Eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·10(3)/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66-6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was <7 between the second and third day. CONCLUSION: Both sustained eosinopenia and persistence of an NLCR >7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia.

Prospective comparison of severity scores for predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Specific prognostic models for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) to guide treatment decisions have been developed, such us the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age ≥ 65 years index (CURB-65). Additionally, general models are available such as the Mortality Probability Model (MPM-II). So far, which score performs better in CAP remains controversial. The objective was to compare PSI and CURB-65 and the general model, MPM-II, for predicting 30-day mortality in patients admitted with CAP. METHODS: Prospective observational study including all consecutive patients hospitalised with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP and treated according to the hospital guidelines. Comparison of the overall discriminatory power of the models was performed by calculating the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC curve) and calibration through the Goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty two patients were included (mean age 73.0 years; 69.1% male; 75.0% with more than one comorbid condition). Seventy-five percent of the patients were classified as high-risk subjects according to the PSI, versus 61.2% according to the CURB-65. The 30-day mortality rate was 11.8%. All three scores obtained acceptable and similar values of the AUCs of the ROC curve for predicting mortality. Despite all rules showed good calibration, this seemed to be better for CURB-65. CURB-65 also revealed the highest positive likelihood ratio. CONCLUSIONS: CURB-65 performs similar to PSI or MPMII for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with CAP. Consequently, this simple model can be regarded as a valid alternative to the more complex rules.

Prospective comparison of severity scores for predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia

Introducción. En la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) es esencial una evaluación precoz de la gravedad para un correcto manejo. Existen varios modelos pronósticos específicos como el Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) o el sencillo CURB-65 (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age ≥ 65), así como de modelos generales como el Mortality-Probability-Model-II (MPM-II). Ante la controversia existente sobre cuál es el mejor modelo el objetivo fue comparar el PSI , el CURB-65 y el MPM-II en la predicción de la mortalidad hospitalaria a los 30 días. Pacientes y método. Estudio prospectivo observacional que incluyó consecutivamente todos los pacientes hospitalizados con NAC. La capacidad discriminatoria de los modelos se comparó mediante las áreas bajo la curva ROC y la calibración mediante el test de Goodness-of-fit. Resultados. Ciento cincuenta y dos pacientes (edad media: 73,0 años; 69,1% varones; 75,0% con más de una comorbilidad asociada). El PSI clasificó el 75,0% como de alto riesgo y el CURB-65 como graves el 61,2%. La mortalidad hospitalaria a los 30 días fue del 11,8%. Los tres modelos obtuvieron valores aceptables y similares de AUC de las curvas ROC. A pesar de que los tres modelos mostraron una buena calibración, esta parece ser mejor para el CURB-65 que también obtuvo el mejor valor predictivo positivo. Conclusiones. El CURB-65 obtiene una capacidad discriminatoria similar al PSI o al MPM-II en la predicción de la mortalidad hospitalaria a los 30 días en pacientes con NAC y se presenta como una alternativa válida y sencilla al resto de modelos más complejos(AU)

Introduction. Specific prognostic models for communityacquired pneumonia (CAP) to guide treatment decisions have been developed, such us the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age ≥ 65 years index (CURB-65). Additionally, general models are available such as the Mortality Probability Model (MPM-II). So far, which score performs better in CAP remains controversial. The objective was to compare PSI and CURB-65 and the general model, MPM-II, for predicting 30- day mortality in patients admitted with CAP. Methods. Prospective observational study including all consecutive patients hospitalised with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP and treated according to the hospital guidelines. Comparison of the overall discriminatory power of the models was performed by calculating the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC curve) and calibration through the Goodness-of-fit test. Results. One hundred and fifty two patients were included (mean age 73.0 years; 69.1% male; 75.0% with more than one comorbid condition). Seventy-five percent of the patients were classified as high-risk subjects according to the PSI, versus 61.2% according to the CURB-65. The 30-day mortality rate was 11.8%. All three scores obtained acceptable and similar values of the AUCs of the ROC curve for predicting mortality. Despite all rules showed good calibration, this seemed to be better for CURB-65. CURB-65 also revealed the highest positive likelihood ratio. Conclusions. CURB-65 performs similar to PSI or MPMII for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with CAP. Consequently, this simple model can be regarded as a valid alternative to the more complex rules(AU)

Global cardiovascular risk in patients with HIV infection: concordance and differences in estimates according to three risk equations (Framingham, SCORE, and PROCAM).

