Virtual Molecular and Precision Medicine Clinic to Improve Access to Clinical Trials for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Academic/Community Collaboration.

PURPOSE: There is a demand for improved care delivery surrounding genomic testing and clinical trial enrollment among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We sought to improve the current process via real-time informal consultation and prescreening assessment for patients with MBC treated by community and academic medical oncologists by implementing a virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic. METHODS: The vMAP program used a virtual referral system directed to a multidisciplinary team with precision medicine expertise. Providers contacted vMAP regarding patients with MBC, and on receipt of referral, the vMAP team engaged in discussion to identify if further diagnostics were needed (including genomic testing) and to identify potential clinical trials or standard treatment options. Recommendations were then sent to the referring provider within 72 hours. Pre-/postsurveys were issued to network physicians to assess for barriers, clinical trial access, and vMAP referral experience. Program implementation was evaluated with the Squire 2.0 reporting guidelines for quality improvement in health care as a framework. RESULTS: Eighty-one cases from 22 providers were referred to vMAP over a 26-month period. The average response time to the referring provider with a finalized recommendation was 1.90 ± 1.82 days. A total of 86.4% of cases had clinical trial options on vMAP prescreen, with 40.7% initiating formal screening assessments and 27 patients (33.3%) ultimately enrolling on trials. On resurvey, 92% of survey responses across community oncology referring providers said that they were very likely to use vMAP again. CONCLUSION: In the initial 2-year period, vMAP demonstrated an efficient means to offer real-time interpretation of genomic testing and identification of clinical trials for patients with MBC, with effective clinical trial enrollment and high rates of referring provider satisfaction.

A Gene Panel Associated With Abemaciclib Utility in ESR1-Mutated Breast Cancer After Prior Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6-Inhibitor Progression.

PURPOSE: For patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), first-line treatment is endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i). After disease progression, which often comes with ESR1 resistance mutations (ESR1-MUT), which therapies to use next and for which patients are open questions. An active area of exploration is treatment with further CDK4/6i, particularly abemaciclib, which has distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with the other approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and ribociclib. We investigated a gene panel to prognosticate abemaciclib susceptibility in patients with ESR1-MUT MBC after palbociclib progression. METHODS: We examined a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with ESR1-MUT MBC who received abemaciclib after disease progression on ET plus palbociclib. We generated a panel of CDK4/6i resistance genes and compared abemaciclib progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without versus with mutations in this panel (CDKi-R[-] v CDKi-R[+]). We studied how ESR1-MUT and CDKi-R mutations affect abemaciclib sensitivity of immortalized breast cancer cells and patient-derived circulating tumor cell lines in culture. RESULTS: In ESR1-MUT MBC with disease progression on ET plus palbociclib, the median PFS was 7.0 months for CDKi-R(-) (n = 17) versus 3.5 months for CDKi-R(+) (n = 11), with a hazard ratio of 2.8 (P = .03). In vitro, CDKi-R alterations but not ESR1-MUT induced abemaciclib resistance in immortalized breast cancer cells and were associated with resistance in circulating tumor cells. CONCLUSION: For ESR1-MUT MBC with resistance to ET and palbociclib, PFS on abemaciclib is longer for patients with CDKi-R(-) than CDKi-R(+). Although a small and retrospective data set, this is the first demonstration of a genomic panel associated with abemaciclib sensitivity in the postpalbociclib setting. Future directions include testing and improving this panel in additional data sets, to guide therapy selection for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.

Utilizing cell-free DNA to predict risk of developing brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

We compared cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results at MBC diagnosis in patients who developed brain metastases (BM) vs those without (non-BM) to understand genomic predictors of BM. Patients with cfDNA testing at MBC diagnosis (Guardant360®, 73 gene next generation sequencing) were identified. Clinical and genomic features of BM and non-BM were compared (Pearson's/Wilcoxon rank sum tests). Eighteen of 86 patients (21%) with cfDNA at MBC diagnosis developed BM. Comparing BM vs non-BM, a higher prevalence of BRCA2 (22% vs 4.4%, p = 0.01), APC (11% vs 0%, p = 0.005), CDKN2A (11% vs 1.5%, p = 0.05), and SMAD4 (11% vs 1.5%, p = 0.05) was observed. Seven of 18 BM had ≥1 of the following 4 mutations in baseline cfDNA: APC, BRCA2, CDKN2A or SMAD4 vs 5/68 non-BM (p = 0.001). Absence of this genomic pattern had a high negative predictive value (85%) and specificity (93%) in excluding BM development. Baseline genomic profile varies in MBC that develops BM.

Clinical Implications and Treatment Strategies for ESR1 Fusions in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Series.

In hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC), endocrine resistance is commonly due to genetic alterations of ESR1, the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). While ESR1 point mutations (ESR1-MUT) cause acquired resistance to aromatase inhibition (AI) through constitutive activation, far less is known about the molecular functions and clinical consequences of ESR1 fusions (ESR1-FUS). This case series discusses 4 patients with HR+ MBC with ESR1-FUS in the context of the existing ESR1-FUS literature. We consider therapeutic strategies and raise the hypothesis that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) may be effective against ESR1-FUS with functional ligand-binding domain swaps. These cases highlight the importance of screening for ESR1-FUS in patients with HR+ MBC while continuing investigation of precision treatments for these genomic rearrangements.

Superior Block Length and Reduced Opioid Use with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone regional block versus plain Ropivacaine: a retrospective trial.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if using a combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine (Dex-Dex) in a single-shot perineural local anesthestic provides an increased duration of pain relief and reduced consumption of opioids for patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective trial of adult patients without major comorbidities undergoing elective, upper arm orthopedic procedures with regional nerve block for post-operative analgesia. Patients underwent nerve block with either 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine with 5mg dexamethasone and 25mg dexmedetomidine ("dex-dex"). Patients were assessed in 1-week intervals for two weeks for duration of block analgesia, pain scores, and opioid use. Results: 31 patients were included, 12 controls and 19 in the dex-dex group. These patients underwent one of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, reverse total shoulder repair or repair of humerus fractures. Dex-dex blocks provided significantly longer analgesia (median block time 3.5 versus 1.5 days, p<0.0001), significantly better analgesia (mean NRS 2.32 versus 8.58 on post-operative day 1, p<0.0001), and significantly reduced opioid requirements (108.16mg vs 275.63mg in MME, p<0.0001). One patient experienced transient hypotension and prolonged paresthesia in the dex-dex group. Conclusion: Preoperative single-shot interscalene nerve blocks with preservative-free dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine added as adjuvants to ropivicaine provide approximately two additional days of benefit versus ropivicaine alone. Additionally, postoperative opioid consumption is reduced.