Effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on midazolam and dabigatran pharmacokinetics in healthy participants.

AIMS: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety after coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone with midazolam (a cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate) and dabigatran (a P-glycoprotein substrate). METHODS: PK was studied in 2 phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. Single oral doses of midazolam 2 mg (n = 12) or dabigatran 75 mg (n = 24) were administered alone and after steady state (i.e. ≥2 days) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg and ritonavir 100 mg. Midazolam and dabigatran plasma concentrations and adverse events were analysed for each treatment. RESULTS: After administration of midazolam with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), midazolam geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased 14.3-fold and 3.7-fold, respectively. Midazolam coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in 16.5-fold and 3.9-fold increases in midazolam geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax , respectively. After administration of dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax increased 1.9-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively. Dabigatran coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax . Midazolam or dabigatran exposures were generally comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, with a slightly higher dabigatran Cmax with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir vs. ritonavir alone. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without midazolam or dabigatran. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of midazolam or dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir increased systemic exposure of midazolam or dabigatran. Midazolam exposures were comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, suggesting no incremental effect of nirmatrelvir. Dabigatran Cmax was slightly higher when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with of ritonavir alone, suggesting a minor incremental effect of nirmatrelvir.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Doses of PF-07304814, a Phosphate Prodrug Protease Inhibitor for the Treatment of SARS-CoV-2, in Healthy Adult Participants.

Studies on targeted antivirals for treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of the ongoing pandemic, are limited. PF-07304814 (lufotrelvir) is the phosphate prodrug of PF-00835231, a protease inhibitor targeting the 3C-like protease of SARS-CoV-2. This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single ascending intravenous doses of lufotrelvir (continuous 24-hour infusion of 50, 150, 500, or 700 mg) versus placebo in healthy volunteers (2 interleaving cohorts: 1, n = 8; 2, n = 7). Each dosing period was separated by a washout interval (≥5 days). Treatment-emergent adverse events, PK, and biomarker concentrations were estimated from plasma/urine samples. Lufotrelvir was administered to 15 volunteers (mean [SD] age 39.7 [11.8] years). No serious adverse events, discontinuations, or deaths were reported. Mean maximum observed concentration of PF-00835231 (active moiety; 97.0 ng/mL to 1288 ng/mL) were observed between median time to maximum concentration of 14 to 16 hours after the start of the lufotrelvir infusion. Near-maximum plasma concentrations of PF-00835231 were observed ≈6 hours after infusion start and sustained until infusion end. PF-00835231 plasma concentrations declined rapidly after infusion end (mean terminal half-life: 500 mg, 2.0 hours; 700 mg, 1.7 hours). Approximately 9%-11% of the dose was recovered in urine as PF-00835231 across doses. A continuous, single-dose, 24-hour infusion of lufotrelvir (50-700 mg) was rapidly converted to PF-00835231 (active moiety), with dose-proportional PK exposures and no significant safety concerns. A daily, 24-hour continuous infusion of 270 to 350 mg is expected to maintain PF-00835231 concentration at steady state/above effective antiviral concentrations. Further studies exploring lufotrelvir efficacy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 are ongoing.

The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Dacomitinib.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dacomitinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. To evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dacomitinib, two dedicated studies were conducted to inform optimal dosing. METHODS: Study 1 (NCT01571388) evaluated the effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the plasma pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after a single oral dose of dacomitinib 30 mg, and Study 2 (NCT03865446) evaluated the same endpoints in a severe hepatic impairment population. Both studies were phase I, open-label, parallel-group studies. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unequal variance assumption and hepatic impairment group as a fixed effect was used to compare the natural log of area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for each hepatic impairment group to the respective normal hepatic function group. Since dacomitinib is a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 substrate, only participants with extensive or intermediate CYP2D6 phenotypes were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: The AUCinf for participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment decreased by 6%, decreased by 23%, and increased by 4%, respectively, compared with normal hepatic function, while the Cmax for participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment increased by 3%, decreased by 20%, and increased by 31%, respectively, compared with normal hepatic function. A single oral dose of dacomitinib 30 mg was well tolerated in all participants. CONCLUSION: Based on these pharmacokinetic results, dacomitinib pharmacokinetics of participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment were not statistically different relative to participants with normal hepatic function based on the ANOVA analysis. No dacomitinib dose adjustments for patients with hepatic impairment are recommended. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01571388, registered 5 April 2012; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865446, registered 6 March 2019.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Glasdegib in Participants With Moderate/Severe Hepatic Impairment: A Phase I, Single-Dose, Matched Case-Control Study.

