Current situation in radiation oncology residency-Results of a national survey performed by the working group Young DEGRO of the German Society of Radiation Oncology.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the radiation oncology (RO) residency programs in Germany. For this, RO residents and RO specialists were surveyed regarding the current situation of the RO residency training and the working conditions in Germany. METHODS: The Continuing Education Section of the Young DEGRO (yDEGRO) Working Group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) developed a survey to assess (1) the overall satisfaction, learning objectives, and teaching methods used during training; and (2) the perception of the importance of specific disease patterns in RO training. Open-ended questions were also asked to elicit opinions on areas for improvement. From 21 November to 27 December 2022, RO residents registered with DEGRO and/or in the working group yDEGRO were invited to participate anonymously in an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 97 participants completed the survey, including 65 RO residents (67%) and 32 RO specialists (33%); 66 (68%) of the respondents reported being employed in the university setting, 23 (23.7%) in the non-university setting, and 8 (8.3%) in private practice. Within the training, heterogeneity was found in the teaching methods used. In terms of knowledge transfer, the greatest importance was accorded to annual continuing education discussions with the head of the residency training (92.8%), participation in tumor boards (85.6%), written training concepts (81.4%), and evaluations at the beginning (76.3%) and end of a rotation (80.4%). The arithmetic mean of satisfaction with specialist training was 6/10 points (SD: 1.99); 88.7% of respondents would like to see a nationally uniform and mandatory curriculum in RO residency training. CONCLUSION: The study provides suggestions for improving RO medical training in Germany: further development of accompanying education and training programs in cooperation with professional associations, e.g., the DEGRO, structured feedback, and supervision.

Dose-escalated re-irradiation improves outcome in locally recurrent head and neck cancer - Results of a large multicenter analysis.

To determine efficacy and prognostic parameters of definitive re-irradiation of locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locoregionally recurrent or second primary HNSCC undergoing re-irradiation with modern radiotherapy technique were eligible for this multicentric retrospective analysis. Main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LC). Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier Method (log-rank). For multivariable analysis, Cox regression was used. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients treated between 2009 and 2020 at 16 university hospitals in Germany were included. The median follow up was 27.4 months (range 0.5-130). The median OS and PFS were 13.2 (CI: 10.7 - 15.7) months and 7.9 (CI: 6.7 - 9.1) months, respectively, corresponding to two-year OS and PFS rates of 29 % and 19 %. Rates of locoregional progression and "in-field-failure" were 62 % and 51 % after two years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified good ECOG performance status and high radiation dose as independent prognostic parameters for OS. Doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) achieved longer median OS of 17.8 months (vs 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and longer PFS of 9.6 months (vs 6.8 months, p < 0.01). In addition, there was a trend for worse survival in patients with tracheostomy (multivariable, p = 0.061). Concomitant systemic therapy did not significantly impact PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation of locally recurrent or second primary HNSCC is efficient, especially if doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) are delivered. ECOG performance score was the strongest prognostic parameter for OS and PFS.

Prehabilitation of dysphagia in the therapy of head and neck cancer- a systematic review of the literature and evidence evaluation.

Background: Prehabilitation is becoming increasingly important in oncology because of the significant survival benefits that the reduction of malnutrition provide. Specifically, tumor- and therapy-related dysphagia leads to malnutrition in more than half of head and neck tumor patients. Studies describe the positive effects of an early onset of swallow-specific prehabilitation on the protection of the swallowing function. This paper intents to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficacy of preventive forms of swallowing therapy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in February 2022 in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials investigating preventive swallowing therapy in head and neck tumor patients. This Procedure complies with the PRISMA statement. The RCTs were evaluated by using the PEDro Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool RoB2. Results: Five randomized-controlled trials with 423 participants were identified. Four Studies showed moderate to high quality in the PEDro analysis, one showed less. The risk of bias was high in all studies because there was no possibility for blinding and there were high dropout rates. Heterogeneity in interventions, measurement instruments, measurement time points, and outcomes limits a general statement about which swallowing exercises are suitable for the prevention of dysphagia in head and neck tumor patients. Evidence is provided for short-term effects (≤24 months) on functional aspects of swallowing and quality of life. Overall, a decreasing adherence over time was observed in the intervention groups. Discussion: Initial studies describe swallowing-specific prehabilitation programs in head and neck tumor patients as effective, at least in the short term, whereas long-term effects need to be further investigated. At the current time the evidence base for clear recommendations does not appear to be sufficiently high and studies share a high risk of bias. Further well-designed research, especially considering the conditions in the national health care system, is needed. Other: There was no funding and no registration.

