OSNA Total Tumor Load for the Prediction of Axillary Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Should We use Different Thresholds According to the Intrinsic Molecular Subtype? MOTTO Study.

Aims: To assess the impact of the molecular subtype (MS) on the total number of CK19 mRNA copies in all positive SLN (TTL) threshold, to predict non-SLN affectation, and to compare 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) according to the risk of recurrence (ROR) group by PAM50. Methods: Cohort with infiltrating breast cancer with intra-operative metastatic SLN detected by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay who underwent subsequent ALND. Logistic regression was used to assess a possible interaction between TTL and MS(Triple Negative, Her-2-Enriched, Luminal A, or Luminal B), or hormone receptors (HR: positive or negative) by immunohistochemistry (IMH). Cox regression was used to compare PFS and OS in the 3 ROR groups (high, medium, or low). Results: TTL was predictive of non-SLN affectation in both univariate (OR [95% CI]: 1.72 [1.43, 2.05], P < .001) and multivariate (1.55 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.32], P = .030) models, but MS-IMH or HR-IMH, and their interactions with TTL were not (best multivariate model: HR + main effect OR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.18, 7.64], P = .874; interaction OR: 1.04 [0.7, 1.55], P = .835; univariate model: HR + main effect OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.44], P = .180). PFS was lower in the high-risk ROR group (81.1%) than in the low-risk group (93.9%) (HR: 3.68 [95 CI: 1.70, 7.94], P < .001). Conclusions: our results do not provide evidence to support the utilization of subtype-specific thresholds for TTL values to make therapeutic decisions on the axilla. The ROR group was predictive of 5 years-PFS.

Indicaciones y resultados de la biopsia del ganglio centinela en el cáncer de mama: cambios observados en el año 2018 respecto al año 2012 / Indications and results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in breast cancer: changes observed in 2018 compared to 2012

Antecedentes y objetivo Durante los últimos 15 años se han sucedido múltiples cambios en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama (CM) y, en especial, en las indicaciones de la biopsia del ganglio centinela (BGC) y las actitudes ante su resultado. Valorando estos avances, nuestro objetivo es comparar los resultados de las BGC realizadas en nuestro centro en 2012, año a partir del cual se dejó de practicar linfadenectomía axilar (LA) ante el hallazgo de micrometástasis en la BGC, con aquellas llevadas a cabo en 2018, cuando empezaron a aplicarse los criterios Z0011. Material y métodos Hemos desarrollado un estudio retrospectivo observacional comparativo entre la población de pacientes con CM cN0 a las que se les hizo una BGC en el año 2012 y aquellas a las que se les practicó este procedimiento en 2018. Resultados Al analizar los 2 grupos, 174 pacientes de 2012 y 165 de 2018, se hallaron algunas diferencias significativas: en 2018 hubo mayor tasa de BGC, menor número de cánceres lobulillares (14/28; p<0,05), el tamaño medio anatomopatológico fue menor (p<0,001), la representación de tumores Her2 y triple negativos fue mayor (28/49; p<0,01), así como la proporción de tratamiento neoadyuvante (6,6 vs. 42,5%; p<0,001). Al valorar los resultados del estudio axilar, en 2018 hubo un descenso tanto en la positividad de la BGC, que descendió a casi la mitad que en 2012 (42,4 vs. 24,1%; p<0,0001), como en el porcentaje de LA (21,2 vs. 12,6%; p<0,05), así como el de LA con resultado negativo (74,3 vs. 59,1%; p=ns). Conclusión En el grupo de estudio de 2018 se halló una mayor tasa de BGC, con menor tasa de resultado positivo y de LA en blanco, pese a tratarse de una población con tumores más agresivos. Este hecho podría justificarse con la mejora en el filtro radiológico mediante ecografía al diagnóstico, así como con el aumento en el uso de la terapia neoadyuvante (AU)

Background and objective Over the last 15 years, breast cancer (BC) treatment has undergone numerous changes, which have also affected the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as well as the procedures depending on its outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the SLNB carried out at our center during 2012, when we stopped performing an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after the finding of a micrometastasis, with those conducted in 2018, when we started applying Z011 criteria. Materials and methods We have performed a comparative retrospective observational study, including cN0 BC patients that underwent a SLNB in 2012 versus those that underwent this procedure in 2018. Results A total of 174 patients from 2012 and 165 from 2018 were studied. We found significant differences between the 2groups: in 2018 there were fewer lobular invasive cancers (14 vs. 28) (P<0.05), a smaller mean pathological size(P<0.001), a higher proportion of HER2 and triple negative tumors (28 vs. 49; P<0.01) and, finally, an increase in use of neoadjuvant treatments (42.0 vs. 6.7%). Regarding axillary involvement, we observed a decrease in both the presence of a positive sentinel node (24.1% in 2018 vs. 42.4% in 2012; P<0.0001) as well as in the proportion of ALND performed (12.6% in 2018 vs. 21.2% in 2012) and the presence of positive non sentinel nodes after a ALND (59.1% vs. 74.3%; P=ns). Conclusion Although the 2018 cohort that underwent SLNB had more aggressive tumors, there were fewer positive SN and ALND performed. This is probably due to a more accurate radiological diagnosis with ultrasound, that enables to detect cN1 cases before surgery, and to the increasing use of neoadjuvant treatments that may downstage the axilla (AU)

