Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0131571, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26148007

RESUMEN

METHODS: In an observer blind, phase 2 trial, 55 adults were randomized to receive one dose of Ad35.CS.01 vaccine followed by two doses of RTS,S/AS01 (ARR-group) or three doses of RTS,S/AS01 (RRR-group) at months 0, 1, 2 followed by controlled human malaria infection. RESULTS: ARR and RRR vaccine regimens were well tolerated. Efficacy of ARR and RRR groups after controlled human malaria infection was 44% (95% confidence interval 21%-60%) and 52% (25%-70%), respectively. The RRR-group had greater anti-CS specific IgG titers than did the ARR-group. There were higher numbers of CS-specific CD4 T-cells expressing > 2 cytokine/activation markers and more ex vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospots in the ARR-group than the RRR-group. Protected subjects had higher CS-specific IgG titers than non-protected subjects (geometric mean titer, 120.8 vs 51.8 EU/ml, respectively; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in vaccine efficacy of ARR-group over RRR-group was not achieved. Future strategies to improve upon RTS,S-induced protection may need to utilize alternative highly immunogenic prime-boost regimens and/or additional target antigens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01366534.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/prevención & control , Esporozoítos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Formación de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...