RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in certain hobbies (e.g., participation in sports, playing musical instruments, or other hobbies requiring fine motor skills), preresidency, are associated with higher technical skills ratings at the time of residency graduation. DESIGN: Faculty members from 14 general surgery residency programs scored individual graduates from 2017 to 2020 on their technical skills using a 5-point Likert scale. Hobbies for these residents were collected from their Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data. A single reviewer classified each ERAS hobby into predefined categories including musical instruments, sports requiring hand-eye coordination, team sports, and activities necessitating hand-eye coordination. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationship between each category of hobby-as well as the total number of hobbies in each category-and the outcome of surgical faculty ratings of residents' technical surgical skills during their last year of residency. A proportional odds model including the above predictive variables was also fit to the data. SETTING: Fourteen general surgery residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residency graduates from 14 different programs from 2017 to 2020. RESULTS: There were 296 residents across 14 institutions. The average ranking of residents' technical skills was 3.24 (SD 1.1). A total of 40% of residents played sports involving hand-eye coordination, 31% played team sports, 28% participated in nonsport hobbies that require eye-hand coordination, and 20% played musical instruments. Correlation coefficients were not statistically significant for any of the categories. In the proportional odds model, none of the variables were associated with statistically significant increased odds of a higher technical skills rating. CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between general surgery chief residents' technical skills as rated by faculty, and self-reported pre-residency hobbies on the ERAS application. These findings suggest such hobbies prior to residency are unlikely to predict future technical skills prowess.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Pasatiempos , Cirugía General/educación , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
Importance: Characteristics of outstanding graduating surgical residents are currently undefined. Identifying these qualities may be important in guiding resident selection and resident education. Objective: To determine characteristics that are most strongly associated with being rated as an outstanding graduating surgical resident. Design, Setting, and Participants: The multi-institutional study had 3 phases. First, an expert panel developed a list of characteristics embodied by top graduating surgical residents. Second, groups of faculty from 14 US general-surgery residency programs ranked 2017 through 2020 graduates into quartiles of overall performance. Third, faculty evaluated their graduates on each characteristic using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank-order correlation to identify which individual characteristics were associated with overall graduate performance. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) ordinal regression was performed to select a parsimonious model to predict the outcome of overall performance rating from individual characteristic scores. Main Outcome and Measures: Surgical educators' rankings of general surgery residency graduates' overall performance. Results: Fifty faculty from 14 US residency programs with a median of 13 (range, 5-30) years of surgical education experience evaluated 297 general surgery residency graduates. Surgical educators identified 21 characteristics that they believed outstanding graduating surgical residents possessed. Two hundred ninety-seven surgical residency graduates were evaluated. Higher scores in every characteristic correlated with better overall performance. Characteristics most strongly associated with higher overall performance scores were surgical judgment (r = 0.728; P < .001), leadership (r = 0.726; P < .001), postoperative clinical skills (r = 0.715; P < .001), and preoperative clinical skills (r = 0.707; P < .001). The remainder of the characteristics were moderately associated with overall performance. The LASSO regression model identified 3 characteristics from which overall resident performance could be accurately predicted without measuring other qualities: surgical judgment (odds ratio [OR] per 1 level of 5-level Likert scale OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.51), leadership (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.48), and medical knowledge (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). Conclusions and Relevance: All individual characteristics identified by surgical educators as being qualities of outstanding graduating surgical residents were positively associated with overall graduate performance. Surgical judgment and leadership skills had the strongest individual associations. Assessment of only 3 qualities (surgical judgment, leadership, and medical knowledge) were required to predict overall resident performance ratings. These findings highlight the importance of developing specific surgical judgment and leadership skills curricula and assessments during surgical residency.