RESUMEN
Objetivo: Evaluar la relación de la diferencia venoarterial de PCO2 (ΔPCO2) con la aparición de complicaciones en el manejo postoperatorio precoz del trasplante hepático. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional y prospectivo realizado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos médico-quirúrgica de un hospital universitario. Se incluyó a 150 pacientes adultos que recibieron un trasplante de hígado ortotópico entre enero de 2015 y noviembre de 2018. Los pacientes fueron clasificados en 4grupos predefinidos de acuerdo con la evolución de la ΔPCO2 durante las primeras 6 h del postoperatorio en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, al considerar ese periodo como el de mayor riesgo de alteraciones hemodinámicas: 1) ΔPCO2 persistentemente normal (normal en T0 y T6); 2) ΔPCO2 descendente (alta en T0, normal en T6); 3) ΔPCO2 ascendente (normal en T0, alta en T6) y 4) ΔPCO2 persistentemente alta (alta en T0 y T6). Se comparó la relación de dichos grupos con la aparición de disfunción multiorgánica a las 72 h y las probabilidades de supervivencia globales y en el día 30 se describieron mediante curvas de Kaplan-Meier; las diferencias se calcularon mediante un test log-rank. Para el estudio de la correlación entre índice cardiaco y ΔPCO2 se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Resultados: La disfunción multiorgánica representada mediante el SOFA a las 72 h (p=0,86) y el Δ-SOFA (p=0,088) no presentó diferencias significativas entre los 4grupos a estudio, de la misma forma que ocurrió con la mortalidad hospitalaria (χ2=5,72; p=0,126) y a los 30 días (χ2=2,23; p=0,5252). Con respecto a la relación entre índice cardiaco y ΔPCO2, se demostró una correlación inversa estadísticamente significativa de valor bajo (rho de Spearman: −0,17; p=0,002). Conclusiones: En pacientes críticos admitidos tras un trasplante hepático, la diferencia venoarterial de PCO2 no predice la mortalidad ni la incidencia de complicaciones en el periodo postoperatorio inmediato.(AU)
Objective: Test whether the development of abnormal venous-to arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) during the early phases of postoperative care after a liver transplantation is related to multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes. Materials and methods: Prospective cohort study accomplished in a mixed intensive care unit at a university hospital. We included 150 eligible patients after a liver transplantation between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified in 4predefined groups according to the ΔPCO2 evolution during the first 6h of resuscitation: 1) persistently normal ΔPCO2 (normal at T0 and T6); 2) decreasing ΔPCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); 3) increasing ΔPCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); and 4) persistently high ΔPCO2 (high at T0 and T6). Multiorgan dysfunction at day-3 was compared for predefined groups and a Kaplan Meier curve was constructed to show the survival probabilities using a log-rank test to evaluate differences between groups. A Spearman-rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2. Results: There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding higher SOFA scores at day-3 (P=0.86), Δ-SOFA (P=0.088), as well as global mortality rates (χ2=5.72; P=0.126) and mortality rates at day-30 (χ2=2.23; P=0.5252). A significantly poor inverse agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2 was observed (rho de Spearman −0,17; P=0,002) at different points of resuscitation. Conclusions: After a liver transplantation, central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference was not associated with survival or postoperative adverse outcomes in a critical care patients population.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Hospitales Universitarios , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , AnestesiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Test whether the development of abnormal venous-to arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) during the early phases of postoperative care after a liver transplantation (LT) is related to multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study accomplished in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. We included 150 eligible patients after a LT between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified in four predefined groups according to the ΔPCO2 evolution during the first 6â¯h of resuscitation: (1) persistently normal ΔPCO2 (normal at T0 and T6); (2) decreasing ΔPCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); (3) increasing ΔPCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); and (4) persistently high ΔPCO2 (high at T0 and T6). Multiorgan dysfunction at day-3 was compared for predefined groups and a Kaplan Meier curve was constructed to show the survival probabilities using a log-rank test to evaluate differences between groups. A Spearman-Rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding higher SOFA scores at day-3 (Pâ¯=â¯.86), Δ-SOFA (Pâ¯=â¯.088), as well as global mortality rates (χ²â¯=â¯5.72; Pâ¯=â¯.126) and mortality rates at day-30 (χ²â¯=â¯2.23; Pâ¯=â¯.5252). A significantly poor inverse agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2 was observed (r2 -0,17; Pâ¯=â¯,002) at different points of resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: After a LT, central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference was not associated with survival or postoperative adverse outcomes in a critical care patients population.
Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resucitación , Unidades de Cuidados IntensivosRESUMEN
Objetivo: Determinar la capacidad de predicción del índice de shock y del índice de shock modificado para hemorragia masiva tras sufrir un trauma grave. Diseño: Cohorte retrospectiva. Ámbito: Atención inicial hospitalaria al paciente con enfermedad traumática grave en una unidad de cuidados intensivos de trauma de un hospital terciario. Sujetos: Pacientes mayores de 14 años con trauma grave (injury severity score [ISS] >15), admitidos de forma consecutiva desde enero de 2014 hasta diciembre de 2015. Variables: Se estudiaron sensibilidad (Se), especificidad (Sp), valores predictivos positivo y negativo (VP+ y VP-), razones de verosimilitud positiva y negativa (RV+ y RV-), curvas ROC (receiver operating characteristics) y el área bajo las mismas (AUROC) para predicción de hemorragia masiva. Resultados: Se incluyeron 287 pacientes, el 76,31% (219) fueron varones, con una edad media de 43,36 (±17,71) e ISS de 26 (rango intercuartil [RIC]: 21-34). La frecuencia global de hemorragia masiva fue de 8,71% (25). Para el índice de shock se obtuvo: AUROC de 0,89 (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 0,84-0,94), con un punto de corte óptimo en 1,11, Se del 91,3% (IC 95%: 73,2-97,58) y Sp del 79,69% (IC 95%: 74,34-84,16). Para el índice de shock modificado se obtuvo: AUROC de 0,90 (IC 95%: 0,86-0,95), con un punto de corte óptimo en 1,46, Se del 95,65% (IC 95%: 79,01-99,23) y Sp del 75,78% (IC 95%: 70,18-80,62). Conclusiones: El índice de shock y el índice de shock modificado son buenos predictores de hemorragia masiva y de fácil aplicación durante la atención inicial del trauma grave (AU)
Objective: To determine the predictive value of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in patients with massive bleeding due to severe trauma. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Severe trauma patient's initial attention at the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. Subjects: Patients older than 14 years that were admitted to the hospital with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) form January 2014 to December 2015. Variables: We studied the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PV+ and PV-), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-), ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristics) and the area under the same (AUROC) for prediction of massive hemorrhage. Results: 287 patients were included, 76.31% (219) were male, mean age was 43,36 (±17.71) years and ISS was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 21-34). The overall frequency of massive bleeding was 8.71% (25). For Shock Index: AUROC was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.84 to 0.94), with an optimal cutoff at 1.11, Se was 91.3% (95% CI: 73.2 to 97.58) and Sp was 79.69% (95% CI: 74.34 to 84.16). For the Modified Shock Index: AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95), with an optimal cutoff at 1.46, Se was 95.65% (95% CI: 79.01 to 99.23) and Sp was 75.78% (95% CI: 70.18 to 80.62). Conclusion: Shock Index and Modified Shock Index are good predictors of massive bleeding and could be easily incorporated to the initial workup of patients with severe trauma (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Choque/clasificación , Choque/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Hidroxicloroquina/envenenamiento , Intento de Suicidio , Paro Cardíaco/inducido químicamente , Cuidados Críticos/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in patients with massive bleeding due to severe trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Severe trauma patient's initial attention at the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients older than 14 years that were admitted to the hospital with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) form January 2014 to December 2015. VARIABLES: We studied the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PV+ and PV-), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-), ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristics) and the area under the same (AUROC) for prediction of massive hemorrhage. RESULTS: 287 patients were included, 76.31% (219) were male, mean age was 43,36 (±17.71) years and ISS was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 21-34). The overall frequency of massive bleeding was 8.71% (25). For Shock Index: AUROC was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.84 to 0.94), with an optimal cutoff at 1.11, Se was 91.3% (95% CI: 73.2 to 97.58) and Sp was 79.69% (95% CI: 74.34 to 84.16). For the Modified Shock Index: AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95), with an optimal cutoff at 1.46, Se was 95.65% (95% CI: 79.01 to 99.23) and Sp was 75.78% (95% CI: 70.18 to 80.62). CONCLUSION: Shock Index and Modified Shock Index are good predictors of massive bleeding and could be easily incorporated to the initial workup of patients with severe trauma.