Bowel Perforation after Extracorporeal Wave Lithotripsy: A Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is considered a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones up to 10-20 mm in diameter. Complications are uncommon, with a reported rate of 0-6% in the literature. Bowel perforation has only been described in a few case reports but requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: A review of the literature from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed including studies reporting bowel perforation secondary to ESWL between January 1990 and June 2022. RESULTS: We found 16 case reports of intestinal perforation in the literature. Although some patients had previously undergone abdominal surgery or had inflammatory intestinal disease, others were without comorbidities that could lead to complications. Abdominal pain was the main symptom and imaging was required to confirm the diagnosis, which usually necessitated a surgical intervention. As regards the ESWL technique, it appears that the combination of a high energy level and the prone position constitutes a risk factor for these rare complications. At the authors' centre, only one case has been reported among 24,000 ESWL procedures over 20 years: A 59-year-old female who underwent ESWL for a distal right ureteral stone presented acute abdominal pain and free intraperitoneal pelvic fluid on ultrasound. A CT scan revealed a small bowel perforation requiring open laparotomy with primary closure. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although bowel perforation after ESWL is rare, progressive abdominal pain with tenderness at physical examination requires proper imaging evaluation to exclude bowel perforation and prompt intervention if required.

Oral Acidification with l-Methionine as a Noninvasive Treatment for Encrusted Uropathy.

Background: Encrusted uropathy (EU) is a rare disease caused by urea-splitting bacteria, most commonly Corynebacterium urealyticum, whose incidence is increasing. Standard treatment is based on pathogen-directed antibiotic therapy, urinary diversion, bladder instillations, and surgical resection of urinary calcifications. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 60-year-old man with symptomatic bilateral encrusted pyelitis and cystitis with acute renal failure. We initially treated the patient with antibiotic therapy, urinary diversion, and oral acidification with acetohydroxamic acid, achieving negative urinary cultures. Because of the persistence of encrusted pyelitis, the patient was discharged on oral l-methionine 500 mg bid and 12 months later the encrustations had almost disappeared. Finally, we performed right retrograde intrarenal surgery to remove a persistent small calcification. Conclusion: Oral urinary acidification with l-methionine is a valid treatment for urinary encrustations in EU, with no complications reported. Complete resolution of the calcifications may be achieved without the need for invasive processes and unnecessary manipulation of the urinary system.

Simultaneous and synchronous bilateral endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis: a multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: The general prevalence of bilateral urolithiasis has risen to 15% and bilateral non-simultaneous treatment has been reported to have good outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An international multicenter analysis was performed between May 2015 and December 2017. All patients with bilateral stone disease that underwent SBES were included. Patients were treated under general anesthesia in either the supine or lithotomy position. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years and 70% of the patients were males. The mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2. The mean diameter of right- and left-sided stones was 29.43 mm (2-83 mm) and 31.15 (4-102 mm), respectively. Staghorn stones were treated in 18 cases (8 right-sided and 10 left-sided), four of them were defined as complete staghorn. The procedures performed were 42 cases of bilateral URS and PCNL and ureteroscopy. Additionally, 5 bilateral flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) cases were described. Intraoperative complications occurred in five patients: four of them were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and one as CD II. Postoperatively, there were two cases with CD I, 6 with CD II and one CD IIIa.The stone-free status was 70%. Residual stones (30%) were detected only on the side treated for high-volume (complete) staghorn calculi. CONCLUSIONS: SBES is a feasible, effective and safe procedure. It may potentially avoid repeated anesthetic sessions as needed for staged procedures and reduce the length of patients' hospital stay.

[Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Spain: Review of published demographic data in the period 1977-2016.] / Epidemiología de la urolitiasis en España: revisión de los datos demográficos publicadosen el periodo 1977­2016.

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data on urolithiasis in Spain have appeared in publications especially local and regional level, with few referrals to Spanish national territory. The aim of this paper is to review and systematize the epidemiological data published on urolithiasis in Spain. METHODS: We reviewed publications in national and international scientific journals, meetings and conferences, and research reports (1977-2016). PubMed search (indexed papers) and manual bibliography search (not indexed works) were performed. Bibliometric data evaluated: Year of publication, geographic area, number of cases, sample type, study design and publishing format. Demographic systematization of data: age, age and frequency distribution by gender, family history, social stratum, profession, place of residence, ethnics, seasonality and dietary habits. RESULTS: Publications revised: 79 corresponding to 56 main authors. Selected publications with original data: 42 (2 composed by Part I and II, and 2 composed by paper and thesis), corresponding to 35 authors. Bibliometric and demographic data of all publications are displayed in tables, sorted by variables. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive review of studies on epidemiology in Spain constitutes a solid basis for future research about epidemiology of urolithiasis.

Epidemiología de la urolitiasis en España: revisión de los datos demográficos publicados en el período 1977-2016 / Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Spain: review of published demographic data in the period 1977-2016

OBJETIVO: Los datos epidemiológicos sobre urolitiasis en España han aparecido sobre todo en publicaciones de ámbito comarcal y autonómico, siendo escasas las de carácter nacional español. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar y sistematizar los datos epidemiológicos publicados sobre urolitiasis en España en los distintos trabajos. MÉTODOS: Revisión de las publicaciones en revistas científicas nacionales e internacionales, reuniones y congresos, e informes de investigación (1977-2016). Búsqueda en PubMed (trabajos indexados) y rastreo bibliográfico manual (trabajos no indexados). Datos bibliométricos evaluados: año de publicación, zona geográfica, número de casos, tipo de muestra, diseño del estudio y formato de publicación. Datos demográficos sistematizados: edad, distribución de edad y frecuencia por género, antecedente familiar, estrato social, profesión, lugar de residencia, aspectos étnicos, estacionalidad y hábitos dietéticos. RESULTADOS: Publicaciones revisadas: 79, correspondientes a 56 autores principales. Publicaciones seleccionadas con datos originales: 42 (2 compuestas de parte I y II), correspondientes a 35 autores. Se muestran en tablas los datos bibliométricos y demográficos del conjunto de publicaciones, ordenados por variables. CONCLUSIONES: La revisión completa de trabajos sobre epidemiología en España constituye una base sólida para establecer futuras investigaciones epimiológicas sobre urolitiasis

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data on urolithiasis in Spain have appeared in publications especially local and regional level, with few referrals to Spanish national territory. The aim of this paper is to review and systematize the epidemiological data published on urolithiasis in Spain. METHODS: We reviewed publications in national and international scientific journals, meetings and conferences, and research reports (1977-2016). PubMed search (indexed papers) and manual bibliography search (not indexed works) were performed. Bibliometric data evaluated: Year of publication, geographic area, number of cases, sample systematization of data: age, age and frequency distribution by gender, family history, social stratum, profession, place of residence, ethnics, seasonality and dietary habits. RESULTS: Publications revised: 79 corresponding to 56 main authors. Selected publications with original data: 42 (2 composed by Part I and II, and 2 composed by paper and thesis), corresponding to 35 authors. Bibliometric and demographic data of all publications are displayed in tables, sorted by variables. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive review of studies on epidemiology in Spain constitutes a solid basis for future research about epidemiology of urolithiasis