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish expert consensus regarding the domains and topics for senior surgery residents (PGY-4) to make critical decisions and assume senior-level responsibilities, and to develop the formative American College of Surgeons Senior Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS SRRA) Program. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) education leadership team conducted a focus group with surgical experts to identify the content for an assessment tool to evaluate senior residents' readiness for their increased levels of responsibility. After the focus group, national experts were recruited to develop consensus on the topics through three rounds of surveys using Delphi methodology. The Delphi participants rated topics using Likert-type scales and their comments were incorporated into subsequent rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement with internal-consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) ≥ 0.8. In a stepwise fashion, topics that did not achieve consensus for inclusion were removed from subsequent survey rounds. SETTING: The surveys were administered via an online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve program directors and assistant program directors made up the focus group. The 39 Delphi participants represented seven different surgical subspecialties and were from diverse practice settings. The median length of experience in general surgery resident education was 20 years (IQR 14.3-30.0) with 64% of the experts being either current or past general surgery residency program directors. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% and Cronbach's alpha was ≥ 0.9 for each round. The Delphi participants contributed a large number of comments. Of the 201 topics that were evaluated initially, 120 topics in 25 core clinical areas were included to create the final domains of ACS SRRA. CONCLUSIONS: National consensus on the domain of the ACS SRRA has been achieved via the modified Delphi method among expert surgeon educators. ACS SRRA will identify clinical topics and areas in which each senior resident needs improvement and provide data to residents and residency programs to develop individualized learning plans. This would help in preparing the senior residents to assume their responsibilities and support their readiness for future fellowship training or surgical practice.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Introduction: Firearm injuries are a major public health concern. Safe firearm storage is recommended by multiple medical organizations. However, rates of firearm safety counseling are particularly low among trauma providers. Educational initiatives for other provider groups have proven to be effective. We hypothesized that educating trauma providers to offer safety counseling would be similarly effective. Methods: We developed a didactic session around safe firearm storage counseling for trauma providers consisting of a lecture followed by an interactive session with standardized patients. Session participants completed pre- and postsurveys evaluating their knowledge about firearm storage, self-efficacy in providing firearm storage counseling, and attitudes towards firearm safety. We compared differences between pre- and postsurvey data using chi-square tests. Results: The didactic session was delivered to target trauma providers: three trauma nurse practitioners, 42 general surgery residents, and 26 emergency medicine residents. After the session, participants were more likely to know the optimal way to safely store a firearm and to be confident in effectively counseling patients about safe firearm storage. Learners were not more likely to believe that providers have a responsibility to counsel patients on firearm safety. Discussion: A didactic session on safe firearm storage counseling was associated with increased rates of knowledge and self-efficacy. The session did not change attitudes among trauma providers, although, prior to the session, most providers already believed they had a responsibility to counsel patients on safe firearm storage. Similar curricula should be piloted at other trauma centers.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Consejo , Curriculum , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Suicide is the second most common cause of death among adolescents and young adults. In the pediatric population, gunshot wounds (GSWs) and hangings are common mechanisms of pediatric suicide. Comorbid psychiatric illness is prevalent in this population, but psychiatric resource utilization after self-inflicted traumatic injury is not well characterized. METHODS: We analyzed patients < 18 years old presenting to a level 1 pediatric trauma center after suicide attempt by GSW, hanging, or jumping from a height from 2009 to 2019. The primary outcome was psychiatric resource utilization. Secondary outcomes included prior emergency department (ED) visits to identify prior opportunities for intervention. RESULTS: Of 6538 pediatric trauma patients, there were 219 GSWs, 7 hangings, and 7 jumps from height, for a total of 233 patients. Of these, 14 presented following a suicide attempt (four GSWs, six hangings, and four jumps, total 6.0%). Half of these patients died due to their injuries. Self-inflicted GSWs had the highest mortality (75%). Most surviving patients were placed on involuntary psychiatric holds (n = 5/7, 71.4%), and three patients were discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital (n = 3/7, 42.9%). Five of the 14 patients had prior ED visits (35.7%), and of these, 60% were for suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatric trauma patients, suicide attempts are rare, but are highly lethal, with the highest mortality rate seen in self-inflicted GSWs. Psychiatric resource utilization is high both during and after the hospitalization. Prior ED visits may represent opportunities for depression and suicidality screening in this at-risk population.