Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 491, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that the effect of using cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthwashes on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load in COVID-19 patients has been inconsistent. Additionally, no clinical study has investigated the effectiveness of on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash against COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label clinical trial to assess for any effects of using mouthwash on the salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load among asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic adult COVID-19-positive patients. Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mL of 0.05% CPC, 10 mL of 0.01% on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide, or 20 mL of placebo mouthwash (purified water) in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the cycle threshold (Ct) values employed for SARS-CoV-2 salivary viral load estimation. We used linear mixed-effects models to assess for any effect of the mouthwashes on SARS-CoV-2 salivary viral load. RESULTS: Of a total of 96 eligible participants enrolled from November 7, 2022, to January 19, 2023, 90 were accepted for the primary analysis. The use of 0.05% CPC mouthwash was not shown to be superior to placebo in change from baseline salivary Ct value at 30 min (difference vs. placebo, 0.640; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.425 to 2.706; P = 0.543); 2 h (difference vs. placebo, 1.158; 95% CI, -0.797 to 3.112; P = 0.246); 4 h (difference vs. placebo, 1.283; 95% CI, -0.719 to 3.285; P = 0.209); 10 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.304; 95% CI, -1.777 to 2.385; P = 0.775); or 24 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.782; 95% CI, -1.195 to 2.759; P = 0.438). The use of 0.01% on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash was also not shown to be superior to placebo in change from baseline salivary Ct value at 30 min (difference vs. placebo, 0.905; 95% CI, -1.079 to 2.888; P = 0.371); 2 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.709; 95% CI, -1.275 to 2.693; P = 0.483); 4 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.220; 95% CI, -1.787 to 2.226; P = 0.830); 10 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.198; 95% CI, -1.901 to 2.296; P = 0.854); or 24 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.784; 95% CI, -1.236 to 2.804; P = 0.447). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic adults with COVID-19, compared to placebo, the use of 0.05% CPC and 0.01% on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash did not lead to a significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 salivary viral load. Future studies of the efficacy of CPC and on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash on the viral viability of SARS-CoV-2 should be conducted using different specimen types and in multiple populations and settings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cetilpiridinio , Antisépticos Bucales , Saliva , Carga Viral , Humanos , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Saliva/virología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Cetilpiridinio/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Compuestos de Cloro/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Cloro/farmacología , Óxidos/uso terapéutico , Anciano
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7750, 2024 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565930

RESUMEN

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use is indicated for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nevertheless, reports discussing the reasons for not prescribing HCQ are limited. We identified the factors that interfere with HCQ use in patients with SLE. This observational, single-center study included data from 265 patients with SLE in 2019. The patients were categorized into groups with and without a history of HCQ use. Between these groups, clinical characteristics were compared using univariate analysis and logistic regression models. Among the 265 patients, 133 (50.2%) had a history of HCQ use. Univariate analysis identified older age; longer disease duration; lower prednisolone dose, clinical SLE disease activity index 2000, and estimated glomerular filtration rate; higher C3 level; and lower anti-double-stranded DNA antibody concentration as HCQ non-use-related variables. Logistic regression models identified a positive association between HCQ non-use and longer disease duration (odds ratio [OR] 1.08), prednisolone dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day (OR 4.03), C3 level ≥ 73 mg/dL (OR 2.15), and attending physician having graduated > 10 years prior (OR 3.19). In conclusion, a longer disease duration, lower prednisolone dose, higher C3 level, and longer time since attending physicians' graduation correlated with HCQ non-use. Physicians and patients should be educated to facilitate HCQ use despite these factors.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(4): 665-671, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413242

RESUMEN

Clostridium butyricum, a probiotic commonly prescribed in Asia, most notably as MIYA-BM (Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; https://www.miyarisan.com), occasionally leads to bacteremia. The prevalence and characteristics of C. butyricum bacteremia and its bacteriologic and genetic underpinnings remain unknown. We retrospectively investigated patients admitted to Osaka University Hospital during September 2011-February 2023. Whole-genome sequencing revealed 5 (0.08%) cases of C. butyricum bacteremia among 6,576 case-patients who had blood cultures positive for any bacteria. Four patients consumed MIYA-BM, and 1 patient consumed a different C. butyricum-containing probiotic. Most patients had compromised immune systems, and common symptoms included fever and abdominal distress. One patient died of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. Sequencing results confirmed that all identified C. butyricum bacteremia strains were probiotic derivatives. Our findings underscore the risk for bacteremia resulting from probiotic use, especially in hospitalized patients, necessitating judicious prescription practices.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Clostridium butyricum , Probióticos , Humanos , Clostridium butyricum/genética , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Probióticos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/epidemiología
4.
IDCases ; 35: e01927, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38303733

