Pre-operative analgesia for patients with femoral neck fractures using a modified fascia iliaca block technique.

Adequate pre-operative analgesia for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures is difficult to assess and is often an overseen aspect of their care. We aimed to assess the efficacy of fascia iliaca blocks inserted via plexus blockade catheters in the pre-operative period. Our simple technique allowed the block to be administered safely without the need for a nerve stimulator. We assessed the effectiveness of the block with a novel objective sitting score and by assessing the degree of passive hip flexion that could be achieved comfortably. Visual analogue scores were also used. We studied 30 consecutive patients, regardless of their mental state. One hour following the block, there was a significant improvement in the sitting scores as well as the passive hip flexion (mean increase 44 degrees ). Visual analogue scores also score improved significantly from 7.2 to 4.6 (S.D. 2.4) in the 18 patients without cognitive impairment. We conclude that fascia iliaca blocks can provide significant benefit in the pre-operative period and allow patients to sit up more comfortably while they await surgery.

Propofol-thiopentone admixture: recovery characteristics.

We have investigated, in a prospective double-blind study, recovery from anaesthesia induced by two admixtures of propofol and thiopentone and compared it with a third group of patients who received propofol and lignocaine. Ninety unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopy as a daycase procedure were randomly allocated to receive one of three different mixtures for induction of anaesthesia as part of a standardized anaesthetic: Group P50: propofol 1% 10 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 10 ml, Group P75: propofol 1% 15 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 5 ml, Group P100: propofol 1% 20 ml/lignocaine 1% 4 ml. Recovery from anaesthesia was assessed for up to four hours post-induction by critical flicker fusion threshold and best post-box toy completion time. Comparison was made with preoperative baseline performance. There was no significant difference in postoperative recovery between the three groups with either assessment but no group returned to their mean preoperative performance levels within the first four hours post-induction. Nor was there any difference between the groups with respect to postoperative analgesia or anti-emetic administration. Utilizing the most sensitive end-point, a sample of nearly 1000 patients in each group would be required to confirm the observed difference with a power of 0.8 based on the data from this study. In comparison with lignocaine, the addition of thiopentone to propofol does not delay recovery from anaesthesia and does not increase postoperative analgesic or anti-emetic requirements.

Motor power pharmacodynamics of subarachnoid hyperbaric 5% lidocaine in the sitting position.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive dynamometric measurement using a plantar flexion power device (PFPD) provides detailed data describing the onset and offset of motor block following spinal administration of lidocaine. The aim of this study was to evaluate administration of two doses of spinal lidocaine in the sitting position to determine whether our dynamometric model produces data consistent with our current understanding of the pharmacokinetics of subarachnoid, hyperbaric, 5% lidocaine. METHODS: Twenty male patients (54 to 80 yr) undergoing cystoscopy received spinal anaesthesia with either 75 mg (n = 10) or 100 mg of hyperbaric lidocaine 5%, in the sitting position, under standardised conditions. Plantar flexion muscle power was recorded during onset and offset of anaesthesia using a load cell interfaced with a computer (PFPD). RESULTS: Onset of paralysis following spinal block in the sitting position was rapid and complete with motor power declining exponentially to 5% of preoperative values by 8.5 min in all patients. There was no difference in decay or recovery of plantar flexion motor power data between dosage groups in the sitting position. Measurement using the PFPD shows that onset of motor paralysis is described by an exponential decay and that motor recovery occurs at a fixed rate. Extent of block to cold and pinprick was similar in both dosage groups in the sitting position (median T4). CONCLUSION: This study shows that in the sitting position, doses less than 75 mg of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine are required to significantly improve ambulatory times.

Pharmacodynamics of subarachnoid hyperbaric 5% lignocaine.

Twenty male patients (55 to 85 yr) undergoing cystoscopy received spinal anaesthesia with either 75 mg (n = 10) or 100 mg of hyperbaric lignocaine 5% under standardised conditions. Plantar flexion muscle power was recorded during onset and offset of anaesthesia using a load cell interfaced with a computer (PFPD) and these data were compared with intermittent clinical assessments of spinal anaesthesia. Onset of paralysis was rapid and complete with motor power declining exponentially to 5% of preoperative values by 5 minutes in all patients. Extent of block to cold and pinprick was similar in both dosage groups (median T4), as was the rate of block onset. Block regression was complete by three hours in all patients and restitution of plantar flexion motor power was associated with normal thermosensibility at L1 and recovery of the patient's ability to walk and micturate. Recovery of plantar flexion motor power occurred at 95.5 +/- 7.38 min in patients given 75 mg compared with 129 +/- 9.5 min in those given 100 mg lignocaine (P < 0.05). The time between onset and full motor recovery in the 75 mg group (7.2 +/- 1.2 min) was less than the 100 mg lignocaine group (29 +/- 5.1 min) (P < 0.001). The larger dose of lignocaine did not confer any clinical advantage in block onset or intensity and made the onset of recovery less predictable. The Bromage grading, while clinically appropriate during anaesthesia onset, does not provide data relating to the density of block and the PFPD was therefore useful for describing the anaesthesia recovery phase.