Rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine practice (GERINIS): six-year results from a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study in 2,484 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care, and to monitor changes in daily practice since the introduction of RTX therapy. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study conducted under routine practice conditions in Germany. Efficacy was evaluated using Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety was assessed by recording adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Physician and patient global efficacy and tolerability assessments were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 2,484 patients (76.7% female, mean age 56.4 years, mean disease duration 11.7 years) received RTX treatment (22.7% monotherapy). The total observation period was approximately six-years (median follow-up 14.7 months). RTX treatment led to improvements in DAS28 and HAQ-DI that were sustained over multiple courses. DAS28 improvements positively correlated with higher rheumatoid factor levels up to 50 IU/ml. Response and tolerability were rated good/very good by the majority of physicians and patients. Mean treatment intervals were 10.5 and 6.8 months for the first and last 400 enrolled patients, respectively. Infections were the most frequently reported ADRs (9.1%; 11.39/100 patient-years); approximately 1% of patients per course discontinued therapy due to ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged RTX treatment in routine care is associated with good efficacy and tolerability, as measured by conventional parameters and by physicians' and patients' global assessments. Rheumatoid factor status served as a distinct and quantitative biomarker of RTX responsiveness. With growing experience, physicians repeated treatments earlier in patients with less severe disease activity.

Persistent clinical efficacy and safety of infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis after 8 years--early clinical response predicts long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To report for the first time on the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF therapy after 8 years of follow-up in patients with active AS, and analyse possible short-term predictors for long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this open-label extension of a randomized controlled trial, proportions of the initially included 69 patients with active AS were treated with infliximab 5 mg/kg i.v./6 weeks for 8 years. The last report was published after 5 years. All analyses were based on completers. RESULTS: Overall, 33 (48%) patients completed 8 years. Their mean (s.d.) BASDAI [2.6 (1.9)], BASFI [3.3 (2.6)] and BASMI [2.7 (2.4)] remained low at Year 8. At the end of Year 8, most patients were either in partial remission (n = 8, 24%) or had low disease activity (BASDAI < 3; n = 21, 64%). No new serious adverse events occurred within the past 3 years. Adverse events were the most frequent reason for dropout (56%). There were no differences between completers and dropouts at baseline, but the latter had higher BASFI values at dropout. No baseline parameter was associated with good long-term response to infliximab, but lower BASDAI levels after 12 weeks were predictive of a higher probability of partial remission [odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% CI 1.3, 6.3, P = 0.007], low disease activity (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3, P = 0.005) or remaining on treatment (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61, 1.01, P = 0.06) after 8 years. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the initially treated patients remained on anti-TNF therapy for 8 years, and almost 90% were in partial remission or had low disease activity. Short-term response (low BASDAI at 3 months) is predictive of outcome after 8 years. Infliximab therapy was safe over 8 years.

Safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab therapy in patients with different autoimmune diseases: experience from a national registry (GRAID).

INTRODUCTION: Evidence from a number of open-label, uncontrolled studies has suggested that rituximab may benefit patients with autoimmune diseases who are refractory to standard-of-care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab in several standard-of-care-refractory autoimmune diseases (within rheumatology, nephrology, dermatology and neurology) other than rheumatoid arthritis or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS: Patients who received rituximab having shown an inadequate response to standard-of-care had their safety and clinical outcomes data retrospectively analysed as part of the German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases. The main outcome measures were safety and clinical response, as judged at the discretion of the investigators. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients (299 patient-years) with various autoimmune diseases (23.0% with systemic lupus erythematosus, 15.7% antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated granulomatous vasculitides, 15.1% multiple sclerosis and 10.0% pemphigus) from 42 centres received a mean dose of 2,440 mg of rituximab over a median (range) of 194 (180 to 1,407) days. The overall rate of serious infections was 5.3 per 100 patient-years during rituximab therapy. Opportunistic infections were infrequent across the whole study population, and mostly occurred in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. There were 11 deaths (3.0% of patients) after rituximab treatment (mean 11.6 months after first infusion, range 0.8 to 31.3 months), with most of the deaths caused by infections. Overall (n = 293), 13.3% of patients showed no response, 45.1% showed a partial response and 41.6% showed a complete response. Responses were also reflected by reduced use of glucocorticoids and various immunosuppressives during rituximab therapy and follow-up compared with before rituximab. Rituximab generally had a positive effect on patient well-being (physician's visual analogue scale; mean improvement from baseline of 12.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this registry indicate that rituximab is a commonly employed, well-tolerated therapy with potential beneficial effects in standard of care-refractory autoimmune diseases, and support the results from other open-label, uncontrolled studies.

