Incidence and risk factors for postpartum mood and anxiety disorders among women veterans.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine rates of postpartum mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) among U.S. women Veterans and the overlap among PMADs. We further sought to identify PMAD risk factors, including those unique to military service. METHODS: A national sample of women Veterans completed a computer-assisted telephone interview (N = 1414). Eligible participants were aged 20-45 and had separated from service within the last 10 years. Self-report measures included demographics, general health, reproductive health, military exposures, sexual assault, childhood trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The PMADs of interest were postpartum depression (PPD), postpartum anxiety (PPA) and postpartum PTSD (PPPTSD). This analysis included 1039 women Veterans who had ever been pregnant and who answered questions about PPMDs related to their most recent pregnancy. RESULTS: A third (340/1039, 32.7%) of participants were diagnosed with at least one PMAD and one-fifth (215/1039, 20.7%) with two or more. Risk factors common for developing a PMAD included: a mental health diagnosis prior to pregnancy, a self-report of ever having had a traumatic birth experience, and most recent pregnancy occurring during military service. Additional risk factors were found for PPD and PPPTSD. CONCLUSION: Women Veterans may be at an increased risk for developing PMADs due to high rates of lifetime sexual assault, mental health disorders, and military-specific factors including giving birth during military service and military combat deployment exposures.

Creating affiliations, learning, and mindfulness for in vitro fertilization patients (CALM IVF): a clinical trial.

Objective: Determine if group psychoeducational support can improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients' quality of life (QoL). Design: Randomized controlled trial (NCT04048772). Setting: University-affiliated IVF clinic. Patients: Women (n = 76) and male partners undergoing initial autologous IVF cycle from August 2019, to December 2020. Interventions: Couples were assigned to groups based on projected oocyte retrieval date. Groups were randomly assigned to the control or intervention arm. Clinic closures because of the COVID-19 pandemic delayed treatment for a portion of participants. Groups were conducted in person before and virtually during the pandemic. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was a change in fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) from baseline to 3 days after retrieval. Secondary outcomes were changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience scale), IVF knowledge scores, and the likelihood of return to treatment. Results: Knowledge scores among women in Creating Affiliations, Learning, and Mindfulness (CALM) for IVF groups significantly increased compared with control (mean difference 13.19 [3.53 - 22.84]) before the pandemic. During the pandemic, women in CALM IVF had significant improvement in the social FertiQoL score compared with controls (10.42 [1.79 - 19.04]). Compared with controls, male CALM IVF participants had significantly greater improvement in total FertiQoL (mean difference 6.68 [0.39 - 12.98]), treatment FertiQoL (8.26 [0.69 - 15.82]), and resilience (Connor-Davidson 1.13 [0.54 - 1.72]). Immediate return to care did not significantly differ between arms. Conclusions: For women undergoing IVF, group psychoeducational programs can improve IVF knowledge and social QoL during a pandemic. Participation in a group psychoeducational program can improve QoL and resilience in IVF dyad male partners. Clinical Trial Registration Number: Trial registration NCT04048772.

Longitudinal semen parameter assessments and live birth: variability and implications for treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether semen parameters are associated with live birth among couples seeking infertility treatment after accounting for semen parameter variability. DESIGN: Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST) prospective cohort. SETTING: Four US reproductive endocrinology and infertility care study centers, 2013-2017. PATIENT(S): Couples (n = 2,369) seeking fertility consultations at 4 US infertility care study centers. INTERVENTION(S): Semen volume, pH, sperm viability, morphology, progressive and total motility, concentration, count, and total and progressive motile count assessed at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months after enrollment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Log-binomial models stratified by fertility treatment received (in vitro fertilization [IVF], intrauterine insemination [IUI], ovulation induction [OI], or no treatment) estimated risk differences (RDs) between semen parameter quartiles and live birth and accounted for multiple semen assessments per person. We accounted for abstinence time, the biological interdependence of semen parameters, and potential selection bias because of loss to follow-up. RESULT(S): Among couples using OI only or no treatment, 39% had a live birth, and relative to the highest quartile, the lowest quartiles of morphology (RD, -19 [95% CI, -23 to -15] per 100 couples), motility (RD, -13 [95% CI, -17 to -9]), concentration (RD, -22 [95% CI, -26 to -19]), and total motile count (RD, -18 [95% CI, -22 to -14]) were associated with fewer live births. For IUI, 26% had a live birth, and the lowest quartiles of volume (RD, -6 [95% CI, -11 to -0.4]), concentration (RD, -6 [95% CI, -11 to -0.1]), count (RD, -10 [95% CI, -15 to -4]), and total motile count (RD, -7 [95% CI, -13 to -1]) were associated with fewer live births. For IVF, 61% had a live birth, and only morphology (Q1 RD, -7 [95% CI, -14 to 0.2]; Q2 RD, -10 [95% CI, -17 to -2.2]) was associated with live birth. CONCLUSION(S): Semen parameters are critical in couples undergoing OI/IUI. Only low morphology was important for live birth after IVF. Although data supporting the use of semen parameters are fragmented across differing populations, current findings are generalizable across the range of male fertility and couple fertility treatments, providing evidence about which semen parameters are most relevant in which settings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT#01857310.

