Comparison of Efficacy of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy With 5% Topical Minoxidil Spray in Treating Alopecia Areata: A Head-to-Head Assessment of Novel Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) remains one of the most challenging afflictions encountered in dermatology clinics. It is characterized by an autoimmune-mediated inflammatory process of and around hair follicles, causing reversible, non-scarring hair loss. With the ongoing search for optimal treatment strategies, the potentially positive role of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy as well as minoxidil has been reported in various studies; however, the comparison of the two treatment modalities is largely underexplored. This research aims to compare and assess the effectiveness of intralesional PRP with topical minoxidil therapy in AA to identify efficacious management options amongst the newly described treatment modalities. METHODOLOGY: The research work was conducted over four months and included 40 (31 males and 9 females) patients suffering from alopecia areata. They were divided into Group A, which was administered monthly autologous PRP injections, while Group B was given daily topical 5% minoxidil therapy. In group A, four treatments of PRP were given, each one month apart. While in group B, daily topical minoxidil spray was administered for the same duration. The alopecia areata severity grade was recorded by employing the "Severity of Alopecia Tool" (SALT) scoring system. The pre- and post-treatment SALT scores were noted and compared at each monthly visit. RESULTS: The study comprised nine (22.5%) female and 31 (77.5%) male patients. At the beginning of the study and after one month of treatment, the difference in the SALT score was not statistically significant between the two groups, suggesting that both interventions had similar effects during the early stages of the treatment. At two months, a statistically significant difference emerged (p-value 0.037), indicating that a more significant fall in the SALT score was observed with autologous PRP treatment compared to topical minoxidil. After four months, a highly significant difference was noted between the two groups (p-value <0.0001), implying that intralesional PRP therapy led to a far more significant decrease in the SALT score compared to topical minoxidil therapy. CONCLUSION: Monthly intralesional autologous PRP therapy for four months manifests better outcomes in alopecia areata than daily 5% topical minoxidil therapy.

Comparing the Efficacy of Topical 4% Benzoyl Peroxide Versus Topical 0.1% Adapalene for Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Skin of Color Population: A South Asian Perspective.

Introduction Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin problems encountered in the dermatology department. It is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit, clinically presenting with comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. With its particularly high prevalence in the younger population, it has significant adverse sequelae on patient's quality of life. At present, due to an enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis of acne, various therapeutic modalities are available. The current management strategies generally follow a systematic treatment escalation based on disease severity and treatment response. However meticulous choice of appropriate anti-acne medicine for the acne type is the key to the management plan. Starting with mild to moderate types of acne as per the Leeds photometric grading scale, the most useful topical agents include topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, and topical antibiotics while systemic therapies such as oral antibiotics or isotretinoin are generally reserved for moderate to severe acne treatment. The skin of color (SOC) population is a relatively neglected group concerning the optimum and safe management strategies in different dermatological conditions and acne is no different, where there remains a need for comparing the available topical modalities for appropriate drug selection in the treatment of mild to moderate acne in SOC population. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of topical 4% benzoyl peroxide versus topical 0.1% adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris in the SOC population. Methods The participants were divided into two groups, groups A and B. A total of 64 patients of both genders, with acne vulgaris (duration > three months) were included in the study. In group A, 32 patients were administered topical 0.1% adapalene whereas, in group B, 32 patients were given topical 4% benzoyl peroxide. Both medicines were applied at night daily. Patients were called for follow-up after 12 weeks. In both groups, the final efficacy evaluation was done using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) score after 12 weeks of treatment period. Results In group A, the age ranged from 15 to 40 years with a mean age of 25.781±3.93 years while the duration of complaint was 5.843±1.27 months. GAGS score was 25.281±2.65 and mean BMI was 23.092±3.51 kg/m2. In group B, the mean age was 25.187± 4.06 years, the duration of complaint was 7.375±2.25 months, the GAGS score was 23.906± 2.60 while the mean BMI was 21.485±3.88 kg/m2. Efficacy in group A was noted in 25 (78.1%) patients as compared to 24 (75%) patients in group B (p =0.768). Conclusion The present study showed that the safety and efficacy of 0.1% adapalene the traditional drug 4% benzoyl peroxide in the SOC population was comparable.

Study Comparing Topical Ivermectin Versus Topical Permethrin in the Treatment of Scabies.

Introduction Scabies is a highly contagious skin disease caused by an ectoparasite mite called Sarcoptes scabiei. Ivermectin and permethrin have been commonly used for the treatment of scabies. However, topical ivermectin has been compared to other treatment modalities to a lesser extent. Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of topical ivermectin versus topical permethrin in the treatment of uncomplicated scabies. Methods 354 patients with scabies attending the dermatology outpatient department of Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups randomly. The first group and their family contacts received 1% ivermectin lotion whereas the other received 5% permethrin lotion. Patients were evaluated at the end of the second and the fourth week. Results At the end of the second week, initial follow-up showed that 97 out of 159 patients (61.0%) in the ivermectin 1% group, and 107 out of 159 patients (67.3%) in the permethrin 5% group had achieved clinical cure (P=0.24). On the final follow-up at the end of Week 4, the cure rate amounted to 85.5% (136 of 159 patients) in the ivermectin group and 89.9% (143 of 159 patients) in the permethrin group. Differences among both groups remained statistically insignificant (P=0.23). Conclusions The use of ivermectin 1% versus permethrin 5% as topical therapy showed almost identical results for the treatment of uncomplicated scabies. Side effects were minimal and there were no significant differences observed in patients with regard to compliance among both the groups.

Rise in the Number of Complex Skin Cancers Necessitates Establishing Mohs Micrographic Surgery Fellowships in Pakistan.

As more and more patients seek treatment for increasingly complicated and cosmetically challenging skin cancers, Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is now exceedingly in demand. Training in MMS could help dermatologists improve patient outcomes allowing them to handle complex lesions safely and efficiently and hence, provide the best possible care. As a result, there is an urgent need to train additional dermatologists in Mohs Surgery in order to meet the huge demand for dermatologists with imperative expertise, specifically in this field.