Safety and efficacy of readministration of infliximab after longterm continuous therapy and withdrawal in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of the anti-tumor necrosis factor agent infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after discontinuation of longterm therapy over 1 year and readministration, using clinical and laboratory assessments including serum levels of antibodies to infliximab (ATI). METHODS: Altogether 42/43 patients with AS in a 3-year multicenter trial discontinued therapy after continuous treatment with infliximab (5 mg/kg/6 wks). Infliximab was only readministered in case of a clinical relapse [judged by Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and physician global assessment > 4]. ATI were measured at different timepoints. The primary outcome was safety, and efficacy outcomes were secondary. RESULTS: One patient dropped out after the eighth infusion after retreatment due to repeated local infections. ATI were detected in this patient only. No other relevant adverse events were observed. One patient remained in clinical remission without therapy for more than 1 year. The other 40 patients (97.6%) were reinfused because of clinical relapse. There was no correlation between ATI and clinical measures. BASDAI 50% responses were seen in 25 (63%) and partial remission in 12 (30%) patients. The mean (+/- SD) BASDAI score dropped from 6.0 +/- 1.4 at the time of relapse to 2.6 +/- 2.0, and the median C-reactive protein from 11.2 to 1.8 mg/l after 1 year (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Readministration of infliximab after discontinuation of longterm treatment was generally safe and efficacious. Ongoing remission after discontinuation was rare. There was only one patient with relevant adverse events. ATI were detected only in this patient, but there was no correlation to clinical data. Formation of ATI seems to be rare after longterm infliximab therapy in AS.

Clinical response to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 3 years of continuous treatment with infliximab.

We analyzed the clinical response and the time to relapse after discontinuation of continuous long-term infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After 3 years of infliximab therapy, all AS patients (n = 42) discontinued treatment (time point (TP)1) and were visited regularly for 1 year in order to assess the time to relapse (TP2). Relapse was defined as an increase to a value >or= 4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and a physician's global assessment >or= 4 according to the recommendations of the Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) working group. After 52 weeks, 41 of the 42 patients (97.6%) had to be reinfused because of relapse. The mean change in the BASDAI between TP1 and TP2 was 3.6 +/- 1.7 and that in the physician's global assessment was 4.4 +/- 1.8 (both P < 0.001). The mean time to relapse was 17.5 weeks (+/- 7.9 weeks, range 7 to 45). Ten patients (24%) showed a relapse within 12 weeks and 38 patients (90.5%), within 36 weeks. After 52 weeks, only one patient had remained in ongoing remission without further treatment with anti-tumor-necrosis factor. Patients who were in partial remission according to the ASAS criteria and those with normal C-reactive protein levels at the time point of withdrawal had longer times to relapse after discontinuation of the treatment. Retreatment with infliximab was safe and resulted in clinical improvement in all patients to a state similar to that before the treatment was stopped. Discontinuation of long-term therapy with infliximab eventually led to relapse of disease activity in all patients but one.

Successful short term treatment of patients with severe undifferentiated spondyloarthritis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha fusion receptor protein etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-alpha) therapy has been successfully used in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and other subtypes of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Treatment options for patients with severe forms of undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (uSpA), a rather frequent SpA subset, are limited. In this open study we examined the efficacy of the TNF-alpha receptor fusion protein etanercept in patients with uSpA. METHODS: Ten patients classified to have uSpA according to modified European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria in a severe and active stage of disease were included in the study and received etanercept in a dosage of 25 mg two times a week for 12 weeks, followed by an observation period of 12 weeks. The following outcome variables were used: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Functional Index (BASFI), pain on a numerical rating scale, disability by the Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH), a validated questionnaire to assess functional disability, and quality of life (Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36, SF-36). The primary outcome variable was defined as >or= 50% improvement of the BASDAI. RESULTS: Treatment with etanercept resulted in a >or= 50% regression of disease activity in 60% (95% CI 31-83%) of the patients. The mean BASDAI at baseline of 6.1 (range 3.7-9.2) dropped significantly to 3.5 at Week 12 (0.8-8.7; p = 0.01). Function, spinal pain, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, quality of life, and acute phase reactants improved similarly. The FFbH improved from 62.8% to 69.7%. After cessation of anti-TNF therapy, 4 out of 8 patients relapsed after an average of 4.5 weeks (range 3-6). Two patients went into longstanding remission. No severe adverse events or major infections were observed. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that treatment with etanercept has short term efficacy in patients with active and severe uSpA. Since it is known that 30-50% of uSpA patients develop AS over time, it will be important to study whether this can be prevented by anti-TNF-alpha therapy.