RESUMEN

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) has a dramatic clinical course and high mortality rate. Here, we report a case of STSS complicated by primary peritonitis and bilateral empyema. A previously healthy young woman was diagnosed with STSS complicated by primary peritonitis and bilateral empyema. Blood culture results on admission were negative. Sever shock, respiratory failure, systemic inflammation, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, ascites, and pleural effusion occurred, mimicking thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis/renal failure and organomegaly (TAFRO) syndrome. Retesting blood cultures identified Streptococcus pyogenes. Gram staining of ascites and pleural fluid indicated gram-positive cocci in chains. Antibiotics, immunoglobulins, and surgical intervention led to recovery without complications. Ex-post genotypic analyses showed uncommon emm103.0 (cluster E3) of emm long sequence (784 base) and novel sequence type 1363. STSS diagnosis can be difficult as it mimics other systemic inflammatory diseases. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to perform microbiological examinations from infection foci, even if the initial culture is negative.

5.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387786

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Qualitative urinalysis using the Sternheimer stain is a common method in Japan for identifying bacteriuria, but there is a lack of studies examining its test characteristics. In this study, we aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the Sternheimer stain for urine culture results and compare it with the sensitivity and specificity of the Gram stain. Our goal was to determine the usefulness of the Sternheimer stain in identifying bacteriuria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 986 patients aged 16 years or older from whom samples for both urinalysis and urine culture were obtained at the emergency room of Tenri Hospital from January 2019 to December 2019, 342 patients with pyuria, defined as the presence of 10 or more white cells per cubic millimeter in a urine specimen, who had not received prior antimicrobial therapy were included. Urine cultures were used for comparison to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Sternheimer and Gram stain in this patient group. A positive Sternheimer stain result was defined as bacteriuria ≥ (1+), and that of Gram stain was defined as ≥ 1/1 field of high-power ( × 1000) oil immersion. RESULTS: Using urine culture results for comparison, the sensitivity of Sternheimer stain was 92.2%, the specificity was 48.5%, the positive likelihood ratio was 1.79, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.16. DISCUSSION: Sternheimer stain is a rapid and useful method to exclude bacteriuria in a group of patients with pyuria in the emergency department.

6.
Life (Basel) ; 13(12)2023 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38137913

RESUMEN

Mouthwashes containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) or on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide (ACD) have potential to reduce the salivary severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) load in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study will evaluate the effect of CPC and on-demand ACD mouthwashes on salivary SARS-CoV-2 levels in individuals with acute asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) staying in a residential recuperation facility in Osaka, Japan. This randomized, open-label clinical trial will include three equal-sized groups (CPC mouthwash, on-demand ACD mouthwash, and placebo), with 30 participants per group. A stratified replacement block method will be used to ensure balanced allocation based on symptom presence and days since symptom onset. Participants will use mouthwash at set times for 7 days or until the end of recuperation. Saliva samples will be collected at multiple time points and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome will be changes in salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load 2 h after the first mouthwash use compared with the pre-mouthwash level. Secondary outcomes will include changes in salivary viral load and clinical parameters at different time points. This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 18 October 2022 (jRCTs051220107).

7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(10): ofad502, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37901123

RESUMEN

Background: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales have become a global concern owing to increased infections, high mortality, and limited antibiotic treatment options. Carbapenems (CPMs) are effective against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, but their overuse leads to the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Cefmetazole (CMZ) is effective in vitro; however, its clinical efficacy remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated with CMZ or CPMs for bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales between 1 April 2014 and 31 September 2022 at Tenri Hospital. The primary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. We also evaluated resistance genes and sequence types of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Results: In total, 156 patients were enrolled in this study. Ninety patients (58%) received CMZ therapy. Patients in the CMZ group were significantly older than those in the CPM group (median [IQR], 79 years [71-86] vs 74 years [64-83]; P = .001). The severity of the Pitt bacteremia score of the CMZ group was lower than that in the CPM group (0 [0-2] vs 2 [0-2], P = .042). Six patients (7%) in the CMZ group and 10 (15%) in the CPM group died by day 90 (P = .110). Charlson Comorbidity Index and prevalence of sequence 131 between the groups were statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CMZ is a well-tolerated alternative to CPM for treating bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales.

