Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(23): 8959-8968, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36524515

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) remains controversial, particularly in stages I-II. We aimed to investigate the effect of treatment modalities on survival in high-risk EEC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high-risk EEC were evaluated retrospectively between 2010 and 2019. Patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment were excluded. We included seventy patients and formed two groups: patients who received radiotherapy (RT) alone and those who received chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT and RT). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 60.3 months (8.0-143.5). 38.5% of the patients had relapsed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 97. 1%, 68.3% , and 60.8% at 12-, 36-, and 60-month, respectively. Overall survival rates were 97.1%, 80.6%, and 72.6% at 12-, 36-, and 60-month, respectively. Hematological adverse events and neuropathy were more common in the CT and RT group than in the RT group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for RFS revealed that the FIGO stage and treatment modalities were statistically independent factors (p=0.031 and p=0.040, respectively). Stage stratified log-rank test revealed that adding chemotherapy improved RFS in patients with stage III (p=0.020) but not in stage I-II disease (p=0.725). The number of chemotherapy cycles administered (≤4 vs. >4) did not affect survival in all patients and stage III disease (p=0.497, and p=0.436, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy may be considered in high-risk stage III EEC. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Carcinoma Endometrioide/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Endometrioide/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante
2.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 41(3): 293-298, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28770447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elastase-1 is a proteolytic enzyme secreted by pancreatic acinar cells, and measurements of the concentration this enzyme are used to evaluate pancreatic exocrine function. We aimed to determine whether pancreatic exocrine function declines due to chronic hypercalcemia by measuring fecal elastase levels. METHODS: 75 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (18 men and 47 women) and 30 healthy subjects (11 men and 19 women) participated in this study. Renal function tests, lipid parameters, bone mineral density, and serum calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, parathormone, glucose, and thyroid stimulating hormone levels as well as fecal elastase concentrations, were determined in these patients and controls. RESULTS: The mean fecal elastase level was 335.3 ± 181.4 µg/g in the PHPT group and 317.4 ± 157.3 µg/g in the control group. There was no significant difference in fecal elastase levels between the two groups (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hypercalcemia in primary hyperparathyroidism did not decrease the fecal elastase level, which is an indirect indicator of chronic pancreatitis; therefore, chronic hypercalcemia in PHPT may not cause chronic pancreatitis.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/etiología , Heces/enzimología , Hipercalcemia/complicaciones , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/fisiopatología , Elastasa Pancreática/metabolismo , Pancreatitis Crónica/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/enzimología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Crónica/enzimología , Pronóstico
3.
Transplant Proc ; 49(2): 270-277, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28219583

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors affecting graft and patient survival after transplantation from deceased donors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 186 transplantations from deceased donors performed at our center between 2006 and 2014. The recipients were divided into two groups: Group I (141 recipients without graft loss) and Group II (45 recipients with graft loss). Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regressions were used. RESULTS: The characteristics of both groups were similar except renal resistive index at the last follow-ups. When graft survival and mortality at the first, third, and fifth years were analyzed, tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimens were superior to cyclosporine (CsA)-based regimens (P < .001). Risk factors associated with graft survival at the first year included cardiac cause of death (versus cerebrovascular accident [CVA]; hazard ratio [HR], 6.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-22.05; P = .004), older transplant age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P < .001), and high serum creatinine level at 6 months post-transplantation (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.48-2.03; P < .001), whereas younger donor age decreased risk (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00; P = .019). Also, the Tac-based regimen had a 3.63-fold (95% CI, 1.47-8.97; P = .005) lower risk factor than the CsA-based regimen, and 2.93-fold (95% CI, 1.13-7.63; P = .027) than other regimens without calcineurin inhibitors. When graft survival at 3 years was analyzed, diabetes mellitus was lower than idiopathic causes and pyelonephritis (P = .035). In Cox regression analysis at year 3, older transplantation age (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39; P = .014) and serum creatinine level at month 6 post-transplantation (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.42-1.90; P < .001) were significant risk factors for graft survival. Hemodialysis (HD) plus peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment was 2.22-fold (95% CI, 1.08-4.58; P = .03) risk factor than only HD before transplantation. When graft survival and mortality at year 5 were analyzed, diabetes mellitus was lower compared with all other diseases. In Cox regression analysis at year 5, younger donor age (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86; P < .001) was protective for graft survival, whereas older transplantation age (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20-1.64; P < .001) and serum creatinine level at month 6 of post-transplantation (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61; P < .001) were significant risk factors. PD increased 3.32 (95% CI, 1.28-8.61; P = .014) times the risk than HD. In Cox regression analysis at year 1, cardiac cause of death (versus CVA; HR, 5.28; 95% CI, 1.37-20.31; P = .016), CsA-based regimen (versus Tac; HR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.78-13.78; P = .002), HD plus PD treatment (versus alone HD; HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.28-8.30; P = .013), older transplantation age (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P < .001), serum creatinine level at month 6 post-transplantation (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.62; P = .003), and low HLA mismatches (HR, 1.67; 95% CI 1.01-2.70; P = .044) were risk factors for mortality. At year 3, CsA-based regimen (versus Tac; HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.32-9.47; P = .012), PD (versus HD; HR, 5.04; 95% CI, 1.41-18.05; P = .013), HD plus PD treatment (versus alone HD; HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.37-9.04; P = .009), and older transplantation age (HR, 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.53; P = .015) were risk factors for mortality. At year 5, older age at transplantation (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23-1.77; P < .001), PD (versus HD; HR, 9.21; 95% CI, 3.09-27.45; P < .001), and CsA-based regimen (versus Tac; HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.04-7.23; P = .041) were risk factors for mortality, whereas younger donor age decreased risk (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Death of donor with cardiac cause, CsA-based immunosuppressive regimen, donor age, serum creatinine level at month 6 post-transplantation, and renal replacement therapy before transplantation affected mortality and graft survival in deceased donors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/cirugía , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...