Topical application of tranexamic acid after adenoidectomy: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Is to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid when applied locally in children after primary isolated adenoidectomy with respect to intra-operative blood loss and post-operative bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Otolaryngology department, Tanta University and Tiba Hospitals, Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over three years, 400 children underwent primary isolated adenoidectomy followed by topical application of tranexamic acid (tranexamic acid group, 200 children) or saline (Placebo group, 200 children) with at least two weeks' follow up. Intra-operative blood loss and post-operative hemorrhage were monitored. RESULTS: Both groups were almost equivalent in age and gender. The frequency of primary post-adenoidectomy hemorrhage as well as the rate of postnasal packing and blood transfusion required to manage severe bleeding were higher in placebo group. The volume of blood loss during surgery showed significant reduction in tranexamic acid group. CONCLUSION: Topical application of tranexamic acid after adenoidectomy led to a significant reduction in blood loss during surgery and decreasing in the rate of post-operative bleeding as well as the need for postnasal packing and blood transfusion.

Powered versus conventional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments in management of sinonasal polyposis.

To conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of powered versus conventional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments in the management of sinonasal polyposis. Two hundred patients with sinonasal polyposis who failed conservative therapy were included in the study. They were equally randomized into powered and conventional instruments groups. A subjective visual analogue scale (VAS), endoscopic examination, saccharine clearance time and coronal CT were done preoperatively. Intraoperatively, the operative time, the surgical conditions and degrees of dryness of the operative field were carefully rated and recorded. Postoperatively, VAS, polyp grades, saccharine clearance time, the number of endoscopic debridement and time to mucosalization were recorded. Complications, smoothness of postoperative course were reported. Both groups experienced a significant improvement in the VAS with no statistically significant difference in symptom improvement between the two groups except for olfaction where there was significant improvement in the powered group. Similarly, the two groups demonstrated a significant improvement in the objective parameters including polyp grade and saccharine clearance time changes, but no significant difference between the two groups was found. The operative time as well as the surgical conditions and dryness of the operative field score were significantly better in the powered group. There was a tendency for improvement in the number of endoscopic debridement and time to mucosalization in powered group when compared to conventional instruments group, but this did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of postoperative synechiae was significantly lower in powered endoscopic group. Powered endoscopic sinus surgery offers a better therapeutic approach for patients with sinonasal polyposis when compared to endoscopic surgery with the conventional instruments. It provides a bloodless dry operative field with better visualization for a more precise, less traumatic procedure with minimal intraoperative complications and shorter operative time. Additionally, patients have a smoother postoperative course, less incidence of synechiae, with a tendency for a faster healing.

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with double posteriorly based nasal and lacrimal flaps: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct the first prospective randomized controlled trial assessing and comparing the safety and efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with double posteriorly based nasal and lacrimal flaps to conventional endoscopic DCR in adult patients with acquired complete nasolacrimal obstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study. SETTING: General hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four adult patients with a total of 80 procedures were recruited to undergo endoscopic DCR. They were prospectively equally randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic DCR with flaps (group I) and conventional endoscopic DCR (group II). Regular follow-up settings were done to document the patient's subjective improvement, judge ostium patency on irrigation, and record any complications. RESULTS: Endoscopic DCR with flaps had a higher (92.1%) but nonsignificant difference in success rate when compared with conventional endoscopic DCR (87.4%). There was no significant difference between the 2 techniques in operative time, adverse events, and tolerability of the technique to be done under local anesthesia with minimal sedation. Group I demonstrated a significantly lower number of debridement sessions than did group II. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR with double posteriorly based nasal and lacrimal flaps provides a viable alternative to conventional endoscopic DCR in managing acquired nasolacrimal duct obstructions in adults. It has a comparable success rate, operative time, and safety profile, with a suggestion of a better healing profile in terms of mucosal recovery, wound healing, and less need for debridement sessions.

Topical intranasal fluorescein: the missing partner in algorithms of cerebrospinal fluid fistula detection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to focus on the development and validation of the use of topical fluorescein in the intraoperative localization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas, and to screen its use in preoperative diagnosis of CSF rhinorrhea as well as postoperative detection of a recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with CSF rhinorrhea were treated with an endoscopic endonasal technique. Topical intranasal 5% fluorescein was used for preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative localization of the site of the leak. A change in the color of the fluorescein from yellow to green fluorescence and sometimes streaming the fluorescein over the nasal mucosa and blood denoted the presence of CSF, and the site of the leak could be traced. RESULTS: The cause of the leak was accidental trauma in 11 patients, spontaneous in 9 patients, and iatrogenic in 5 patients. The ethmoidal roof was the most common site of leak (52%) followed by the cribriform plate (40%) and then the sphenoid sinus (8%). We have achieved 100% success rate in sealing the CSF fistulas in our 25 patients with no recurrence detected during the follow-up period (mean, 19+/-10 months). The preoperative use of fluorescein-soaked cotton pledgets was 100% accurate in diagnosing CSF rhinorrhea when compared with B2 transferrin testing. The intraoperative use of topical intranasal fluorescein was also 100% accurate in locating the site of the CSF fistula when compared with the surgical findings. No major complications have been reported. CONCLUSION: In the presence of a clinically diagnosed CSF leakage, topical fluorescein is a very easy, sensitive, safe, and highly accurate tool in the intraoperative localization of the site and extent of CSF fistulas, and should be considered a viable noninvasive alternative to intrathecal fluorescein. We also recommend its use as a simple and quick outpatient clinic test for preoperative diagnosis of CSF rhinorrhea. It can be used postoperatively as well when there is a doubt of recurrence of the CSF leak.

Radiophonosurgery of benign superficial vocal fold lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial describing and investigating the efficacy and safety of radiosurgical excision of benign superficial vocal fold lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with benign superficial vocal fold lesions (20 vocal nodules, 27 vocal polyps and three Reinke's oedema) who failed conservative therapy were included in the study. They were equally randomized into cold knife or radiosurgical excision. Clinical and voice assessments were done pre-operatively and after surgery. Voice analysis included a subjective visual analogue scale (VAS) and a perceptual assessment with a simplified version of the GRBAS scale (GRB) consisting of G (grade), R (roughness), and B (breathiness). Acoustic voice evaluation included jitter and shimmer. Post-operative voice therapy was provided for all patients. Complications, smoothness of post-operative recovery, and administration of analgesia were reported. RESULTS: Both groups experienced significant improvement in VAS, perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis after surgery, with no evidence of significant differences between the cold knife and radiofrequency groups. The radiofrequency group showed a decrease of 17 per cent in the mean operative time when compared with the cold knife group, but this was not statistically significant. No evidence of a significant difference was noticed in the smoothness of post-operative recovery, administration of analgesia and complication rate. CONCLUSION: Radiophonosurgery opens a new therapeutic approach for patients with benign superficial vocal fold lesions. It combines the advantages of both cold knife and laser phonosurgery, being easy, safe, precise and effective, and having excellent tactile and haemostatic properties.