RESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate whether the results of chemosensitivity testing were associated with prognosis of colorectal cancer patients after adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (FU)/ leucovorin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who received 5-FU/leucovorin adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer were enrolled. Chemosensitivity tests were performed and tumor growth inhibition rate was calculated using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)02,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide) assay. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (57.3%) were sensitive to 5-FU according to the chemosensitivity test. After a median follow-up of 64 months, there was a significant difference between the 5-year disease-free survival rates of the chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant groups. However, there was no significant difference in the overall 5-year survival between the chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant groups. CONCLUSION: A positive 5-FU sensitivity test with in vitro histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was associated with better disease-free survival. Chemosensitivity may be a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients undergoing adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos de Selección de Medicamentos Antitumorales , Femenino , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PronósticoAsunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Granuloma de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Radiofármacos , Enfermedades del Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown the features of skip metastasis in other cancers besides gastric cancer. Since minimally invasive surgery has been applied to gastric cancer, the concerns and awareness of skip metastasis have grown in the medical community. We conducted the present retrospective study to reveal the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with skip metastasis. We also wished to clarify the clinical impact of skip metastasis for gastric cancer. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty-nine patients having lymphatic metastases were enrolled in the present study. Among them, 266 patients had positive nodes extending into the N2 group. We divided these patients into the skip positive (+) and the skip negative (-) group, and we comparatively analysed clinicopathological factors and calculated the survival probabilities for the two groups. RESULTS: The skip (+) and skip (-) groups involved 14 (5.3%) and 252 (94.7%) patients, respectively. Of all the investigated factors, a significant difference between two groups was observed only in the total number of retrieved nodes. Stations of skip nodes were along left gastric (7), anterior common hepatic (8a), celiac (9), splenic (11) artery and right paracardial nodes (1). The survival curves calculated in the present study did not show any statistical differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Due to problems of skip metastasis in gastric cancer, D2 lymph node dissection should be performed until sentinel node detection is feasible and reliable. The potential risk from skip metastasis is not great and skip metastasis itself should not be a major consideration in therapeutic decisions.
