Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health-related quality of life with peramivir in influenza patients with chronic respiratory disease: Additional outcomes of a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: To compare peramivir 300 mg single-dose, peramivir 600 mg repeat-dose, and oseltamivir effects on health-related quality of life, including respiratory symptoms and general conditions, time to symptom alleviation, time to fever resolution, incidence of exacerbations, and virus titer, in influenza patients with chronic respiratory disease. METHODS: We report additional outcomes from a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in Japan (UMIN000030118). Influenza patients with chronic respiratory disease received intravenous peramivir (300 mg single-dose [n = 66], 600 mg repeat-dose [600 mg/d of 2 consecutive days; n = 70]) or oral oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily, 5 days; n = 72). The principal endpoint of this analysis was change from baseline to Day 14 at each time point in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) scores. RESULTS: Both peramivir regimens reduced total CAT score at Day 3 more than oseltamivir (peramivir 600 mg vs oseltamivir, P = .0032; peramivir 300 mg vs oseltamivir, P = .0203). Cough/phlegm CAT scores were most improved with peramivir 600 mg. Median time to alleviation of three respiratory symptoms was longer with peramivir 600 mg (68.9 hours) than with peramivir 300 mg (50.6 hours, hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; P = .0191) and shorter with peramivir 300 mg than oseltamivir (78.8 hours, HR 0.62; P = .0141). Alleviation of seven influenza symptoms and fever resolution was shortest with peramivir 300 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid improvement in CAT score, including cough, and shorter time to alleviation of respiratory symptoms associated with peramivir is of potential benefit to patients with chronic respiratory disease.

Effect of peramivir on respiratory symptom improvement in patients with influenza virus infection and pre-existing chronic respiratory disease: Findings of a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors on improvement of respiratory symptoms triggered by influenza in patients with pre-existing chronic respiratory diseases is unknown. METHODS: This 2-week, randomized, open-label study evaluated intravenous peramivir 600 mg on two consecutive days (peramivir-repeat), peramivir 300 mg single dose (peramivir-single), and oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days in patients with confirmed influenza and chronic respiratory diseases. Patients recorded symptom scores daily. The primary endpoint of cumulative area of time vs symptoms (CATVS) was expressed as an index value of area under the curve vs time of the total score of cough, sore throat, and nasal congestion from baseline to 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of 214 randomized patients, 209 (56% female, 77% aged <65 years, 94% outpatients, 91% bronchial asthma, 62% influenza A) received ≥1 dose of study drug. Mean (standard deviation) CATVS was similar for peramivir-repeat (782.78 [487.17]) vs peramivir-single (717.35 [347.55]; P = .4371), and for peramivir-repeat vs oseltamivir (856.34 [404.99]; P = 1.00). However, CATVS was significantly shorter for peramivir-single vs oseltamivir, with an estimated treatment difference (TD) of -145.07 (95% confidence interval: -284.57, -5.56; P = .0416). In subgroup analyses, CATVS was significantly shorter for peramivir-single vs oseltamivir among patients with influenza A (TD: -206.31 [-383.86, -28.76]; P = .0231), bronchial asthma (TD: -156.57 [-300.22, -12.92]; P = .0328), baseline respiratory severity score <5 (TD: -265.32 [-470.42, -60.21]; P = .0120), and age <65 (TD: -184.30 [-345.08, -23.52]; P = .0249). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic respiratory diseases, peramivir-single was not significantly different from peramivir-repeat and was more effective than oseltamivir at alleviating respiratory symptoms.

Antibody dynamics in Japanese paediatric patients with influenza A infection treated with neuraminidase inhibitors in a randomised trial.

Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) complement influenza virus infection management by helping to clear virus, alleviate symptoms, and reduce transmission. In a previous randomised study, we examined the effect of 4 NAIs on virus clearance and influenza symptoms in Japanese paediatric patients. In this second analysis, we examined the effects of NAI treatment on antibody responses and virus clearance, and the relationships between antibody responses and patients' infection histories (previous infection; asymptomatic infection via household members of same virus type/subtype; vaccination), and between infection histories and viral kinetics. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody responses produced HI titres ≥40 by Day 14 of NAI treatment, in parallel with virus clearance (trend test P = 0.001). Comparing patients with and without influenza infection histories (directly or asymptomatic infection via household members) showed that infection history had a marked positive effect on HI antibody responses in patients vaccinated before the current influenza season (before enrolment). Current virus clearance was significantly faster in patients previously infected with the same virus type/subtype than in those not previously infected, and clearance pattern depended on the NAI. Assessment of anti-influenza effects of antiviral drugs and vaccines should consider virus and antibody dynamics in response to vaccination and natural infection histories.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, in healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including MDR pathogens. Cefiderocol is under clinical investigation for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections including nosocomial pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed intrapulmonary penetration after a single intravenous dose of cefiderocol (2000 mg infused over 60 min) in healthy adult males. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each subject underwent one bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to collect BAL fluid (BALF). Fifteen subjects were assigned to one of three collection timepoints (1, 2 or 4 h from start of infusion). Five additional subjects were assigned to a collection timepoint at 6 h, which was added based on concentration data between 1 and 4 h predicting measurable BALF cefiderocol concentrations at 6 h. RESULTS: Cefiderocol concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages (AMs) were calculated for each subject. The ELF concentration of cefiderocol was 13.8, 6.69, 2.78 and 1.38 mg/L at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after single intravenous dosing, respectively. Over 6 h, geometric mean concentration ratios ranged from 0.0927 to 0.116 for ELF to total plasma and from 0.00496 to 0.104 for AMs to total plasma. AUC ratios of ELF and AMs to plasma were 0.101 and 0.0177 based on total drug in plasma, respectively, and 0.239 and 0.0419 based on free drug in plasma, respectively. There were no major drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that cefiderocol penetrates into ELF, and ELF and plasma concentrations appear to be parallel.

The effect of neuraminidase inhibitors on household transmission in Japanese patients with influenza A and B infection: A prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The relative ability of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) to reduce household influenza transmission when given to index patients is not established. OBJECTIVES: To compare daily secondary infection rates (SIR) of influenza A (A/H1pdm and A/H3) and B in households of index patients treated with oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, or peramivir. PATIENTS/METHODS: This Japanese, single-center, prospective, observational study (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000024650) enrolled index patients with confirmed influenza who were treated with an NAI during 6 influenza seasons (2010-2016). Secondary infection patients were household members diagnosed with the same influenza subtype 1-7 days after onset in the index patient. Daily SIR was calculated using a modified Reed-Frost model. The rate of household members with secondary infection and proportion of households with any secondary infection were also calculated. RESULTS: Index patients with influenza A (n = 1146) or B (n = 661) were enrolled (~3400 total index and secondary patients). Daily SIR for all virus subtypes was highest when oseltamivir was used (eg, unadjusted estimate: type A, 1.47% vs 0.71%-1.13%; type B, 1.30% vs 0.59%-0.88%). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in daily SIR between NAIs for influenza type A, type B, and subtype A/H3; for example, for type A, SIR was significantly higher with oseltamivir than with peramivir or zanamivir. The rate of household members with secondary infection and proportion of households with any secondary infection also varied between NAIs. CONCLUSIONS: Neuraminidase inhibitors differed in their ability to reduce household influenza transmission; transmission was highest with oseltamivir. Physicians may consider effects on household transmission when deciding which NAI to prescribe.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin for Gram-Negative Bacteria, in Healthy Subjects.