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Uninsured pediatric trauma patients are at increased risk of poor outcomes. The impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) on pediatric trauma patients has not been studied. We hypothesized that the expansion of Medicaid coverage under the ACA was associated with increased insurance coverage and improved outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients <18 y old presenting to a level 1 pediatric trauma center 2009-2019. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion under the ACA in January 2014. The primary outcome was rate of insurance coverage. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, disposition, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. RESULTS: A total of 5645 patients were evaluated, (pre-ACA n = 2,243, post-ACA n = 3402). Expansion of Medicaid was associated with minimal changes on insurance coverage. There a decrease in mortality (RR = 0.96, P = 0.0355) and a slight increase in disposition to a rehabilitation facility (RR = 1.02, P = 0.0341). There was no association with 30-day readmission (RR = 1.02, P = 0.3498). Similarly, expansion of Medicaid was not associated with change in LOS (estimate = -0.00, P = 0.8893). There was a slight decrease in ICU LOS (estimate = -0.03, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with marginal changes in insurance coverage among pediatric trauma patients. We did not identify significant impacts on patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Niño , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Centros Traumatológicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Firearms and motor vehicle collisions (MVC) are leading causes of mortality in children. We hypothesized that firearm injuries would have a higher mortality than MVCs in children and a higher level of resource utilization METHODS: Trauma patients <18 years old at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center sustaining gunshot wounds (GSW) or MVCs 2009-2019 were included. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcome was immediate surgery. The California Department of Public Health's Overall Injury Surveillance tool was queried for patients <18 with GSW or MVC 2006-2015 to compare statewide case fatality rates (CFRs), and analyze proportions of GSWs by intent: assault, self-inflicted, and unintentional. RESULTS: Of 13,840 pediatric trauma patients at our institution, 295 GSWs (2.1%) and 4467 MVCs (32.3%) were included. Mortality was higher for GSWs (7.5% vs. 0.8%, p<0.0001). GSW patients were more likely to require immediate surgery (34.4% vs. 11.2%, p<0.0001). On multivariable analysis, GSW patients were 7.8-times more likely to die than MVC patients (OR 7.83, 95% CI 3.68-16.66, p<0.0001), adjusted for age, sex, and injury severity. Statewide, there were 10,790 pediatric GSWs with 1586 deaths (CFR 14.7%) vs. 710 deaths in 261,363 children in MVCs (CFR 0.3%, p<0.0001). The GSW CFR rose (13.4% to 16.5%, p = 0.05) while the MVC CFR decreased (0.5% to 0.2%, p<0.0001) in 2015 vs. 2006. CONCLUSION: Firearm violence in pediatric patients is significantly more lethal than MVCs and is resource intensive. The case fatality rate for pediatric firearm violence is rising. Resources must be directed at preventing pediatric firearm injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis study, Level II.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen , Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , ViolenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Child-rearing is difficult for medical trainees, but much of the available evidence is limited to individual specialties or lacks an analysis of well-being. In light of this, we sought to examine current perspectives across a wide range of medical specialties, determine associations with stress and burnout, and identify potential supportive solutions. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a voluntary and anonymous survey was sent to all residents and fellows at a large academic medical center with a U.S. Air Force joint training agreement in 2019. Frequency tables were generated for survey responses, using χ2 test for analysis between groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four physician trainees completed the survey (21.6% response rate), of which 38.0% were parents. Overall, 90.8% of trainees want children but 68.5% plan to wait until after training to start or grow their families, mainly due to insufficient time or inadequate child care. Less than 2% cited lack of program support as the reason. Among trainee parents, 72.0% reported that child care was at least quite stressful. Child care contributes to burnout for 68.6% of