The impact of permanent pacemaker implantation on long-term survival after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation on survival after cardiac surgery remains ill defined. We aimed to investigate the effect of PPM on survival and explore factors driving outcomes using meta-regression according to the type of surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through October 2023 to identify studies reporting the long-term outcomes of PPM implantation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during follow-up. The secondary outcome was heart failure rehospitalization. The subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed according to the type of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. 183,555 patients (n = 6298; PPM, n = 177,257; no PPM) were analyzed for all-cause mortality, with a weighted median follow-up of 79.7 months. PPM implantation was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.22; confidence interval, 1.08-1.38, P < .01) and heart failure rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.24; confidence interval, 1.01-1.52, P = .04). Meta-regression demonstrated the adverse impact of PPM was less prominent in patients undergoing mitral or tricuspid valve surgery, whereas studies with a greater proportion with aortic valve replacement were associated with worse outcomes. Similarly, a greater proportion with atrioventricular block as an indication of PPM was associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: PPM implantation after cardiac surgery is associated with a greater risk of long-term all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. This impact is more prominent in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery or atrioventricular block as an indication than those undergoing mitral or tricuspid valve surgery.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for stenotic bicuspid aortic valve: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Bicuspid aortic valves have been excluded from randomized trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with surgical aortic valve replacement. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis using a meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through March 2022 to identify observational studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement for severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital outcomes, including all-cause mortality, stroke, vascular complication, permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, blood transfusion, paravalvular leak, and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Results: Four propensity score-matched studies and 54,047 patients (transcatheter aortic valve replacement, n = 3841; surgical aortic valve replacement, n = 50,206) yielding 3142 pairs using propensity score were included. Median follow-up periods were 21 to 24 months. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.20; P = .19) or stroke (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.14; P = .29). Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with higher risks of permanent pacemaker implantation rate (risk ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.84; P = .0003), transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with lower risks of acute kidney injury (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.88; P = .01) and transfusion (risk ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.29; P = .0001). There were no significant differences in in-hospital vascular complication, paravalvular leak, and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Conclusions: In selected patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, no significant differences in in-hospital mortality or stroke were observed between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. Further investigations with long-term follow-up and morphological features are warranted.

Externally mounted versus internally mounted leaflet aortic bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies reported higher-than-expected rates of early structural valve degeneration (SVD) and/or reoperation of externally mounted leaflet aortic bioprosthesis compared with others. This meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of bioprostheses with externally versus internally mounted leaflet design in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through November 2021 to identify comparative studies investigating outcomes following SAVR with either externally or internally mounted leaflet aortic bioprosthesis. Outcomes of interest were reoperation for SVD or any cause and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Our analysis included 15 observational studies that enrolled a total of 23,539 patients who underwent SAVR using externally mounted (n = 9338; 39.7%) or internally mounted leaflet (n = 14,201; 60.3%) bioprostheses. Externally mounted valves consisted of the Trifecta (Abbott, St Paul, MN) (n = 6146) and the Mitroflow (LivaNova, London, UK) (n = 3192), and all internally mounted valves were the Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Externally mounted valves compared with the Perimount were associated with higher reoperation rates for SVD [hazard ratio (HR) 3.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.67-4.72; P < 0.001] and any cause (HR 9.36, 95% CI 3.70-23.67; P < 0.001). Furthermore, externally mounted valves demonstrated higher all-cause mortalities (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.56; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study summarizing updated evidence revealed higher reoperation rates and all-cause mortalities in patients with externally mounted leaflet aortic bioprostheses compared with those with internally mounted design. Choosing the right SAVR valve type is critical part of lifetime management of aortic valve disease.

Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through November 2021 to identify studies comparing TAVR + PCI and SAVR + CABG for severe aortic stenosis with concurrent coronary artery disease. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, repeat coronary intervention, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke during follow-up, and 30-day periprocedural outcomes. RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies including a total of 104,220 patients (TAVR + PCI, n = 5004; SAVR + CABG, n = 99,216) were included. The weighted mean follow-up period was 30.2 months. TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality and coronary reintervention during follow-up period (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.65; P = .003, hazard ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.74-9.86; P = .001, respectively), 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.61-8.95; P = .002), and periprocedural vascular complications (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.85-26.30; P = .004). In contrast, TAVR + PCI was associated with a lower rate of 30-day acute kidney injury (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.50; P = .0001). Rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke during follow-up, and other periprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality at follow-up compared with SAVR + CABG. Heart Team approach to assess TAVR candidacy remains imperative.

[Mitral Valve Repair in a Jehovah's Witnesses Patient with Post Myocardial Infarction Papillary Muscle Rupture;Report of a Case].

A 70-years old man was referred to our department for acute heart failure due to post myocardial infarction papillary muscle rupture. We planned emergent surgery, but he refused blood transfusion because of religious reason( Jehovah's Witness). Therefore, we chose medical therapy using intra-aortic balloon pumping and catecholamine. He was also treated with subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron supplement to increase preoperative hemoglobin. One month later, we decided to undergo mitral valve repair because he was stabilized with medical treatment. The patient underwent mitral valve repair with artificial chordae through median sternotomy. The mitral valve A3 prolapse was caused by posterior papillary muscle rupture. No blood transfusion was given and postoperative course was uneventful. We experienced successful mitral repair for post infarction papillary muscle rupture in a Jehova's Witnessess patient.

Surgical treatment of cardiac fibroma in a child with left ventricular noncompaction.

Surgical treatment of cardiac fibroma is rare in patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). Although several case reports regarding cardiac fibroma have been published, resection in a patient with LVNC has not been described. Here, we describe the surgical treatment of left ventricular fibroma in a child with LVNC. We resected a cardiac fibroma in a 10-year-old boy with LVNC to control ventricular arrhythmia. Partial resection with careful tumor dissection was performed to avoid endocardial damage and entering the ventricular cavity. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient remains asymptomatic without heart failure or arrhythmia. Surgical excision of cardiac fibroma can be performed safely with excellent results, even in a child with LVNC.

[Infective Endocarditis in Right Ventricle( RV)-Pulmonary Artery( PA) Conduit Late after the Ross Procedure;Report of a Case].

Ross procedure has been found to have a lower incidence of infective endocarditis compared to other aortic replacement procedure using prosthetic valves. We report a case of 25-year-old man who underwent Ross procedure for congenital aortic stenosis and regurgitation when he was 7 years old. He presented with fever and was highly suspected of infective endocarditis. All sets of blood cultures were positive for Heamophilus parainfluenzae. Autologous pericardial pulmonary valve was severely stenotic and computed tomography (CT) scan and radio isotope (RI) scan revealed infection at the stenotic valve. We performed right ventricle (RV)-pulmonary artery (PA) conduit replacement and he was discharged after completion of intravenous antibiotic treatment. We experienced a rare case of infective endocarditis in a patient late after Ross procedure. Prophylaxis against infective endocarditis is mandatory even in patients with infection resistant Ross procedure.