Tumor Response-speed Heterogeneity as a Novel Prognostic Factor in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Differential tumor response to therapy is partially attributed to tumor heterogeneity. Additional efforts are needed to identify tumor heterogeneity parameters in response to therapy that is easily applicable in clinical practice. We aimed to describe tumor response-speed heterogeneity and evaluate its prognostic value in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from Amgen (NCT00364013) and Sanofi (NCT00305188; NCT00272051) trials were retrieved from Project Data Sphere. Patients in the Amgen 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) arm were used to establish response-speed heterogeneity. Its prognostic value was subsequently validated in the Sanofi FOLFOX arms and the Amgen panitumumab+FOLFOX arm. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: Patients with high response-speed heterogeneity in the Amgen FOLFOX cohort had significantly shorter ( P <0.001) median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.27 months (95% CI, 6.12-7.96 mo) and overall survival (OS) of 16.0 months (95% CI, 13.8-18.2 mo) than patients with low response-speed heterogeneity with median PFS of 9.41 months (95% CI, 8.75-10.89 mo) and OS of 22.4 months (95% CI, 20.1-26.7 mo), respectively. Tumor response-speed heterogeneity was a poor prognostic factor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.49-6.99; P <0.001) and shorter OS (hazard ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.64-4.01; P <0.001), after adjustment for other common prognostic factors. Comparable findings were found in the external validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Tumor response-speed heterogeneity to first-line chemotherapy was a novel prognostic factor associated with early disease progression and shorter survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant rectal score is prognostic for survival: A population-based propensity-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score may serve as a surrogate short-term endpoint for overall survival (OS) in clinical trials. This study aims to test the NAR score using a large, national cancer registry. METHODS: National Cancer Database patients with clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery were selected and divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR subgroups. OS outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 12 452 patients were selected, of which 5071 (40.7%) were in clinical stage II and 7381 (59.3%) were in clinical stage III; 15.2% had pathologic complete response. The mean NAR score was 10.01 ± 10.61. Six thousand nine hundred and forty-one (55.7%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and were propensity-matched across NAR subgroups (966 in each group). A significant difference in 5-year OS between low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR groups was observed (85% vs. 76% vs. 68%; p < 0.001). Five thousand five hundred and eleven (44.3%) received AC and 1045 triplets were propensity-matched per NAR groups. A significant difference was again observed for 5-year OS (93% vs. 88% vs. 75%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression confirmed NAR strata as a significant predictor of 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: NAR score, as a neoadjuvant response measure, is a strong predictor of 5-year OS, regardless of AC receipt in a heterogenous population of locally advanced RAC patients.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of PIK3CA Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling is used to guide the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, the role of PIK3CA mutations, present in up to 20% of mCRCs, is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association of PIK3CA mutations with other common mutations in mCRC and determine the prognostic and predictive value of PIK3CA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients in the Moffitt Clinical Genomic Database with mCRC. A meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate the predictive value of PIK3CA mutations to the response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. RESULTS: Among 639 patients, PIK3CA was positively correlated with KRAS mutation (r = 0.11, p = 0.006) and negatively correlated with TP53 mutation (r = - 0.18, p ≤ 0.001) and ERBB2 amplification (r = - 0.08, p = 0.046). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PIK3CA-mutant mCRC (n = 49) was 35.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.7-48.1) months vs. 55.3 (95% CI 47.5-65.6) months for PIK3CA wild-type mCRC (n = 286) [p = 0.003]. This OS difference remained significant with exon 9 and exon 20 subset analyses. There was no significant difference in response rate between patients with PIK3CA wild-type (n = 97) versus mutant (n = 9) mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy (43% vs. 56%, p = 0.61) and no significant difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.3 versus 7.2 months (p = 0.60). However, our meta-analysis of 12 studies, including ours, using a common effect model identified that PIK3CA mutations are associated with reduced response to anti-EGFR therapy, with a relative risk of 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our study identified PIK3CA mutations as a poor prognostic factor, and our meta-analysis identified PIK3CA mutations as predictive of decreased response to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with mCRC.

A phase I/Ib study of regorafenib and nivolumab in mismatch repair proficient advanced refractory colorectal cancer.

