Where are the inequalities in colorectal cancer care in a country with universal healthcare? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer living in more deprived areas experience worse survival than those in more affluent areas. Those living in more deprived areas face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We evaluated the literature for any association between socioeconomic group, hospital delay and treatments received among patients with colorectal cancer in the UK, a country with universal healthcare. DESIGN: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCIE, AMED and PsycINFO were searched from inception to January 2023. Grey literature, including HMIC, BASE and Google Advanced Search, and forward and backward citation searches were conducted. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Observational UK-based studies were included if they reported socioeconomic measures and an association with either hospital delay or treatments received. The QUIPS tool assessed bias risk, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The review is reported to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. RESULTS: 41 of the 7209 identified references were included. 12 studies evaluated 7 different hospital intervals. There was a significant association between area-level deprivation and a longer time from first presentation in primary care to diagnosis. 32 studies evaluated treatments received. There were socioeconomic inequalities in surgery and chemotherapy but not radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with colorectal cancer face inequalities across the cancer care continuum. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment. Qualitative research of patients and clinicians conducted across various settings would provide a rich understanding of the complex factors that drive these inequalities. Further research should also consider using a causal approach to future studies to considerably strengthen the interpretation. Clinicians can try and mitigate some potential causes of colorectal cancer inequalities, including signposting to financial advice and patient transport schemes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022347652.

Phenotyping patients with chronic cough: Evaluating the ability to predict the response to anti-inflammatory therapy.

BACKGROUND: Whether the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement can predict the response to anti-inflammatory treatment in chronic cough is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the effectiveness of treatment with 10 mg of montelukast or 20 mg of prednisolone in patients with chronic cough is predicted by FeNO level. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study conducted in the Clinical Trial Unit in Castle Hospital in the United Kingdom, 50 nonsmoking patients with a cough that lasted more than 8 weeks were sequentially enrolled in the study. Thirty patients with high FeNO levels (≥30 ppb) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 10 mg of montelukast or 20 mg of prednisolone for 2 weeks followed by 10 mg of montelukast for 2 weeks. Twenty patients with a low FeNO level (≤20 ppb) received 10 mg of montelukast. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of treatment on 24-hour cough counts. RESULTS: The 24-hour cough counts decreased in both groups by approximately 50% (P < .005), indicating that FeNO did not predict treatment response. However, it was a good marker for eosinophilic inflammation with a high degree of correlation with blood and sputum eosinophilia (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that prior investigation may not predict response to anti-inflammatory treatment, which may be consequent on localized leukotriene-mediated inflammation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02479074.

Does FeNO Predict Clinical Characteristics in Chronic Cough?

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether exhaled nitric oxide measurement can facilitate in the assessment of chronic cough patients based on their airway inflammatory phenotype. METHODS: We have studied consecutive patients attending a specialist cough clinic. 30 patients with high FeNO (> 30 ppb) and 20 patients with low FeNO (< 20 ppb) were recruited. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between FeNO, B-Eos and sputum eosinophil count (p < 0.001). The number of recorded coughs in 24 h and HARQ scores were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients with a low FeNO. In contrast to the high FeNO group (48%), the greater proportion of these patients were women (90%). LCQ scores were worse in the low FeNO group but it was not significant. CONCLUSION: A strong relationship between FeNO, blood eosinophils and sputum eosinophils confirming phenotypic identity was observed. Whether the observed gender disparity accounts for the different cough frequency characteristics is unknown.