RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The growth-promoting effects of IGF-I is mediated through the IGF-I receptor (IGF1R), a widely expressed cell-surface tyrosine kinase receptor. IGF1R copy number variants (CNV) can cause pre- and postnatal growth restriction or overgrowth. METHODS: Whole exome sequence (WES), chromosomal microarray, and targeted IGF1R gene analyses were performed on 3 unrelated children who share features of small for gestational age, short stature, and elevated serum IGF-I, but otherwise had clinical heterogeneity. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of cell-surface IGF1R was performed on live primary cells derived from the patients. RESULTS: Two novel IGF1R CNV and a heterozygous IGF1R nonsense variant were identified in the 3 patients. One CNV (4.492 Mb) was successfully called from WES, utilizing eXome-Hidden Markov Model (XHMM) analysis. FACS analysis of cell-surface IGF1R on live primary cells derived from the patients demonstrated a â¼50% reduction in IGF1R availability associated with the haploinsufficiency state. CONCLUSION: In addition to conventional methods, IGF1R CNV can be identified from WES data. FACS analysis of live primary cells is a promising method for efficiently evaluating and screening for IGF1R haploinsufficiency. Further investigations are necessary to delineate how comparable IGF1R availability leads to the wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes and variable responsiveness to rhGH therapy.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Crecimiento/genética , Haploinsuficiencia , Receptores de Somatomedina/genética , Niño , Exoma , Femenino , Trastornos del Crecimiento/diagnóstico , Humanos , Receptor IGF Tipo 1RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether children with Down syndrome in the US are at an increased risk for obesity, we determined the obesity prevalence and analyzed obesity development throughout childhood in a cohort of children with Down syndrome. In addition, we analyzed a comorbidity that is associated with Down syndrome and obesity, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review that evaluated 303 children ages 2 through 18 years with a diagnosis of Down syndrome. All children were patients at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center with multiple height and weight measurements. To determine obesity burden, the rate of obesity was compared with a local control cohort using contingency tables. Change in obesity rate through time was determined with mixed models. Association of obesity with OSAS was determined with contingency tables. RESULTS: We evaluated 303 individuals, 47.8% of whom were obese (body mass index ≥95th percentile for age and sex). This was significantly higher than the general pediatric population, which had a 12.1% obesity rate (P < .0001). Body mass index z-scores did not change markedly over time (P = .40). The majority of children with Down syndrome also had OSAS (74.0% of the 177 children who had polysomnography studies). However, OSAS risk was elevated in obese children (risk ratio = 2.4, P = .0015). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that children with Down syndrome are at a substantial risk for obesity and OSAS. These findings support the need for more aggressive weight management in early childhood and throughout the lifespan.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Polisomnografía , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the decisions of pediatric primary care physicians about their diagnostic evaluation for a child with suspected global developmental delay (GDD). STUDY DESIGN: A survey was mailed to a sample of pediatricians (n = 600) and family physicians (n = 600) randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The survey contained a clinical vignette describing a 9-month-old nondysmorphic boy with GDD. Participants were asked their initial evaluation steps (test, refer, or both test and refer) and what types of referral and/or testing they would pursue. We examined bivariate associations between physician/clinical practice characteristics and participants' evaluation decision. RESULTS: More pediatricians than family physicians completed the survey (response rates: 55% vs 38%). Almost three-quarters of the respondents (74%) reported that their first step in a diagnostic evaluation would be to refer the child without testing, 22% would test only, and 4% would both test and refer. As their initial step, most physicians referred to a developmental pediatrician (58%), and only 5% would refer to a geneticist. The most commonly ordered test was general biochemical testing (64%). The most commonly ordered genetic test was a karyotype (39%). CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating a child with GDD, few primary care physicians would order genetic testing or refer to a genetics specialist as a first evaluation step. Future studies should examine both barriers to and utilization of a genetic evaluation for children with GDD.
Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Pruebas Genéticas , Médicos de Familia/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of screening brain/orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a large population of children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) over a 20-year period. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data from children with NF1 seen at a single center between 1990 and 2010 was performed. RESULTS: During the 20-year study period, 826 individuals with NF1 (402 females, 424 males) ages 1-9 years were screened for optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) using brain/orbital MRI; 18% were identified with OPGs with a median age at detection of 3 years. Fifteen percent of patients with OPGs had radiologic or clinical progression requiring therapy. Children with chiasmatic and postchiasmatic tumors were more likely to require therapy compared with patients with prechiasmatic OPGs (P < .0001). Patients with visual deficits at the time of diagnosis were more likely to experience visual decline despite therapy when compared with patients treated based on radiologic progression (P < .012). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that chiasmatic and postchiasmatic OPG in children with NF1 have the highest risk for progression and vision loss. Early identification of OPG by screening MRI prior to the development of vision loss may lead to improved visual outcomes. Children with negative brain and orbital MRI screening at age 15 months or later did not develop symptomatic OPGs.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neurofibromatosis 1/diagnóstico , Glioma del Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico , Encéfalo/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Glioma del Nervio Óptico/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Nervio Óptico/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos de la Visión/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize morbidity, mortality, and surgical outcomes in pediatric patients with symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted retrospective analysis of data from clinical records of surgical history and other neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-related complications in children with PNFs seen at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between 1997 and 2007. RESULTS: A total of 154 children with NF1 and PNFs were identified. Children with symptomatic PNFs had increased incidence of other NF1-related tumors (P < .05). Patients with NF1 and PNFs had a higher mortality rate (5/154, 3.2%) when compared with patients without or with asymptomatic PNFs (2/366, 0.5%; P = .024). The most common morbidities leading to surgeries were neurologic, disfigurement, orthopedic, and airway complaints. Less extensive resection predicted a shorter interval to second surgery (P < .0019). The highest recurrence was seen in tumors located in the head, neck, and thorax (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings quantify the increased risk for additional tumors and mortality associated with symptomatic PNFs. Surgical interventions were required in many cases and resulted in added morbidity in some cases. Patients with PNFs were more likely to benefit from surgery when the indications were airway compression or disfigurement.
Asunto(s)
Neurofibroma Plexiforme/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/complicaciones , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Vaina del Nervio/complicaciones , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/mortalidad , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/patología , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/cirugía , Neurofibromatosis 1/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the prevalence of deletion 22q11.2 among individuals who meet criteria for DiGeorge anomaly (DGA) is lower than the 90% commonly cited. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were identified through retrospective chart reviews on all patients who underwent testing for deletion 22q11.2 and all patients with a diagnosis of "DiGeorge" or any of the major criteria associated with DGA at a large pediatric hospital over a period of 6 years. DGA was confirmed in 64 individuals, based on the presence of at least 2 of the following features: (1) cellular immune deficiency and/or absence of part or all of the thymus; (2) hypocalcemia and/or parathyroid deficiency; (3) congenital heart disease. RESULTS: Of the 64 individuals with DGA, 29 (45%) did not have a chromosome 22q11.2 deletion. Among this deletion-negative subset, diabetic embryopathy and other chromosome abnormalities were the most commonly recognized underlying etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge a widely held belief that nearly 90% of DGA is due to chromosome 22q11.2 deletion. This study also calls attention to the heterogeneity of DGA, highlights similarities and differences between those with and without a chromosome 22q11.2 deletion, and attempts to resolve some confusing features of conditions associated with DGA.