KCNN4 Expression Is Elevated in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: This Might Be a Novel Marker and Therapeutic Option Targeting Potassium Channels.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The K + channel KCNN4 is involved in many inflammatory diseases. Previous work has shown that this channel is involved in epithelial ion transport and intestinal restitution. In inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) a defective epithelial barrier can lead to typical symptoms like secretory diarrhea and the formation of intestinal ulcers. We compared surgical samples from patients with IBD, diverticulitis and controls without inflammation to determine the potential role of KCNN4 as a diagnostic marker and/or therapeutic target. METHODS: mRNA-levels of KCNN4 and a control K + channel were determined in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) from patients with IBD, diverticulitis and controls. In addition, we performed a Western blot analysis of KCNN4 and a respective control K + channel in IEC from patients with IBD. Furthermore, we determined epithelial barrier integrity by measuring the flux of fluorescent-labeled dextran beads across a cell monolayer upon incubation with interferon-γ. RESULTS: KCNN4 mRNA and protein levels were elevated in IEC from patients with Crohn`s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Of note, KCNN4 was not elevated in non-IBD intestinal inflammatory conditions e.g. diverticulitis. Of clinical relevance, pharmacological KCNN4 channel openers stabilized epithelial barrier function in vitro. Thus, KCNN4 may have a protective role in IBD and constitute a therapeutic target. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate elevated KCNN4 both at mRNA and protein level in IEC specifically from patients with IBD. Therefore, we conclude that KCNN4 could be used as a novel marker for IBD, especially for the establishment of initial diagnosis. Of therapeutic consequence, we show that pharmacological KCNN4 openers stabilize the epithelial barrier. Thus, KCNN4 might be a novel target to diagnose and treat IBD.

Re-irradiation for humeral epicondylitis : Retrospective analysis of 99 elbows.

BACKGROUND: Humeral epicondylitis is a common elbow disease. The prevalence is about 1.7%. One of the most effective treatment options is radiotherapy. Some authors mention that they apply a second or third course of radiation for recurrent pain or partial or no response to the initial course. As the results of a re-irradiation have not been systematically analyzed, the aim of this study was to document the results of repeated radiation treatment and to identify those patients who will benefit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients from three German radiotherapy institutions and included 99 re-irradiated elbows. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy as well as for the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 51 years with 48.8% male and 51.2% female patients. Repeated radiation was indicated because the initial radiotherapy resulted in 39.7% of no response, in 41.0% of partial response and in 19.3% of recurrent pain. RESULTS: A significant response to re-irradiation was found. For the whole sample the median pain score was 6 before re-irradiation, 3 after 6 weeks, 2 after 12 months and 1 after 24 months. The percentage of patients being free of pain or with very little pain was 50.9% 24 months after re-irradiation. All subgroups, notably those with no response, partial response and recurrent pain had a significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation of humeral epicondylitis is an effective and safe treatment. All subgroups showed a good response to re-irradiation for at least 24 months.

Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints-analysis of 66 joints.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints is less common than osteoarthritis of the knee or hip, but the associated disability is at least as severe as that of the other major joints of the lower limb. The results for total arthroplasty are still not satisfactory. For this reason, arthrodesis is still the gold standard of non-joint-conserving surgery. For the reason of functionality, joint-conserving therapies play a major role in treatment of ankle and tarsal osteoarthritis. Low-dose radiotherapy has a long history of treatment of osteoarthritis. The aim of this survey was to examine the results of low-dose radiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients of three German radiotherapy institutions and included 66 irradiated joints. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy course as well as for the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 68 years, with 24.5% male and 75.5% female patients. The upper ankle was treated in 37.9%, the lower ankle in 27.3% and the tarsal joints in 34.8%. RESULTS: We could find a significant response to radiotherapy. For the whole sample, the median pain was 7 on the NRS before radiotherapy, 5 after 6 and 12 weeks, and 4 after 12 months. The percentage of patients with 0 or 1 on the NRS was 19.6% 12 months after radiotherapy. An improvement of joint mobility could be detected in 56.7% of the cases. All investigated subgroups had a significant reduction in pain. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy of ankle and tarsal osteoarthritis is an effective treatment without showing side effects. All analysed subgroups show a good response to radiotherapy for at least 24 months.

Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis-an analysis of 295 joints treated with a linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis is a common disease, with a prevalence of symptomatic disease of 8.9%. One treatment option is radiotherapy. Most published samples were treated with an orthovoltage technique or with a telecobalt device. A lot of radiotherapy institutions are nowadays using linear accelerators for treatment of osteoarthritis. There is a discussion on whether the treatment results achieved with a linear accelerator are comparable to those with the orthovoltage technique. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of radiotherapy for osteoarthritis with a linear accelerator and compare the results with reference to different joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was performed in patients of two German radiotherapy institutions and included 295 irradiated joints. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy course as well as for the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 65 years, with 39.0% male and 61.0% female patients. Most frequently, osteoarthritis of the knee (34.6%) or the finger (15.9%) was treated. RESULTS: We could find a significant response to radiotherapy. Median pain for the whole sample was 7 on the NRS before radiotherapy, 4 after 6 weeks, and 3 after 12 and 24 months. The percentage of patients with 0 or 1 on the NRS was 33.8% 12 months after radiotherapy. All investigated subgroups had a significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy of osteoarthritis with a linear accelerator is an effective treatment which is very well tolerated. All analyzed subgroups show a good response to radiotherapy for at least 24 months. Orthovoltage therapy seems to be superior to treatment with a linear accelerator in a case-related analysis of the published samples. Further investigations should be performed for a definitive answer to this question.

Radiotherapy of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline-is the risk of relevant errors overestimated?

PURPOSE: Ionizing radiation is able to cause severe damage to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In Germany, the DEGRO/DGK guideline recommends close monitoring of patients with CIEDs undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Nevertheless, especially in the era of intensity-modulated techniques and predominant use of 6 MV photons, errors of CIEDs are rare events. Therefore, we performed daily CIED controls and hypothesized that no relevant device interaction would occur in our cohort. METHODS: From 2014 to 2018, we collected data of 51 patients (62 courses) with daily interrogation (n = 1046) of CIED. The dose to the skin above the CIED was measured by semiconductor or ion chamber dosimetry at least once per RT course. In many cases the dose was also calculated. RESULTS: The prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 7.5 to 78.0 Gy (IQR 27.8-61.0 Gy). The median measured cumulative dose to the skin above the CIED was 0.17 Gy, whereas the median calculated dose was 1.03 Gy. No error occurred in the group with maximum beam energy >10 MeV. Three events without clinical relevance could be recognized in the group with an intensity-modulated technique at 6 MV. None of the three concerned devices were located directly within the PTV. CONCLUSION: Errors of CIEDs during RT are rare events. The approach according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline is safe, but also consumes resources. In our cohort it was not compulsory to relocate any CIED. Clinically relevant events are uncommon, so it remains debatable which procedure is necessary. Daily controls could be avoided in some selected cases without compromising patient safety.

Re-irradiation for osteoarthritis-retrospective analysis of 217 joints.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis is a common disease with a prevalence of approximately 8.9% among the average population. One treatment option is low-dose radiotherapy. Some authors mention that they apply a second or third course of radiation for recurrent pain or partial or no response to the initial course. As the results of re-irradiation have not been analysed systematically, the aim of this study was to document the results of repeated radiation treatment and to identify those patients who will benefit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The analysis was performed on patients of three German radiotherapy institutions and included 217 re-irradiated joints. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy as well as at the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 67 years, with 40% male and 60% female patients. Re-irradiation was indicated because the initial radiotherapy resulted in no response in 21.2%, in partial response in 41.5%, and in recurrent pain in 37.3%. RESULTS: We found a significant response to re-irradiation. For the whole sample, the median pain was 6 before re-irradiation, 4 after 6 weeks, and 3 after 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. The percentage of patients being free of pain or with very little pain was approximately 25% 12 months after re-irradiation. All subgroups, notably those with no response to the first course versus partial response to the first course versus recurrent pain, had significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation of osteoarthritis is an effective and safe treatment. All subgroups showed a good response to re-irradiation for at least 24 months.

Radiotherapy of epicondylitis humeri : Analysis of 138 elbows treated with a linear accelerator.

BACKGROUND: Epicondylitis humeri is a common disease with a prevalence of 1.7%. One of the treatment options is radiotherapy. Most published cases were treated with the orthovoltage technique or with a telecobalt device. Many radiotherapy institutions are nowadays using linear accelerators for treatment of epicondylitis humeri. There is a discussion whether the treatment results with linear accelerators are comparable to the orthovoltage technique. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of radiotherapy with a linear accelerator for epicondylitis humeri. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients of 2 German radiotherapy institutions and included 138 irradiated elbows. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy course as well as for the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 49 years with 48.4% male and 51.6% female. In all, 81.0% were suffering from from epicondylitis humeri radialis while 16.7% were treated because of epicondylitis humeri ulnaris. In 65.4% the dominant arm was treated. RESULTS: A significant response to radiotherapy could be found. For the whole sample the median pain was 7 on the NRS before radiotherapy, 4 after 6 weeks and 0 after 12 and 24 months. The percentage of patients with 0 or 1 on the NRS was 64.6% 12 months after radiotherapy. All subgroups, notably those with epicondylitis humeri radialis and epicondylitis humeri ulnaris had a significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy of epicondylitis humeri with a linear accelerator is an effective treatment without showing side effects. All analyzed subgroups showed a good response to radiotherapy for at least 24 months.

