The role of genetic testing in diagnosis and care of inherited cardiac conditions in a specialised multidisciplinary clinic.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of genetic testing for inherited cardiac diseases is up to 40% and is primarily indicated for screening of at-risk relatives. Here, we evaluate the role of genomics in diagnosis and management among consecutive individuals attending a specialised clinic and identify those with the highest likelihood of having a monogenic disease. METHODS: A retrospective audit of 1697 consecutive, unrelated probands referred to a specialised, multidisciplinary clinic between 2002 and 2020 was performed. A concordant clinical and genetic diagnosis was considered solved. Cases were classified as likely monogenic based on a score comprising a positive family history, young age at onset, and severe phenotype, whereas low-scoring cases were considered to have a likely complex aetiology. The impact of a genetic diagnosis was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 888 probands fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and genetic testing identified likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) variants in 330 individuals (37%) and suspicious variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in 73 (8%). Research-focused efforts identified 46 (5%) variants, missed by conventional genetic testing. Where a variant was identified, this changed or clarified the final diagnosis in a clinically useful way for 51 (13%). The yield of suspicious VUS across ancestry groups ranged from 15 to 20%, compared to only 10% among Europeans. Even when the clinical diagnosis was uncertain, those with the most monogenic disease features had the greatest diagnostic yield from genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Research-focused efforts can increase the diagnostic yield by up to 5%. Where a variant is identified, this will have clinical utility beyond family screening in 13%. We demonstrate the value of genomics in reaching an overall diagnosis and highlight inequities based on ancestry. Acknowledging our incomplete understanding of disease phenotypes, we propose a framework for prioritising likely monogenic cases to solve their underlying cause of disease.

Loss of FANCD2 and related proteins may predict malignant transformation in oral epithelial dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Predicting malignant transformation (MT) in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is challenging. The higher rate of MT reported in nonsmokers suggests an endogenous etiology in oncogenesis. We hypothesize that loss of FANCD2 and associated proteins could influence genomic instability and MT in the absence of environmental carcinogens. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal archival samples were obtained from 40 individuals with OED: from diagnosis to the most recent review in 23 patients with stable OED or until excision of the squamous cell carcinoma in 17 patients with unstable OED undergoing MT. Histopathological reassessment, immunohistochemistry for FANCD2, and Western blotting for phosphorylation/monoubiquitylation status of ATR, CHK1, FANCD2, and FANCG were undertaken on each tissue sample. RESULTS: Decreased expression of FANCD2 was observed in the diagnostic biopsies of OED lesions that later underwent MT. Combining the FANCD2 expression scores with histologic grading more accurately predicted MT (P = .005) than histology alone, and it correctly predicted MT in 10 of 17 initial biopsies. Significantly reduced expression of total FANCD2, pFANCD2, pATR, pCHK-1, and pFANCG was observed in unstable OED. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence that defects in the DNA damage sensing/signaling/repair cascade are associated with MT in OED. Loss of expression of FANCD2 protein in association with a higher histologic grade of dysplasia offered better prediction of MT than clinicopathologic parameters alone.