Lifetime infertility and environmental, chemical, and hazardous exposures among female and male US veterans.

BACKGROUND: Veterans experience many potentially hazardous exposures during their service, but little is known about the possible effect of these exposures on reproductive health. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between infertility and environmental, chemical, or hazardous material exposures among US veterans. STUDY DESIGN: This study examined self-reported cross-sectional data from a national sample of female and male US veterans aged 20 to 45 years separated from service for ≤10 years. Data were obtained via a computer-assisted telephone interview lasting an average of 1 hour and 27 minutes that assessed demographics, general and reproductive health, and lifetime and military exposures. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between exposures to environmental, chemical, and hazardous materials and infertility as defined by 2 different definitions: unprotected intercourse for ≥12 months without conception and trying to conceive for ≥12 months without conception. RESULTS: Of the veterans included in this study, 592 of 1194 women (49.6%) and 727 of 1407 men (51.7%) met the unprotected intercourse definition for infertility, and 314 of 781 women (40.2%) and 270 of 775 men (34.8%) met the trying to conceive definition for infertility. Multiple individual exposure rates were found to be higher in women and men veterans with self-reported infertility, including petrochemicals and polychlorinated biphenyls, which were higher in both the men and women groups reporting infertility by either definition. Importantly, there was no queried exposure self-reported at higher rates in the noninfertile groups. Moreover, veterans reporting infertility reported a higher number of total exposures with a mean±standard deviation of 7.61±3.87 exposures for the women with infertility vs 7.13±3.67 for the noninfertile group (P=.030) and 13.17±4.19 for veteran men with infertility vs 12.54±4.10 for the noninfertile group (P=.005) using the unprotected intercourse definition and 7.69±3.79 for the women with infertility vs 7.02±3.57 for the noninfertile group (P=.013) and 13.77±4.17 for the veteran men with infertility vs 12.89±4.08 for the noninfertile group (P=.005) using the trying to conceive definition. CONCLUSION: The data identified an association between infertility and environmental, chemical, and hazardous materials that the veterans were exposed to during military service. Although this study was limited by the self-reported and unblinded data collection from a survey, and causation between exposures and infertility cannot be proven, it does show that veterans encounter many exposures during their service and calls for further research into the possible link between veteran exposures and reproductive health.

Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage.

PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility, with the exception of random assignment to infertility being labeled as a "condition," "disease," or "disability." Participants then responded to questions measuring their beliefs and attitudes towards policies related to the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. We measured public support for infertility policies, public preference for infertility labels, and whether support differed by the randomly assigned label used. We also queried associations between demographic data and support for infertility policies. RESULTS: Support was higher for insurance coverage of infertility treatments (p=.014) and fertility preservation (p=.017), and infertility public assistance programs (p=.036) when infertility was described as a "disease" or "disability" compared to "condition." Participants who were younger, were planning or trying to conceive, had a family member or friend with infertility, and/or had a more liberal political outlook were more likely to support infertility policies. A majority of participants (78%) felt the term "condition" was the best label to describe infertility, followed by "disability" (12%). The least popular label was "disease" (10%). Those preferring "condition" were older (p<.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic White (p=.046), and less likely to have an infertility diagnosis (p<.001). CONCLUSION: While less commonly identified as the best descriptors of infertility, labeling infertility as a "disease" or "disability" may increase support for policies that improve access to infertility care.

