Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 37(5): 736-749, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27732995

RESUMEN

Advanced stage nonsmall cell lung cancer had been treated mainly with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, and other cytotoxic agents that offered significant survival advantage over best supportive care, until recently. Modest improvements were achieved with the addition of antibodies targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor, and the introduction of maintenance chemotherapy. Improvements in our knowledge of lung cancer biology have shifted the current treatment paradigm from being based on histology to one based on molecular biomarkers. Identification of potentially targetable driver mutations in a subgroup of these patients, pertaining to genes directing cell signaling pathways involved in proliferation and survival, has been the single most influential development in the treatment of lung cancer in the last two decades. Personalized medicine based on driver mutations offers enhanced efficacy at the expense of relatively minimal toxicity burden. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway in patients with an activating mutation results in substantial improvement in patient outcome. Similarly, targeting ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) fusion gene with first- and second-generation inhibitors results in improved efficacy over chemotherapy. For certain other mutations such as MET exon 14 and BRAF, promising inhibitory strategies are being investigated. In addition, the recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors to reverse exhaustion of T cells has been a major breakthrough in rapidly changing the therapeutic landscape for lung cancer. This article reviews the role of systemic therapy in advanced stage lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Mutación , Medicina de Precisión , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores
4.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 5(4): 253-8, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25083297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer patients face a dismal outcome despite tri-modality management and median survival remains 15-18 months. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is an ATP-dependent efflux protein associated with chemotherapy resistance. The role of BCRP expression in esophageal cancer and normal esophageal cells is not known. Excision repair cross complement-1 (ERCC1) overexpression has been correlated with poorer response to cisplatin based chemotherapy. We examined the expression of BCRP and ERCC1 in patients with esophageal cancer and correlated it with survival in patients receiving irinotecan and cisplatin based chemotherapy. METHODS: With IRB approval, 40 cases of esophageal cancer diagnosed from 2004-2008, were stained for BCRP and ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemistry and scored by a pathologist blinded to clinical data. Baseline demographics, therapy given and survival data were collected and correlated with BCRP and ERCC1 expression. Fisher's exact test was used to determine association between BCRP and ERCC1 expression and demographics. Cox proportional hazards model was used for association of BCRP and ERCC1 with survival. RESULTS: On immunohistochemistry, 30/40 cancers (75%) expressed BCRP. Interestingly, down-regulation of BCRP expression in tumor compared with normal cells was seen in 40% of patients. ERCC1 positivity was seen in 15/30 cases (50%). Median overall survival (OS) was 19 months with no difference in survival between BCRP positive and negative patients (P=0.13) or ERCC1 positive and negative patients (P=0.85). Estimated hazard ratio (HR) of death for BRCP positive patients was 2.29 (95% CI: 0.79-6.64) and for ERCC1 positive patients was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.46-2.56). There was no association of BCRP and ERCC1 expression with disease stage, age, gender or histology. For patients who received cisplatin and irinotecan as first line chemotherapy, there was no difference in survival based on BCRP or ERCC1 status. CONCLUSIONS: BCRP expression is seen in a majority of esophageal cancers and normal esophageal mucosa. ERCC1 expression is seen in about half of the patients with esophageal cancer. Irinotecan based studies with esophageal and gastric cancer suggest response rates of 14-65%. Whether the 40% of tumors in our study found with down regulation of BCRP expression, constitute a majority of these responders needs to be prospectively validated in a larger data set. It should include markers such as ERCC1 predicting response to 5-fluorouracil and platinum based chemotherapy, to enable individualizing therapy for this cancer.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...