Arterial pressure, left ventricular mass, and aldosterone in essential hypertension.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of aldosterone to blood pressure and left ventricular size in black American (n=109) and white French Canadian (n=73) patients with essential hypertension. Measurements were obtained with patients off antihypertensive medications and included 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, plasma renin activity and aldosterone, and an echocardiogram. Compared with the French Canadians, the black Americans had higher body mass indexes, higher systolic blood pressures, attenuated nighttime reduction of blood pressure, and lower serum potassium concentrations (P:<0.01 for each). Left ventricular mass index, posterior wall thickness, interventricular septal thickness, and relative wall thickness were also greater (P:<0.01 for each) in the black American patients. Supine and standing plasma renin activity was lower (P:<0.01 and P:<0.05, respectively) in the black Americans, whereas supine plasma aldosterone concentrations did not differ, and standing plasma aldosterone was greater (P:<0.05) in the black Americans (9.2+/-0.7 ng/dL) than in the French Canadians (7.3+/-0.6 ng/dL). In the black Americans, supine plasma aldosterone was positively correlated with nighttime systolic (r=0.30; P:<0.01) and diastolic (r=0.39; P:<0.001) blood pressures and inversely correlated with the nocturnal decline of systolic (r=-0.29; P:<0.01) and diastolic (r=-0.37; P:<0.001) blood pressures. In the black Americans, standing plasma aldosterone was positively correlated with left ventricular mass index (r=0.36; P:<0.001), posterior wall thickness (r=0.33; P:<0.01), and interventricular septal thickness (r=0.26; P:<0.05). When the black American patients were divided into obese and nonobese groups, significant correlations between plasma aldosterone and both blood pressure and cardiac mass were observed only in the obese. In the French Canadians, overall, plasma aldosterone did not correlate with either blood pressure or any measures of heart size. However, among obese French Canadians, supine plasma aldosterone correlated with nighttime diastolic (r=0.53, P:<0.02) and systolic (r=0.44, P:<0.01) blood pressures but not with cardiac mass. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that aldosterone contributes to elevated arterial pressure in obese black American and obese white French Canadian patients with essential hypertension and to the attenuated nocturnal decline of blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in obese, hypertensive black Americans.

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and dipyridamole sestamibi scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: limitations and concordance.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) and dipyridamole Technetium 99-m (Tc-99m) sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scintigraphy (DMIBI) for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Both DASE and DMIBI are effective for evaluating patients for CAD, but their concordance and limitations have not been directly compared. METHODS: To investigate these aims, patients underwent multistage DASE, DMIBI and coronary angiography within three months. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and stress-rest DMIBI were performed according to standard techniques and analyzed for their accuracy in predicting the extent of CAD. Segments were assigned to vascular territories according to standard models. Angiography was performed using the Judkin's technique. RESULTS: The 183 patients (mean age: 60 +/- 11 years, including 50 women) consisted of 64 patients with no coronary disease and 61 with single-, 40 with two- and 18 with three-vessel coronary disease. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and DMIBI were similarly sensitive (87%, 104/119 and 80%, 95/119, respectively) for the detection of CAD, but DASE was more specific (91%, 58/64 vs. 73%, 47/64, p < 0.01). Sensitivity was similar for the detection of CAD in patients with single-vessel disease (84%, 51/61 vs. 74%, 45/61, respectively) and multivessel disease (91%, 53/58 vs. 86%, 50/58, respectively). Multiple wall motion abnormalities and perfusion defects were similarly sensitive for multivessel disease (72%, 42/58 vs. 66%, 38/53, respectively), but, again, DASE was more specific than DMIBI (95%, 119/125 vs. 76%, 95/125, respectively, p < 0.01). Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and DMIBI were moderately concordant for the detection and extent of CAD (Kappa 0.47, p < 0.0001) but were only fairly (Kappa 0.35, p < 0.001) concordant for the type of abnormalities (normal, fixed, ischemia or mixed). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and DMIBI were comparable tests for the detection of CAD. Both were very sensitive for the detection of CAD and moderately sensitive for the extent of disease. The only advantage of DASE was greater specificity, especially for multivessel disease. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography may be advantageous in patients with lower probabilities of CAD.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of stress echocardiography in stable patients.