Cefiderocol is a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin that shows potent efficacy against various Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains, in vitro and in preclinical models of infection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of cefiderocol after both single and multiple dosing by intravenous infusion over 60 min in healthy adult subjects. A single-ascending-dose study at doses of 100, 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 mg was conducted in 40 healthy Japanese males and females (6 individuals receiving the active drug and 2 individuals receiving a placebo per cohort). A multiple-ascending-dose study at doses of 1,000 (two groups) and 2,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) was conducted in 30 healthy Japanese and Caucasian males (8 individuals receiving the active drug and 2 individuals receiving a placebo per cohort). There were no serious or clinically significant adverse events (AEs) observed in either study. A single subject receiving 1,000 mg cefiderocol q8h was withdrawn due to AEs. Dose-proportional increases in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration after dosing, and the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated from time zero to infinity were observed across the dose range of 100 to 2,000 mg. The mean plasma half-life of cefiderocol was 1.98 to 2.74 h. Cefiderocol was primarily excreted unchanged in the urine (61.5% to 68.4% of the dose). There was little accumulation of Cmax and AUC by dosing q8h, and the PK of cefiderocol did not change with multiple dosing. This study indicates that single and multiple intravenous doses of cefiderocol at up to 2,000 mg are well tolerated in healthy subjects and exhibit linear PK at doses up to 2,000 mg.

Clinical and virologic effects of four neuraminidase inhibitors in influenza A virus-infected children (aged 4-12 years): an open-label, randomized study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) reduce influenza symptoms but clear evidence of relationships between viral titer reduction and symptom alleviation is lacking. This open-label, randomized study evaluated differences in viral dynamics between NAIs, and relationships between viral dynamics and influenza symptoms (trial registration number: UMIN000012670). METHODS: Patients (n = 123) aged 4-12 years with influenza A virus infection were randomized to intravenous peramivir, oral oseltamivir, inhaled zanamivir, or inhaled laninamivir. Patients received regular viral assessments of nasal discharge, at least until rapid antigen tests were negative. Time to virus clearance, based on influenza virus titer, was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Peramivir recipients had a significantly shorter time to virus clearance than oseltamivir recipients (adjusted p = 0.035). Comparisons between the peramivir group and other NAI groups were not significant. There were no significant inter-group differences in other clinical efficacy endpoints (time to resolution of fever, time to alleviation of symptoms). However, the peramivir group showed a smaller numerical proportion of relapses with fever or positive virus than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The time to virus clearance was significantly shorter with peramivir than with oseltamivir. Although no clear relationship between virus dynamics and symptoms was observed, ongoing studies should clarify the situation.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Peramivir Compared With Oseltamivir in High-Risk Patients Infected With Influenza A and B Viruses: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies comparing the different neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment of at-risk patients with influenza have not been performed. To optimize such treatments, we assessed the efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir compared with oral oseltamivir in treating seasonal influenza A or B virus infection. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted from December 2012 to May 2014 in high-risk patients infected with seasonal influenza. A total of 92 adult inpatients and outpatients with high risk factors (HRFs) were treated by either a single intravenous infusion of peramivir (600 mg) or oral administration of oseltamivir (75 mg, twice per day for 5 days). RESULTS: The median times to clinical stability (time to reach <37°C) were 40.0 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.3-64.5) and 37.8 hours (95% CI = 26.3-45.3) in the peramivir and oseltamivir groups, respectively; these values did not reveal a significant difference. The virus titer and change of mean total symptom scores decreased similarly with both treatments. Results of step-wise regression suggested that virus type was a significantly effective prognostic factor with respect to illness resolution. Adverse events (AEs) with peramivir and oseltamivir occurred in 2.2% (n = 1/46) and 13.0% (n = 6/46) of patients, respectively. The severity of AEs was mild in all cases except 2 patients who showed pneumonia or COPD aggravation; both were in the oseltamivir group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous peramivir was effective based on the result of direct comparison with oral oseltamivir. Thus our data show that peramivir is a useful option for the treatment of influenza-infected patients with HRFs.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous peramivir, neuraminidase inhibitor of influenza virus, in healthy Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous peramivir is a potent neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor with activity against influenza A and B viruses. The early use of NA inhibitors has been shown to reduce mortality in influenza patients. METHODS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of peramivir and confirm the safety and tolerability of multiple infusions of peramivir in healthy Japanese subjects, two Phase I, single-centre, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled studies consisting of a multiple-dose study and a high-dose study were conducted. RESULTS: Multiple intravenous infusions of peramivir were well tolerated up to 800 mg once a day and 400 mg twice daily for 6 days. Dose proportionalities for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were established up to the 800 mg dose. Approximately 90% of unchanged peramivir was excreted into urine within 12 h after treatment with 800 mg of peramivir. The peramivir plasma and upper respiratory tract fluid levels were significantly higher than the 50% inhibition concentrations for NA enzyme activity (IC50) of epidemic influenza viruses, including those harbouring the H274Y mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic properties obtained here for intravenous peramivir are consistent with the previously reported clinical efficacy and safety of this antiviral.