To compare cardiovascular risk stratification according to Framingham, PROCAM (Prospective Cardiovascular Münster), and SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) equations in patients with HIV infection, a cross-sectional study of a well-characterized cohort of 760 HIV-infected adults managed at the outpatient Infectious Disease Unit in 2003 was conducted. Cardiovascular risk score was examined and patients were classified as having low, moderate, or high risk using Framingham and PROCAM (<10%, 10%-20%, and <20%, respectively) and SCORE (<3%, 3%-4%, and >/=5%, respectively) equations. The prevalence of patients with low, moderate and high cardiovascular risk was 76.6%, 15.1%, and 8.3% by the Framingham, respectively, 90.1%, 4.9%, and 5% by the PROCAM, respectively, and 88.6%, 3%, and 8.4% by SCORE, respectively. Concordance between these three risk functions was significant, but globally moderate (Framingham and PROCAM, kappa 0.36, p < 0.0001; Framingham and SCORE, kappa 0.32, p < 0.0001; PROCAM and SCORE, kappa 0.46, p < 0.0001). The Framingham equation categorized a higher proportion of HIV-infected male patients with moderate cardiovascular risk and a lower proportion of those with low risk (p < 0.0001) compared with PROCAM and SCORE. The present study showed a high prevalence of HIV-infected patients at low cardiovascular risk regardless of the assessed coronary risk system used. However, compared with PROCAM and SCORE, Framingham risk equation in HIV-infected patients identified a higher number of male patients with moderate cardiovascular risk.

Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients: role of combination antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whether or not combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) alone directly contributes to accelerating atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients has not been studied in depth. This study aimed to ascertain the relationship between this therapy and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis according to cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Sixty-eight HIV-infected patients with < or =1 cardiovascular risk factors and 64 with > or =2 risk factors completed the study protocol consisting of clinical, laboratory, and vascular evaluation by carotid high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, defined by carotid intima-media thickness >0.8 mm or the presence of plaque being the dependent variable. RESULTS: Among the 132 enrolled patients, 93 (70.5%) were on CART and 39 (29.5%) had never been on antiretroviral therapy. In accordance with cardiovascular risk stratification, subclinical carotid atherosclerosis was found in 26.6% (17 of 64 patients) of the very low-risk group (10-year coronary risk <5%), 35.3% (12 of 34 patients) of the low-risk group (10-year coronary risk between 5% and 9%) and 76.5% (26 of 34 patients) of the moderate/high-risk group (10-year coronary risk > or =10%). Thus, 55 (41.7%) of the 132 HIV-infected patients had subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, and independent variables associated with carotid atherosclerosis (odds ratio; 95% CI) were: CART exposure (10.5; 2.8 to 39) and 10-year coronary risk > or =10% (4.2; 1.5 to 12). In very low coronary risk patients (<5%), age (per 10-year increment: 4.01; 1.12 to 14.38), systolic blood pressure (per unit mm Hg 1.07; 1.01 to 1.14), and CART exposure (8.65; 1.54 to 48.54) were independently associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: CART should be considered a strong, independent predictor for the development of subclinical atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients, regardless of known major cardiovascular risk factors and atherogenic metabolic abnormalities induced by this therapy.

Hypertension in HIV-infected patients: prevalence and related factors.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about hypertension in the HIV-infected population. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of hypertension and related factors in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 710 HIV-infected patients (626 on combination antiretroviral therapy and 84 naive) managed at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital during 2003 and 802 controls completed the study protocol consisting of medical examination and a 6-month follow-up period including three control visits. RESULTS: Hypertension prevalence was 13.1% in HIV-infected patients and 13.5% in the control group. Age (per 10-year increment) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-2.48), body mass index (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10-1.27), and lipoaccumulation pattern of fat redistribution (OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.20-4.24) were independently and significantly associated with the presence of hypertension in HIV-infected patients at logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest no meaningful difference in prevalence of hypertension between subjects with and without HIV infection. Thus, the influence of combination antiretroviral therapy appears to have little impact on the prevalence of hypertension.

Evolución de una cohorte de pacientes mayores de 60 años infectados por el VIH tratados con tratamiento antirretroviral de gran actividad / Evolution of a cohort of patients over 60 years old with HIV infection treated with highly-active antiretroviral therapy

No disponible

Epidemiology and predictors of mortality in cases of Candida bloodstream infection: results from population-based surveillance, barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003.