Stress echocardiography is an effective diagnostic and prognostic technique in stable patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction, or chronic left ventricular dysfunction and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events regardless of the clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Stress echocardiography provides incremental prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable to that from radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for one-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Importance of chamber size and systolic wall stress.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy is a heterogeneous disorder with distinct morphologies. Changes in wall thickness, left ventricular chamber diameter, and mass alter systolic wall stress of the left ventricle and may influence ischemic threshold. Thus, the goal of this study was to investigate the effect of the different patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy on the accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three-hundred eighty-six patients underwent multistage dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and diagnostic angiography. Echocardiograms were measured for mean and relative wall thicknesses, chamber size, left ventricular mass, and end-systolic wall stress. The patterns of ventricular hypertrophy were concentric hypertrophy (increased wall thickness and mass), eccentric hypertrophy (normal wall thickness and increased mass), and concentric remodeling (increased wall thickness and normal mass). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease were 85%, 87%, and 86%, respectively. Increased left ventricular mass index alone did not affect accuracy. Sensitivity was markedly reduced (36%) only in those with concentric remodeling. The univariate predictors of false-negative studies were single-vessel left circumflex disease, increased wall thickness, small chamber size, hyperdynamic ejection fraction, and left ventricular concentric remodeling. Multivariate predictors were concentric remodeling (P<0.0001; odds ratio, 13.5), left ventricular ejection fraction >2 SD above normal (P<0.0001), and single-vessel left circumflex disease (P<0.0007; odds ratio, 7.6). Sensitivity was excellent in patients with small ventricles and normal wall thickness and in those with normal or large chambers regardless of wall thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography is an accurate test in most patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, but it is insensitive in the small subset with concentric remodeling.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is strongly related to infarct size. The contribution of viability in the infarct zone and the presence of multivessel disease remains unknown. Because dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) can estimate infarct size and detect myocardial viability and multivessel disease, we postulated that DSE can accurately predict LV remodeling after acute MI. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, 30 patients age 59 +/- 15 years, 21 men, 14 with anterior MI, underwent multistage DSE (low dose, 5 to 10 microg, and peak dose) during the first week after MI occurred. Follow-up echocardiography was performed at >/=1 year. LV remodeling (2 SD increase in LV volume) occurred in 17 of 30 patients. Remodeling occurred in 12 (92%) of 13 patients with large nonviable infarct and in 1 (13%) of 8 patients with large viable infarct (P <.001). Univariate predictors of LV remodeling were baseline ejection infarct (P <.01), infarct size (number of akinetic segments at low dose P <.01), age (P <.05), and multivessel coronary disease (P <. 01). The only multivariate predictor of remodeling was infarct size. Viability of infarct zone was a negative predictor of LV remodeling. CONCLUSION: DSE performed during the first week after acute MI predicts subsequent LV remodeling. Infarct size, nonviability of the infarct zone, and age are independent predictors of LV remodeling. Myocardial viability is a strong negative predictor of LV remodeling.

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for risk stratification in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of sustained improvement, scar and inducible ischemia with or without viability in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). BACKGROUND: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) accurately detects scar, reversible dysfunction and the extent of coronary artery disease in LVD. METHODS: Three hundred fifty consecutive patients (age 62+/-13 years, mean+/-SD, 215 men/135 women) with moderate to severe LVD (LVEF < 40%, mean 30+/-8%) underwent DASE and were followed for > or =18 months. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiographic findings were classified according to sustained improvement in all vascular territories, scar, inducible ischemia (worsening wall motion at peak dose only or biphasic responses) and their extent. RESULTS: Sustained improvement occurred in 83 patients (24%), scar alone in 99 (28%) and inducible ischemia in 168 (48%, with biphasic responses in 104). Ischemia was induced in all vascular territories in 26 patients. Patients with sustained improvement or scar alone were treated medically, whereas 46% (78/168) with inducible ischemia were revascularized (coronary bypass surgery, n = 67 or angioplasty, n = 11). There were 76 hard events including cardiac death in 59, nonfatal myocardial infarction in 11, and resuscitated sudden death in 6. Hard events were rare in sustained improvement (5%, 4/83), uncommon in scar (13%, 13/99) and common (p < 0.01) in medically treated patients with inducible ischemia (59%, 53/90). Cardiac deaths were especially common (p < 0.01) in patients with biphasic responses (55%, 28/51). Inducible ischemia independently predicted hard events (chi2 = 75.35, p < 0.001) along with reduced LVEF at peak dose (chi2 = 8.38, p = 0.004). Hard cardiac events were uncommon (8%, 6/78, p < 0.001) in patients with inducible ischemia who underwent early revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Inducible ischemia during DASE was the major determinant of outcome in LVD and independent of clinical data and left ventricular function. Improved wall thickening alone and scar alone predicted good outcome. Survival of patients with inducible ischemia was better after revascularization.

