Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e30365, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720704

RESUMEN

Objectives: Determining the best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections is a challenge. Cefiderocol is an attractive alternative drug effective against many resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. However, its place in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains unclear and much debated, with contradictory results. Methods: We describe here the case of a 37-year-old man with ventilator-associated bacteraemic CRAB pneumonia in an intensive care unit. He was initially treated with a combination of colistin and tigecycline, and was then switched onto colistin and cefiderocol. We then used a new accessible protocol to test 30 CRAB isolates (OXA-23/OXA-24/OXA-58/NDM-1) for adaptive resistance to cefiderocol (ARC) after exposure to this drug. Results: After clinical failure with the initial combination, we noted a significant clinical improvement in the patient on the second combination, leading to clinical cure. No ARC was detected in the two OXA-23 case-CRAB isolates. All NDM-1 CRAB isolates were resistant to cefiderocol in standard tests; the OXA-23, OXA-24 and OXA-58 CRAB isolates presented 84.2 %, 50 % and 0 % ARC, respectively. Conclusions: ARC is not routinely assessed for CRAB isolates despite frequently being reported in susceptible isolates (69.2 %). Subpopulations displaying ARC may account for treatment failure, but this hypothesis should be treated with caution in the absence of robust clinical data. The two main findings of this work are that (i) cefiderocol monotherapy should probably not be recommended for OXA-23/24 CRAB infections and (ii) the characterisation of carbapenemases in CRAB strains may be informative for clinical decision-making.

2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 198: 115911, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103498

RESUMEN

The increasing threats to ecosystems and humans from marine plastic pollution require a comprehensive assessment. We present a plastisphere case study from Reunion Island, a remote oceanic island located in the Southwest Indian Ocean, polluted by plastics. We characterized the plastic pollution on the island's coastal waters, described the associated microbiome, explored viable bacterial flora and the presence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria. Reunion Island faces plastic pollution with up to 10,000 items/km2 in coastal water. These plastics host microbiomes dominated by Proteobacteria (80 %), including dominant genera such as Psychrobacter, Photobacterium, Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio. Culturable microbiomes reach 107 CFU/g of microplastics, with dominance of Exiguobacterium and Pseudomonas. Plastics also carry AMR bacteria including ß-lactam resistance. Thus, Southwest Indian Ocean islands are facing serious plastic pollution. This pollution requires vigilant monitoring as it harbors a plastisphere including AMR, that threatens pristine ecosystems and potentially human health through the marine food chain.


Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Humanos , Océano Índico , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Reunión , Bacterias , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA