Use of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework to inform clinical reasoning in postgraduate level physiotherapy students: a qualitative study using think aloud methodology.

BACKGROUND: Vascular pathologies of the head and neck are rare but can present as musculoskeletal problems. The International Federation of Orthopedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) Cervical Framework (Framework) aims to assist evidence-based clinical reasoning for safe assessment and management of the cervical spine considering potential for vascular pathology. Clinical reasoning is critical to physiotherapy, and developing high-level clinical reasoning is a priority for postgraduate (post-licensure) educational programs. OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of the Framework on clinical reasoning processes in postgraduate physiotherapy students. METHODS: Qualitative case study design using think aloud methodology and interpretive description, informed by COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research. Participants were postgraduate musculoskeletal physiotherapy students who learned about the Framework through standardized delivery. Two cervical spine cases explored clinical reasoning processes. Coding and analysis of transcripts were guided by Elstein's diagnostic reasoning components and the Postgraduate Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Practice model. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis (inductive and deductive) for individuals and then across participants, enabling analysis of key steps in clinical reasoning processes and use of the Framework. Trustworthiness was enhanced with multiple strategies (e.g., second researcher challenged codes). RESULTS: For all participants (n = 8), the Framework supported clinical reasoning using primarily hypothetico-deductive processes. It informed vascular hypothesis generation in the patient history and testing the vascular hypothesis through patient history questions and selection of physical examination tests, to inform clarity and support for diagnosis and management. Most participant's clinical reasoning processes were characterized by high-level features (e.g., prioritization), however there was a continuum of proficiency. Clinical reasoning processes were informed by deep knowledge of the Framework integrated with a breadth of wider knowledge and supported by a range of personal characteristics (e.g., reflection). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support use of the Framework as an educational resource in postgraduate physiotherapy programs to inform clinical reasoning processes for safe and effective assessment and management of cervical spine presentations considering potential for vascular pathology. Individualized approaches may be required to support students, owing to a continuum of clinical reasoning proficiency. Future research is required to explore use of the Framework to inform clinical reasoning processes in learners at different levels.

Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy when compared with oral pain medications in patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to investigate the effectiveness and safety of manual therapy (MT) interventions compared to oral pain medication in the management of neck pain. METHODS: We searched from inception to March 2023, in Cochrane Central Register of Controller Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCO) for randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of manual therapy interventions for neck pain when compared to medication in adults with self-reported neck pain, irrespective of radicular findings, specific cause, and associated cervicogenic headaches. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool to assess the potential risk of bias in the included studies, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to grade the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Nine trials (779 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. We found low certainty of evidence that MT interventions may be more effective than oral pain medication in pain reduction in the short-term (Standardized Mean Difference: -0.39; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.11; 8 trials, 676 participants), and moderate certainty of evidence that MT interventions may be more effective than oral pain medication in pain reduction in the long-term (Standardized Mean Difference: - 0.36; 95% CI - 0.55 to - 0.17; 6 trials, 567 participants). We found low certainty evidence that the risk of adverse events may be lower for patients that received MT compared to the ones that received oral pain medication (Risk Ratio: 0.59; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79; 5 trials, 426 participants). CONCLUSIONS: MT may be more effective for people with neck pain in both short and long-term with a better safety profile regarding adverse events when compared to patients receiving oral pain medications. However, we advise caution when interpreting our safety results due to the different level of reporting strategies in place for MT and medication-induced adverse events. Future MT trials should create and adhere to strict reporting strategies with regards to adverse events to help gain a better understanding on the nature of potential MT-induced adverse events and to ensure patient safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023421147.

An evidence-informed rehabilitation management framework for posterior shoulder tightness: A scoping review.

