Epigenomics may begin to explain in vitro differential response to hypomethylating agents in MMR-D hypermethylated endometrial cancer.

This work examines differences in chromatin accessibility, methylation, and response to DNA hypomethylating agents between mismatch repair-deficient and non-mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer. Next-generation sequencing of a stage 1B, grade 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer tumor revealed microsatellite instability and a variant of unknown significance in POLE along with global and MLH1 hypermethylation. Inhibition of viability by decitabine in the study and comparison tumors was minimal, as shown by an inhibitory effect of 0 and 17.9, respectively. Conversely, the inhibitory effect of azacitidine on the study tumor was more pronounced, at 72.8 versus 41.2. In vitro, mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer with MLH1 hypermethylation respond better to DNA methyltransferase inhibition by azacytidine (DNA/RNA inhibition), than to decitabine (DNA-only inhibition). Additional large studies are needed to substantiate our findings.

MCM6 versus Ki-67 in diagnosis of luminal molecular subtypes of breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Currently, breast cancers are divided into four major molecular subtypes. The distinction between the luminal A and luminal B subtypes is mainly based on the cellular proliferation indices and is assessed by the Ki-67 scoring. Due to the limitations in the assessment and expression of Ki-67, we hypothesized that minichromosome maintenance protein 6 (MCM6) might be taken as a surrogate marker to differentiate molecular subtypes and aid in more precise grading of tumors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study on 124 samples of breast cancer and 40 samples of normal breast tissue. Relevant clinical information was retrieved from the Cancer Institute database. RESULTS: MCM6 could discriminate between various categories of histologic grades, tubule formation, mitotic indices, and nuclear pleomorphism (P = 0.002 for tubule formation and P < 0.001 for other). Moreover, the MCM6 score exhibited a significant correlation with the mitotic count (P < 0.001). However, the Ki-67 score could not discriminate subgroups of the mitotic index and nuclear pleomorphism. Compared to the luminal A subtype, luminal B exhibited a higher MCM6 score (P = 0.01). Besides, MCM6 scores were higher for certain subtypes with more aggressive behaviors, such as hormone receptor (HR)-negative disease, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched and triple-negative breast cancers, as there was a significantly higher MCM6 mean score in the HR-negative in comparison to the luminal breast cancers (P < 0.001). Similarly, higher MCM6 scores were observed among samples with more advanced nuclear grades, tubule formation, and overall grades. CONCLUSION: MCM6 can differentiate luminal A and luminal B subtypes and is correlated with mitotic counts. However, this study was unable to prove the superiority of MCM6 in differentiating between molecular subtypes compared to the Ki-67 score. Nevertheless, in our study, MCM6 was superior to Ki-67 in exhibiting correlations with the mitotic grade, tubule formation, and nuclear grades. More studies are needed to standardize its assessment methods, determine more robust cut-off values, and evaluate its associations with prognostic features of breast cancer.

Orthotopic Liver Transplantation for Etanercept-induced Acute Hepatic Failure: A Case Report.

Occurrence of hepatotoxicity following prescription of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonist, is a relatively well-known issue. On the other hand, acute hepatic failure which could lead to liver transplantation is extremely rare to the best of our knowledge, and there is no previously published case in the literature. In this article, we presented a case of acute liver failure followed by liver transplantaion, in a 32- year old man with a previous history of ankylosing spondylitis after etanercept usage. On pathologic examination of the explanted liver of the patient, extensive confluent necrosis in all liver segments with prominent infiltration of a mixed population of inflammatory cells in portal tracts was noticed. In conclusion, close follow-up of patients who are receiving etanercept is crucial, since its liver complications could be severe enough to subject the patients for liver transplantation.