Veteran-Reported Receipt of Prepregnancy Care: Data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need (ECUUN) Study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the prevalence of women Veterans reporting receipt of counseling about health optimization prior to pregnancy, topics most frequently discussed, and factors associated with receipt of this care. METHODS: We analyzed data from a nationally representative, cross-sectional telephone survey of women Veterans (n = 2302) ages 18-45 who used VA for primary care in the previous year. Our sample included women who were (1) currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant, (2) not currently trying but planning for pregnancy in the future, or (3) unsure of pregnancy intention. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine adjusted associations of patient- and provider-level factors with receipt of any counseling about health optimization prior to pregnancy (prepregnancy counseling) and with counseling on specific topics. RESULTS: Among 512 women who were considering or unsure about pregnancy, fewer than half (49%) reported receiving any prepregnancy counseling from a VA provider in the past year. For those who did, the most frequently discussed topics included healthy weight (29%), medication safety (27%), smoking (27%), and folic acid use before pregnancy (27%). Factors positively associated with receipt of prepregnancy counseling include history of mental health conditions (aOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.00) and receipt of primary care within a dedicated women's health clinic (aOR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.35, 3.18), whereas factors negatively associated include far-future and unsure pregnancy intentions (aOR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.71 and aOR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.70, respectively). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Routine assessment of pregnancy preferences in primary care could identify individuals to whom counseling about health optimization prior to pregnancy can be offered to promote patient-centered family planning care.

Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model.

Objective: To adapt a fertility care wellness model.Background: Despite availability of a range of diagnostic and therapeutic services for infertility, many do not seek care or discontinue care prior to achieving a live birth. Wellness models can inform research on patient decisions to seek and continue fertility care, as many barriers and drivers are represented within the dimensions of wellness.Methods: A mixed-methods online survey was completed by 135 people of reproductive age who experienced infertility in the USA. Outcomes included drivers and barriers to seeking or continuing fertility care. Identified factors were compared by treatment history using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Themes and patterns were identified within 174 responses to 6 open-response items through conventional content analysis.Results: Thematic analysis revealed practical (environmental, financial, and physical) and affective (emotional, social and spiritual) dimensions of wellness in decisions to seek care (67%), with affective rationales more prominent in decisions to return for care (78%).Conclusion: Decisions to seek fertility care and return after failed treatment integrate practical and affective rationales from financial, physical, environmental, emotional, social and spiritual wellness dimensions. Drivers and barriers within these dimensions should be considered to encourage care seeking and improve patient retention.

Current evidence supporting a goal of singletons: a review of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with twin versus singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

With increasing use of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) almost 2% of all babies born in the United States each year are now conceived with these technologies, making outcomes of IVF-ICSI extremely important not only to patients and families but to public health. Twin pregnancy rates after IVF-ICSI in the United States have declined since their peak in 2013 but remain at approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 20 pregnancies. A review of the current international literature on twin versus singleton pregnancy outcomes after IVF-ICSI treatment confirms statistically significantly higher risks to maternal and perinatal health and statistically significantly higher health care costs. The field of infertility care should continue to work to develop practices that lower twin pregnancy rates to an absolute minimum to maximize the safety of these medical treatments.

A Prospective Cohort Study to Evaluate the Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle on Fertility: Design and Baseline Characteristics.

Diet, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors might influence fertility for men and women, although evidence is mixed, and couple-based approaches are needed for assessing associations with reproductive outcomes. The Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle (IDEAL) on Fertility Study is a prospective cohort with contemporaneous detailed follow-up of female partners of men enrolled in the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial studying couples seeking infertility treatment (2016-2019). Follow-up of men continued for 6 months, while female partners were followed for 9 months while attempting pregnancy and throughout any resulting pregnancy (up to 18 months). Longitudinal data on diet, physical activity (including measurement via wearable device), sleep, and stress were captured at multiple study visits during this follow-up. A subset of women (IDEALplus) also completed daily journals and a body fat assessment via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. IDEAL enrolled 920 women, and IDEALPlus enrolled 218. We demonstrated the ability to enroll women in a prospective cohort study contemporaneous to a partner-enrolled randomized trial. In combination with data collected on male partners, IDEAL data facilitates a couple-based approach to understanding associations between lifestyle factors and infertility treatment outcomes. We describe in detail the study design, recruitment, data collection, lessons learned, and baseline characteristics.