Objective: To systematically scope the literature on posterior shoulder tightness (PST) and define a therapist-instructed and therapist-administered management framework. Design: Scoping review. Literature search: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar from inception to December 2021. Study selection criteria: Peer-reviewed studies written in English, French, Greek, Japanese or Tamil, with extractable pre- and post-intervention data. Physiotherapy interventions amenable for posterior shoulder structural (muscle, capsule) causes of PST within an adult population. Data synthesis: Arksey and O'Malley's framework was implemented and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews directed our data synthesis. The data charted from each study included authors, title, study year, location, study design; participant number, age, sex; PST intervention and parameters; patient-reported outcomes; and results. Themes were organized into therapist-instructed and therapist-administered rehabilitation strategies, as well as combined treatment methods. Results: Of 2777 articles identified from our search strategy, 21 articles were included. Therapist-instructed interventions included cross-body stretch (CBS), sleeper stretch (SS), a combination of the two and general stretching. Therapist-administered interventions included CBS, SS, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), muscle energy techniques, dry needling and Fauls protocol (12 therapist-assisted stretches). Combined interventions of tape with self-stretching and IASTM and stretching were also identified. Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, CBS and SS are the most researched treatments for PST and seem to be effective at improving PST. Furthermore, stabilization of the scapula while performing these stretches optimized the stretch targeted to the PST and ROM benefits for horizontal adduction.

Shoulder electromyography activity during push-up variations: a scoping review.

Background: Push-ups (PU) are a common closed chain exercise used to enhance shoulder girdle stability, with variations that alter the difficulty or target specific muscles. To appropriately select and prescribe PU exercises, an understanding of muscle activity during variations of the PU is needed. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify common PU variations and describe their muscle activation levels. Methods: Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus for articles published between January 2000 and November 2019. Results: Three hundred three articles were screened for eligibility with 30 articles included in the analysis. Six PU types and five muscles met the criteria for analysis. Weighted mean electromyography (EMG) amplitude was calculated for each muscle across PU types and for each PU type as a measure of global muscle activity. Triceps and pectoralis major had the highest EMG amplitude during unstable, suspension, incline with hands on a ball and the standard PU. Serratus anterior had the highest EMG amplitude during PU plus and incline PU. The greatest global EMG amplitude occurred during unstable surface PU. Discussion: These results provide clinicians with a framework for prescribing PU to target specific muscles and scale exercise difficulty to facilitate rehabilitation outcomes.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of objective structured clinical examinations used in physical therapy licensure and a structured review of licensure practices in countries with well-developed regulation systems.

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a commonly used tool internationally to assess clinical competency. Physical therapy (PT) licensure processes vary internationally. The OSCE is the tool used in Canada to assess clinical competency for PT graduates seeking licensure. Previous studies that examined the measurement properties of OSCEs present contradictory results. OBJECTIVES: The first objective was to investigate the reliability and validity of OSCEs when administered to PTs during their education or as part of a licensure process. The second objective was to conduct a structured review to report PT educational and licensing components and policies in 17 countries with well-developed PT regulation systems. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in four databases from inception to 31st March 2021 to identify relevant articles. Two reviewers performed the critical appraisal of the included studies using a validated quality assessment tool. We deployed a random effects meta-analysis on reliability and validity estimates of OSCEs and examined sources of heterogeneity with univariate meta-regressions. We searched websites of professional regulatory bodies and associations for data on educational and licencing components and policies. Educational and licensing components across countries were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: A pooled estimate of Cronbach's alpha of 0.55, (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67) was determined for OSCEs. The pooled estimate of Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between assessors was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.83). The pooled estimate of Pearson Correlation between multiple OSCE stations' scores was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.39); and between each station score and the total score was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.79). The pooled estimates for kappa Coefficients were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.86) and 0.84, (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91) for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the standardised patient respectively. From the 17 included countries, Canada (excluding Quebec) was the only country that required both a clinical and written competency exam following graduation from an accredited PT program. Two countries (USA, UAE) required a written competency exam. The remaining 14 countries did not require an additional competency examination after completion of degree requirements from an accredited program. CONCLUSIONS: We found weak evidence that OSCE examinations items are internally consistent when used to assess PTs. Canada (excluding Quebec) is the only country out of 17 implementing a national clinical competency examination for their PT graduates to achieve licensure after completing professional degree requirements.

Telehealth e-mentoring in postgraduate musculoskeletal physiotherapy education: A mixed methods case study.

BACKGROUND: Educational standards of advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy include mentored clinical practice. Whilst traditionally delivered face-to-face, telehealth e-mentoring affords a distinctive andragogy to facilitate mentee development. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences and outcomes of stakeholders participating in musculoskeletal physiotherapy telehealth e-mentoring. DESIGN: A case study design with sequential mixed methods (quantitative patient outcome data and qualitative interviews and a focus group) of a 20-week e-mentored telehealth physiotherapy service. METHODS: Data collection comprised 1) Patient experiences and measures of musculoskeletal health 2) Mentee semi-structured interviews 3) Mentor focus group. Data analysis included descriptive statistics (median and IQR) and the Framework Method for qualitative and quantitative data respectively. An exploratory bidirectional approach supported data integration across all participants. RESULTS: Participants included patients (n = 90), mentees (n = 10) and mentors (n = 6). Patients reported improvements (>MCID) in MSK-HQ and Patient Specific Functional Scale, with high scores for Consultation and Relational Empathy and Patient Enablement Instruments. Main themes were a) social learning b) advanced professional practice c) learner experience and d) limitations of telehealth for mentees, and for mentors a) preparedness b) journey of development and c) challenges. Participant data integration resulted in 4 main themes 1) energising/positive experience 2) communications skills valued 3) perceptions of telehealth 4) upskilling required. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth e-mentoring is a valuable alternative to face-to-face mentored physiotherapy practice to support development in advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice. Findings indicate that technical and professional skills are required, high levels of communication skills were valued, there is a need for reconceptualisation of musculoskeletal physiotherapeutic interventions.

Experiences of telehealth e-mentoring within postgraduate musculoskeletal physical therapy education in the UK and Canada: a protocol for parallel mixed-methods studies and cross-cultural comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Mentored clinical practice is central to demonstrating achievement of International Educational Standards in advanced musculoskeletal physical therapy. While traditionally delivered face-to-face, telehealth e-mentoring is a novel alternative to offering this unique pedagogy to facilitate mentee critical reflection, deeper learning and enhanced knowledge translation to optimise patient care. With COVID-19 resulting in widespread adoption of telehealth and access to mentors often limited by geography or cost, the potential value of telehealth e-mentoring needs investigating. To investigate the experiences and outcomes of multiple stakeholders (student mentees, mentors and patients) engaged in musculoskeletal physical therapy telehealth e-mentoring across two universities (UK and Canada). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using case study design, we will use sequential mixed methods involving qualitative and quantitative components based on existing evidence. To examine the influence of telehealth e-mentoring on health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal complaints, we will use patient-reported outcomes for satisfaction, patient empowerment and change in musculoskeletal health. We will conduct semistructured interviews to explore the development of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, communication skills and confidence of students engaged in telehealth e-mentoring. To explore the mentor acceptability and appropriateness of telehealth e-mentoring, we will conduct a focus group in each site. Finally, we will include a focus group of participants from each site to allow a cross-cultural comparison of findings to inform international stakeholders. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics (median and IQR) to describe changes in outcome data and qualitative data will be analysed following the Framework Method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from both institutions: the University of Birmingham (ERN_20-0695) and Western University (2020-116233-47832). Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to key stakeholders in musculoskeletal physical therapy education and practice.

Posterior Shoulder Instability Classification, Assessment, and Management: An International Delphi Study.

OBJECTIVE: To reach consensus among international shoulder experts on the most appropriate assessment and management strategies for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). DESIGN: Delphi. METHODS: In phase 1 of the study, we reviewed the literature, generated the Delphi items, created the survey, and identified clinical experts. In phase 2 of the study, clinical shoulder experts (physical therapists, orthopaedic surgeons, sports medicine physicians, and researchers) participated in a 3-round e-Delphi survey. For consensus, we required a minimum of 70% agreement per round. Descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of the respondents, the response rate of the experts in each round, and the consensus for PSI classification, assessment, and management. RESULTS: Round 3 was completed by 47 individuals from 5 different countries. The response rate ranged from 57/70 (81%) to 47/50 (94%) per round. Respondents agreed on 3 subgroups to define PSI: traumatic (100% agreement), microtraumatic (98% agreement), and atraumatic (98% agreement). CONCLUSION: International shoulder experts agreed that the clinical presentation, management strategy, and outcome expectations differ for traumatic, microtraumatic, and atraumatic PSI. Their recommendations provide a framework for managing these subgroups, with additional consideration of sport and work participation and subsequent risks. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(7):373-380. Epub 29 Apr 2020. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9225.

What is the diagnostic accuracy of red flags related to cauda equina syndrome (CES), when compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review and statistically pool available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of red flags to clinically identify MRI confirmed Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Ovid Healthstar, Amed and CINAHL from inception to January 30, 2018 and a grey literature search. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Primary diagnostic studies, published in English; comparing red flags for CES; to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as reference standard; in humans; older than 18 years. METHODS: Data extraction, assessment of study quality using a modified QUADAS-2 tool and the use of GRADE to synthesize the results for each test was performed by three independent assessors. Diagnostic accuracy statistics applied to the identified data andpooled analysis performed using Meta-DiSc, version 1.4. Moderator analyses planned for pooled results. RESULTS: Seven studies (total N = 569 participants) were included. Potential signs or symptoms of CES were compared to MRI findings. Diagnostic data could be pooled for reduced anal tone, leg pain, back pain, saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention, urinary incontinence and bowel incontinence from six of seven studies. The pooled sensitivity for the signs and symptoms ranged from 0.19 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.33) to 0.43 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56) while the pooled specificity ranged from 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.73) to 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Red flags used to identify potential CES appear to be more specific than sensitive. As such, when these are present, they should be considered justification for prompt diagnostic workup.

Validity of the central sensitization inventory with measures of sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis.

Our purpose was to determine the validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) with psychophysical tests, psychological and physical factors in patients with Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA). Patients with KOA were recruited from three Montreal hospitals. Psychophysical tests (pressure pain threshold, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation) were conducted and questionnaires administered to determine the presence of neuropathic pain, somatization, anxiodepressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing (PC), and widespread pain (WSP). Relations between the CSI, psychophysical tests, and questionnaires were assessed using correlations and chi-square analysis. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves determined sensitivity and specificity scores. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict the association of CSI scores with somatization, anxiodepressive symptoms, PC, and WSP factors. One hundred thirty-three participants were assessed, 56.4% female, mean age 63.5 years. The CSI was weakly correlated with decreased pressure pain thresholds locally (rs - 0.264, p = 0.004) and remotely (rs - 0.235, p = 0.011) and with conditioned pain modulation (rs 0.187, p = 0.045). ROC curve analyses suggested an optimal CSI cut-point of 36 (Sn 75%, Sp 63.4%). Performance of the CSI used in combination with a neuropathic pain questionnaire was not significantly superior. After adjustment for covariates, a multivariable linear regression determined WSP (unstandardized ß 4.161(0.067, 8.255) p = 0.046), somatization (unstandardized ß 1.828 (1.368, 2.288) p < 0.005), and anxiodepressive symptoms (unstandardized ß 0.419 (0.107, 0.730) p = 0.009) significantly predicted CSI scores. The CSI is more strongly associated with psychological factors than psychophysical test results in a KOA population. Its moderate sensitivity and specificity suggest it should be used as part of a more comprehensive evaluative toolkit.

Clinical Diagnostic Tests versus Medial Branch Blocks for Adults with Persisting Cervical Zygapophyseal Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify clinical tests for diagnosing cervical zygapophyseal joint pain (CZP) and to determine their diagnostic accuracy. Method: A search strategy was carried out to find relevant evidence published in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PEDro from 1980 to January 1, 2015, pertaining to the clinical diagnosis of CZP. Quality assessment was completed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Results were analyzed to pool sensitivity and specificity and clarify diagnostic value. Results: Seven articles (n=463) were included for data synthesis and review. Intersegmental mobility tests were found to have the highest diagnostic accuracy, with pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.81). The pooled sensitivity for mechanical sensitivity (palpation) was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.95), and specificity was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.71). Conclusion: Limited studies are available that discuss the clinical diagnosis of CZP, and significant heterogeneity is present in the available data. In this review, intersegmental mobility tests were found to be the most accurate. Clustering of tests, agreement on a reference standard, and further exploration of CZP referral patterns are recommended.