The value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.

To determine whether there were any gender-based differences in the detection of coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography, we examined 288 patients (187 men and 101 women) who underwent coronary angiography within 8 weeks of dobutamine stress testing. Abnormal test results were indicated by let ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest, which did not improve or worsen, or inducible wall motion abnormalities in two or more segments with dobutamine. Overall, dobutamine stress echocardiography showed a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in both men and women: 85%, 96%, and 88% anx 90%, 79%, and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity in detecting significant coronary artery disease in our population was not influenced by gender. However, the sensitivity of the test was influenced by the extent and location of coronary disease and the pattern of left ventricular, hypertrophy. The sensitivity was 80% in patients with single-vessel disease, whereas the sensitivity was 91% in patients with multivessel disease. In addition, patients with single-vessel disease had lower sensitivity when the abnormality was located in the left circumflex coronary artery territory (59% versus 86% in the left anterior descending and right coronary territories). Our data indicated that there is no gender-based difference in the sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease and that the limitations of the test should be attributed to the extent and location of coronary disease.

Safety and accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery and multivessel disease during the first week after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The safety of dobutamine-atropine echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction is unknown. Its accuracy for the early detection of infarct artery stenosis and multivessel coronary artery disease is also unclear. The objective of the present study was to document its safety and accuracy during the first week after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multistage dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was performed in 232 patients (age, 58 +/- 13 years; 58 women) at 5 +/- 2 days after acute myocardial infarction. The peak heart rate was 116 +/- 20 bpm. There were no episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, myocardial infarction, or death. Atropine with dobutamine was tolerated well. Coronary angiography was performed in 206 patients (89%). There were 171 patients (83%) with infarct artery stenosis of > or = 50% and 114 patients (55%) with multivessel disease. Ischemic or biphasic responses in the infarction zone were 82% (140 of 171) sensitive and 80% (28 of 35) specific for residual stenosis. Sensitivity was similar for occluded arteries (77%, 36 of 47) and patent but stenotic arteries (84%, 104 of 124). Wall motion abnormalities outside the infarction zone were specific (97%, 89 of 92) and moderately sensitive (68%, 77 of 114) for multivessel disease. The only determinant of sensitivity for residual infarct artery stenosis was improved wall motion at low dose (P < .01). The determinants of sensitivity for multivessel disease were peak heart rate and infarct size (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was safely used to detect residual infarct artery stenosis and multivessel disease during the first week after acute myocardial infarction. The test may be very effective for evaluating patients with acute myocardial infarction because sensitivity for residual stenosis and multivessel disease was maximal in the high-risk subsets of patients with viable, jeopardized myocardium and large infarct size.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for risk stratification after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Because dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides assessment of left ventricular function and ischemia at a distance, the major determinants of adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we undertook this study to determine the role of DSE in risk stratification after AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A graded DSE in 5-minute stages was performed in 214 patients (age, 57 +/- 13 years [mean +/- SD]) at 2 to 7 days after AMI. Coronary angiography was performed in 193 patients. Follow-up data regarding major cardiac events were obtained through telephone interviews and chart reviews. All patients were followed for > or = 500 days or until a hard cardiac event occurred. The mean follow-up interval was 494 +/- 182 days after AMI. Peak heart rate and systolic blood pressure were 115 +/- 21 bpm and 135 +/- 29 mm Hg, respectively. An adverse outcome occurred in 80 of 214 patients; cardiac death occurred in 15, nonfatal AMI occurred in 15, sustained or symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 5, congestive heart failure occurred in 14, and unstable angina occurred in 31. Significant predictors of adverse outcome by univariate analysis were prior myocardial infarction (P = .005), anterior infarction (P = .006), multivessel coronary artery disease (P < .0001), global resting left ventricular wall motion score index (P < .0001), infarction zone nonviability based on akinesis unresponsive to low-dose dobutamine (P < .0001), and ischemia/infarction at a distance (P < .0001). Furthermore, the extent of infarct zone and nonviability correlated with the severity of the cardiac event. Multivariate analysis of clinical, angiographic, and DSE variables revealed that the only independent predictors of adverse outcome were ischemia/infarction at a distance (P < .0001) and infarction zone nonviability (P < .0001). Multivessel disease identified through DSE was more predictive of adverse outcome than was angiographically determined multivessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: DSE can be used to predict adverse outcomes after AMI.

Injury to the Ca2+ ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in anesthetized dogs contributes to myocardial reperfusion injury.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcoplasmic reticulum dysfunction may contribute to calcium (Ca2+) overload during myocardial reperfusion. The aim of this study was to investigate its role in reperfusion injury. METHODS: Open chest dogs undergoing 15 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion were randomized to intracoronary infusions of 0.9% saline, vehicle, or the Ca2+ channel antagonist, nifedipine (50 micrograms/min from 2 minutes before to 5 minutes after reperfusion). After each experiment, transmural myocardial biopsies were removed from ischemic/reperfused and nonischemic myocardium in the beating state and analyzed for (i) sarcoplasmic reticulum protein content (Ca2+ ATPase, phospholamban, and calsequestrin) by immunoblotting and (ii) Ca2+ uptake by sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles with and without 300 micromolar ryanodine or the Ca2+ ATPase activator, antiphospholamban (2D12) antibody. RESULTS: Contractile function did not recover in controls and vehicle-treated dogs after ischemia and reperfusion (mean systolic shortening, -2 +/- 2%), but completely recovered in nifedipine-treated dogs (17 +/- 2%, p = NS vs. baseline, p < 0.01 vs. control). Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 50% of controls and vehicle dogs and 0% of nifedipine-treated dogs (p < 0.01). Ca2+ uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles was severely reduced in ischemic/reperfused myocardium of controls and vehicle dogs (p < 0.01 vs. nonischemic). Ryanodine and the 2D12 antibody improved, but did not reverse the low Ca2+ uptake. Protein content was similar in ischemic/reperfused and nonischemic myocardium. In contrast, Ca2+ uptake and the responses to ryanodine and 2D12 antibody were normal in ischemic/reperfused myocardium from nifedipine-treated dogs. CONCLUSION: Dysfunction of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase pump correlates with reperfusion injury. Reactivation of Ca2+ channels at reperfusion contributed to Ca2+ pump dysfunction. Ca2+ pump injury may be a critical event in myocardial reperfusion injury.

Differential roles of myocardial Ca2+ channels and Na+/Ca2+ exchange in myocardial reperfusion injury in open chest dogs: relative roles during ischemia and reperfusion.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the roles of Ca2+ channels and Na+/Ca2+ exchange in reperfusion injury (reperfusion ventricular fibrillation and myocardial stunning). METHODS: Open chest dogs undergoing 15 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 3 hours of reperfusion were randomized to controls or intracoronary infusions of the respective antagonists, nifedipine (50 micrograms/min) or amiloride (5 mg/min), according to five protocols: (A) 40 minutes before occlusion to 30 minutes after reperfusion; (B) 2 minutes before to 5 minutes after reperfusion; (C) 10 minutes before to 10 minutes after reperfusion (two step infusion for nifedipine only 5 micrograms/min during occlusion and 50 micrograms/min after reperfusion); and (D) 0 to 30 minutes after reperfusion. The role of Ca2+ channels was further investigated by infusing the agonist, Bay K 8644 (50 micrograms/min), alone or simultaneously with any protocol B, C, or D infusions altering both reperfusion ventricular fibrillation and myocardial stunning. RESULTS: Effects of the agents on injury did not result from hemodynamic effects or alterations in blood flow. Amiloride had no effect on ventricular fibrillation. Only protocol A infusion of amiloride prevented myocardial stunning. In contrast, protocol A and B infusions of nifedipine prevented both myocardial stunning (p = ns vs. baseline, p < 0.01 vs. control) and ventricular fibrillation (0%, p < 0.01). Protocol C prevented reperfusion ventricular fibrillation, but not stunning (p = ns vs. control). Protocol D did not alter injury. Bay K 8644 co-treatment reversed the effects of Protocol B infusion of nifedipine. Ventricular fibrillation was common and postischemic function worst in dogs treated with Bay K 8644 alone (protocol B). CONCLUSION: Myocardial Ca2+ channels contribute to both reperfusion ventricular fibrillation and stunning, whereas Na+/Ca2+ exchange contributes only to stunning. Inhibitors of myocardial Ca2+ channels are protective when infused in high doses just before reperfusion, whereas the efficacy of Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitors is dependent on pretreatment.

Intracoronary amiloride prevents contractile dysfunction of postischemic "stunned" myocardium: role of hemodynamic alterations and inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange and L-type Ca2+ channels.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish the effect of amiloride on stunned myocardium and to determine the role of hemodynamic alterations and inhibition of sodium/proton (Na+/H+) exchange and L-type cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) channels. BACKGROUND: Amiloride is a nonspecific agent that may reduce reperfusion injury, but its effect on reversible dysfunction or stunned myocardium is unclear. METHODS: Ninety-seven open chest dogs undergoing 15 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion with monitoring of hemodynamic variables, systolic shortening and myocardial blood flow were randomized to seven intracoronary infusions: control dogs (5% dextrose, n = 16); low dose amiloride (1 mg/min, n = 14); high dose amiloride (5 mg/min) with (n = 12) and without (n = 16) atrial pacing; sodium nitroprusside (20 micrograms/min, n = 16); hexamethylene amiloride (a specific inhibitor of Na+/H+ exchange, 60 micrograms/min, n = 14); and nifedipine (a specific inhibitor of L-type Ca2+ channels, 5 micrograms/min, n = 9). Drug infusions were started 40 min before occlusion and stopped at 30 min after reperfusion. RESULTS: Forty-three dogs were excluded because of ventricular fibrillation or high collateral flow. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation was similar in all groups to that in control dogs. Systolic shortening completely recovered (p = NS vs. baseline; p < 0.01 vs. control group) by 2 h after reperfusion in the low dose amiloride group and 30 min in the high dose group (p < 0.01 vs. low dose). High dose amiloride increased myocardial blood flow and had positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effects (p < 0.05 vs. control group). Atrial pacing did not attenuate recovery. The only effect of low dose amiloride was increased myocardial blood flow after reperfusion. Systolic shortening did not deteriorate after washout of drug effects. Sodium nitroprusside and nifedipine similarly increased myocardial blood flow, but systolic shortening never recovered. Hexamethylene amiloride had no hemodynamic effects, and systolic shortening never recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Amiloride prevented the contractile dysfunction of myocardial stunning but did not prevent arrhythmias. Hemodynamic alterations, increased myocardial blood flow and inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange or L-type Ca2+ channels alone did not account for the improved function. Inhibition of Na+/Ca2+ exchange may be the mechanism of improved postischemic function.

Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to prospectively compare helical CT with pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with an unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with an unresolved suspicion of pulmonary embolism were evaluated with contrast-enhanced helical CT and with selective pulmonary angiography. An average of 11 hr separated the two studies. The CT scans were obtained during one 24-sec or two 12-sec breath-holds. CT scans were interpreted without knowledge of the results of scintigraphy or angiography. Selective pulmonary angiograms were obtained with knowledge of the findings on the ventilation/perfusion scan only. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were compared with those of angiography for central vessels (segmental and larger) only and for all vessels. RESULTS: Eleven of the 20 patients had proved pulmonary embolism (seven in central vessels and four in subsegmental vessels only). When only central vessels were analyzed, CT sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 92%, and the likelihood ratio was 10.7. However, when subsegmental vessels were included, CT results were 63%, 89%, and 5.7, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our subset of patients, helical CT was only 63% sensitive. Subsegmental emboli are difficult to diagnose. Pulmonary angiography remains the study of choice. CT has a limited role in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.

Acoustic propagation properties of normal, stunned, and infarcted myocardium. Morphological and biochemical determinants.