Effect of Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation in Men on Semen Quality and Live Birth Among Couples Undergoing Infertility Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Dietary supplements marketed for male fertility commonly contain folic acid and zinc based on limited prior evidence for improving semen quality. However, no large-scale trial has examined the efficacy of this therapy for improving semen quality or live birth. Objective: To determine the effect of daily folic acid and zinc supplementation on semen quality and live birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial was a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Couples (n = 2370; men aged ≥18 years and women aged 18-45 years) planning infertility treatment were enrolled at 4 US reproductive endocrinology and infertility care study centers between June 2013 and December 2017. The last 6-month study visit for semen collection occurred during August 2018, with chart abstraction of live birth and pregnancy information completed during April 2019. Interventions: Men were block randomized by study center and planned infertility treatment (in vitro fertilization, other treatment at a study site, and other treatment at an outside clinic) to receive either 5 mg of folic acid and 30 mg of elemental zinc (n = 1185) or placebo (n = 1185) daily for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were live birth (resulting from pregnancies occurring within 9 months of randomization) and semen quality parameters (sperm concentration, motility, morphology, volume, DNA fragmentation, and total motile sperm count) at 6 months after randomization. Results: Among 2370 men who were randomized (mean age, 33 years), 1773 (75%) attended the final 6-month study visit. Live birth outcomes were available for all couples, and 1629 men (69%) had semen available for analysis at 6 months after randomization. Live birth was not significantly different between treatment groups (404 [34%] in the folic acid and zinc group and 416 [35%] in the placebo group; risk difference, -0.9% [95% CI, -4.7% to 2.8%]). Most of the semen quality parameters (sperm concentration, motility, morphology, volume, and total motile sperm count) were not significantly different between treatment groups at 6 months after randomization. A statistically significant increase in DNA fragmentation was observed with folic acid and zinc supplementation (mean of 29.7% for percentage of DNA fragmentation in the folic acid and zinc group and 27.2% in the placebo group; mean difference, 2.4% [95% CI, 0.5% to 4.4%]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common with folic acid and zinc supplementation compared with placebo (abdominal discomfort or pain: 66 [6%] vs 40 [3%], respectively; nausea: 50 [4%] vs 24 [2%]; and vomiting: 32 [3%] vs 17 [1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among a general population of couples seeking infertility treatment, the use of folic acid and zinc supplementation by male partners, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve semen quality or couples' live birth rates. These findings do not support the use of folic acid and zinc supplementation by male partners in the treatment of infertility. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01857310.

Factors Impacting Fertility Preservation in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: Fertility preservation before therapy is underutilized for those diagnosed with cancer as an adolescent or young adult (AYA). The purpose of this study was to describe factors impacting utilization of fertility preservation consultations and procedures among AYAs at the University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC). Methods: Patients were identified by the oncology registry at UIHC. Disease site, histology, date of diagnosis, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and zip code data were gathered by the registrars. UIHC's electronic medical record was queried for fertility preservation consultation. The Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinical database captured information about patients who underwent fertility preservation. Rural-urban commuting area codes measured rurality. Descriptive statistics and multivariate linear probability models were used to predict the probability of fertility preservation consultation and procedure. Results: From 2008 to 2017, 2932 AYAs were treated for an invasive malignancy at UIHC. Of the 440 (15%) who received a fertility preservation consultation, 156 (5%) underwent a fertility preservation procedure. Multivariate analyses showed that AYAs with public insurance coverage, those diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) disease or melanoma, and those >30 years old at diagnosis had a significant decrease in the percentage point probability of having a consultation. The percentage point probability of undergoing a procedure was decreased for female patients, those with melanoma or carcinoma, those seen by a pediatric-based provider, and those diagnosed after 25 years of age. Conclusion: This study has important implications for practice and policy, particularly regarding insurance coverage and patient and provider characteristics leading to fertility preservation consultations and procedures for AYAs with cancer.

Infertility and Health-Related Quality of Life in United States Women Veterans.

Background: To assess associations between infertility and health-related quality of life and medical comorbidities in U.S. women Veterans. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study involved computer-assisted telephone interviews of Veterans Administration-enrolled women between ages 21 and 52 years. Patients were analyzed in two groups by self-reported history of infertility. Outcomes included health-related quality of life as measured by the short-form 12-item interview (SF-12) physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorders, fibromyalgia, other chronic pain, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and cancer. Age-adjusted p-values and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated using individual multivariate regression models to control for significant confounding covariates. Results: Of the 996 women veterans included, 179 (18.0%) reported a history of infertility. Infertility was associated with worse perceived physical health as determined by the SF-12 PCS [beta coefficient (B) -3.23 (-5.18 to -1.28)] and fibromyalgia [AOR 1.97 (1.22 to 3.19)]. Infertility was also associated with higher rates of depression, other chronic pain, and cancer, which remained significant after adjusting for age (p = 0.021, p = 0.016, and p = 0.045, respectively); however, no association for all was seen after adjustment for other significant covariates. There was no difference in Veterans' mental health using the SF-12 MCS, nor differences seen in PTSD or eating disorder rates, or in cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: This novel investigation in U.S. women Veterans found worse physical health-related quality of life and increased rates of fibromyalgia among women reporting a history of infertility, adding to the growing literature on infertility as a marker for overall poorer health.