trainee parents, and there was no difference between medical and surgical trainees or between military and nonmilitary trainees. Day care was the most common primary child care strategy, and 37.1% of trainee parents reported spending >25% of their household income on child care. Proposed helpful solutions include on-site day care and subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: Most medical trainees in this sample want children, yet many are delaying growing their families due to time and financial constraints. For trainee parents, child care causes stress and family and financial strain and contributes to burnout. Physicians in training, including military members training at civilian medical centers, could benefit from child care assistance in order to relieve stress, reduce burnout, and improve well-being. Furthermore, by expanding existing resources and implementing new creative solutions to the challenges of child-rearing among medical professionals, the U.S. military has an opportunity to improve members' well-being and be a model to civilian graduate medical education programs nationwide.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Internado y Residencia , Medicina , Médicos , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/etiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Importance: The suspension of elective operations in March 2020 to prepare for the COVID-19 surge posed significant challenges to resident education. To mitigate the potential negative effects of COVID-19 on surgical education, it is important to quantify how the pandemic influenced resident operative volume. Objective: To examine the association of the pandemic with general surgical residents' operative experience by postgraduate year (PGY) and case type and to evaluate if certain institutional characteristics were associated with a greater decline in surgical volume. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective review included residents' operative logs from 3 consecutive academic years (2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020) from 16 general surgery programs. Data collected included total major cases, case type, and PGY. Faculty completed a survey about program demographics and COVID-19 response. Data on race were not collected. Operative volumes from March to June 2020 were compared with the same period during 2018 and 2019. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test adjusted for within-program correlations. Main Outcome and Measures: Total major cases performed by each resident during the first 4 months of the pandemic. Results: A total of 1368 case logs were analyzed. There was a 33.5% reduction in total major cases performed in March to June 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019 (45.0 [95% CI, 36.1-53.9] vs 67.7 [95% CI, 62.0-72.2]; P < .001), which significantly affected every PGY. All case types were significantly reduced in 2020 except liver, pancreas, small intestine, and trauma cases. There was a 10.2% reduction in operative volume during the 2019-2020 academic year compared with the 2 previous years (192.3 [95% CI, 178.5-206.1] vs 213.8 [95% CI, 203.6-223.9]; P < .001). Level 1 trauma centers (49.5 vs 68.5; 27.7%) had a significantly lower reduction in case volume than non-level 1 trauma centers (33.9 vs 63.0; 46%) (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of operative logs of general surgery residents in 16 US programs from 2017 to 2020, the first 4 months of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant reduction in operative experience, which affected every PGY and most case types. Level 1 trauma centers were less affected than non-level 1 centers. If this trend continues, the effect on surgical training may be even more detrimental.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) is rarely used in pediatric trauma patients due to bleeding risk, and the use of ECLS following angioembolization of traumatic hemorrhage has never been reported in a child. We report a case of a 10-year-old boy run over by a parade float resulting in severe thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic trauma, with hemorrhage from pelvic fractures requiring massive transfusion. Due to ongoing blood product requirements and contrast extravasation near the symphysis pubis, angioembolization of the internal iliac arteries was performed. Extreme hypoxemia persisted despite maximal ventilator support due to pulmonary contusions and aspiration pneumonitis. Six hours after angioembolization, venovenous ECLS was initiated. Following an initial heparin bolus, ECLS was run without anticoagulation for 12 h, but development of circuit clot required resumption of low-dose heparin. After four days, his respiratory status improved substantially and ECLS was discontinued. There were no hemorrhagic complications. The patient was discharged home in good health following inpatient rehabilitation. In this case, ECLS was successfully used in the treatment of post-traumatic respiratory failure 6 h following angioembolization of pelvic hemorrhage in a pediatric trauma patient. Further research is needed to determine the safest interval between hemorrhage control and ECLS in severely injured children.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resident evaluation of faculty teaching is an important metric in general surgery training, however considerable variability in faculty teaching evaluation (FE) instruments exists. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two general surgery programs provided their FE and program demographics. Three clinical education experts performed blinded assessment of FEs, assessing adherence 2018 ACGME common program standards and if the FE was meaningful. RESULTS: Number of questions per FE ranged from 1 to 29. The expert assessments demonstrated that no evaluation addressed all 5 ACGME standards. There were significant differences in the FEs effectiveness of assessing the 5 ACGME standards (p < 0.001), with teaching abilities and professionalism rated the highest and scholarly activities the lowest. CONCLUSION: There was wide variation between programs regarding FEs development and adhered to ACGME standards. Faculty evaluation tools consistently built around all suggested ACGME standards may allow for a more accurate and useful assessment of faculty teaching abilities to target professional development.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Competencia Profesional , Acreditación , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgeons frequently care for children who have sustained gunshot wounds (GSWs). However, firearm safety education is not a focus in general surgery training. We hypothesised that firearm safety discussions do not routinely take place when children present to a trauma centre with a GSW. METHOD: A retrospective review of patients <18 years presenting with GSWs to a level 1 paediatric trauma centre from 2009 to 2019 was performed. The primary outcome was discussion of firearm safety with the patient or family. The secondary outcome was notification of child protective services (CPS). RESULTS: A total of 226 patients with GSWs were identified, 22% were unintentional and 63% were assault. Firearm safety discussions took place in 10 cases (4.4%). Firearm safety discussions were more likely to occur after unintentional injuries compared with other mechanisms (16.0% vs 1.3%, p<0.001). CPS was contacted in 29 cases (13%). CPS notification was more likely for unintentional injuries compared with other mechanisms (40% vs 3.9%, p<0.001) and for younger patients (7 years vs 15 years, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: At a paediatric trauma centre, firearm safety discussions occurred in 4.4% of cases of children presenting with a GSW. There is a significant room for improvement in providing safety education interventions.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Accidentales , Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pursuit of an advanced degree during dedicated research time (DRT) in a general surgery residency training program impacts a resident's research productivity. DESIGN: A retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study. SETTING: General surgery residency programs that were approved to graduate more than 5 categorical residents per year and that offered at least 1 year of DRT were contacted for participation in the study. A total of 10 general surgery residency programs agreed to participate in the study. PARTICIPANTS: Residents who started their residency between 2000 and 2012 and spent at least one full year in DRT (nâ¯=â¯511) were included. Those who completed an advanced degree were compared on the following parameters to those who did not complete one: total number of papers, first-author papers, the Journal Citation Reports impact factors of publication (2018, or most recent), and first position after residency or fellowship training. RESULTS: During DRT, 87 (17%) residents obtained an advanced degree. The most common degree obtained was a Master of Public Health (MPH, nâ¯=â¯42 (48.8%)). Residents who did not obtain an advanced degree during DRT published fewer papers (median 8, [interquartile range 4-12]) than those who obtained a degree (9, [6-17]) (pâ¯=â¯0.002). They also published fewer first author papers (3, [2-6]) vs (5, [2-9]) (pâ¯=â¯0.002) than those who obtained a degree. Resident impact factor (RIF) was calculated using Journal Citation Reports impact factor and author position. Those who did not earn an advanced degree had a lower RIF (adjusted RIF, 84 ± 4 vs 134 ± 5, p < 0.001) compared to those who did. There was no association between obtaining a degree and pursuit of academic surgery (pâ¯=â¯0.13) CONCLUSIONS: Pursuit of an advanced degree during DRT is associated with increased research productivity but is not associated with pursuit of an academic career.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Estudios de Cohortes , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Eficiencia , Becas , Cirugía General/educación , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is emerging as a viable intervention for hemorrhagic shock. Training surgeons to place the device is only part of the process. We hypothesize that implementation challenges extend beyond surgical skills training and initial REBOA use should not be expected to mirror published success. METHODS: All REBOA placements from January 2016 to February 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed for opportunities for improvement. From September 2016 to February 2017, all patients meeting highest trauma activation criteria were reviewed against our REBOA algorithm to identify patients meeting criteria for REBOA placement but not undergoing the procedure. RESULTS: REBOA was introduced at our institution in September 2015, with the first placement in January 2016. Trauma surgery, emergency department, and operating room staff underwent training. Nine patients had REBOA placed with six survivors. One patient underwent an unsuccessful REBOA attempt and died. Four patients had complications from REBOA. Eight additional patients met indications but did not undergo REBOA. CONCLUSIONS: Successful REBOA use requires more than teaching surgeons indications and techniques. For a successful REBOA program, system factors must be addressed. System processes must ensure equipment and procedures are standardized and familiar to all involved. Complications should be expected.