Abdominal massage to prevent ileus after colorectal surgery. A single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial: the MATRAC Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce literature on the effect of mechanical abdominal massage on the duration of ileus after colectomy, particularly in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). The aim of this study was to determine whether abdominal massage after colorectal surgery with anastomosis and no stoma helps toward a faster return of intestinal transit. METHODS: This study was a superiority trial and designed as a prospective open-label, single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups. Patients scheduled to undergo intestinal resection and follow an ERAS protocol were randomly assigned to either the standard ERAS group or the ERAS plus massage group. The primary endpoint was the return of intestinal transit, defined as the first passage of flatus following the operation. Secondary endpoints included time of the first bowel motion, maximal pain, 30 day complications, complications due to massage, anxiety score given by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire, and quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. RESULTS: Between July 2020 and June 2021, 36 patients were randomly assigned to the ERAS group or the ERAS plus massage group (n = 19). Patients characteristics were comparable. There was no significant difference in time to passage of the first flatus between the ERAS group and the ERAS plus abdominal massage group (1065 versus 1389 min, p = 0.274). No statistically significant intergroup difference was noted for the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Our study, despite its limitations, failed to demonstrate any advantage of abdominal massage to prevent or even reduce symptoms of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 38RC20.021.

Oncological outcomes and hospitalization cost of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) open and closed abdomen techniques: Results from two French expert centers.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) associated with CC0 excision is performed using either an open (OPEN_HIPEC) or closed abdominal technique (CLOSED_HIPEC). However, little data is available on the costs of this treatment, as there is no code for HIPEC in the French Classification of Medical Acts. Oncological outcomes and the mean cost of hospitalization were compared. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, 144 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (all etiologies) were included (OPEN_HIPEC, n = 70; CLOSED_HIPEC, n = 74) in this retrospective two-center study. Morbi-mortality, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and mean cost of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: The median OS and RFS were 71.3 months [63-71.5] and 26.8 months [20-35.3] respectively, and were similar for both techniques; and after stratification by histology. Multivariate analysis adjusted on PCI score of OS identified mitomycin as a protective factor (HR = 0.31 [0.10-0.90], p = 0.032) and ASA score>2 (HR = 2.32 [1.32- 4.06], p = 0.003) and number of resection (HR = 1.21 [1.06-1.39], p = 0.006) as a risk factors of RFS. Complication rates at day 30 were similar between OPEN and CLOSED_HIPEC, 31 (44.3 %) vs 42 (56.8 %); p = 0.135. OPEN_HIPEC had more severe complications (11 (35.5 %) vs 6 (14.3 %); p = 0.034). The mean cost of hospitalization was estimated as €15,627 for OPEN_HIPEC and €14,211 for CLOSED_HIPEC for a mean length-of-stay of 12.7 and 16.7 days respectively. The mean amount received by the hospital per hospitalization was estimated at €16,399 and €15,536 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OS and RFS were similar for open and closed HIPEC. Severe complications at day 30 were more frequent in OPEN_HIPEC group. The amount received by hospital for both HIPEC techniques is sufficient.

Association between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, risk factors and 3-year survival after colorectal surgery for cancer in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: As life expectancy is currently growing, more elderly and fragile patients need colorectal resection for cancer. We sought to assess the link between enhanced rehabilitation after surgery (ERAS), risk factors and overall survival at 3 years, in patients aged 65 and over. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2017, all patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer were included. Overall survival at 3 years was compared for patients treated in following ERAS guidelines compared to conventional treatment (pre-ERAS). RESULTS: 661 patients were included (ERAS, n = 325; pre-ERAS, n = 336). The 3-year overall survival rate was significantly better regardless of age for ERAS vs pre-ERAS patients (73.1% vs 64.4%; p = 0.016). With overall survival rates of 83.2% vs 73.8%, 65.4% vs 62.8% and 59.6% vs 40% for the age bands 65-74, 75-84 and ≥ 85 years. The analysis of survival at 3 years by a multivariate Cox model identified ERAS as a protective factor with a reduction in the risk of death of 30% (HR = 0.70 [0.50-0.94], p = 0017) independently of other identified risk factors: age bands, ASA score > 2, smoking, atrial fibrillation and abdominal surgery. This result is confirmed by an analysis of the propensity score (HR = 0.67 [0.47-0.97], p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that ERAS is associated with better 3-year survival in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer, independent of risk factors. The practice of ERAS is effective and should be offered to patients aged 65 and over.

Effect of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and risk factors on 3-year survival after colorectal surgery for cancer-a retrospective cohort of 1001 patients.

PURPOSE: Several recent studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces morbidity and mortality and shortens the length of stay compared to conventional recovery strategy (pre-ERAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, comparative, and non-randomized study. Between January, 2005, and December, 2017, 1001 patients were included (ERAS, n = 497; pre-ERAS, n = 504). RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival rate was significantly better for ERAS than for pre-ERAS patients (76.1 vs 69.2%; p = 0.017). The length of hospital stay (median 10 days vs 15; p = ≤ 0.001) and the 90-day readmission rate (15 vs 20%; p = 0.037) were significantly lower in the ERAS group. Three-year recurrence-free survival (p = 0.398) and 90-day complications (p = 0.560) were similar in the two groups. Analysis of 3-year survival by a multivariate Cox model identified ERAS as a protective factor with a 30% reduction in the risk of death: (HR = 0.70 [0.55-0.90]). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the ERAS protocol was associated with an improvement in 3-year survival, a reduction of the length of hospital stay and the rate of readmission. ERAS is associated with better 3-year survival, independent of other commonly considered parameters. An ASA score > 2, smoking, a history of cancer, and atrial fibrillation are deleterious risk factors linked to earlier mortality.

Delayed Postoperative Hemorrhage Complicating Major Supramesocolic Surgery Management and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The place of surgery and interventional radiology in the management of delayed (> 24 h) hemorrhage (DHR) complicating supramesocolic surgery is still to define. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of DHR using a combined multimodal strategy. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2019, 57 patients (median age 64 years) experienced 86 DHR episodes after pancreatic resection (n = 26), liver transplantation (n = 24) and other (n = 7). Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computed tomography evaluation followed by interventional radiology (IR) treatment (stenting and/or embolization) or surveillance. Hemodynamically unstable patients were offered upfront surgery. Failure to identify the leak was managed by either prophylactic stenting/embolization of the most likely bleeding source or surveillance. RESULTS: Mortality was 32% (n = 18). Bleeding recurrence occurred in 22 patients (39%) and was multiple in 7 (12%). Sentinel bleeding was recorded in 77 (81%) of episodes, and the bleeding source could not be identified in 26 (30%). Failure to control bleeding was recorded in 9 (28%) of 32 episodes managed by surgery and 4 (11%) of 41 episodes managed by IR (p = 0.14). Recurrence was similar after stenting and embolization (n = 4/18, 22% vs n = 8/26, 31%, p = 0.75) of the bleeding source. Recurrence was significantly lower after prophylactic IR management than surveillance of an unidentified bleeding source (n = 2/10, 20% vs. n = 11/16, 69%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: IR management should be favored for the treatment of DHR in hemodynamically stable patients. Prophylactic IR management of an unidentified leak decreases recurrence risks.

Intraoperative nasogastric tube during colorectal surgery may not be mandatory: a propensity score analysis of a prospective database.

BACKGROUND: Avoiding the use of nasogastric tubes (NGTs) is recommended after colorectal surgery but there is no consensus on intraoperative gastric decompression using NGTs during colorectal surgery. The objective was to assess the effect of avoiding insertion of NGTs during colorectal surgery for the recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) functions. METHOD: 1561 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, for whom information on NGT use was available, were included in this retrospective analysis and propensity score analysis of the prospective GRACE Audit database. Patients who did and did not have an NGT during surgery were compared. RESULTS: Among the study population of 1561 patients, 696 patients were matched to correct baseline differences between groups. The no-NGT group significantly improved GI motility impairment (e.g., less postoperative nausea [OR = 0.59; CI 95%: 0.42-0.84] and a better tolerance of early feeding [OR = 2.07; CI 95%: 1.33-3.22]). Such an association was also highlighted for reduced postoperative morbidity [OR = 0.60; CI 95%: 0.43-0.83], and especially pulmonary complications [OR = 0.08; CI 95%: 0.01-0.59], or parietal complications [OR = 0.29; CI 95%: 0.09-0.87]. The risk of postoperative ileus was not significantly reduced in the no-NGT group [OR = 0.67; CI 95%: 0.43-1.06]. CONCLUSION: No NGT insertion during colorectal surgery is safe and could improve postoperative GI function recovery.

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries for patients with left ventricular assist device.

