The role of immunotherapy sensitizers and novel immunotherapy modalities in the treatment of cancer.

The importance of the immune system in the response against cancer has always been a subject of intense investigation. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the landscape of oncologic treatments, while expanding the understanding of this disease's pathophysiology. Consequently, many therapies are being investigated, with interventions directed at different steps and pathways of the immune response. Relevantly, immunotherapy sensitizers have arisen as approaches focused on the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Concomitantly, novel immunotherapy modalities are also in development. Approaches focusing from the tumor intrinsic pathways to the tumor microenvironment and ex-vivo interventions, such as CAR-T cell therapies and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are important examples. Although many of those interventions were initially envisioned as standalone options, their combination has demonstrated promising results in early-phase in vitro studies and clinical trials. The possibility of coupling different immunotherapy modalities, as well as with other techniques, further strengthen the concept of sensitizers, allowing for deeper and more robust responses in cancer treatment. This review aims to present an overview of the concepts of these sensitizing mechanisms that are the basis for the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and a multitude of therapeutic strategies. Novel immunotherapy modalities are also presented, focusing on the potential of combining them with sensitizer interventions. Understanding the complexity underlying these principles may be the key for future breakthroughs and improved patient outcomes.

Comparing Anticoagulation Strategies for Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Active Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Current guidelines recommend several direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) equally for managing cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with active cancer. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central in November 2022. Randomized controlled trials investigating anticoagulation strategies (vitamin K antagonists, parenteral anticoagulation [eg, low-molecular weight heparin], and DOACs) for VTE in patients with active cancer were identified for network meta-analysis. The outcomes included recurrent VTE, recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep venous thrombosis, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and a composite outcome of major bleeding or CRNMB. Pooled HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using either the HR or relative risk provided from each study. Random-effects models were used for all the analyses. Results: Seventeen randomized controlled trials involving 6,623 patients with active cancer were included. No significant differences were found among the DOACs for efficacy outcomes (recurrent VTE, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis). In terms of major bleeding, apixaban was similarly safe compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban but was associated with a decreased risk compared with edoxaban (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.15-0.93). Regarding CRNMB, edoxaban was similarly safe compared with apixaban but was associated with a decreased risk compared with rivaroxaban (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.10-0.91). Compared with parenteral anticoagulation, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk for recurrent VTE (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.38-0.93) without increasing bleeding, edoxaban was associated with an increased risk for major bleeding or CRNMB (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.79), and rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk for CRNMB (HR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.43-9.88). Conclusions: DOACs demonstrate comparable efficacy but exhibit different safety profiles. Apixaban may confer an antithrombotic benefit without an increased risk for bleeding, distinguishing it from other contemporary anticoagulation strategies in patients with active cancer and VTE.

Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been widely adopted for the treatment of lung cancer since receiving first U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2015. However, along with their use, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has presented a challenge for both patients and oncology providers. In this manuscript, we reviewed the clinical trials that led to the approval of ICI by the FDA for the treatment of lung cancer between 2015 and 2023 to establish the frequency of irAEs in this patient population. Among the adverse events associated with ICI, we focused on the most common and relevant ones, including hypothyroidism, pneumonitis, diarrhea/colitis, skin rash, and hepatitis. RECENT FINDINGS: We thoroughly examined the available literature, including society guidelines concerning these complications, to discuss various aspects such as their pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostic process, grading system, and clinical management. Additionally, we explored the association between irAEs and disease response. The management of irAEs is a crucial aspect of oncologic care, particularly due to their potential to cause severe and life-threatening clinical manifestations. We present each pertinent aspect in a concise and organized manner to provide guidance and assistance to oncology providers managing these patients in both outpatient and inpatient settings.

Obstetric and perioperative management of patients with factor XI deficiency: a retrospective observational study.

Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is an autosomal inherited, milder bleeding disorder that may predispose to a potential risk of life-threatening bleeding during childbirth or surgery. Unfortunately, data regarding obstetric and perioperative management of this condition are scarce, with limited cases reviewed in the last decade. Therefore, the present study aimed to expand this database and identify factors associated with increased bleeding risk. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with FXI deficiency who underwent childbirth or other surgical procedures between August 2011 and April 2021 within a single academic health system and identified 198 patients who underwent 252 procedures, including 143 vaginal deliveries, 63 cesarean deliveries, and 46 other surgical procedures. Thirty-three of the 252 procedures resulted in bleeding complications. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, personal history of bleeding was the strongest predictor of perioperative or obstetric bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 5.92; P = .001). Higher FXI levels were correlated with lower odds of bleeding (OR, 0.72 with every 10 U/dL increase in FXI level; P = .05). On receiver operative characteristic analysis, FXI level of >40 U/dL predicted a lower bleeding risk with reasonable specificity (75%) but lacked sensitivity (47%). A family history of bleeding, ethnicity, genotype, preprocedural partial thromboplastin time, and platelet levels were not associated with bleeding risk. There were no cases of epidural or spinal hematoma associated with neuraxial anesthesia. FXI levels remain stable during pregnancy and repeated measurements may not be necessary.