A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation on Male Fertility and Livebirth: Design and Baseline Characteristics.

The Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST) was a multicenter, double-blind, block-randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether folic acid and zinc supplementation in men improves semen quality and increases livebirth rate among couples seeking infertility treatment (2013-2017). Eligible men were aged 18 years or older with female partners aged 18-45 years, seeking infertility treatment. Men were randomized (1:1) to 5 mg folic acid and 30 mg elemental zinc daily or matching placebo for 6 months. Randomization was stratified by site and intended infertility treatment (in vitro fertilization (IVF), non-IVF/study site, and non-IVF/outside clinic). Follow-up of men continued for 6 months, and female partners were passively followed for a minimum of 9 months. Women who conceived were followed throughout pregnancy. Overall, 2,370 men were randomized during 2013-2017 (1,185 folic acid and zinc, 1,185 placebo); they had a mean age of 33 years and body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) of 29.8. Most participants were white (82%), well educated (83% with some college), and employed (72%). Participant characteristics were balanced across intervention arms. Study visits were completed by 89%, 77%, and 75% of men at months 2, 4, and 6, respectively. Here we describe the study design, recruitment, data collection, lessons learned, and baseline participant characteristics.

Infertility Services for Veterans: Policies, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Infertility prevalence and care needs among male and female Veterans are understudied topics. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical benefits package covers full infertility evaluation and many infertility treatments for Veterans but not, by law, for their spouses. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is also specifically excluded from this medical benefits package by regulation. Congress passed a law in 2016 that allowed VHA to provide IVF to Veterans and their legal spouses, and broader infertility benefits to the legal spouse, if the Veteran has a service-connected condition associated with his or her infertility, with some limitations. As the Veteran population becomes increasingly female, research efforts in reproductive health, including infertility, are expanding and evolving. This includes a nationwide study currently underway examining infertility among male and female Veterans and associations with military-related trauma, such as injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, military sexual trauma, and toxin exposure. In this review, we describe the state of the science and policy on infertility care in the VHA along with challenges and opportunities that exist within the VHA system.

Ethnic Minority Status and Experiences of Infertility in Female Veterans.

BACKGROUND: In the general population, infertility is increasingly prevalent in ethnic minority women; these women suffer longer and are less likely to access care. There is a paucity of data regarding the issue of race and infertility in the growing female military veteran population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study involved computer-assisted telephone interviews of 1,004 Veterans Administration (VA)-enrolled women aged ≤52 years. RESULTS: Racial minority veterans were more likely than white veterans to self-report infertility (24% vs. 18%), equally likely to report infertility evaluation (52% vs. 52%), and less likely to report receiving infertility treatment (31% vs. 63%). Differences in self-reported infertility (odds ratios [OR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-2.22) and infertility treatment (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.81) were retained after controlling for age, income, marital status, education, insurance, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, and lifetime sexual assault. While racial minority veterans were equally as likely as white veterans to be evaluated for infertility, white and racial minority groups reported different reasons for not seeking evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with civilian studies, our data suggest that racial minority VA-enrolled female veterans are more likely to self-report infertility and less likely to receive infertility treatment. Future research should investigate whether these findings are consistent nationwide and regardless of VA enrollment, and if minority veterans have unique barriers to care. A better understanding of how the VA might improve awareness of infertility evaluation and treatment options, especially for racial minority veterans, is needed.

Müllerian Aplasia with Severe Hematometra: A Case Report of Diagnosis and Management in a Low Resource Setting.

BACKGROUND: Müllerian aplasia or Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is described as congenital absence of the proximal vagina with or without absence of the cervix and uterus, most often recognized after the onset of primary amenorrhea. CASE: An 18-year-old woman presented to a free medical clinic in Arcahaie, Haiti with primary amenorrhea, abdominal distention, and cyclic monthly abdominal pain. Physical exam was significant for uterus palpable superior to the umbilicus, absence of vagina, and rectal exam without palpable vagina or cervix. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examinations did not reveal hematocolpos. Exploratory laparotomy revealed severe endometriosis with bilateral hematosalpinx, markedly distended uterus, no proximal vagina, and normal ovaries. Uterine specimen was filled with blood and no clear cervix was present. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of vaginal and cervical agenesis is complicated in low-resource settings and treatment must be modified when subspecialty care and consistent follow-up are not available.