PURPOSE: There is limited literature regarding the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic procedures in patients having mechanical circulatory support, especially colonic resections. METHODS: The aim of this study is to present the case of a laparoscopic colectomy for cancer undergone in a 69-year-old patient having a HeartWare II at our institution without any postoperative major complications and to describe the perioperative management and outcome of these patients according to the literature, regarding the hemodynamic, hemorrhagic, and infectious risks and the safety of this procedure. RESULTS: There was no 90-day postoperative morbidity or death. A total of six patients including ours were identified in the study. This study has a limited number of patients and relatively short follow-up time. CONCLUSION: Even though the management of patients having a LVAD is challenging and needs a multidisciplinary approach, reported literatures have shown the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic interventions for colorectal surgeries.

Assessment of haemorrhoidal artery network using Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation for haemorrhoids and pathogenesis implications.

BACKGROUND: Some authors, either with anatomical studies or Doppler laser flowmetric investigations have shown the blood flow to the posterior midline of the anus to be potentially deficient. This relative local ischaemia might explain pathogenesis of anal fissure, which is often located posteriorly. The aim of this study was to record the exact position of the distal branches of the superior rectal artery during Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation-rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) procedures with special reference to posterior distribution of the arteries. METHODS: All consecutive patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids who were treated with the HAL-RAR procedure between February 2008 and February 2014 in a single institution were included in the study. Number and position of Doppler-guided ligations were prospectively collected. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare artery locations. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (75 women) with symptomatic haemorrhoids were included in the study. Median age was 53 years (range 23-83). A median of 10 ligations were placed per patient (range 3-18). A significantly lower number of cumulative arterial ligations was recorded in the posterior position (88 ligations overall, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The number of distal branches of the superior rectal artery that have been localized by the Doppler-guided HAL-RAR technique is lower at the posterior midline than in the other segments of the lower rectum. This is another evidence of the vascular deficiency at the posterior pole of the anal canal that might explain the pathogenesis of the anal fissure.

Short-term outcomes of the over-the-scope clip proctology system for rectovaginal fistula repair: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The over-the-scope clip proctology system is rather new and information regarding its use for the closure of anorectal fistulas is scarce. No study has been designed to focus exclusively on its application in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the clip for rectovaginal fistula repair. METHODS: From September 2014 to November 2017, consecutive patients underwent a rectovaginal fistula repair using the over-the-scope clip proctology system and were enrolled in a non-randomized prospective monocentric study. The primary outcome was fistula healing at 8 months. Secondary outcomes included assessment of morbidity and timing of rectovaginal fistula recurrence. RESULTS: There were 16 patients with a median age of 40.1 years. The most common causes of rectovaginal fistula were adverse events following proctectomy or pelvic radiotherapy (6 patients), obstetric trauma (5 patients) and inflammatory bowel disease (3 patients). Most participants had undergone at least two previous surgical interventions before the clipping procedure. 11 patients had a temporary diverting stoma at time of the clipping procedure. Successful primary healing of the fistula was observed in 7 (43.7%) patients. Short-term complications were rare and included pain, which occurred in 4 patients, and spontaneous clip detachment, which occurred in 2 patients. Most recurrences appeared shortly after the procedure, with a median delay of 45 days (range 16-217). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the Over-The-Scope Clip Proctology system in rectovaginal fistula repair for the patients selected. Further trials should be designed, incorporating comparisons to well-established techniques, a longer follow-up period, and a larger cohort.

Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results.

AIM: To assess effectiveness, complications, recurrence rate, and recent improvements of the anterior rectopexy procedure for treatment of total rectal prolapse. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and other relevant database were searched to identify studies. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies and original articles in English language, with more than 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse, with a follow-up over 3 mo were considered for the review. RESULTS: Twelve non-randomized case series studies with 574 patients were included in the review. No surgical mortality was described. Conversion was needed in 17 cases (2.9%), most often due to difficult adhesiolysis. Twenty eight patients (4.8%) presented with major complications. Seven (1.2%) mesh-related complications were reported. Most frequent complications were urinary tract infection and urinary retention. Mean recurrence rate was 4.7% with a median follow-up of 23 mo. Improvement of constipation ranged from 3%-72% of the patients and worsening or new onset occurred in 0%-20%. Incontinence improved in 31%-84% patients who presented fecal incontinence at various stages. Evaluation of functional score was disparate between studies. CONCLUSION: Based on the low long-term recurrence rate and favorable outcome data in terms of low de novo constipation rate, improvement of anal incontinence, and low complications rate, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy seems to emerge as an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with total rectal prolapse.