8.
J Radiol Prot ; 43(3)2023 07 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37435690

RESUMEN

Using the Fukushima accident experience, this letter discusses recent efforts on measuring scientific consensus views-that is, quantifying the agreement among scientists. In the field of radiological protection, the efforts to measure scientific consensus views deserve attention, because hoaxes have been spreading even after the Fukushima nuclear accident. We discussed two points. First, the visualization of the diversity of scientific opinions shatters the diversity illusion caused by the mass media's irresponsible dissemination of pro and con arguments. Second, the use of scientific consensus views without an ethical code is dangerous. Measuring scientific consensus views should be accompanied with the development of ethical guidelines on using it.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Protección Radiológica , Consenso , Códigos de Ética
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(8): 1680-1681, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486321

RESUMEN

An 84-year-old man in Japan who had undergone endovascular aortic repair 9 years earlier had an infected aneurysm develop. We detected Desulfovibrio desulfuricans MB at the site. The patient recovered after surgical debridement, artificial vessel replacement, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Clinicians should suspect Desulfovibrio spp. infection in similar cases.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Desulfovibrio desulfuricans , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Japón
10.
Clin Rheumatol ; 42(9): 2287-2295, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37243802

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with polypharmacy, including social aspects, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We conducted this single-centre, cross-sectional study at a 715-bed regional tertiary care teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as having five or more medications administered orally regularly, and excessive polypharmacy was defined as having 10 or more medications administered orally regularly. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, distribution of medication types, and factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were investigated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The proportions of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 61% and 15%, respectively, in 991 patients. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.03 and 1.03, respectively), high Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (odds ratio, 1.45 and 2.03, respectively), medication with glucocorticoids (odds ratio, 5.57 and 2.42, respectively), high Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.28 and 1.36, respectively), and a history of hospitalisation in internal medicine (odds ratio, 1.92 and 1.87, respectively) and visits to other internal medicine clinics (odds ratio, 2.93 and 2.03, respectively). Moreover, excessive polypharmacy was associated with the presence of public assistance (odds ratio, 3.80). CONCLUSIONS: Considering that polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are associated with a history of hospitalisation and glucocorticoid medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, medications during hospitalisation should be monitored, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued. Key points • The proportion of polypharmacy (five or more medications administered orally regularly) was 61%. • The proportion of excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications administered orally regularly) was 15%. • Medications during hospitalisation should be reviewed and examined, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Polifarmacia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Mod Rheumatol ; 34(1): 79-86, 2023 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36702156

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the vaccination coverage and the factors associated with non-vaccination for vaccine-preventable diseases among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This single-centre, cross-sectional study was conducted in a 715-bed regional tertiary-care teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Vaccination status and the factors and reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), and varicella vaccine live (VVL) were investigated. RESULTS: Among 991 patients, the vaccination coverage for the influenza vaccine, PPSV23, PCV13, and VVL was 62%, 46%, 14%, and 3%, respectively. The most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were efficacy concerns for the influenza vaccine, safety concerns for the PPSV23 and PCV13, and both efficacy and safety concerns for the VVL. Younger age, no use of biologics or other hospital visits, and public assistance were factors significantly associated with non-vaccination for the influenza vaccine; younger age, short disease duration, and no visits to other hospitals for PPSV23; younger age, no hospitalisation, more experienced doctor, and no medical immunodeficiency for PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the factors associated with non-vaccination varied by vaccine type; therefore, vaccinations should be promoted with individualised strategies.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Humanos , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Conjugadas , Método Doble Ciego , Vacunación , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico
12.
Intern Med ; 62(17): 2483-2491, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36575017

RESUMEN

Objective This study aimed to clarify the vaccination coverage of vaccine-preventable diseases and the factors and reasons for non-vaccination among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods This single-centre, cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2020 in a 715-bed regional tertiary-care teaching hospital in Japan. A questionnaire survey was undertaken to investigate the vaccination status of patients with SLE, and the factors and reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine, 23-valent-pneumococcal-polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), varicella vaccine live (VVL), and recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Results The vaccination coverage for the influenza vaccine, PPSV23, PCV13, VVL, and RZV was 61%, 22%, 19%, 3.4%, and 0%, respectively, among 261 patients. The most common reason for vaccine hesitancy was 'efficacy concerns about vaccines' for the influenza vaccine and 'cost' for PPSV23 and PCV13. The factors significantly associated with non-vaccination were prescription of high-dose glucocorticoids and no history of visits to other internal medicine clinics for the influenza vaccine; a younger age and prescription of high-dose glucocorticoids for PPSV23; and a younger age, no medication with hydroxychloroquine, no history of hospitalisation in internal medicine, and extensive clinical experience of the doctor for PCV13. Conclusion These findings, which demonstrated that the factors and reasons for non-vaccination varied by vaccine type, suggest that individualised strategies should be used to promote vaccination in this population.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Mod Rheumatol ; 2022 Dec 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36508299