Objectif : analyse systématique et méta-analyse afin de déterminer les tests cliniques nécessaires pour diagnostiquer des douleurs des articulations zygapophysaires cervicales (AZC) et en établir l'exactitude diagnostique. Méthodologie : les chercheurs ont adopté une stratégie de recherche pour extraire les données probantes pertinentes publiées dans CINAHL, Embase, Medline et PEDRo entre 1980 et le 1er janvier 2015, à l'égard du diagnostic clinique d'AZC. Ils en ont évalué la qualité au moyen des études d'exactitude diagnostique des évaluations de la qualité­2. Ils ont analysé les résultats pour en regrouper la sensibilité et la spécificité ainsi que pour en confirmer la valeur diagnostique. Résultats : les auteurs ont conservé sept articles (n=463) pour la synthèse et l'analyse des données. Ils ont découvert que les tests de mobilité intersegmentaire possédaient la plus grande précision diagnostique. En effet, la sensibilité groupée s'établissait à 0,91 (IC à 95% : 0,85, 0,94) et la spécificité, à 0,74 (IC à 95 % : 0,65, 0,81). La sensibilité mécanique groupée (palpation) était de 0,88 (IC à 95 % : 0,78, 0,95), et la spécificité, à 0,61 (IC à 95 % : 0,50, 0,71). Conclusion : peu d'études portent sur le diagnostic clinique des AZC, et les données disponibles sont très hétérogènes. Dans la présente analyse, les tests de mobilité intersegmentaire étaient les plus précis. Il est recommandé de regrouper les tests, de s'entendre sur une norme de référence et d'approfondir l'examen des profils d'orientation des AZC vers d'autres spécialistes.

Evidence-Based Review of Clinical Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Clinical Tests That Evaluate Response to Conservative Rehabilitation for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Posterior glenohumeral instability is poorly understood and can be challenging to recognize and evaluate. Using evidence-based clinical and predictive tests can assist clinicians in appropriate assessment and management. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence-based clinical diagnostic tests for posterior glenohumeral instability and predictive tests that identify responders to conservative management. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive electronic bibliographic search was conducted using Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PEDro, and CINAHL databases from their date of inception to February 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included for further review if they (1) reported on clinical diagnostic tests for posterior or posteroinferior instability of the glenohumeral joint, (2) assessed predictive clinical tests for posterior instability of the glenohumeral joint, and (3) were in English. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers and included patient demographics and characteristics, index/reference test details (name and description of test), findings, and data available to calculate psychometric properties. RESULTS: Five diagnostic and 2 predictive studies were selected for review. There was weak evidence for the use of the jerk test, Kim test, posterior impingement sign, and O'Brien test as stand-alone clinical tests for identifying posterior instability. Additionally, there was weak evidence to support the use of the painless jerk test and the hand squeeze sign as predictive tests for responders to conservative management. These findings are attributed to study design limitations, including small and/or nonrepresentative samples. CONCLUSION: Clustering of thorough history and physical examination findings, including the aforementioned tests, may identify those with posterior glenohumeral instability and assist in developing management strategies.

Quantifying performance metrics of cervical spine mobilization for improved education and clinical outcomes: Early experience with a novel wearable device.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of manual skills training for spinal rehabilitation has been stagnant for 40 years. Observation and mimicry are coupled with feedback from "expert" observers to train and evaluate learners, relying on rater experience to discern speed and force. Spinal manipulation is a controlled act under the Regulated Health Professions Act (1991) as it is not without risk. The discordance between current methods for evaluating proficiency and the potential risks of inadequate application is a critical gap. METHODS: This work reports a novel wearable device that measures finger forces via microstrain bending of the physiotherapist's nail. The device leaves the tactile finger pad unobstructed and does not interfere with treatment application. Five expert-level physiotherapists performed a standard postero-anteriorly directed spinal segmental mobilization treatment for 1 min at 1-1.5 Hz rhythm. RESULTS: The device successfully measured all treatment forces (0.2-27.3 N). Physiotherapists applied a maximum force rate of 0.03 ± 0.01 N/s with a rhythm of 1.76 ± 0.38 Hz. In 15 trials, there were no device failures. The device was easily applied and removed, and physiotherapists were able to walk about and interact normally with patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that this technology can be integrated into a skills training program to provide quantitative feedback for objective assessments.