This phase I open-label trial (NCT03627754) assessed glasdegib pharmacokinetics and safety in otherwise healthy participants with moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment. Participants with hepatic impairment and age/weight-matched controls with normal hepatic function received a single oral 100-mg glasdegib dose under fasted conditions. The primary end points were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ). Twenty-four participants (8/cohort) were enrolled. Glasdegib plasma exposures in moderate hepatic impairment were similar to controls, with adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of 110.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 78.0-157.3) for AUCinf and 94.8% (69.9-128.4) for Cmax versus controls. In severe hepatic impairment, glasdegib plasma exposures were lower than controls (AUCinf GMR, 75.7%; 90%CI, 51.5-111.0; Cmax GMR, 58.0%; 90%CI, 37.8-89.0). Unbound glasdegib exposures were similar to controls for moderate (AUCinf,u GMR, 118.1%; 90%CI, 88.7-157.2; Cmax,u GMR, 101.1%; 90%CI, 78.4-130.3) and severe hepatic impairment (AUCinf,u GMR, 116.3%; 90%CI 81.8-165.5; Cmax,u GMR, 89.2%, 90%CI, 60.2-132.3). No treatment-related adverse events or clinically significant changes in laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiograms were observed. Together with previous findings, this suggests glasdegib dose modifications are not required based on hepatic impairment.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bococizumab Following a Single Subcutaneous Injection Using Drug Substance Manufactured at Two Sites or Administration via Two Different Devices.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bococizumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, were compared following a single 150-mg subcutaneous dose administered to healthy subjects (n = 156-158/arm) via: (1) a prefilled syringe (PFS) using drug substance (DS) manufactured by Pfizer, (2) a PFS using DS manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, (3) a prefilled pen using DS manufactured by Pfizer (NCT02458209). Blood samples were collected for 12 weeks postdose. Safety was monitored throughout. Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) ranged between 11.0 and 11.3 µg/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCinf ) ranged between 177.6 and 185.0 µg·day/mL across treatments. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of adjusted geometric means for Cmax and AUCinf fell within the 80%-125% range for both DS and delivery device comparisons. Comparable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol profiles were observed, with nadir values of 54.3-56.1 mg/dL across treatments. Similar PCSK9 responses were also observed. Safety profiles were similar across treatments, and the majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild. Three subjects reported serious AEs. The most frequently reported AEs were headache, injection-site reaction, and upper respiratory tract infection, with no clear differences across treatments. Comparable PK, PD, and safety were observed following a single bococizumab 150-mg subcutaneous injection regardless of site of DS manufacture or delivery device used.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bococizumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, after single subcutaneous injection at three sites [NCT 02043301].

AIM: To characterize the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bococizumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm (NCT02043301). METHODS: Seventy-five adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥130 mg/dL and not on background lipid-lowering therapy were randomized (1:1:1) to a single 150-mg s.c. dose of bococizumab administered to the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm. Blood samples for bococizumab and lipids were collected for 12 weeks postdose. RESULTS: Plasma bococizumab concentration-time profiles and PK parameters were generally similar across injection sites. Mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) ranged from 8.14 to 11.9 µg/mL, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUCinf ) ranged from 160.3 to 198.9 µg∙day/mL. The median time to Cmax (Tmax ) ranged from 4.25 to 6.93 days. Similar LDL-C concentration-time profiles were observed across injection sites, with mean (% coefficient of variation) maximum reductions in LDL-C of -57.5% (15.8), -57.0% (25.9), and -55.0% (24.1) for the abdomen, thigh, and upper arm, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild and generally similar across injection sites. Commonly reported AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (9.3%), headache (6.7%), and injection site reaction (6.7%). One serious AE was reported (ischemic colitis), which was not considered related to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Similar PK profiles and robust LDL-C reductions were observed following a single 150-mg s.c. injection of bococizumab administered to the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm in untreated subjects with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL. Bococizumab was generally well tolerated following a single 150-mg s.c. administration in this subject population.

