Noninvasive Neuromonitoring of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest in Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Circulatory arrest carries a high risk of neurological damage, but modern monitoring methods lack reliability, and is susceptible to the generalized effects of both anesthesia and hypothermia. The objective of this prospective, explorative study was to research promising, reliable, and noninvasive methods of neuromonitoring, capable of predicting neurological outcome after hypothermic circulatory arrest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing hypothermic circulatory arrest during surgery of the thoracic aorta were recruited in a single center and over the course of 4 years. Neuromonitoring was performed with a four-channel electroencephalogram montage and a near-infrared spectroscopy monitor. All data were tested off-line against primary neurological outcome, which was poor if the patient suffered a significant neurological complication (stroke, operative death). RESULTS: A poor primary neurological outcome seen in 10 (33%) patients. A majority (63%) of the cases were emergency surgery, and thus, no neurological baseline evaluation was possible. The frontal hemispheric asymmetry of electroencephalogram, as measured by the brain symmetry index, predicted primary neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 79 (interquartile range; 62%-88%) and specificity of 71 (interquartile range; 61%-84%) during the first 6 h after end of circulatory arrest. CONCLUSION: The hemispheric asymmetry of frontal electroencephalogram is inherently resistant to generalized dampening effects and is predictive of primary neurological outcome. The brain symmetry index provides an easy-to-use, noninvasive neuromonitoring method for surgery of the thoracic aorta and postoperative intensive care.

Responsiveness of the frontal EMG for monitoring the sedation state of critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Excessive sedation is associated with adverse patient outcomes during critical illness, and a validated monitoring technology could improve care. We developed a novel method, the responsiveness index (RI) of the frontal EMG. We compared RI data with Ramsay clinical sedation assessments in general and cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: We developed the algorithm by iterative analysis of detailed observational data in 30 medical-surgical ICU patients and described its performance in this cohort and 15 patients recovering from scheduled cardiac surgery. Continuous EMG data were collected via frontal electrodes and RI data compared with modified Ramsay sedation state assessments recorded regularly by a blinded trained observer. RI performance was compared with Entropy™ across Ramsay categories to assess validity. RESULTS: RI correlated well with the Ramsay category, especially for the cardiac surgery cohort (general ICU patients ρ=0.55; cardiac surgery patients ρ=0.85, both P<0.0001). Discrimination across all Ramsay categories was reasonable in the general ICU patient cohort [P(K)=0.74 (sem 0.02)] and excellent in the cardiac surgery cohort [P(K)=0.92 (0.02)]. Discrimination between 'lighter' vs 'deeper' (Ramsay 1-3 vs 4-6) was good for general ICU patients [P(K)=0.80 (0.02)] and excellent for cardiac surgery patients [P(K)=0.96 (0.02)]. Performance was significantly better than Entropy™. Examination of individual cases suggested good face validity. CONCLUSIONS: RI of the frontal EMG has promise as a continuous sedation state monitor in critically ill patients. Further investigation to determine its utility in ICU decision-making is warranted.