AIM: In contrast to mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC), mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) CRC is usually unresponsive to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Recent preclinical data suggest that regorafenib may enhance the antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. However, the safety and efficacy of regorafenib plus nivolumab have not been established in patients with refractory metastatic pMMR CRC. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib plus nivolumab in metastatic pMMR metastatic CRC. METHOD: This was a phase I/Ib study with standard 3 + 3 design plus dose expansion of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with refractory metastatic pMMR CRC. Patients were treated with regorafenib combined with nivolumab. The primary end-points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD. The secondary end-points were objective response rate, safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 51 patients received at least one dose of treatment. Three patients experienced DLT (all grade 3 rash). MTD was regorafenib 80 mg and nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (16%), rash (10%) and anaemia (6%). Among 40 evaluable patients, four (10%) achieved partial response, including one unconfirmed response, 21 (53%) achieved stable disease, and disease control rate was 63%. The median progression-free survival and OS were 4.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib plus nivolumab appears to be well tolerated with limited anticancer activity in metastatic pMMR CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03712943.

Core Homologous Recombination Mutations and Improved Survival in Nonpancreatic GI Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Homologous recombination mutations (HRM) have led to increased responses to platinum chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. However, HRMs' role in nonpancreatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains to be determined. Our objective was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of core (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) and noncore HRM in nonpancreatic GI cancers receiving platinum therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study performed at Moffitt Cancer Center included metastatic nonpancreatic GI cancer patients treated with platinum therapy. All patients had either a core or noncore HRM, determined by next generation sequencing. Response rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were determined and compared between core versus noncore HRM patients. RESULTS: In the study, 69 patients with one or more HRM were included: 63.8% were male, 87.0% were Caucasian, and 47.9% had colorectal cancer. Twenty-one (30.4%) patients had a core HRM and 48 (69.6%) had a noncore HRM. Among evaluable patients (n=64), there was no significant difference in objective response: 20.0% with core HRM versus 22.7% with noncore HRM responded to platinum therapy (P=0.53). Median PFS was 10.4 months versus 7.1 months for core HRM versus noncore HRM, respectively (P=0.039). Median OS was 68.9 months versus 24.3 months (P=0.026) for core HRM versus noncore HRM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated response of core and noncore HRM to platinum therapy in metastatic nonpancreatic GI malignancies, suggesting benefit in both groups. Core HRM patients had significantly increased median OS and median PFS compared with those with noncore HRM, suggesting potential prognostic and predictive significance. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Cancer Detection and Classification by CpG Island Hypermethylation Signatures in Plasma Cell-Free DNA.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation has emerged as a promising biomarker for early cancer detection, tumor type classification, and treatment response monitoring. Enrichment-based cfDNA methylation profiling methods such as cfMeDIP-seq have shown high accuracy in the classification of multiple cancer types. We have previously optimized another enrichment-based approach for ultra-low input cfDNA methylome profiling, termed cfMBD-seq. We reported that cfMBD-seq outperforms cfMeDIP-seq in the enrichment of high-CpG-density regions, such as CpG islands. However, the clinical feasibility of cfMBD-seq is unknown. In this study, we applied cfMBD-seq to profiling the cfDNA methylome using plasma samples from cancer patients and non-cancer controls. We identified 1759, 1783, and 1548 differentially hypermethylated CpG islands (DMCGIs) in lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer patients, respectively. Interestingly, the vast majority of DMCGIs were overlapped with aberrant methylation changes in corresponding tumor tissues, indicating that DMCGIs detected by cfMBD-seq were mainly driven by tumor-specific DNA methylation patterns. From the overlapping DMCGIs, we carried out machine learning analyses and identified a set of discriminating methylation signatures that had robust performance in cancer detection and classification. Overall, our study demonstrates that cfMBD-seq is a powerful tool for sensitive detection of tumor-derived epigenomic signals in cfDNA.

