RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that emergency departments (EDs) need to reorganize their operations rapidly. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on structural and logistical issues at EDs and the measures taken. Belgian EDs were surveyed on the implemented changes at the start of the pandemic in relation to the 4 S's in disaster medicine: Structure, Staff, Supplies, and System. The study demonstrated that Belgian EDs felt largely unprepared for this pandemic, but nevertheless dynamically restructured their organization. A 46% increase in ED beds was created in different types of structures and more than 50% of all ED beds were reserved for COVID-19 care, but overall the number of patient presentations dropped by 29%. EDs deployed extra personnel, additional training, and psychological support. More than 50% reported an acute shortage of personal protective equipment, and several reported a shortage of ventilatory equipment and medications.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Bélgica/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
Introduction Being one of Europe's most densely populated countries, and having multiple nuclear installations, a heavy petrochemical industry, and terrorist targets, the Netherlands is at-risk for chemical, biological, or radionuclear (CBRN) incidents. Recent world and continental events show that this threat is real and that authorities may be underprepared. Hypothesis The hypothesis of this study is that Dutch hospitals are underprepared to deal with these incidents. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed. All 93 Dutch hospitals with an emergency department (ED) were sent a link to an online survey on different aspects of CBRN preparedness. Besides specific hospital information, information was obtained on the hospital's disaster planning; risk perception; and availability of decontamination units, personal protective equipment (PPE), antidotes, radiation detection, infectiologists, isolation measures, and staff training. RESULTS: Response rate was 67%. Sixty-two percent of participating hospitals were estimated to be at-risk for CBRN incidents. Only 40% had decontamination facilities and 32% had appropriate PPE available for triage and decontamination teams. Atropine was available in high doses in all hospitals, but specific antidotes that could be used for treating victims of CBRN incidents, such as hydroxycobolamine, thiosulphate, Prussian blue, Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), or pralidoxime, were less frequently available (74%, 65%, 18%, 14%, and 42%, respectively). Six percent of hospitals had radioactive detection equipment with an alarm function and 22.5% had a nuclear specialist available 24/7 in case of disasters. Infectiologists were continuously available in 60% of the hospitals. Collective isolation facilities were present in 15% of the hospitals. CONCLUSION: There is a serious lack of hospital preparedness for CBRN incidents in The Netherlands. Mortelmans LJM , Gaakeer MI , Dieltiens G , Anseeuw K , Sabbe MB . Are Dutch hospitals prepared for chemical, biological, or radionuclear incidents? A survey study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):483-491.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres , Desastres , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Hospitales/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Bioterrorismo , Terrorismo Químico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Internet , Países Bajos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TerrorismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Children, with their specific vulnerabilities and needs, make up to more than 20% of society, so they are at risk of getting involved in disasters. Are the specialists treating them for medical problems in daily life also capable to deal with them in disaster situations? HYPOTHESIS/PROBLEM: The goals of this study were to evaluate perceived knowledge and capability of tertiary pediatricians to deal with disasters, to identify promoting factors, and to evaluate education need and willingness to work. METHODS: A survey looking for demographics, hospital disaster planning, estimated risk and capability for disasters, training, and willingness to work, and a set of six content assessment questions to evaluate knowledge, were presented to emergency pediatricians and pediatric emergency physicians in specialized tertiary centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 51%. Thirty-five percent had disaster training and 53% felt that disaster education should be obligatory in their curriculum. Risk for disasters was estimated from 2.4/10 for nuclear incidents to 7.6/10 for major trauma. Self-estimated capability for these situations ranged from 1.8/10 in nuclear incidents to 7.6/10 in major trauma. Unconditional willingness to work ranged from 37% in nuclear situations to 68% in pandemics. Mean score on the questions was 2.06/6. Training, knowledge of antidote and personal protective equipment (PPE) use, self-estimated capability, and exposure were significant predictors for higher scores. Willingness to work correlated significantly with age, self-estimated capability, and risk estimation. In case of chemical and nuclear incidents, there was correlation with knowledge on the use of decontamination, PPE, and radio-detection devices. CONCLUSION: Despite a clear perception of the risks and a high willingness to work, preparedness is limited. The major conclusion is that basics of disaster management should be included in pediatric training.