What is the reliability of clinical measurement tests for humeral head position? A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION: Physiotherapists routinely assess the position of the humeral head (HH) in patients with shoulder pain. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To conduct a systematic review to determine the quality and content of studies that evaluated the reliability of clinical measurement methods for assessing the HH position. METHODS: Five databases and gray literature were searched for studies fitting the eligibility criteria. After abstract and full-text review, the included studies were appraised using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist. Articles were considered of high quality if 8 was achieved on the checklist, and the overall quality of evidence was classified using prespecified criteria. Multiple raters extracted and performed quality ratings; a consensus process was used to finalize the reliability data that were synthesized and presented in a narrative synthesis. Reliability was classified as excellent if the intracorrelation coefficients or intercorrelation coefficients (ICCs) reported exceeded 0.75. RESULTS: Fifteen studies on the reliability of ultrasound (US) and 3 studies on palpation were included. The methodologic quality was moderate in 17 of 18 studies. The intrarater reliability for all studies was excellent (ICC, 0.76-0.99) with the exception of the 90° abduction in internal rotation position (ICC, 0.48) for palpation. The inter-rater reliability tended to be lower (ICC, 0.48-0.68) for palpation and higher (ICC, 0.66-0.99) for US. Physiotherapists demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability across different levels of training in ultrasonography. DISCUSSION: Our study found a moderate overall level of evidence to support the use of US for assessing HH position in symptomatic or asymptomatic subjects. CONCLUSION: A moderate overall level of evidence exists for the use of US to reliably assess the HH position. Limited research supports the methods used for palpation within a clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a.

Rehabilitation of symptomatic atraumatic degenerative rotator cuff tears: A clinical commentary on assessment and management.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical Commentary. INTRODUCTION: Atraumatic rotator cuff (RC) disease, is one of the most common cause of shoulder pain, which encompasses a continuum from tendinopathy to full thickness cuff tears. Extrinsic, intrinsic and environmental factors have been implicated in the pathophysiology of this disorder, affecting the clinical presentation of symptoms including pain and irritability. Successful rehabilitation of symptomatic atraumatic degenerative rotator cuff (SADRC) tears must address the underlying mechanisms causing dysfunction and correct modifiable factors. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this paper is to review the shoulder complex anatomy, introduce atraumatic degenerative RC pathology, differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic degenerative RC tears, propose an assessment and introduce the Rotator Cuff Protocol 1 (RCP1) designed by the clinical reasoning of one of the lead authors (LW) as a rehabilitation management approach for those clients who present with SADRC tears. METHODS/RESULTS/DISCUSSION: N/A for clinical commentary. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to identify SADRC tears should consider shoulder anatomy, extrinsic, intrinsic and environmental factors, and the consideration for the natural history of atraumatic partial and full thickness tears in the general population. A thorough clinical history and examination, which includes shoulder symptom modification tests, allows the examiner to determine at what phase the patient may start their exercise program. The RCP1 is a program that has been used clinically by many therapists and clients over the years and research is underway to test this protocol in atraumatic rotator cuff disease including SADRC tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

A comprehensive rehabilitation program for posterior instability of the shoulder.

Posterior shoulder instability is recognised as being less prevalent than anterior instability, however the diagnosis of this pathology is easily overlooked or missed and this may contribute to an underestimation of prevalence. Recently, there has been increasing recognition of this condition and consequently a greater requirement for knowledge of diagnostic procedures and treatment directions. Currently there is limited research into the conservative management of posterior instability, although it is recommended as first-line treatment prior to surgical review, particularly in those with an atraumatic instability mechanism. The aim of this paper is to outline a comprehensive rehabilitation program for the conservative management of posterior instability with a focus on scapular and humeral head control. The information provided includes extensive written information, flowcharts, figures and a table of management parameters that will provide therapists with adequate detail to replicate the program in the clinical setting.

Evidence-based conservative rehabilitation for posterior glenohumeral instability: A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To identify the best evidenced-based approach for the conservative rehabilitation of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability. BACKGROUND: Posterior glenohumeral instability is more common than previously thought. Proper management is imperative to control symptoms and maximize function. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search, up to November 2014, for English-language studies involving rehabilitation of posterior shoulder instability. A manual search of reference lists of included articles and previously published reviews was also performed. RESULTS: Five studies met the review inclusion criteria. Most studies demonstrated that rotator cuff and posterior deltoid strengthening could reduce instability recurrence and pain, and increase function, mainly in those with atraumatic posterior instability without previous surgery. These studies were mainly case series or retrospective designs. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff and posterior deltoid strengthening may help with symptom-management and functioning in those with posterior glenohumeral instability. Further research is needed to detect statistically significant outcomes from conservative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, Level 3.