Immune-Related Adverse Events and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer with Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications for Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Immune-related adverse event (IRAE) onset may represent a clinical biomarker for anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody response based on emerging evidence from patients with various advanced malignancies. This phenomenon has not been previously reported in a multidisease cohort of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications to receive immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of 76 patients with GI cancer who had received anti-PD-1 antibodies for FDA-approved indications. The primary and secondary outcomes of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients based upon IRAE presence, respectively. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; a Cox proportional-hazards model adjusted for IRAE onset, patient age, and enrolling institution was used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS were prolonged in patients who experienced IRAEs compared with those who did not experience them (PFS: not reached [NR] vs. 3.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.3, p < .001]; OS: NR vs. 7.4 months [HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.36, p < .001]). Among patients who experienced IRAEs, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS by either initial IRAE severity, management, or time to onset. CONCLUSION: Patients with gastrointestinal cancer who experienced IRAEs while on anti-PD-1 antibodies demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and OS compared with their counterparts who did not develop IRAEs. Although these findings add to results from studies in other tumor types, larger prospective studies are needed prior to clinical adoption of IRAE onset as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Predictive clinical biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor response have been understudied in the field of immuno-oncology. Immune-related adverse event onset appears to be one such biomarker. Across tumor types, immune-related adverse event onset has been associated with response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies. The results of this study demonstrate this for the first time in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving anti-PD-1 antibodies. Before immune-related adverse event onset can be adopted clinically as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor response, however, larger prospective studies are needed to better understand the nuances between immune-related adverse event characteristics (severity, site, management, timing of onset) and immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: insights into patterns of recurrence and disease behavior.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with high metastatic potential. Clinical observations suggest that there is disease heterogeneity among patients with different sites of distant metastases, yielding distinct clinical outcomes. Herein, we investigate the impact of clinical and pathological parameters on recurrence patterns and compare survival outcomes for patients with a first site of recurrence in the liver versus lung from PDAC following original curative surgical resection. METHODS: Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ICD billing codes and tumor registry database over a 10 years period (January 2004-December 2014), we identified PDAC patients who underwent resection and subsequently presented with either liver or lung recurrence. Time from relapse to death (TRD) was calculated from date of recurrence to date of death. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, TRD was estimated and compared by recurrence site using log-rank test. RESULTS: The median overall follow-up was 37.3 months among survivors in the entire cohort. Median TRD in this cohort was 10.7 months (95%CI: 8.9-14.6 months). Patients with first site of lung recurrence had a more favorable outcome compared to patients who recurred with liver metastasis as the first site of recurrence (median TRD of 15 versus 9 months respectively, P = 0.02). Moderate to poorly or poor differentiation was associated more often with liver than lung recurrence (40% vs 21% respectively, P = 0.047). A trend to increased lymph node metastasis in the lung recurrence cohort was observed. CONCLUSION: PDAC patients who recur with a first site of lung metastasis have an improved clinical outcome compared to patients with first site of liver recurrence. Our data suggests there may be epidemiologic and pathologic determinants related to patterns of recurrence in PDAC.

Evaluating Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Recommendations.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibition has been shown to generate profound and durable responses in mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D) solid tumors and has elicited interest in detection tools and strategies to guide therapeutic decision-making. Herein we address questions on the appropriate screening, detection methods, patient selection, and initiation of therapy for MMR-D pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and assess the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in providing additional prognostic and predictive information for MMR-D PDAC.Experimental Design: Archival and prospectively acquired samples and matched normal DNA from N = 833 PDAC cases were analyzed using a hybridization capture-based, NGS assay designed to perform targeted deep sequencing of all exons and selected introns of 341 to 468 cancer-associated genes. A computational program using NGS data derived the MSI status from the tumor-normal paired genome sequencing data. Available germline testing, IHC, and microsatellite instability (MSI) PCR results were reviewed to assess and confirm MMR-D and MSI status.Results: MMR-D in PDAC is a rare event among PDAC patients (7/833), occurring at a frequency of 0.8%. Loss of MMR protein expression by IHC, high mutational load, and elevated MSIsensor scores were correlated with MMR-D PDAC. All 7 MMR-D PDAC patients in the study were found to have Lynch syndrome. Four (57%) of the MMR-D patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade had treatment benefit (1 complete response, 2 partial responses, 1 stable disease).Conclusions: An integrated approach of germline testing and somatic analyses of tumor tissues in advanced PDAC using NGS may help guide future development of immune and molecularly directed therapies in PDAC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1326-36. ©2018 AACR.