BACKGROUND: Identification of viable but stunned myocardium remains a major problem. Since stunned myocardium results in impairment of myocardial function without any structural damage and infarcted myocardium causes major structural disruption, we postulated that acoustic properties could distinguish between the two insults. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anesthetized open-chest dogs underwent a total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 15 minutes (stunned, n = 7) and 90 minutes (infarcted, n = 8), followed by reperfusion for 3 hours. Circumflex coronary artery perfusion territory (n = 15) served as normal control tissue. Regions of myocardium were quantitatively evaluated with a scanning laser acoustic microscope operating at 100 MHz and a research ultrasound system operating at 4 to 7 MHz. Four ultrasonic parameters were determined: attenuation coefficient (an index of loss per unit distance), speed of propagation, a spatial variation of propagation speed called the heterogeneity index (HI), and ultrasonic backscatter at 5 MHz (IBR5). Myocardial water, lipid, and protein contents of normal, stunned, and infarcted myocardium were also determined. The attenuation coefficient of normal myocardium (179 +/- 20 dB/cm) was significantly greater than that of stunned (136 +/- 7 dB/cm, P < .001) and infarcted (130 +/- 8 dB/cm, P < .001) myocardium. The propagation speed of normal myocardium (1597 +/- 6 m/s) was similar to that of stunned (1600 +/- 6 m/s) and significantly higher than that of infarcted (1575 +/- 7 m/s, P < .001) myocardium. The HI for specimen thicknesses of 75 to 100 microns showed an increase of 33% between normal (5.0 +/- 0.8 m/s) and stunned (7.5 +/- 2.3 m/s, P < .05) myocardium. However, for the infarcted myocardium (5.8 +/- 2.0 m/s), the HI was essentially the same as that of the normal myocardium (5.0 +/- 0.8 m/s). The IBR5 of normal (-47.1 +/- 1.0 dB) was not significantly different from that of stunned myocardium (-46.8 +/- 0.9 dB). The IBR5 of infarcted myocardium (-42.4 +/- 1.0 dB) was significantly greater than that of normal myocardium. Myocardial water and protein contents were similar in the normal and stunned myocardium. Water content in the infarcted myocardium (80.8 +/- 2%) was significantly greater (P < .05) than in the normal (72.7 +/- 1.3%), and protein content of 18.5 +/- 0.7% was significantly lower (P < .05) than the normal (21.4 +/- 0.8%). Lipid content was increased in the stunned (8.5 +/- 0.5%) and virtually absent in the infarcted myocardium (0.8 +/- 0.3%) compared with normal (5.5 +/- 0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that acoustic propagation properties can identify stunned and infarcted myocardium and may be related to biochemical/morphological differences.

Relation of ultrasonic backscatter and acoustic propagation properties to myofibrillar length and myocardial thickness.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic backscatter demonstrates a cardiac cycle-dependent modulation. The exact mechanism of the modulation is under debate. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that a change in size and configuration of myofilaments from systole to diastole alters acoustic propagation properties and backscatter. METHODS AND RESULTS: In vivo measurements were made of integrated backscatter at 5 MHz (IBR5), followed by in vitro measurements of ultrasonic attenuation, speed, and heterogeneity index using a scanning laser acoustic microscope at 100 MHz. Studies were performed in canine hearts (16) arrested in systole (8) with calcium chloride or arrested in diastole (8) with potassium chloride. Sarcomere length was measured with a calibrated eyepiece on a Ziess microscope. Wall thickness was measured with calipers. The attenuation coefficient of 220 +/- 34 dB/cm during systole was significantly higher than the coefficient of 189 +/- 24 dB/cm during diastole (P < .01); the IBR5 of -44.7 +/- 1.2 dB during systole was significantly greater than the IBR5 of -47.0 +/- 1.0 dB during diastole (P < .01); the ultrasonic speed of 1591 +/- 11 m/s during systole was higher than the speed of 1575 +/- 4.2 m/s during diastole (P < .01); and the heterogeneity index of 7.4 +/- 1.8 m/s during systole was significantly lower than the index of 9.0 +/- 2.0 m/s during diastole (P < .02). The sarcomere length of 1.804 +/- 0.142 microns during diastole was significantly higher than the length of 1.075 +/- 0.177 micron during systole (P < .01). Wall thickness was significantly greater during systole than during diastole (20 +/- 3 versus 9 +/- 3 mm, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic backscatter and propagation properties are directly related to sarcomere length and myocardial thickness and may be responsible for cardiac cycle-dependent variation in backscatter.

Ultrasonic tissue characterization for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit.

