abnormalities in LSC.

Adding Azathioprine to Remission-Induction Glucocorticoids for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss), Microscopic Polyangiitis, or Polyarteritis Nodosa Without Poor Prognosis Factors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In most patients with nonsevere systemic necrotizing vasculitides (SNVs), remission is achieved with glucocorticoids alone, but one-third experience a relapse within 2 years. This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of azathioprine (AZA) to glucocorticoids could achieve a higher sustained remission rate of newly diagnosed nonsevere eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss) (EGPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), or polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). METHODS: All patients included in this double-blind trial received glucocorticoids, gradually tapered over 12 months, and were randomized to receive AZA or placebo for 12 months, with stratification according to SNV (EGPA or MPA/PAN). The primary end point was the combined rate of remission induction failures and minor or major relapses at month 24. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (51 with EGPA, 25 with MPA, and 19 with PAN) met the inclusion criteria, were randomized, and received at least 1 dose of AZA (n = 46) or placebo (n = 49). At month 24, 47.8% of the patients receiving AZA versus 49% of the patients receiving placebo had remission induction failures or relapses (P = 0.86). Secondary end points were comparable between the AZA and placebo arms. These included initial remission rate (95.7% versus 87.8%), total relapse rate (44.2% versus 40.5%), and glucocorticoid use. Two patients in the placebo arm died; 22 patients in the AZA arm (47.8%) and 23 patients in the placebo arm (46.9%) experienced ≥1 severe adverse event. For EGPA patients, the primary end point (48% in the AZA arm versus 46.2% in the placebo arm) and the percent of patients who experienced asthma/rhinosinusitis exacerbations (24% in the AZA arm versus 19.2% in the placebo arm) were comparable between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Addition of AZA to glucocorticoids for the induction of remission of nonsevere SNVs does not improve remission rates, lower relapse risk, spare steroids, or diminish the EGPA asthma/rhinosinusitis exacerbation rate.

Guidelines on smoking management during the perioperative period.

Smoking is a public health problem of particular importance during the perioperative period, since it exposes patients scheduled for surgery to risk increases of 20% in hospital mortality and 40% in major postoperative complications. In addition, current smoking increases almost all specific surgical complications. The perioperative period offers a genuine opportunity for smoking cessation. The rate of preoperative smoking cessation can be increased significantly by offering behavior management and the prescription of a nicotine substitute before any scheduled surgical intervention. Preoperative smoking cessation should be routinely recommended independently of the timing of the intervention, even though the benefits increase in proportion with the length of cessation. All professionals of the care pathway (general practitioners, surgeons, anesthetists-intensivists, caregivers) must inform smokers of the positive effects of smoking cessation and offer them dedicated management and personalized follow-up. In children, cessation of parental smoking or removal of the child from environmental tobacco smoke as long before surgery as possible is indispensable.

[Perioperative therapies in surgical non N2 non-small cell lung cancer]. / Place des traitements complémentaires pour les cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules opérables non N2.

Platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy is actually the standard of care in stage II-IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A benefit may also be seen in stage IB NSCLC with tumors of more than 4cm of diameter. Perioperative chemotherapy improves 5-year survival of 4 to 15%. This benefit is mainly proved by postoperative chemotherapy trials. Nevertheless, preoperative chemotherapy has advantages: a better tolerance, an estimation of tumor chemosensibility, without an increased postoperative morbimortality. However, pTNM and pathological tumor analyses are modified. Indications of postoperative radiotherapy are limited. In early stage NSCLC (stage I-II), radiotherapy worsens survival. Radiotherapy is routinely achieved in NSCLC with parietal tumor invasion and incomplete tumor resection. Indications of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in case of oncogenic addiction remain to be established in resected NSCLC. Several biomarkers are studied to better describe the indications of perioperative chemotherapy: recognize groups of patients with a worse prognosis and distinguish chemosensibility of the tumor.

EGFR and KRAS mutation status in non-small-cell lung cancer occurring in HIV-infected patients.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common non-acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related malignancy responsible for death. Mutational status is crucial for choosing treatment of advanced NSCLC, yet no data is available on the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten ras (KRAS) mutations and their impact on NSCLC in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients (HIV-NSCLC). All consecutive HIV-NSCLC patients diagnosed between June 1996 and August 2013 at two Paris university hospitals were reviewed, with tumor samples analyzed for EGFR and KRAS mutational status. Overall, 63 tumor samples were analyzed out of 73 HIV-NSCLC cases, with 63% of advanced NSCLC. There were 60 non-squamous and nine squamous cell carcinomas, with EGFR and KRAS mutations identified in two (3.3%) and seven (11.5%) tumors, respectively. The proportion of KRAS mutations was 29% if solely the more sensitive molecular techniques were considered. The two patients with advanced adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations exhibited lasting partial response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Overall survival for patients with advanced NSCLC were >30 months for those with EGFR mutations, <3 months for KRAS mutations (n=2), and the median was 9 months [4.1-14.3] for wild-type (n=34). In multivariate analysis, KRAS mutation and CD4<200 cells/µL were associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio (HR): 24 [4.1-140.2], p=0.0004; HR: 3.1 [1.3-7.5], p=0.01, respectively). EGFR mutation must be investigated in HIV-NSCLC cases due to its predictive and prognostic impact, whereas KRAS mutation is of poor prognostic value. Clinicians should search for drugs dedicated to this target population.

[News about targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer in 2015 (except immuno-therapy)]. / Actualités sur les thérapies ciblées dans les cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules, hors immunothérapie.

Recently, developments of therapies that target abnormally activated signaling pathways are increasing for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. EGFR mutations are found in about 10% of lung cancers, especially in adenocarcinoma, women and non-smokers. Three EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib) received a European marketing authorization for up to first line treatment of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Effectiveness of EGFR inhibitors is higher than conventional chemotherapy. Third generation EGFR inhibitors (rociletinib, AZD9291) are effective for patients who develop a resistance mutation such as T790M resistance mutation; they obtained temporary authorization for use in France in 2015. The EML4-ALK translocation is found in about 5% of NSCLC and more particularly in adenocarcinoma of young non-smoking patients. Crizotinib is a new therapeutic standard in ALK translocated NSCLC in second line. Ceritinib is a 2nd generation ALK inhibitor which received a European marketing authorization for up to treatment of ALK translocated NSCLC after progression with crizotinib. INCA supports ACSé program evaluating the efficacy of crizotinib in NSCLC amplified for MET or translocated for ROS1 and ACSé program evaluating the efficacy of vemurafenib in tumors non melanoma mutated V600E BRAF. The role of other biomarkers such as KRAS, BRAF, HER2 and PI3KCA mutations remains to be defined in NSCLC.