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single-center comparative effectiveness studies evaluating outcomes that can occur posthospitalization may become biased if outcomes diagnosed at other facilities are not ascertained. Administrative datasets that link patients' records across facilities may improve outcome ascertainment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of linked administrative data significantly augments thromboembolic outcome ascertainment. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with an acute isolated calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed at 1 Californian center during 2010-2013. MEASURES: Proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE) within 180 days. We ascertained outcomes from linked California hospitalization, emergency department, and ambulatory surgery data and compared this information to outcomes previously identified from review of the center's medical records. RESULTS: Among 384 patients with an isolated calf DVT, 333 could be linked to longitudinal administrative data records. Ten patients had a possible proximal DVT or PE (4 more clearly so) from administrative data; all were unknown from medical record review. Eleven patients with known outcomes from medical record review had no outcome from administrative data. The adjusted odds ratio of proximal DVT or PE with therapeutic anticoagulation attenuated from 0.33 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.87] using only medical record review to 0.64 (95% CI, 0.29-1.40) using both medical record review and possible outcomes from administrative data. Restricting the outcome to diagnoses clearly involving proximal DVT or PE, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.19-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Use of linked hospital administrative data augmented detection of outcomes but imperfect linkage, nonspecific diagnoses, and documentation/coding errors introduced uncertainty regarding the accuracy of outcome ascertainment.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Organización y Administración/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , California , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The average medical school debt in 2011 was $170,000, and by 2017 it increased to $190,000. High debt burden has been shown to affect career choices for residents in primary care specialties; however, it has not been well studied among surgical residents. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to assess the amount of debt among general surgery residents and its effects on their career and lifestyle decisions. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were distributed to 607 categorical general surgery residents at 19 different residency programs. Degree of debt was assessed and responses compared. RESULTS: Overall, 427 (70.3%) residents completed the survey, 317 (74.2%) of whom reported having student loan debt. Of those with debt, 262 (82.6%) believed that repaying debt was a significant financial burden in residency, 248 (78.3%) thought it would remain a burden after residency, 210 (66.2%) believed their debt would influence their future job choice, and 225 (71%) thought their debt would delay their ability to buy a home. Debt did not affect decisions to get married or have children. There were 109 (25.6%) residents with no debt, 131 (30.8%) with <$200,000, 103 (24.2%) with $200,000 to $300,000, and 83 (19.5%) with >$300,000. Residents with high debt were less likely to feel financially secure now (p < 0.0001) and when thinking about their future (p < 0.0001). They also had higher minimum starting salary goals (p = 0.002) and were less likely to have had assistance paying for their education (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents believe their debt is a significant financial burden. Furthermore, high debt significantly influences their financial security, practice location, and salary goals.