Is low dose radiotherapy an effective treatment for Baker's cyst?

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common disease, often associated with a Baker's cyst. Besides osteoarthritis, also other joint pathologies of the knee can be causative for a Baker's cyst. Radiotherapy is known to be an effective treatment for osteoarthritis, with an anti-inflammatory effect. As the excessive production of synovia usually is associated with intraarticular inflammation, our hypothesis was that radiotherapy might positively influence the synovial production and reduce the volume of a Baker's cyst. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective trial, including 20 knees receiving radiotherapy for knee arthritis. Besides documentation of NRS (numeric rating scale), WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) score and Knee Society Score, the volume of the Baker's cyst was calculated for a short- (6 to 12 weeks) and long-term (9 to 12 months) follow-up. Ultrasonic volumetry was performed using an ultrasound device with a high-resolution multifrequency linear probe (6-9 MHz). RESULTS: Low-dose radiotherapy improved NRS, WOMAC score and Knee Society Score significantly. The mean volume of Baker's cyst decreased from 22.3 ml to 10.7 respectively 3.1 ml during follow-up. A decrease in volume of more than 25% compared to the baseline could be achieved for 75% of the patients in the short-term and 79% of the patients in the long-term follow up. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy of knee osteoarthritis is an effective treatment that decreases the volume of a Baker's cyst. Most patients respond to the treatment. Whether radiotherapy is an effective treatment for Baker's cyst without associated osteoarthritis has to be further examined.

Predictive and prognostic value of tumor volume and its changes during radical radiotherapy of stage III non-small cell lung cancer : A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes heterogeneous presentation of the disease including lymph node involvement and large tumour volumes with infiltration of the mediastinum, heart or spine. In the treatment of stage III NSCLC an interdisciplinary approach including radiotherapy is considered standard of care with acceptable toxicity and improved clinical outcome concerning local control. Furthermore, gross tumour volume (GTV) changes during definitive radiotherapy would allow for adaptive replanning which offers normal tissue sparing and dose escalation. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to describe the predictive value of GTV changes during definitive radiotherapy especially focussing on overall survival. The literature search was conducted in a two-step review process using PubMed®/Medline® with the key words "stage III non-small cell lung cancer" and "radiotherapy" and "tumour volume" and "prognostic factors". RESULTS: After final consideration 17, 14 and 9 studies with a total of 2516, 784 and 639 patients on predictive impact of GTV, GTV changes and its impact on overall survival, respectively, for definitive radiotherapy for stage III NSCLC were included in this review. Initial GTV is an important prognostic factor for overall survival in several studies, but the time of evaluation and the value of histology need to be further investigated. GTV changes during RT differ widely, optimal timing for re-evaluation of GTV and their predictive value for prognosis needs to be clarified. The prognostic value of GTV changes is unclear due to varying study qualities, re-evaluation time and conflicting results. CONCLUSION: The main findings were that the clinical impact of GTV changes during definitive radiotherapy is still unclear due to heterogeneous study designs with varying quality. Several potential confounding variables were found and need to be considered for future studies to evaluate GTV changes during definitive radiotherapy with respect to treatment outcome.

First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system.

We present a performance evaluation of a recently introduced dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) system equipped with two X-ray tubes and two corresponding detectors, mounted onto the rotating gantry with an angular offset of 90 degrees . We introduce the system concept and derive its consequences and potential benefits for electrocardiograph [corrected] (ECG)-controlled cardiac CT and for general radiology applications. We evaluate both temporal and spatial resolution by means of phantom scans. We present first patient scans to illustrate the performance of DSCT for ECG-gated cardiac imaging, and we demonstrate first results using a dual-energy acquisition mode. Using ECG-gated single-segment reconstruction, the DSCT system provides 83 ms temporal resolution independent of the patient's heart rate for coronary CT angiography (CTA) and evaluation of basic functional parameters. With dual-segment reconstruction, the mean temporal resolution is 60 ms (minimum temporal resolution 42 ms) for advanced functional evaluation. The z-flying focal spot technique implemented in the evaluated DSCT system allows 0.4 mm cylinders to be resolved at all heart rates. First clinical experience shows a considerably increased robustness for the imaging of patients with high heart rates. As a potential application of the dual-energy acquisition mode, the automatic separation of bones and iodine-filled vessels is demonstrated.