Indications and results of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Changes observed in 2018 compared to 2012.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Over the last 15 years, breast cancer (BC) treatment has undergone numerous changes, which have also affected the indications for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) as well as the procedures depending on its outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the SLNB carried out at our Center during 2012, when we stopped performing an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after the finding of a micrometastasis, with those conducted in 2018, when we started applying Z011 criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have performed a comparative retrospective observational study, including cN0 BC patients that underwent a SLNB in 2012 versus those that underwent this procedure in 2018. RESULTS: 174 patients from 2012 and 165 from 2018 were studied. We found significant differences between the two groups: in 2018 there were fewer lobular invasive cancers (14 vs 28) (P < .05), a smaller mean pathological size (P < .001), a higher proportion of HER2 and triple negative tumors (28 vs 49) (P < .01) and, finally, an increase in use of neoadjuvant treatments (42.0% vs 6.7%). Regarding axillary involvement, we observed a decrease in both the presence of a positive sentinel node (24.1% in 2018 vs 42.4% in 2012) (P < .0001) as well as in the proportion of ALND performed (12.6% in 2018 vs 21.2% in 2012) and the presence of positive non sentinel nodes after a ALND (59.1% vs74.3%) (ns) CONCLUSION: Although the 2018 cohort that underwent SLNB had more aggressive tumors, there were fewer positive SN and ALND performed. This is probably due to a more accurate radiological diagnosis with ultrasound, that enables to detect cN1 cases before surgery, and to the increasing use of neoadjuvant treatments that may downstage the axilla.

Is it always necessary to perform an axillary lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Recent prospective studies support the feasibility of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially fine-needle aspiration cytology or ultrasound-guided biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer. The main aid is to identify preoperative features that help us predict a complete axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these patients and thus select the candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy to avoid unnecessary axillary lymphadenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a total of 150 patients, biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast surgery and axillary lymphadenectomy were included and retrospectively analysed. A predictive model was generated by a multivariate logistic regression analysis for pathological complete response-dependent variable. RESULTS: The response of the primary lesion to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging, Her2/neu overexpression and a low estrogen receptor expression are associated with a higher rate of nodal pathologically complete response. The multivariant model generated a receiver operating characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 0.79 and a confidence interval of 0.72-0.87 at a 95% level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: This model could be a helpful tool for the surgeon to help in predicting which cases have a higher likelihood of achieving a pathologically complete response and therefore selecting those who may benefit from a post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel lymph node biopsy and avoid unnecessary axillary lymphadenectomy.

Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The present work assesses the effect of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), deferred breast reconstruction (DBR), and no breast reconstruction on the psychological impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Standard questionnaires were used to determine the psychological impact suffered by patients who underwent IBR, DBR and no reconstruction, their degree of satisfaction with the results achieved, and their postprocedure opinions regarding reconstruction options. RESULTS: A total of 526 women underwent mastectomy. The response rate to the questionnaires was 71.67%. A significantly greater proportion of the women who underwent no reconstruction suffered psychological problems than those who underwent reconstruction of some type (P = 0.01). Some 94.77% of the women who underwent IBR maintained a postprocedure preference for this option; in contrast, some 87.27% of the DBR and 56.14% of the no-reconstruction patients declared a postprocedure preference for IBR. In all, 63.49% of the women who underwent reconstruction were moderately very satisfied with the aesthetic results achieved, while only 22.80% of the no-reconstruction patients declared such satisfaction (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The women who underwent no breast reconstruction suffered more emotional problems than those who underwent a reconstruction procedure. In general, all groups reported a postprocedure preference for IBR in their questionnaire answers. The aesthetic results achieved by IBR seem to be those best accepted.

Manejo del prurito durante el embarazo / Pruritus during pregnancy: a practical approach

El prurito, un síntoma frecuente durante la gestación, puede ser manifestación de un gran número de enfermedades. Si nos centramos en aquellas propias del embarazo podemos distinguir dos grandes grupos. Uno en el que no hay lesiones dermatológicas propias, formado por la colestasis intrahepática del embarazo, y su forma menor el prurito gestacional. Y otro más amplio y eminentemente dermatológico, caracterizado por la aparición de diversas lesiones en la piel. El tratamiento sintomático inicial es común para todos los procesos, y consiste en la administración de antipruriginosos tópicos.En el presente trabajo enfocamos este síntoma desde una perspectiva eminentemente práctica que permite de forma sencilla su diagnóstico diferencial, manejo, y orientación terapéutica inicial (AU)