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia/economía , Estilo de Vida , Apoyo a la Formación Profesional/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute noninfectious diarrhea is a common phenomenon in intensive care unit patients. Multiple treatments are suggested but the most effective management is unknown. A working group of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of loperamide, diphenoxylate/atropine, and elemental diet on acute noninfectious diarrhea in critically ill adults and to develop recommendations applicable to daily clinical practice. METHODS: The literature search identified 11 randomized controlled trials (RCT) appropriate for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was applied to evaluate the effect of loperamide, diphenoxylate/atropine, and elemental diet on the resolution of noninfectious diarrhea in critically ill adults based on selected outcomes: improvement in clinical diarrhea, fecal frequency, time to the diarrhea resolution, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The level of evidence was assessed as very low. Analyses of 10 RCTs showed that loperamide facilitates resolution of diarrhea. Diphenoxylate/atropine was evaluated in three RCTs and was as effective as loperamide and more effective than placebo. No studies evaluating elemental diet as an intervention in patients with diarrhea were found. CONCLUSION: Loperamide and diphenoxylate/atropine are conditionally recommended to be used in critically ill patients with acute noninfectious diarrhea. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Guidelines, level III.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/terapia , Dietoterapia/métodos , Difenoxilato/administración & dosificación , Loperamida/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antidiarreicos/administración & dosificación , Diarrea/fisiopatología , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: In general surgery, women earn less money and hold fewer leadership positions compared with their male counterparts. Objective: To assess whether differences exist between the perspectives of male and female general surgery residents on future career goals, salary expectations, and salary negotiation that may contribute to disparity later in their careers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was based on an anonymous and voluntary survey sent to 19 US general surgery programs. A total of 606 categorical residents at general surgery programs across the United States received the survey. Data were collected from August through September 2017 and analyzed from September through December 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of responses between men and women to detect any differences in career goals, salary expectation, and perspectives toward salary negotiation at a resident level. Results: A total of 427 residents (70.3%) responded, and 407 responses (230 male [58.5%]; mean age, 30.0 years [95% CI, 29.8-30.4 years]) were complete. When asked about salary expectation, female residents had lower expectations compared with men in minimum starting salary ($249â¯502 [95% CI, $236â¯815-$262 190] vs $267â¯700 [95% CI, $258â¯964-$276â¯437]; P = .003) and in ideal starting salary ($334â¯709 [95% CI, $318â¯431-$350â¯987] vs $364â¯663 [95% CI, $351â¯612-$377â¯715]; P < .001). Women also had less favorable opinions about salary negotiation. They were less likely to believe they had the tools to negotiate (33 of 177 [18.6%] vs 73 of 230 [31.7%]; P = .03) and were less likely to pursue other job offers as an aid in negotiating a higher salary (124 of 177 [70.1%] vs 190 of 230 [82.6%]; P = .01). Female residents were also less likely to be married (61 of 177 [34.5%] vs 116 of 230 [50.4%]; P = .001), were less likely to have children (25 of 177 [14.1%] vs 57 of 230 [24.8%]; P = .008), and believed they would have more responsibility at home than their significant other (77 of 177 [43.5%] vs 35 of 230 [15.2%]; P < .001). Men and women anticipated working the same number of hours, expected to retire at the same age, and had similar interest in holding leadership positions, having academic careers, and pursuing research. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found no difference in overall career goals between male and female residents; however, female residents' salary expectations were lower, and they viewed salary negotiation less favorably. Given the current gender disparities in salary and leadership within surgery, strategies are needed to help remedy this inequity.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Objetivos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Cirugía General , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/economía , Masculino , Motivación , Negociación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although most surgery residents pursue fellowships, data regarding those decisions are limited. This study describes associations with interest in fellowship and specific subspecialties. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were distributed to 607 surgery residents at 19 US programs. Subspecialties were stratified by levels of burnout and quality of life using data from recent studies. RESULTS: 407 (67%) residents responded. 372 (91.4%) planned to pursue fellowship. Fellowship interest was lower among residents who attended independent or small programs, were married, or had children. Residents who received AOA honors or were married were less likely to choose high burnout subspecialties (trauma/vascular). Residents with children were less likely to choose low quality of life subspecialties (trauma/transplant/cardiothoracic). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery residents' interest in fellowship and specific subspecialties are associated with program type and size, AOA status, marital status, and having children. Variability in burnout and quality of life between subspecialties may affect residents' decisions.