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pediatras/organización & administración , Atención Terciaria de Salud/organización & administración , Desastres , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical students have been deployed in victim care of several disasters throughout history. They are corner stones in first-line care in recent pandemic planning. Furthermore, every physician and senior medical student is expected to assist in case of disaster situations, but are they educated to do so? Being one of Europe's densest populated countries with multiple nuclear installations, a large petrochemical industry and also at risk for terrorist attacks, The Netherlands bear some risks for incidents. We evaluated the knowledge on Disaster Medicine in the Dutch medical curriculum. Our hypothesis is that Dutch senior medical students are not prepared at all. METHODS: Senior Dutch medical students were invited through their faculty to complete an online survey on Disaster Medicine, training and knowledge. This reported knowledge was tested by a mixed set of 10 theoretical and practical questions. RESULTS: With a mean age of 25.5 years and 60 % females, 999 participants completed the survey. Of the participants, 51 % considered that Disaster Medicine should absolutely be taught in the regular medical curriculum and only 2 % felt it as useless; 13 % stated to have some knowledge on disaster medicine. Self-estimated capability to deal with various disaster situations varied from 1.47/10 in nuclear incidents to 3.92/10 in influenza pandemics. Self-estimated knowledge on these incidents is in the same line (1.71/10 for nuclear incidents and 4.27/10 in pandemics). Despite this limited knowledge and confidence, there is a high willingness to respond (ranging from 4.31/10 in Ebola outbreak over 5.21/10 in nuclear incidents to 7.54/10 in pandemics). The case/theoretical mix gave a mean score of 3.71/10 and raised some food for thought. Although a positive attitude, 48 % will place contaminated walking wounded in a waiting room and 53 % would use iodine tablets as first step in nuclear decontamination. Of the participants, 52 % even believes that these tablets protect against external radiation, 41 % thinks that these tablets limit radiation effects more than shielding and 57 % believes that decontamination of chemical victims consists of a specific antidote spray in military cabins. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high willingness to respond, our students are not educated for disaster situations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of hip-fracture patients with admission hyperglycaemia, and, when present, whether it was associated with a worse outcome (i.e. increased length of hospital stay, admission to ICU, or mortality). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 2-year period, we retrospectively analysed records of patients with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture (ICD-9-CM 820.x). The records were retrieved from an electronic hospital database. RESULTS: An admission blood sugar level (aBSL) greater than 140 mg/dl was observed in 34% of the patients and was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality (P=0.042). ICU admissions and length of stay did not differ for patients having an aBSL above or below the 140 mg/dl cut-off. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycaemia is common in hip-fracture patients. A high aBSL might serve as a prognostic indicator in hip-fracture patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report of hyperglycaemia-associated mortality in less severely traumatised patients, who generally are not admitted to an ICU.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Distribución por Edad , Bélgica , Glucemia/análisis , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/cirugía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: As one of Europe's most densely populated countries with multiple nuclear installations and a prominent petrochemical industry, Belgium is at some reasonable risk for terrorist attacks or accidental chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents. We hypothesize that local hospitals are not sufficiently prepared to deal with these incidents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 138 Belgian hospitals with an emergency department (ED) were sent a survey on their preparedness. Data on hospital disaster planning, risk perception, availability of decontamination units, personal protective equipment, antidotes, radiation detection, infectiologists, isolation measures, and staff training were collected. RESULTS: The response rate was 72%. Although 71% of hospitals reported being at risk for CBRN incidents, only 53% planned for the same in their disaster plans. Only 11% of hospitals had decontamination facilities in front of or at the ED entrance and only 6% had appropriate personal protective equipment for triage and decontaminating teams. Atropine was available at all centers, but more specific antidotes such as hydroxycobolamine, thiosulphate, or pralidoxime were less available (47, 47, and 19%, respectively). Six percent of hospitals had radiodetection equipment with an alarm function and 14% had a nuclear specialist available 24/7. Infectiologists were continuously available in 26% of the total EDs surveyed. Individual isolation facilities were present in 36% of the EDs, and isolation facilities capable of housing larger groups were present in 9%. University hospitals were significantly better prepared than community hospitals. CONCLUSION: There are serious gaps in hospital preparedness for CBRN incidents in Belgium. Lack of financial resources is a major obstacle in achieving sufficient preparedness.