The purpose of this study was to determine the use of ultrasonic tissue characterization (UTC) for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Real-time UTC and conventional 2-dimensional echocardiography were performed with a research prototype and commercially available ultrasonoscope, respectively, in 60 consecutive patients with suspected AMI. Diagnosis of AMI was documented by the presence of 2 of the 3 following clinical criteria: (1) typical history, (2) characteristic electrocardiographic changes, and (3) an increase in creatine phosphokinase-MB. Myocardial infarction was present in 24 of 60 patients and absent in 36 of 60 patients. Tissue characterization correctly diagnosed the presence of myocardial infarction in 22 of 24 patients and the absence in 33 of 36 patients. Two-dimensional echocardiography detected the presence of myocardial infarction in 21 of 24 patients and the absence in 34 of 36 patients. UTC had 2 false-negative and 3 false-positive studies, all in the region of apical infarcts. Two-dimensional echocardiography had 3 false-negative studies in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and 2 false-positive studies in patients with complete left bundle branch block. Both techniques had a comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography does not preclude embolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used recently to detect atrial thrombi before cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. It has been assumed that embolic events after cardioversion result from embolism of preexisting atrial thrombi that are accurately detected by TEE. This study examined the clinical and echocardiographic findings in patients with embolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation despite exclusion of atrial thrombi by TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical and echocardiographic data in 17 patients with embolic events after TEE-guided electrical (n = 16) or pharmacological (n = 1) cardioversion were analyzed. All 17 patients had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including four patients with lone atrial fibrillation. TEE before cardioversion showed left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in five patients and did not show atrial thrombus in any patient. Cardioversion resulted in return to sinus rhythm without immediate complication in all patients. Thirteen patients had cerebral embolic events and four patients had peripheral embolism occurring 2 hours to 7 days after cardioversion. None of the patients were therapeutically anticoagulated at the time of embolism. New or increased left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was detected in four of the five patients undergoing repeat TEE after cardioversion including one patient with a new left atrial appendage thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: Embolism may occur after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in inadequately anticoagulated patients despite apparent exclusion of preexisting atrial thrombus by TEE. These findings suggest de novo atrial thrombosis after cardioversion or imperfect sensitivity of TEE for atrial thrombi and suggest that screening by TEE does not obviate the requirement for anticoagulant therapy at the time of and after cardioversion. A randomized clinical trial is needed to compare conventional anticoagulant management with a TEE-guided strategy including anticoagulation after cardioversion.

Accuracy of color Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosis of patent foramen ovale.

This study assessed the sensitivity of color Doppler as compared with contrast study during transesophageal echocardiography for detection of a patent foramen ovale. We also evaluated the incidence of patent foramen ovale in younger (less than age 50, group 1) as compared with older (greater than age 50, group 2) patients. A total of 114 patients were studied. A patent foramen ovale was found in 17 patients: 7 of 39 (17.9%) in group 1 and 10 of 75 (13.3%) in group 2 (NS). The sensitivity of color Doppler as compared with contrast study was 33%. Our data suggest that color Doppler is a poor method of assessment for the presence of a patent foramen ovale and that patent foramen ovale remains prevalent in older as well as younger patients.

Improved baroreflex sensitivity in elderly hypertensives on lisinopril is not explained by blood pressure reduction alone.

OBJECTIVE: The major goals of this study were to determine whether lisinopril and nifedipine lowered blood pressure and improved carotid baroreflexes in older hypertensives. DESIGN: The effects of lisinopril at 10-40 mg/day versus nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) at 30-90 mg/day on blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity were studied after 3 weeks each on (1) single-blind placebo, (2) double-blind assignment to either lisinopril or nifedipine, (3) single-blind placebo, and (4) crossover to double-blind lisinopril or nifedipine. Measurements at the end of the four phases included 24-h blood pressure using the Accutracker, laboratory hemodynamics with the Dinamap and impedance cardiography, baroreflex sensitivity with the pneumatic neck chamber, and plasma samples for neurohumoral and metabolic activity. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients aged 55 years or older (mean +/- SEM 65 +/- 1 years) with mild-to-moderate hypertension completed the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary data for analysis across the four study phases included ambulatory blood pressure values, laboratory hemodynamics, and baroreflex sensitivity. RESULTS: Compared with the preceding placebo, lisinopril and nifedipine lowered 24-h blood pressure significantly. In the laboratory, the effects of both compounds on blood pressure, cardiac output, calculated total systemic resistance, and the stroke volume-pulse pressure relationship, an index of arterial compliance, were similar. Lisinopril was associated with a relative increase in the standing systolic blood pressure compared with nifedipine (P < 0.05). This coincided with an enhanced heart-rate (R-R interval) response to neck pressure, which also decreased carotid transmural pressure, with lisinopril versus nifedipine (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lisinopril and nifedipine were both effective as monotherapy for controlling blood pressure in these elderly patients. Despite similar effects on blood pressure and systemic hemodynamics, baroreflex sensitivity in response to a reduction in carotid transmural pressure was greater with lisinopril than with nifedipine.