African coastal camera network efforts at monitoring ocean, climate, and human impacts.

Regular and long-term monitoring of coastal areas is a prerequisite to avoiding or mitigating the impacts of climate and human-driven hazards. In Africa, where populations and infrastructures are particularly exposed to risk, there is an urgent need to establish coastal monitoring, as observations are generally scarce. Measurement campaigns and very high-resolution satellite imagery are costly, while freely available satellite observations have temporal and spatial resolutions that are not suited to capture the event scale. To address the gap, a network of low-cost, multi-variable, shore-based video camera systems has been installed along the African coasts. Here, we present this network and its principle of sharing data, methods, and results obtained, building toward the implementation of a common integrated coastal management policy between countries. Further, we list new contributions to the understanding of still poorly documented African beaches' evolution, waves, and sea level impacts. This network is a solid platform for the development of inter-disciplinary observations for resources and ecology (such as fisheries, and sargassum landing), erosion and flooding, early warning systems during extreme events, and science-based coastal infrastructure management for sustainable future coasts.

Suspended sediment flux at the Rhone River mouth (France) based on ADCP measurements during flood events.

Suspended sediment distribution and fluxes were estimated within the dominant channel at the mouth of the Rhone River for two annual flood events. The estimates were based on ADCP acoustic backscatter intensity and using calibration and post-processing methods to account for the grain-size distribution (GSDs). The fluxes were very similar to those obtained from suspended sediment measurements based on surface sampling at an automated station located 35 km upstream. Suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) and GSDs showed little variation along the channel cross-section, except for a graduate suspension that appeared at the maximum of discharge, corresponding to velocities lower than 1 m s-1 near the bottom. However, without post processing to account for the GSD, an under-estimation of 10% was observed during the two flood periods. The two flood events (12 November 2012 and 29 November 2012), separated by only 2 weeks, had clear differences in suspended sediment fluxes (SSF) and SSC during the peak of the river discharge, with twice more flux during the first, respectively, 925,226 and 430,879 tons of SSF.