We conducted population-based surveillance for Candida bloodstream infections in Spain to determine its incidence, the extent of antifungal resistance, and risk factors for mortality. A case was defined as the first positive blood culture for any Candida spp. in a resident of Barcelona, from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2003. We defined early mortality as occurring between days 3 to 7 after candidemia and late mortality as occurring between days 8 to 30. We detected 345 cases of candidemia, for an average annual incidence of 4.3 cases/100,000 population, 0.53 cases/1,000 hospital discharges, and 0.73 cases/10,000 patient-days. Outpatients comprised 11% of the cases, and 89% had a central venous catheter (CVC) at diagnosis. Overall mortality was 44%. Candida albicans was the most frequent species (51% of cases), followed by Candida parapsilosis (23%), Candida tropicalis (10%), Candida glabrata (8%), Candida krusei (4%), and other species (3%). Twenty-four isolates (7%) had decreased susceptibility to fluconazole (MIC > or = 16 microg/ml). On multivariable analysis, early death was independently associated with hematological malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 10.4). Treatment with antifungals (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.2) and removal of CVCs (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9) were protective factors for early death. Receiving adequate treatment, defined as having CVCs removed and administration of an antifungal medication (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.8), was associated with lower odds of late mortality; intubation (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 2.6 to 21.1) was associated with higher odds. The incidence of candidemia and prevalence of fluconazole resistance are similar to other European countries, indicating that routine antifungal susceptibility testing is not warranted. Antifungal medication and catheter removal are critical in preventing mortality.

Metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected patients: prevalence, characteristics, and related factors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence in HIV-infected patients of the metabolic syndrome as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program, i.e., three or more of the following components: abdominal obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, high blood pressure, and high fasting glucose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 710 HIV-infected patients managed at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital during 2003 completed the study protocol consisting of a medical examination and laboratory analysis after a 12-h overnight fast. RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome prevalence was 17% and increased from 5.1% among HIV-infected patients under age 30 years to 27.0% for those aged 50-59 years. Age (per 10-year increment) (odds ratio [OR] 1.41 [95% CI 1.12-1.77]), BMI (1.27 [1.19-1.36]), past and present protease inhibitor exposure (2.96 [1.03-3.55] and 4.18 [1.4-12.5], respectively) were independently associated with the metabolic syndrome on logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, only stavudine (d4T) (1.74 [1.01-2.98]) and lopinavir/ritonavir (2.46 [1.28-4.71]) were associated with the metabolic syndrome after adjustment for age and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among these HIV-infected patients is similar to that previously reported in uninfected individuals. Of specific concern is the association of protease inhibitor exposure with the metabolic syndrome and, more specifically, with exposure to stavudine and lopinavir/ritonavir when individual antiretroviral drugs were analyzed.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus highly active antiretroviral therapy versus highly active antiretroviral therapy alone in HIV patients with Kaposi's sarcoma.

Twenty-eight HIV patients either naive or failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)with moderate-advanced Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)were randomly chosen to initiate a new HAART regimen plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin(PLD) or the new HAART regimen alone. After 48 weeks, better response rates were observed in the HAART plus PLD group (76% versus 20%). In HIV-infected patients with moderate-advanced KS, HAART alone may not be enough for KS response.

Simplified therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir for very nonadherent, treatment-failing patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a simplified therapy for very nonadherent patients who had previously failed with HAART. METHOD: We performed a prospective open-label study of antiretroviral-experienced patients. Dosing schedule comprised (co-formulated) zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir bid. Eligible patients had to have plasma HIV RNA >5000 copies/mL, previous therapy, and very poor adherence to the medication regimen. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included (mean viral load, 4.4 log/mL; mean CD4, 240 cells/mL; IDUs, 78%; methadone maintenance program, 42%; AIDS, 28%). Number of previous therapies: one, 53%; two, 28%; three or more, 19%. In the intent-to-treat analysis at 1 year, 38 patients (44.7%) achieved viral load below 500 copies/mL. Adherence greater than 90% of prescribed drugs was reported in 49% of patients, adverse events were reported in 17.6%, mortality in 6%, and lost to follow-up in 26%. The factors associated with virologic failure were nonadherence (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% CI 1.5-12.3), baseline CD4 cell count <200 cells/mL (OR, 3.4; 95% CI 1.3-8.9; p =.01), and more than one previous treatment (OR, 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.9). CONCLUSION: Regarding previously very nonadherent patients, this simplified combination therapy containing three NRTIs obtained satisfactory results in ART-experienced patients. However, more aggressive interventions to enhance adherence are needed to improve results.