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: This single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing the medical records and questionnaire data of 261 systemic lupus erythematosus patients at a teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as the regular administration of five or more oral medications; excessive polypharmacy consisted of the regular use of ten or more oral medications. This study investigated 1) the prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, 2) the distribution of medication types, and 3) factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy. RESULTS: The proportions of patients that exhibited polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 70% and 19%, respectively. Polypharmacy was associated with older age, long duration of systemic lupus erythematosus, high disease activity, and administration of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents. Excessive polypharmacy was associated with a higher updated Charlson comorbidity index, history of visits to multiple internal medicine clinics, and presence of public assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are related to medical aspects such as disease severity and comorbidities in addition to social aspects such as hospital visitation patterns and economic status.

14.
Intern Med ; 61(24): 3743-3747, 2022 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527029

RESUMEN

We encountered a case of refractory adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) with two relapses. Prednisolone and methotrexate were begun as induction therapy, resulting in the patient's first relapse during tapering of prednisolone. After the introduction of tocilizumab, she achieved remission. However, she experienced a second relapse following prednisolone tapering. While lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and white blood cell (WBC) counts increased in both relapses, interleukin-6 (IL-6) suppression resulted in stable C-reactive protein and ferritin levels in the second relapse. A comparison of the two relapses indicated that increases in both WBC counts and LDH levels can aid in the diagnosis of AOSD relapse.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Still del Adulto , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Leucocitos , Recurrencia , Lactato Deshidrogenasas
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(7): 1008-1011, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35428576

RESUMEN

TAFRO syndrome is a rare disorder that manifests as thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin myelofibrosis, renal dysfunction, and organomegaly. Although this disease often follows a severe clinical course, the cause remains unknown. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major global problem. Vaccination against COVID-19 has been successful; however, there are concerns about severe adverse events. Herein, we report a rare presentation of TAFRO syndrome triggered by the COVID-19 vaccine with a fatal clinical course. A 42-year-old Japanese man presented to our hospital complaining of fever lasting for 2 weeks that occurred a day after receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine. The patient had a low platelet count, ascites, reticulin myelofibrosis, renal failure, and lymphadenopathy and was diagnosed with TAFRO syndrome. Despite administering several immunosuppressive drugs, the condition did not improve. The patient repetitively developed and eventually died of bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. We highlight the first reported case of TAFRO syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad de Castleman , Mielofibrosis Primaria , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Castleman/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema/diagnóstico , Edema/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , ARN Mensajero , Reticulina , Vacunación/efectos adversos
16.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(4): 510-515, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35016825

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), and medical costs. In colorectal surgery, cefmetazole (CMZ) and flomoxef (FMOX) are predominantly used in Japan, and they have almost the same spectrum of antibiotic activity against SSI pathogens, and an approximately four-fold cost difference (CMZ: ∼4$, FMOX: ∼16$). However, the difference between these antibiotics in SSI prophylaxis in colorectal surgery remains poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to investigate the prophylactic effects of these antibiotics, pLOS, and hospitalization costs. Patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between April 2016 and March 2020 were considered for this study. RESULTS: Of the 634 patients, 316 (49.8%) were eligible. The SSI rates in the CMZ and FMOX groups were 14.7% and 12.5%, respectively. The incidence of organ/space SSI was approximately two-fold lower in the CMZ group than in the FMOX group (4.4% vs. 9.4%). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that CMZ was not significantly related to SSI, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-2.82) and did not induce a significant difference in pLOS (difference ratio: 0.951 [95% CI: 0.868-1.041]). Hospitalization costs were reduced in the CMZ group (difference ratio, 0.951 [95% CI: 0.907-0.998], p = 0.042). The sensitivity analysis also showed results similar to the above findings. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CMZ could be a cost-effective antibiotic with similar efficacy for SSI prophylaxis in colorectal surgery, compared with FMOX.