Genomic instability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a new step towards precision medicine and novel therapeutic approaches.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most challenging cancers. Whole genome sequencing studies have been conducted to elucidate the underlying fundamentals underscoring disease behavior. Studies have identified a subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients with distinct molecular and clinical features. Genetic fingerprinting of these tumors is consistent with an unstable genome and defective DNA repair pathways, which creates unique susceptibility to agents inducing DNA damage. BRCA1/2 mutations, both germline and somatic, which lead to impaired DNA repair, are found to be important biomarkers of genomic instability as well as of response to DNA damaging agents. Recent studies have elucidated that PARP inhibitors and platinum agents may be effective to induce tumor regression in solid tumors bearing an unstable genome including pancreatic cancer. In this review we discuss the characteristics of genomic instability in pancreatic cancer along with its clinical implications and the utility of DNA targeting agents particularly PARP inhibitors as a novel treatment approach.

Molecular signature of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an insight from genotype to phenotype and challenges for targeted therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the most clinically challenging cancers despite an in-depth characterization of the molecular underpinnings and biology of this disease. Recent whole-genome-wide studies have elucidated the diverse and complex genetic alterations which generate a unique oncogenic signature for an individual pancreatic cancer patient and which may explain diverse disease behavior in a clinical setting. AREAS COVERED: In this review article, we discuss the key oncogenic pathways of pancreatic cancer including RAS-MAPK, PI3KCA and TGF-ß signaling, as well as the impact of these pathways on the disease behavior and their potential targetability. The role of tumor suppressors particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and their role in pancreatic cancer treatment are elaborated upon. We further review recent genomic studies and their impact on future pancreatic cancer treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Targeted therapies inhibiting pro-survival pathways have limited impact on pancreatic cancer outcomes. Activation of pro-apoptotic pathways along with suppression of cancer-stem-related pathways may reverse treatment resistance in pancreatic cancer. While targeted therapy or a 'precision medicine' approach in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains an elusive challenge for the majority of patients, there is a real sense of optimism that the strides made in understanding the molecular underpinnings of this disease will translate into improved outcomes.

CD44 as a drug delivery target in human cancers: where are we now?

In the treatment of cancers, the dual goals of drug targeting are to deliver therapeutic agents more selectively to tumor tissue and to minimize exposure of normal tissues and organs to those agents, the latter causing toxicities that limit treatment and thereby attenuate clinical efficacy. CD44, a transmembrane proteoglycan, has been considered as a targetable candidate to generate a cancer-specific drug delivery axis. Although numerous preclinical studies showed promising results exploiting CD44 as such a target, results of two clinical trials, including a Phase III registration trial, have been very disappointing. Herein, we discuss the potential underlying causes that might have led to such failures, as well as the future of CD44-targeted cancer treatment.

High prevalence of recurrent thrombosis in subsets of cancer patients with isolated gonadal vein thrombosis: a single center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Cancer patients are a high-risk population for venous thromboembolism (VTE); the natural history of gonadal vein thrombosis (GVT) occurring in cancer patients is not well described in the medical literature. METHODS: Utilizing a software program the computerized tomographic scan reports of patients at a single cancer center from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2011 were searched for the term GVT. Patients included in this analysis had a diagnosis of cancer, an isolated GVT (i.e. no evidence of thrombosis at another site), no symptoms referable to the GVT, and at least six months of follow-up information. All subsequent recurrent VTE events were confirmed by imaging studies. RESULTS: 196 cancer patients with GVT were identified. The majority of patients in this analysis had metastatic disease (118, 61.2%) as well as active cancer (167, 85.2%). Twenty patients (10.8%) developed recurrent VTE (median follow-up 14.5 months); median time to recurrent VTEs was 5.5 months (range 0-19 months). When considering only patients with without a recent history of gynecologic surgery, VTE recurrence rates were 14.3%. Active cancer was the only risk factor significantly associated with recurrent VTE (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the patient's risk factors for VTE, treatment of an incidentally detected GVT in cancer patients with anticoagulation, as per guidelines for other VTE sites, may be indicated in certain high risk subgroups, especially those patients with active cancer who have not had prior pelvic surgery.