Therapeutic Choices in Patients with Ph-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Mexico in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Stem Cell Transplantation or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors? Fifteen Years Later.

Background: Chronic myelogenous leukemia is a neoplastic proliferation of the granulocytic series. In Mexico, chronic myelogenous leukemia accounts for approximately 10% of all leukemias. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors are considered front-line therapy in high-income countries, whereas allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a recognized therapeutic approach, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To analyze the overall survival of persons with chronic myelogenous leukemia who have received tyrosine-kinase inhibitors or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a medical center, since 1994, and briefly discuss the current indications of these treatments in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitors era. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with a diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia treated in a medical center between 1994 and 2023; subsets of individuals who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors therapy as first-line treatment were analyzed. Results: 60 persons with chronic myelogenous leukemia were treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: 35 received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, whereas 25 were given tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. All patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation engrafted successfully, and the procedure was completed on an outpatient basis in most cases (29/35). The median survival in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 78.3 months (CI 95%: 0-205.6) and in persons given tyrosine-kinase inhibitors the median was not reached. Conclusion: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors were significantly superior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in prolonging the overall survival of persons with chronic myelogenous leukemia in our single institution experience.

Prevalence and Consequences of a Delayed Diagnosis in Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease with unspecific initial symptoms which may lead into a delay in the diagnosis, seemingly increasing the risk of complications and in turn reducing the overall survival (OS). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the consequences of a delayed diagnosis of MM in both the OS and the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in a single center in México. METHODS: The study included patients with MM who were diagnosed at Clínica Ruiz, Puebla, México, between 1983 and 2022. According to the time elapsed between the onset of symptoms to the establishment of the definite diagnosis of MM, 4 groups were constructed: 1) Less than 3 months, 2) 3-6 months, 3) 6-12 months, and 4) More than 12 months. RESULTS: About 136 patients had a complete clinical record and at least a 3-month follow up period. A delay in the diagnosis of MM (more than 3 months from the onset of symptoms) was recorded in 92/136 persons (68%). The median follow-up for the whole group was 24.7 months, median OS was 131.4 months, whereas median PFS was 85.4 months. There was a significant trend for being in earlier stages of the disease and being diagnosed within 3 months from the onset of symptoms (P = .049). Both OS and PFS were similar in the patients diagnosed before or after 3 months from the symptoms onset (P = .772). The 6-12 months group was the group with the better median both OS (197.4 months) and DFS (197.4) from the diagnosis. The median OS for the other groups were similar among them. CONCLUSION: A delay in the diagnosis of MM is very frequent in México (68% of cases); despite the fact that there was a significant trend for being in earlier stages of the disease and being diagnosed within 3 months from the onset of symptoms, we did not find a relationship between a delay on the diagnosis of the disease and a higher risk of complications and/or poor prognosis. Possible explanations to these findings are discussed.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammatory index as markers of response to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in persons with multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Biomarkers that help to evaluate the immune system and could be useful in multiple sclerosis (MS) are the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII). The objective of this work is to evaluate the significance of the SII index, PLR, and NLR before and after transplantation in individuals with MS who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) at a single institution. METHODS: Patients with MS who received an aHSCT between 2017 and 2022 were included in the study. NLR, PLR, and SII index were calculated prior to the transplant and 100 days after, and evaluation of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was done before the transplant and 12 months after. The cohort was divided into two groups: aHSCT responders (R) and nonresponders (NR). RESULTS: Fifty-eight individuals were examined: 37 patients in the responders group R group and 21 in NR group. There was no statistically significant difference in the SII, NLR, and PLR prior to the transplant, however at 100 days post-HSCT, NLR in the R group was 1.8 versus 3.1 in the NR group (p = 0.003), PLR was 194 versus 295, respectively (p = 0.024), meanwhile SII index was 489.5 versus 729.3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: High NLR and SII index values after the aHSCT were associated with a worsening in the EDSS score. However, since this is the first ever study that compared NLR and SII index with the aHSCT response in persons with MS, further studies must be performed to corroborate this information.

The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: We have analyzed the association of delayed both diagnosis and treatment of persons with MS with the long-term results of patients given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). METHODS: Patients with MS referred to the HSCT-Mexico program were included in the study; in 103, detailed pre- and post-transplant evolution could be recorded. Two groups of patients were analyzed according to the time of evolution between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis of MS: more than 8 months (delayed diagnosis, DD), or less than 8 months (non-delayed diagnosis, NDD). The progression of MS was assessed by changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). RESULTS: The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis was lower for the NDD group (1.55 vs. 35.87 months, p<0.05). Both groups of patients showed a similar EDSS score at diagnosis (1.5 vs. 1.5); however, the EDSS at the time of the transplant was higher in the DD group (4.5 vs. 3.0, p=0.3) and the response of the EDSS score to the transplant was significantly better for the NDD group, the last EDSS scores being 2.5 vs. 4.25 (p=0.03). Both groups of patients responded to aHSCT by diminishing the EDSS, but the response was significantly better in the NDD group. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that both the pre-transplant progression of the disease and the response to aHSCT were significantly worse in the DD group. An early diagnosis and an early aHSCT intervention are critical for a good prognosis, in terms of lowering and stabilizing the motor disability in MS patients given autografts.

Second Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Center Prospective Experience.

Immunosuppressive therapy is useful in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the most effective immunosuppressive treatment in this setting. Information on the usefulness of a second aHSCT in patients with MS is scarce. In a group of 1225 individuals with MS prospectively managed with aHSCT, we analyzed the salient features of 4 patients who received 2 consecutive transplants. After a moderate initial response to the first aHSCT, the patients were transplanted again after deterioration of their neurologic status; the second transplant was well tolerated and, in all instances, was completed on an outpatient basis and with no associated undesired toxicity. The autograft protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02674217. After the second graft, the expanded disability status scale score stabilized in 2 patients; in 1, the post-transplant period was too short to assess the response, and in another, the development of associated Parkinson's disease precluded the assessment of the outcome. In conclusion, a second aHSCT in persons with MS is feasible, safe, and may lead to a positive response in some cases.