Effects of ethanol on the pharmacokinetics of extended-release oxycodone with sequestered naltrexone (ALO-02).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ALO-02 capsules, intended to deter abuse, contain pellets of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride (HCl), an opioid agonist, surrounding sequestered naltrexone HCl, an opioid antagonist. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of administration of ALO-02 with 20 or 40 % ethanol on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy fasting adults administered ALO-02 20/2.4 mg (oxycodone/naltrexone) with water, 20 % ethanol, or 40 % ethanol, each under naltrexone block. RESULTS: Median time to maximum concentration was 12 h postdose when ALO-02 was administered with water or 20 % ethanol and decreased to 8 h postdose with 40 % ethanol. Geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax) values were similar for ALO-02 administered with water or 20 % ethanol, and increased by about 13 and 37 %, respectively, for ALO-02 administered with 40 % ethanol versus water. The 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC∞ and Cmax ratios of ALO-02 with 20 % ethanol versus water were within 80-125 %; upper 90 % CIs were >125 % for ALO-02 with 40 % ethanol versus water. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate vomiting, nausea, headache, and somnolence. Incidence of adverse events increased for ALO-02 given with ethanol versus water. CONCLUSIONS: Oxycodone exposures (Cmax) were unaffected when ALO-02 was administered with 20 % ethanol but Cmax increased by 37 % with 40 % ethanol versus water. ALO-02 administered with ethanol under naltrexone block was generally well tolerated.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone and naltrexone from ALO-02, an extended release formulation of oxycodone with sequestered naltrexone.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: ALO-02 is being developed as an abuse-deterrent formulation of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride with naltrexone hydrochloride sequestered in the core of pellets contained in capsules. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effects of administration of ALO-02 capsule whole under fed conditions or sprinkling the pellets from ALO-02 capsule on applesauce under fasting conditions on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oxycodone, naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol compared with ALO-02 capsule administered whole under fasting conditions. The plasma naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol concentrations were used to assess the sequestration of naltrexone in the ALO-02 formulation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single 40 mg doses of ALO-02 in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, open-label, single-dose, randomized, 3-period crossover study in 24 healthy adult volunteers, aged 18-55 years. Each subject was assigned to receive single 40 mg doses of ALO-02 administered whole (intact capsule) under fasting conditions, administered whole under fed conditions (high-fat breakfast ∼ 950 calories), or sprinkling the contents of the ALO-02 capsule (pellets) over applesauce and swallowing the dose without chewing under fasting conditions. Each treatment was separated by a 7-day washout interval. Plasma samples were analyzed just before dosing through 48 hours postdose for oxycodone, and through 120 hours postdose for naltrexone and its major metabolite, 6-ß-naltrexol. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ], area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf ] and to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast ], time to Cmax [Tmax ], and terminal half life [t1/2 ]. Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were monitored for safety assessment. RESULTS: The t1/2 and Tmax values for oxycodone were similar for all 3 treatments. There was a lack of effect of food (whole capsule, fed vs. fasted) or of sprinkling on applesauce (pellets vs. whole capsule, fasted) on oxycodone bioavailability. The Test/Reference ratios of adjusted geometric means for oxycodone AUCinf , AUClast , and Cmax were 99.2%, 100%, and 107%, respectively, for the effect of food; and 101%, 101%, and 97.5%, respectively, for the effect of sprinkling on applesauce. The 90% confidence intervals contained entirely within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125% for each comparison. Naltrexone remained sequestered during each treatment, based on the sporadic and low measurable plasma concentrations of naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol. Single doses of ALO-02 40 mg were well tolerated, and adverse events were mild, with no apparent difference in frequency for all 3 treatments. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Results indicate that ALO-02 can be administered without regard to food. Also, the contents of ALO-02 can be sprinkled over applesauce and consumed without chewing as an alternative treatment option by subjects with difficulty swallowing. Naltrexone remained sequestered in the ALO-02 formulation under all 3 treatments.

Tigecycline does not prolong corrected QT intervals in healthy subjects.

We evaluated the effect of tigecycline (50-mg and 200-mg doses) on corrected QT (QTc) intervals and assessed safety and tolerability in a randomized, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study of 48 (44 male) healthy volunteers aged 22 to 53 years. Fed subjects received tigecycline (50 mg or 200 mg) or placebo in a blinded fashion or an open-label oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg) after 1 liter of intravenous fluid. Serial electrocardiograms were recorded before, and for 96 h after, dosing. Blood samples for tigecycline pharmacokinetics were collected after each recording. QTc intervals were corrected using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods with potential relationships examined using linear mixed-effects modeling. Adverse events were recorded. The upper limits of the 90% confidence interval for the mean difference between both tigecycline doses and placebo for all time-matched QTcF interval changes from baseline were <5 ms. The tigecycline concentrations initially declined rapidly and then more slowly. In the group given 50 mg of tigecycline, the pharmacokinetic parameters and means were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), 432 ng/ml; area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), 2,366 ng · h/ml; clearance (CL), 21.1 liters/h; volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)), 610 liters; and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), 22.1 h. Proportional or similar values were found for the group given 200 mg of tigecycline. Linear mixed-effects modeling failed to show an effect on QTcF values by tigecycline concentrations (P = 0.755). Tigecycline does not prolong the QTc interval in healthy subjects. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01287793.