Asunto(s)
Cefmetazol , Cirugía Colorrectal , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cefmetazol/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
17.
Acute Med Surg ; 8(1): e654, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33968417

RESUMEN

AIM: The emergency department requires simple and useful clinical indicators to identify bacteremia. This retrospective study explored the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores for predicting bacteremia. METHODS: Between April and September 2017, we assessed blood cultures of 307 patients in our emergency department. We calculated the SIRS and qSOFA scores for these patients and evaluated their correlation with bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 307 patients, 66 (21.5%) had bacteremia, 237 (77.2%) were SIRS-positive, and 123 (40.0%) were qSOFA-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the SIRS score for predicting bacteremia were 87.9% and 25.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the qSOFA score were 47.0% and 61.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that body temperature (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.84; P = 0.009) and blood pressure (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-5.35; P = 0.004) significantly associated with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: The SIRS score was a more sensitive indicator than the qSOFA score for predicting bacteremia.

18.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 98, 2021 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33568114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor research funding. METHODS: This study aimed to develop a model workshop for healthcare staff to acquire skills in creating systematic review protocols based on their own clinical questions at teaching hospitals. We used an action research method to create a model workshop at four hospitals in Japan from April 2015 to March 2017. To improve the program, we solicited reflections using participant questionnaires for each lecture and examined the quality of homework submitted by participants after each lecture. We administered a revised final version of the workshop at five hospitals from April 2016 to March 2017. We evaluated the participants' scholarly productivity related to these workshops. The observation period was a minimum of 2 years following the workshops. RESULTS: Most participants had never developed a formal clinical research protocol and voluntarily participated in the workshop. The action research was developed and implemented at nine teaching hospitals in Japan, including one university hospital. The study developed a model nine-step workshop curriculum: 1) Research question development, 2) Search strategy development, 3) Search strategy brush-up, 4) Exclusion and inclusion criteria development, 5) Risk of bias assessment planning, 6) Meta-analysis planning, 7) Subgroup and sensitivity analysis planning, 8) Planning the presentation of results, and 9) Presentation protocols. A total of 233 participants, including medical doctors and other health professionals, produced 414 research questions. Seventy-nine participants (34%) completed the workshop, and 47 review teams accomplished systematic review protocols. The participants published 13 peer-reviewed articles as a result of the workshop. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a structured scholarly productive model workshop for healthcare staff working at hospitals. We found healthcare staff with clinical subspecialties were able to develop an unexpectedly high number of research questions through this workshop. Medical teachers at hospitals with prior systematic review experience could teach how to develop systematic review protocols using this model. Further research is needed to increase the academic productivity of such workshops. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/), UMIN000017107 (4/15/2015), UMIN000025580 (1/10/2017).


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Atención a la Salud , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Japón , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
19.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(5): 1215-1221, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389450

RESUMEN

During the influenza season, most patients suspected of having influenza undergo rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) in Japan despite their low sensitivity. However, the physician's actual rationale for prescribing antivirals, besides the results of RIDTs, remains poorly understood. Our study sought to identify the role of clinical information and physicians' experience in the initiation of anti-influenza agents. We retrospectively reviewed 380 patients who underwent RIDTs at the emergency department of our hospital from September 2018 to May 2019. Data regarding sex, age, etc., which could affect the decision of prescribing antivirals, were extracted from medical records. We performed logistic regression analysis to analyze the concurrent effect of potentially relevant clinical factors, results of RIDTs, and the physician's status on antiviral prescription. Multivariable analysis revealed that a positive RIDT had the largest effect on antiviral prescription, followed by physician status, high regional influenza activity, and patients' presentation within 12 h of symptom onset. Patient's age, comorbidities, and presentation after 48 h of symptom onset were not associated with antiviral treatment. Physicians with more years of experience were significantly more likely to prescribe antivirals for patients with low risk of complications. Our findings revealed the physicians' rationale for initiating antiviral treatment and the discrepancy with guideline indications of antivirals, which is the patient's age and comorbidities. Physicians, especially those with more than 3 years of experience, frequently prescribed antivirals for patients with low risk of complications; thus, educational interventions against this population could be useful to improve this situation.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Prescripciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Intern Med ; 59(21): 2789-2795, 2020 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641654

RESUMEN

Lupus aortitis is a rare and potentially life-threatening disorder. Previous studies have reported the utility of high-dose systemic glucocorticoids or surgery as the treatment, although there have been no related controlled trials. We herein report a 49-year-old woman with a 35-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus who was diagnosed with aortitis. Her symptoms and laboratory and imaging abnormalities rapidly resolved upon the administration of moderate-dose glucocorticoids. We subsequently performed a literature review of similar cases to identify the appropriate treatment and discuss these cases. A study of further cases will be needed to identify the characteristics of patients who would benefit from moderate-dose glucocorticoid therapy.


Asunto(s)
Aortitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aortitis/etiología , Aortitis/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aortitis/diagnóstico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...