[Comparison of the kinetics of granulocytes and lymphocytes between influenza A/H1N1/pdm09 and seasonal influenza A].

Peripheral blood tests are performed for the differentiation of febrile diseases, and are useful for diagnosing and determining the effectiveness of treatment in bacterial infections. However, their use for viral infections has not been well-investigated, nor do any clear views exist regarding their use with viral infections. We retrospectively investigated the results of routine peripheral blood tests for febrile diseases (differential leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP)) performed in 1162 patients between the 2004/05 and 2009/10 influenza seasons, and identified the characteristic findings of influenza, along with the differences between cases of seasonal influenza A (including H3N2 and H1N1; hereafter, seasonal A; n = 614) and pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 seen during the 2009/10 influenza season (hereafter, A/H1N1/pdm09; n=548). The differential leukocyte count varies with age; therefore, analysis was performed by adjusting for the age of all patients using a generalized additive model (GAM). Increased granulocytes and decreased lymphocytes were confirmed during the initial stage of influenza infection, followed by inversion to decreased granulocytes and increased lymphocytes. The granulocyte count was significantly lower in A/H1N1/pdm09 compared to seasonal A, with levels 0.93- and 0.82-fold relative to seasonal A before and after treatment, respectively. The lymphocyte count was 1.12- to 1.30-fold greater in A/H1N1/pdm09 compared to seasonal A both before and after treatment, indicating significantly higher levels in A/H1N1/pdm09. CRP levels peaked 24-36 h after onset, with peaks of 0.88mg/dL for A/H1N1/pdm09 and 1.53 mg/dL for seasonal A. Peripheral blood counts change due to factors such as the time course of the disease, onset of complications, modification resulting from treatment, and side effects of pharmacotherapies. We report the present findings because we consider an understanding of the changes and kinetics of differential leukocyte counts in peripheral blood inherent to influenza to be important for diagnosis (particularly for the decision of doing rapid diagnosis test) and to promote recognition of the onset of complications and side effects during the course.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of S-013420, a novel bicyclolide antibacterial, in healthy Japanese subjects.

S-013420 (EDP-420) is a novel bicyclolide (bridged bicyclic macrolide) antibacterial currently under development for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. The objective of the present study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered S-013420 in healthy volunteers. Twenty-eight healthy Japanese male subjects who never smoked were randomly allocated to seven groups of four subjects each who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at different times after dosing (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, or 24 h). Blood samples were also taken at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after dosing. The S-013420 concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AMs) were measured by using a combined high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric technique. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the plasma, ELF, and AM S-013420 concentration profiles was performed. S-013420 was rapidly absorbed in plasma, and the mean time to the maximum concentration in plasma was 2.27 h. S-013420 was rapidly distributed to the ELF and was slowly distributed to AMs. The areas under the concentration-time curves from time zero to 24 h (AUC0-24) for S-013420 were 20.3 times higher in ELF than in plasma and 244.6 times higher in AMs than in plasma. The mean maximum concentration in plasma was higher in ELF than in plasma and was much higher in AM than in plasma. Furthermore, pharmacodynamic calculations were done by using the AUC0-24/MIC90 ratio for common pneumonia pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis). The AUC0-24 for plasma/MIC90s for these four organisms were 41.8, 83.6, 1.3, and 20.9, respectively. The AUC0-24 for ELF/MIC90s were 849.6, 1,699.2, 26.6, and 424.8, respectively. Considering the good efficacy shown in a subsequent phase 2 study (S. Kohno, K. Yamaguchi, Y. Tanigawara, A. Watanabe, A. Aoki, Y. Niki, and J. Fujita, Abstr. 47th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. L-485), the good distribution of S-013420 in AMs and ELF observed in the present study is predictive of the good efficacy of S-013420 against respiratory pathogens.