Asunto(s)
Armas Biológicas , Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Planificación en Desastres , Desastres , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa , Antídotos/provisión & distribución , Bélgica , Recolección de Datos , Descontaminación/normas , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Planificación en Desastres/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Ropa de Protección/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A mass carbon monoxide (CO) intoxication during an ice-hockey game is described. Two hundred and thirty-five patients were seen in different hospitals, 88 of them the same night at the nearby emergency department. To evaluate long-term implications and to identify relevant indicators, a follow-up study was organized 1 year after the incident. METHODS: Apart from the file data from the emergency departments, a 1-year follow-up mailing was sent to all patients. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one patients returned their questionnaire (86%). The mean age of the patients was 28 years, with 61% men. The mean carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) was 9.9%. COHb levels were significantly higher for individuals on the ice (referee, players and maintenance personnel). There was a significant relationship with the initial presence of dizziness, fatigue and the COHb level. Headache, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting were not significantly related to the COHb levels. The relationship between symptoms and CO level, however, should be interpreted with caution as there was a wide range between exposure and blood tests. 5.2% of patients had residual complaints, all including headache, with a significant higher incidence with high COHb levels. Only two patients had an abnormal neurological control (one slightly disturbed electroencephalography and one persistent encephalopathic complaint). Work incapacity was also significantly related to COHb levels. CONCLUSION: CO mass poisonings remain a risk in indoor sporting events. Although it causes an acute mass casualty incident, it is limited in time and delayed problems are scarce. Symptomatology is a poor tool for triage. The best prevention is the use of nonmineral energy sources such as for example electricity.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hockey , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Bélgica , Análisis Químico de la Sangre , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/etiología , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/envenenamiento , Cloroquina/envenenamiento , Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Intoxicación/terapia , Intento de Suicidio , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado Fatal , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Masculino , Intoxicación/etiología , Intoxicación/patología , Resucitación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Clearing the cervical spine after blunt trauma remains a challenge. Even in the computed tomography era many emergency departments worldwide still use classical X-rays in first evaluation. Low odontoid fractures are frequently missed, especially in unconscious patients where an open mouth view is not available. Evaluation of the Harris ring in the lateral view can improve identification rate. We studied the diagnostic values of this sign and the educational effect on trainees. Lateral views of 12 computed tomography confirmed low-axis fractures and 13 controls were randomly presented to 17 residents (traumatology, neurosurgery and emergency medicine) and five experienced radiologists. After the residents were taught the use of the axis ring, they had to review the set. Diagnosis was scored with a degree of certitude from 5 to 1. The specificity and sensitivity for the radiologists was 88% (confidence interval 80-96) and 82% (confidence interval 72-91), respectively. The effect of the education on the scores of the residents was evaluated using the Wilcoxon ranking test with a significant effect for the traumatologists (P=0.0008), emergency physicians (P=0.0005) as well for the neurosurgeons (P=0.0087). The axis ring can be a useful diagnostic tool in identifying low odontoid fractures on cross-table cervical spine X-rays. It is easy to teach and should be included in X-ray-based C-spine clearing protocols.
Asunto(s)
Apófisis Odontoides/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Competencia Clínica , Vías Clínicas , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Radiología/educación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XAsunto(s)
Articulación Atlantoaxoidea/lesiones , Sedación Consciente , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Tracción/métodos , Articulación Atlantoaxoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Manipulación Espinal , Radiografía , Tortícolis/etiología , Tortícolis/terapiaRESUMEN
The management of methanol poisoning includes early antidote therapy to inhibit the metabolism of methanol to formate. Ethanol and fomepizole are both effective, but recently fomepizole has been preferred, although there is no scientific evidence that the use of fomepizole is a superior therapeutic strategy compared with the use of ethanol combined with haemodialysis. The same patient was admitted twice to our emergency department with methanol poisoning. The first time (methanol 3.24 g/l), she was treated with fomepizole without dialysis owing to the absence of acidosis. The second time (methanol 5.5 g/l), she received ethanol as an antidote and dialysis was started. For both therapeutic strategies, hospital length of stay, observation unit length of stay and costs are compared. In the Belgian healthcare system, we found that fomepizole treatment was three times as expensive as ethanol treatment, and the majority of costs are not reimbursed. Fomepizole antidote therapy, compared with ethanol, has fewer reported side effects, but is more expensive. In hospitals where dialysis is easily available, ethanol antidote therapy should still be considered, especially if similar cost differences exist within the healthcare system one is working in.