Toxicity, response rates and survival outcomes of induction cisplatin and irinotecan followed by concurrent cisplatin, irinotecan and radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal cancers; however, the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains to be defined. METHODS: Retrospective single institution analysis of toxicities, response rates and survival outcomes in patients with cT3-4 or N1/M1a esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma treated with induction cisplatin and irinotecan followed by concurrent cisplatin, irinotecan and radiotherapy. Secondary analysis for association of disease control and outcomes with demographic, tumor and treatment factors (including histology). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were eligible for the present analysis. All patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and were either cT3-4 and/or cN1 disease. Fifty patients completed radiotherapy as planned (median dose 50.4 Gy, range 0-61.2), and 35 patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy as planned (range 1-4). Severe acute toxicities included Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and esophagitis in 13 and 12 patients, respectively. There were no Grade 5 (fatal) toxicities noted. At mean survivor follow-up of 24.5 months (range 2.7-63), 17 patients were alive (8 without disease) and 36 deceased. Forty patients experienced disease recurrence, with initial loco-regional, distant or both failures in 28, 9 and 3 patients, respectively. Estimated 2-year overall survival and freedom from failure were 42 and 9%, respectively, without significant difference by histology. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin/irinotecan chemoradiotherapy is tolerable, demonstrating similar efficacy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma esophageal cancers.

Glioneuronal tumor with neuropil-like islands of the spinal cord with diffuse leptomeningeal neuraxis dissemination.

A 54-year-old Caucasian female presented with a 1 year history of intermittent numbness of the left leg progressing to bilateral, lower extremity sensory loss that advanced to include impaired vibration and proprioception. The subsequent thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed a heterogeneous, avidly enhancing, centrally situated spinal cord mass involving T7 through T10 in association with thick linear enhancement of the anterior and posterior cord surfaces extending both superiorly and inferiorly. Both the cervical and lumbar spine MRI demonstrated diffuse leptomeningeal disease as well. A brain MRI revealed focal leptomeningeal enhancement in the left and right sylvian fissures, the suprasellar cistern, and the posterior fossa; a pattern consistent with metastatic disease. The patient underwent a T6-T10 laminectomy for tumor biopsy and debulking. Histology revealed a WHO grade III glioneuronal tumor with rosetted neuropil-like islands. Synaptophysin and neurofilament (NF) positive staining was noted within the neural appearing component, whereas, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunopositivity was evident in the fibrillary astrocytoma component of the tumor. The Ki-67 labeling index was 7%. This tumor pattern, now included in the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumours as a pattern variation of anaplastic astrocytoma (Kleihues et al. In: Louis et al. (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 2007), was first described in a four-case series by Teo et al. in 1999. The majority of subsequently reported cases described them as primary tumors of the cerebrum. Herein, we report a unique example of a spinal glioneuronal tumor with neuropil-like islands with associated leptomeningeal dissemination involving the entire craniospinal axis.

Cisplatin/Irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as definitive chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare toxicities, disease control, and survival outcomes for patients treated with either cisplatin/irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective comparison between treatment groups: the cisplatin/irinotecan group was treated with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, whereas the carboplatin/paclitaxel group began with chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy. Acute toxicities, response rates, disease control, survival outcomes, and patterns of failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and December 2007, 57 patients were identified for inclusion in the present study (38 cisplatin/irinotecan and 19 carboplatin/paclitaxel). Groups were well-balanced by clinical-, pathologic-, staging-, and treatment-related factors. Thirty-five patients (92%) in the cisplatin/irinotecan group and 18 patients (95%) in the carboplatin/paclitaxel group completed the concurrent phase of chemoradiotherapy. There were no significant differences in hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities between the groups. At a median survivor follow-up of 37.6 months (range: 7.3-59.3 months) for the entire population, 22 patients were alive (16 without evidence of disease). The 3-year overall survival estimates was 19.7% for the cisplatin/irinotecan group versus 56.1% for the carboplatin/paclitaxel group (P = 0.022). Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survivals were 24.6% for the cisplatin/irinotecan group versus 59.3% for the carboplatin/paclitaxel group (P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel is well-tolerated and provided superior overall and disease-specific survival compared with cisplatin/irinotecan chemoradiotherapy in the present study population. Further investigation is warranted.